Ruslan Generator Theory of Operation CAE and Development Aid Add On

  • Last Post 2 weeks ago
solarlab posted this 04 January 2019

A very good CAE style video presentation link and a possible development aid (add-on) paper [zip] can be found in a post located here:

NOTE: Unfortunately the post link below was removed [hi-jacked ?] from the original forum thread; as were many other posts. Rather than attempt to "fix" these problems, another approach to presenting information is being explored (publish only in credible forums and periodicals). Edit: 20 May 2019.

Also included in the text is a link to 31 Ruslan demonstration videos.

Some advanced developers may find the material interesting and valuable.

Unfortunately this site does not accommodate file attachments over 2MB or the "USING THE INVERTER SECTION OF A DUAL FUEL INTERNAL COMBUSTION INVERTER/GENERATOR WITH A RUSLAN TYPE ELECTRONIC EXCESS ENERGY PRODUCTION SCHEME" zip or rar file would have been attached in this post.

Good luck in your work and have a great day!


  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
solarlab posted this 04 January 2019

Some "free tools" you might find useful when working with YouTube videos and other files:

Youtube-DLG - this program will directly download videos with a translation subtitle enbeded. You must set your language first, along with some other parameters, in the settings.     {then Clone or download (right hand side)}

VLC Player - a video player that will allow you to slow down the video (read subtitles easier). You must select "subtitle" in the menu bar or in settings | subtitles | select "all" for default subtitle on.

ImageGlass - allows you to view and size many picture formats. For example: in the " How does the installation of Ruslan Kulabukhov 2018 Part 2" video page [found in the above post] there is a file called "Final.jpg" (screen view of video CAE). To zoom in on the text use ImageGlass and "screen width," etc.

InfanView - a more sophisticated and powerful general file, video, etc. program.

Also, a good site for some theories with "interactive parameter graphics displays" as well (e.g. Coil Standing and Travelling Wave power) examples. Site translation is also included (upper right hand flags).

Appologies if some of this has already been provided elsewhere.

Chris posted this 04 January 2019

Great job on sharing Solarlab!

From what I can see, and I have not spent a lot of time reviewing the material, but it looks to be spot on!

Excellent job!


solarlab posted this 05 January 2019

Thanks Chris... You might appreciate the first paper referenced in this attachment brief:

By Professor E. G. CULLWICK, O.B.E., M.A., D.Sc, F.R.S.E., Member.

Attached brief:



Attached Files

solarlab posted this 05 January 2019

Hi Chris,

Is there any way I can contribute such that the download file size limit can be increased?

Please let me know.  Thanks. SL


  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 06 January 2019

Hey Solarlab,

Thanks for the offer. I have a few problems with Files. The transfer of large files restricts site performance. I need site performance.

However, I have increased the file size from just over 5mb to 10mb. This is a more realistic size.

Let me know if this is not enough, I am happy to increase a little more if required.


  • Liked by
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this 06 January 2019

Thank You Chris,

Ten (10) mb should be more than adequate; I fully concure, site performance above all.
BTW, just read your latest version of "Guidelines to Bucking Coils V2.7;" excellent, very informative!

Have a great day! smile


  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 06 January 2019

Hey Solarlab,

Cool, 10Mb.

V2.7 is old now. I should update it. I have learnt a lot more since then.


  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
alohalaoha posted this 06 January 2019

Hey Solarlab and Happy New Year

I am think you are on the right track !






solarlab posted this 07 January 2019

Hi Aloha,

Happy New Year!

Your question as to "What has changed in intrinsic electron structure?" unfortunately I don't have a definitive answer for. That answer, if it could be varified by experiment, would probably be Nobel material. But we can always ponder and study.

A real short (cheat) answer, from an engineering prospective, might be "increase the potential difference [add HV pulses] within the system." This appears to what has been done in Ruslan's and others early (2015) devices.

Over the years my leaning has been towards thinking that Dirac's work in the 1930's is more believable, to me at least, and holds the most promise in describing a viable electron structure and interaction.

