Apparatus and Method for Extracting G-Energy from a Defined Space!

  • 1.4K Views
  • Last Post 4 weeks ago
glennmr2018 posted this 19 May 2019

hei guys, the following is my own original writing, and is more practical than you may think at first! You will especially get the idea when you see the illustrations. cool

====================================================================================

Apparatus and Method for Extracting Gravitational Energy from a Defined Space.

            According to earlier researchers (e.g. Vallee*) there exists an amount of negative potential gravitational energy in any given volume of space (air) on the earth’s surface, which is not at all dependent on mass, but dependent only on local gravitational acceleration (g) and the volume of defined space in question:

 - “We are thus constrained to admit that the matter vacuum must contain, actually, an important quantity of diffuse energy having a finished density p0 in interstellar space. A simple calculation shows, indeed, that one cubic meter of empty matter space on the surface of the ground contains, in the form of energy diffuses 57.000 Mega joules less than one cubic meter of interstellar space. It is thus well necessary that this energy exists, whether it is in this form or another!...”   (- g2 /8π G)

            Taking this at face value, a volume of 1 cubic centimetre would then contain 5.7 x 1010 x 10-6 or 5.7 K-Joules of such potential energy. It must be emphasized that such energy is inherently in a negative (or possibly inverted) state and to be utilised, would need to be activated, resonated and extracted via a cascading of impedances, keeping in mind that the universal impedance of free space (Z = 377 Ohms) still exists within vacuum or air. If such an amount of energy were to be resonated at (say) 7.83Hz (the earth's Schumann Resonance), then the potential Power Output (in the frequency domain) would be:

            (2.π.f) En =  6.28 x 7.83 x 5.7 x 103  =  280 KiloWatts

(since Power = the instantaneous rate of change in Energy) and if the Impedance (Z) were engineered down to 377Ω as well, and so likewise the available Current and Voltage Output would become:

 I =  √(P/Z) = √[(280/377) x 103 ] = 27.3 Amps and V =√(P.Z) = √[(280x377) x103 ] =  10.3 KVolts,                    if it could be converted as such.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Lower frequencies are much preferred for practical purposes anyway, and in any case, ELF (aka prof. Fran de Aquino) is recommended as an initial trial input signal, or even step inputs, in order to carefully monitor the output effects.

            Without delving into further technicalities, the proposed excitation pulses could be expected to produce an output at right angles to both the applied E and H fields but in parallel with the solenoids used for said excitation, as the E & H field begins to precess or gyrate under the influence of the applied input signals. Such an output of rotating or gyrating magnetic fields could well be syphoned off via similar solenoids (conical or otherwise) placed orthogonally. See original figures below/attached.

(since improved on!)

==========================================================================================================================

written circa 2012, but substantially re-edited in May 2019 A.D.

G.M.R.

Main Reference:  http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/synergetics.pdf

Rene-Louis Vallee - THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY, MATERIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL (1970)

The basis of Synergic theory - see p. 86 - http://www.rexresearch.com/vallee/vallee.htm

Rene-Louis Vallee - THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY, MATERIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL (1970)

The basis of Synergic theory - see p. 86 -

Hagelberg, P. Physics, an Introduction..., Prentice Hall, 1973, page 622

 http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=117

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
glennmr2018 posted this 19 May 2019

p.s. i had to cut out most of the maths above as there was not sufficient room to paste it all in.

I can share it with anybody who asks.

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
glennmr2018 posted this 20 May 2019

last part:

 Lower frequencies are much preferred for practical purposes anyway, and in any case, ELF (aka prof. Fran de Aquino) is recommended as an initial trial input signal, or even step inputs, in order to carefully monitor the output effects.

