Floyd Sweet's VTA

  • 652 Views
  • Last Post 21 April 2018
cd_sharp posted this 24 March 2017

I've been researching the VTA for some time. I would like to share my experience about it and read other people's ideas. I will jump straight into the problem. Anybody that is not familiar with the VTA, please read the main website. It's the best online resource about it.

The first important thing that I noticed is the similitude between these pictures:

The first one shows the light emitted by two lamps fed by the VTA, but first rectified through a full wave bridge rectifier. Notice the center vertical beams which Bearden says they do not know what they are.

The next image is a screenshot from this video:

Notice that the load is a LED which is a diode. So, the current feeding the light we see is DC. This led me to believe that the type of induction happening inside the VTA is a linear movement of a Bloch Wall.

I also noticed there is a Bloch Wall forming between the two magnets in attractive configuration.

So, that is the Bloch Wall we most likely need to move.

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

  • Liked by
  • admin
  • tribulationcoming
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
admin posted this 24 March 2017

Hi Cd_Sharp and welcome!

Yes, I agree with you! The Bloch Wall is the Equator, the absolute central meridian of the Magnetic Field Structure.

Faradays Law states, the Time Rate of change of the Magnetic Field/the Conductor in the presence of the Magnetic Field.

Any time, and every time the Magnetic Field Changes, and it does as Lenz's Law is invoked as we draw Current from our Load Coil, the Magnetic Field is changing and as this change happens, the Bloch Wall moves with this Change!

So you're exactly right! Here are some video's I did some time back:

  • Liked by
  • tribulationcoming
cd_sharp posted this 24 March 2017

 Thanks, Chris! I think your website and videos are amazing. I have been following your work also on OU.com for years, but I focused on quiet experiments. I think you understand why after all you have been through.

The next question in my mind was this: what is the minimal configuration for the VTA? I think this is the one:


Since we do not see any excitation coil, but we see a little protuberance (marked in red), I concluded this must be just half of this version:

So, in the minimal (version 4) configuration, there is a vertical output coil probably in 2 halves. Thanks Chris for POC configuration, this must be the output coils configuration in the VTA.

In the minimal configuration, there should also be an excitation coil in the end we do not see.

The next thing I noticed is that in the VTA we see edges on all the coils. A coil having lots of levels of turns stacked or very thick wire tends to look like this:


and hides the edges of the bobbin such that even if the section of the bobbin axis if rectangular, it looks circular on the outside.

So, the axis of the bobbins of the VTA are rectangular. Also, the axis look wide. I think there is no point in having this wide axis without having a big core inside and the core should have edges meaning it should be rectangular or wide toroidal shape. This also points to what Chris shows here:

the VTA coils most likely had cores. So we have 2 ways to indicate a probable thing. Again, thanks Chris! Fantastic intuition.

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

  • Liked by
  • admin
  • tribulationcoming
admin posted this 24 March 2017

Hi Cd_Sharp - A Good question!

Personally I am not yet at the stage of Floyd Sweet, so I can only guess at the end result.

Floyd Sweet had a lot of problems early on, Frequency, stability, many others, all problems I have seen to some varying degrees. It is really hard to figure out some of these problems, I am still learning a lot. Floyd Sweet was a genius, but for sure he saw the same problems.

The absolute minimum configuration to start, is the MrPreva Experiment!

Learning from the most simple experiments is so much easier on the Pocket! and also quicker. If you have done this experiment and wish to move on, I recommend attempting the replication of Ruslan's early work: @11m 11s

and with more detail here:

Of course, when any two waves meet, they can create a Standing Wave, which can have very much more Energy in this Standing Wave, than in the two fundamentals:

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=FuH6u39acY8

admin posted this 24 March 2017

Its worth keeping in mind, the very Action of drawing Current Begets Additional Power "Generation"  - What do I mean, by drawing a Current, this movement of Charge (Current (I)) invokes Magnetic Fields!

Each Oppose, changing in time! Which is Electromagnetic Induction in itself!

See: http://www.hyiq.org/Page/Details?Name=Support

I detail some concepts there. The words Figurea used are beautiful:

CLEMENTE FIGUERA

PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION - Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns, while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet, this action will weaken as the induced is separated from the center of the electromagnet, to increase again, when the induced is approaching the center of another electromagnet with opposite sign to the first one.