            Without delving into further technicalities, the proposed excitation pulses could be expected to produce an output at right angles to both the applied E and H fields but in parallel with the solenoids used for said excitation, as the E & H field begins to precess or gyrate under the influence of the applied input signals. Such an output of rotating or gyrating magnetic fields could well be syphoned off via similar solenoids (conical or otherwise) placed orthogonally.  (at right angles)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone wishing to have a copy of my Corrected TABLES is welcome to ask!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Aetherholic
Jagau posted this 21 May 2019

Hi Glenn
This kind of technique is new to me.
It takes a bit of time to study his concept.
At first it seems to be a device that produces energy from a defined space from orthogonal coils using some special concepts of the golden number and E and H pulses. It can take a long time to understand everything.
Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Vidura
glennmr2018 posted this 21 May 2019

Yes my friend, it can! and i have taken nearly 24 years to understand and work this out, but now i feel i should share it freely in the spirit of why this forum was founded. Please take it and Run with it!

with my compliments

Glenn

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Vidura
Atti posted this 21 May 2019

Hi Glenn!

 

Really great work. Is there any experience in practice, visible somewhere? Is there any measurement?
Just what we learn. And most importantly not just the theory.
I assume the practice is because you want so many years (24 years).

Atti posted this 22 May 2019

Glenn.

It's just a blueprint. Is there work done? Is there a measurement?
If there is nothing, it is worth nothing. I'm sorry.

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Zanzal posted this 22 May 2019

Glenn.

It's just a blueprint. Is there work done? Is there a measurement?
If there is nothing, it is worth nothing. I'm sorry.

An idea can still inspire...

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Vasile
glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

dear Atti!

                   and Others!

                                          i will be very brief and to the point:- Is this a blueprint? - Correct!

Is this worth nothing? - Absolutely wrong! - in the spirit of the open source sharing of this fine forum, my policy has always been to design and SHARE FIRST, then if/when i get time and/or equipment, to work on the design for myself.

I know that i know that i know that this design of extreme worth, and you will not find such quality of detail anywhere else on the web, or possibly elsewhere, so you guys don't know how fortunate you are!

In short: - If you are a fool, then stand there and ask what i have done with it,

                  If you are Not a fool, then take this free gift and RUN with it!

                     You will never get such a chance again, rest assured of that!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

Please Note Significant Changes - the Core is No Longer Connected Directly to the Source Outputs!!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Marathonman
glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

p.s. but Yes - 'an idea can still inspire" - you are quite right about that! cool

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Chris posted this 23 May 2019

I have tried to be patient, this thread is completely off topic.

State relevancy and why this thread should be kept on this forum! It has nothing to do with bucking coils nothing to do with EM Power Generation.

I am getting tired of nonsense and non relevancy!

   Chris

Marathonman posted this 24 May 2019

It is none of my business but this is along the lines of Walter Russel and Lord knows he was as gifted as Tesla. the core are set up to compress the field lines as they are set up which could result in some impressive output if one is cleave.

Just saying, there are way more useless threads then this one. everyone was against me at one time, then through time the madness drifted out and reasoning drifted in.

Regards,

Marathonman

glennmr2018 posted this 25 May 2019

Dear Chris!

I am being patient too, but since you have now asked me specific questions, I will give you very specific answers:- 

1stly, you wrote “State relevancy” – OK, here we go: - Please do yourself the favour of actually having a close look at the diagram I have copied below – When you do so, you will clearly see that it has EVERYTHING to do with bucking coils! – Can you see how each coil of the coil pairs is directly bucking the other? – Please check again – it may take a while to actually sink in, but it is exactly what I said.

Not only is it 1 pair of bucking coils presented here, but 2 pairs working together, and both pairs in perfect harmony, with the pulse timing shown at the base of the chart. Now please tell me how ‘It has nothing to do with bucking coils’ ! - I will await your specific answer. ... .. .

2ndly, you wrote: “It has nothing to do with bucking coils nothing to do with EM Power Generation.” –  to this, I couldn’t agree less! – Again, if you take the time, just a few minutes, to actually LOOK at the details in my chart, and study them for a little while, you will actually soon realize that this again has EVERYTHING to do with EM power generation! – Why or How? – again, just see the excerpt below -  the problem here may be once of semantics, in that I may be using terms that are not yet very familiar to you and other readers on the forum, however, that does not mean the terms I am using are irrelevant or non-sensical, it just means some people have some catching up to do! If you actually take a few minutes to FOCUS on details in my presentation chart, you will sooner than later see that the process of EM power generation is literally printed all over it! – thus to claim that it has ‘nothing to do with EM power generation’ is frankly, to use your word ‘nonsense’! Maybe your rash conclusion comes from the fact that I am not just using the usual tired old keywords or that most people are yet used to in this field of research, but am using a wider range of terms that provide fresh insights into the same truths we are all (hopefully) striving towards.

OK, if after all this clarification, you still cannot or perhaps will not see the relevance to the forum’s aims, I will simply take it off and share it on a forum with people of more open mindedness, if there is one, or not at all.  I don’t actually care that much if others can’t  or won’t see it for now, or perhaps never will. That’s their business. Yes I know you founded this forum, and I acknowledge you have done a LOT of hard work and shared nearly everything, as I have endeavoured to, but you don’t have all the insight, and neither do I, but you don’t need to label an alternative or unique approach as ‘nonsense’ just because you are not accustomed to it. You must be a pretty open-minded person to have even started off in this field, so all I would ask of you is to just open up your mind a little more, and give this a chance. If not, it will still be your choice. The call is yours.  

Let’s still ‘be part of something better’ -    Glenn  MR

 

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Marathonman
glennmr2018 posted this 25 May 2019

It is none of my business but this is along the lines of Walter Russel and Lord knows he was as gifted as Tesla. the core are set up to compress the field lines as they are set up which could result in some impressive output if one is cleave.

Just saying, there are way more useless threads then this one. everyone was against me at one time, then through time the madness drifted out and reasoning drifted in.

Regards,

Marathonman

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

dear MarathonMan

Well thank you for your inverted compliment! - the fact is that i only briefly looked at Walter Russell's works many years ago, and never properly studied them, so any superficial similarity between his and my work is just that - superficial. He was though as you stated, a very gifted man, and probably far beyond Einstein, who was a bit of a plagiarist.

However, i DO believe we should give credit where it is due, so i can acknowledge some influence from W.Russell, and of course many others. Even Chris's artwork has inspired some ideas for me as well. Just for the record, i have been working on this type of thing on and off for 24 years, and can show records to prove it. That alone is no proof of anything, but as you wrote, i am also trusting that open-minded reasoning will drift in here too and people will get outside of the box in order to look into it afresh! (now that's original too!)

Glenn MR

 

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Marathonman
Marathonman posted this 25 May 2019

There is no superficial about it, if you do some research on Walter Russel's set up when he actually changed elements into another form with a set up just like this..

as for your setup. it does have possibilities as compressing the field lines on two different planes so keep on keeping on.

also it is possible to get magnetic and electric sensors placed throughout the center area and record various intensities, directions, field interactions and such. a lot could be learned from this as it is right along Chris's work except your compressing from four different angles not just two.

Regards,

Marathonman

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Aetherholic
Chris posted this 25 May 2019

Hi Glen,

I will allow your thread and monitor as I do with all threads. It is Walter Russel Tech and others may gleam the insight as you have.

I must make an apology as I was under the weather and made comments partially out of context, with other interfering problems also. 

We have very little time left, we are at a cusp, if we don't get this Technology specifically, we, the Human Race may never get the chance again! Time is short, so I ask you, give it your best shot and please remember, I also am doing the same and trying to be as specific as I can. So if our paths do not align as I hope, then I can not allow outside distractions that I find could be misleading of others wanting to learn.

We must make, as best we can, Specifics, and state when we are not sure.

   Chris

glennmr2018 posted this 26 May 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 26 May 2019

Hi Glen,

I will allow your thread and monitor as I do with all threads. It is Walter Russel Tech and others may gleam the insight as you have.

I must make an apology as I was under the weather and made comments partially out of context, with other interfering problems also. 

We have very little time left, we are at a cusp, if we don't get this Technology specifically, we, the Human Race may never get the chance again! Time is short, so I ask you, give it your best shot and please remember, I also am doing the same and trying to be as specific as I can. So if our paths do not align as I hope, then I can not allow outside distractions that I find could be misleading of others wanting to learn.