Because we all know that the effects that are manifested when a closed circuit approaches and moves away from a magnetic center are the same as when, this circuit being still and motionless, the magnetic field is increased and reduced in intensity; since any variation , occurring in the flow traversing a circuit is producing electrical induced current .It was considered the possibility of building a machine that would work, not in the principle of movement, as do the current dynamos, but using the principle of increase and decrease, this is the variation of the power of the magnetic field, or the electrical current which produces it.

The voltage from the total current of the current dynamos is the sum of partial induced currents born in each one of the turns of the induced. Therefore it matters little to these induced currents if they were obtained by the turning of the induced, or by the variation of the magnetic flux that runs through them; but in the first case, a greater source of mechanical work than obtained electricity is required, and in the second case, the force necessary to achieve the variation of flux is so insignificant that it can be derived without any inconvenience, from the one supplied by the machine. Until the present no machine based on this principle has been applied yet to the production of large electrical currents, and which among other advantages, has suppressed any necessity for motion and therefore the force needed to produce it.

I hope this helps, I am sorry if you already know all this stuff, please pass it by if you do.

I have tried to really make a massive effort in the Reference Section, to show the devices by those before us, all using the same concepts. A good percentage, as they themselves said, they did not know how it worked, but it does!

All the best

   Chris

 

Wistiti posted this 25 March 2017

Hi guys!

Moving Bloch wall through an inductor remember the concept of Figuera generator. Nice Chris you have point it! Until now my experiment was about a single primary and a POC as the secondary. But I think using the POC as the primary , for displacing the Bloch wall through a collecting inductor might be also a great idea... As Figuera does!

ps: Nice to have a working team again!

  • Liked by
  • admin
admin posted this 25 March 2017

Hey Wistiti - Absolutely! No limitations! When One Partnered Output Coil is used as an Input, as Akula and Ruslan have shown, when in resonance, there can be very good and useful effects! Just takes a bit of work! @ about 4 and 1/2 minutes in:

 

Yes, this is feeling really good! Nice to have you back my Friend!

   Chris

 

Chris posted this 30 March 2017

Hi Cd_Sharp, I remembered, the Kromrey Converter is another instance where the beam of light can be seen from Light Bulbs:

Of course, you are already well ahead! You can see what the main cause of this EMF is!

I hope you find the video enjoyable!

   Chris 

 

cd_sharp posted this 20 April 2018

Alright, I'd like to do my part in this, so here is the essence of what I learnt so far. Please note that the output is around unity and it can never go overunity in this exact configuration. It turns out self induced current is behaving strangely when separated by the main current using a diode. If we're looking for the cold current Floyd talks about, it is the no 1 suspect.

Any idea how we can use this in conjunction with The Mr Preva experiment?

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

Chris posted this 21 April 2018

Hey CD,

Thanks for sharing! Always exciting to see others progress!

We seem to be getting: Video Unavailable

Looks like the video is private? If you set to unlisted, this will allow the video to play.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
cd_sharp posted this 21 April 2018

Sorry about that. It is my first upload. I think it's fixed now.

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 21 April 2018

Great Job CD! That's excellent!

We are seeing all the Effects we should be, this is great!

  • Input reduction
  • Magnets adding energy to the system

Great work! If you like, you can create a new thread for the Effects youre getting? Let me know if you need help with that?

Thank You very much for sharing! Its great to see others progressing and sharing their work! Larger Core Size will help and more turns if you want to increase this further.

Great Job!

   Chris

cd_sharp posted this 21 April 2018

Thanks for the good words, Chris. I'd keep everything in here for now.

I believe I owe some explanations because I've been experimenting with this exact circuit for a few years.

Larger core or more turns won't do any more good. Once it gets to unity that's it. So this must be just one piece of the puzzle. Next step should be similar to whatever Floyd describes in here and I can only try to guess at this point:

Once unity has been achieved and the gate to the Dirac Sea opened, over-unity is affected 
by loading the open gate more and more which opens it further to the point where direct 
communication/interaction with the nucleus of the atom itself is achieved.

 

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close