We must make, as best we can, Specifics, and state when we are not sure.

   Chris

 

hei Chris!
Well thanks for your positive comments today and of course i accept your apologies as well! Yes i can agree that we don't have much time left - i also share a sense of urgency, but Not panic. Agreed that we need to be as clear and specific as possible and to admit when we're not sure - noted. I appreciate your decision to keep my thread on the forum, and am happy to keep sharing freely. Re: W Russell, ok i can admit that it bears perhaps more than a superficial resemblance, if you say so, but honestly i have not read his works for many years. Now i am getting curious as to how it relates to mine. OK, see u on the forum, and again i regard this forum as one of the best - keep it up. regards Glenn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

hei Guys - please see my latest chart revision above! - now much clearer regarding the switching process & timing of both input and output transistors/gates/mosfets (take your pick) + some keys clarified eg. scalar input-> vector output!

BTW - the aerial and earth shown in this scheme are OPTIONAL here, but can be better put to use with an air-cored ground-based system, speaking of which -

This scheme is based on a cubic core made of special composite material, but i have been asked to describe if such a thing could be designed with an AIR CORE - the answer is YES - so my next schematic sketch will show you how! - this will probably illustrate the method and procedure more clearly to many of you.

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Marathonman
glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

                                    TUNING the GRLC Core: 

B = µ0 H  where µ0 : permeability of free space (Henries/meter)

µ0 = 4π x 10-7 = 1.26 x 10-6 H/m  (μr = 1 for air)    (B: flux/sq.m.)

D = ε0 E  where ε0 : permittivity of free space (Farads/meter)

ε0 = 1/(36&pi x 10-9 = 8.85 x 10-12 F/m  (εr = 1 for air)  (D: webers/sq.m.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined EM Energy Product = [√( µ0 ε0). EH.Ad] = EnEH (Joules)

Note: if A = Area = d2  and   A/d = d = depth   ( if core is a cube)

ideal GYRO Electro-Magnetic applied Frequency = ωg (radians/second)

ωg = 1/(me.c).√[h/2. EH]     

and PEH : Potential Output Power = ωg.EnEH (Watts) (in the frequency domain)

where me : mass of electron, c: light speed, h: Plank’s constant

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Worked Real-Life Example: (note: 'Voltage' here is Potential Difference!)

Let d = 10cm, thus A = 100 cubic cm = 10-2  so A.d = Volume = 10-3 m3

E = 100 V/m so V = E.d = 100 x 0.1 = 10V but E.d/2 = 100 x 0.5 = 5 V

H  = B/µ0 = 45uT/1.26 u-Henries/m =  [45x10-6 ]/[1.26x10-6] = 36 A/m !

Thus combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH].(A.d) since [√( µ0 ε0)] = 1/c

so EnEH = ...  micro-Joules  (not very much!)

Solution: Add Magnetic Potential - eg. magnets to upper and lower plates!

(but don't use ferrous plates so mag. field can penetrate into core)

Typical modern Neodymium magnets have B ~ 1Tesla but H ~ 1KA/m !

So again: combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH]. Ad

Now, if ideal GYRO Electro//Magnetic applied Frequency = ωg (rads/s)

i.e. ωg = 1/(me.c). √[h/2. EH]   where me = 9.11x10-31 , h = 6.63x10-34

(a mistake was found by yours truly - to be corrected and filled in sooner or later)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To achieve this power output under the above-mentioned conditions, such a high pulsation frequency of nearly 1GHz would need to be used - not normally practicable, so an air-core is not recommended, and should be substituted with a core of specially prepared composite material as already described! - so that the εr and μr can get multiplied in to the EnEH potential equation in order to increase it, but while at the same time, the E and H inputs can be lowered (eg. 12V/m and/or 1KA/m) to allow a lower input frequency! Lowered frequency and less EH but higher εr . μr would then tend to then cancel each other out but still allow a similar Power Output! -

Motto: Do the Maths!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Show More Posts
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

Since Nov 27 2018
Advertise here:

Your 233 x 233 image

Content is screened.

Negotiable price.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
Close