One long term project I would like to complete someday is integrating the Dirac and Maxwell equations such that modern CAE software (Comsol Multiphysics in particular) had the capability to work in both positive and negative energies (Dirac). There is light however, since I recently read a paper where apparently this has been accomplished.

There are several papers attached relating to Dirac and one that describes a late 1990's project called Genesis. A long while back but it did strike my interest. Also, I am actively working on Comsol analysis of coils and high voltage interaction. So far so good but still a long way to go!



Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Chris
solarlab posted this 17 January 2019

With respect to "How might High Voltge Pulses be used to increase current flow" question. You may find the attached papers to be quite interesting and thought provoking. Experimenting as well as varification should not be too difficult.

About mid 1999 a postulation was developed known as "The GENESIS PROJECT." It posed an interesting view of positive and negative energy flow and followed Dirac's approach to an extent with an extended feature of adding high voltage around a coil.

The only two surviving papers, to the best of my knowledge, are attached.

Links to the papers are:
Original paper March 1999: 
Revised edition:

Ergo; an interest in integrating Maxwell's and Dirac's equations and ultimately developing a CAE analysis/proof of the Ruslan generator device operation theory.

The Genesis Project 'may' tie well into explaining the Tesla Transformer part of the attached schematics which are a part of the previous video cited by Steven Marks, a.k.a Absolut. Use of the term "non inductive" in the paper, I believe, would also describe a coil's Bi-Filar effect.


Attached Files

alohalaoha posted this 18 January 2019

Hey SolarLab

As an experienced EE and follower of P.Dirac you probably well know what did he said about General Theory of Relativity

Quote him

"The main equations of modern quantum electrodynamics are incorrect." P. Dirac



About "Genesis" project i have stopped reading further after 3rd page where i have found this:

"The above is a new interpretation (genesis project) based on the general principle of relativity about a
conduction current, a magnetic field and an induced electric field."

If you are really searching for the RIGHT TRACK in infinite abyss of lies i can help you , simply pointing you in a truthful direction.

Start research about, particle mass, particle kinetic energy and inertial forces. !!



alohalaoha posted this 18 January 2019

About one of main misconception in modern relaitvity "science".

SolarLab - do you ready to take a look in the eyes of the TRUTH ?

Belive or not, know or not but - in modern Main Stream Physics everything was based on policy.

How had started ?

The Danish theorist Lorentz can from boredom, and can out of boredom, set for himself such ridiculous task: "What happens to Maxwell's equations if to place them in the moving system of coordinates?"

Does there will be they invariable (invariant) or will change?

He thought up the known transformations which were wrong, and showed with their help the invariance of the equations of Maxwell in the moving system of coordinates. Soon these transformations from Lorentz were bought by the WallStreet, Zurich and London bankers, and they entered as a fundamental factor, in the "theory of relativity" of Einstein in a year published in the German scientific magazine "Annalen der Physik".

So the world learned that Einstein is not a small clerk in patent office of Geneva, and the great Jewish physicist and greatest mankind physicist. And Maxwell's equations were after Lorentz it seems objective check of correctness of transformations of Lorentz. Here and everything as it appeared, a detective story with humour of the electrodynamic equations of Maxwell. All business appeared not in Maxwell and even not in Lorentz, and in the Trojan Horse in the jewish physicist Einstein who was filled from the head to a tail by one policy formulated by the called Jewish banksters. And Europe went for this monetaristic zhupel again, taking away science and the people from Truth light to the swamp of obscurantism and fascism.

And where is humour —  you could ask?

Here everyone has to think and, it is possible that depending on man's personal outlook the humour will appear in different color.

I do not want to expatiate on this collective work XIX of Europe and the beginning of the 20th centuries more. Maxwell of these equations composed twenty pieces and soon died.

Then there were well-wishers and began to canonize them. Activists in this process were Hevisayd and Hertz. They long were called Hevisayd's equations — German Hertz until Jew Einstein did not became "the greatest physicist - again Jewish".

From its instruction appropriated to these equations a name of Maxwell again. And all archaisms in them remained. Including one famous that magnetic field has no mass!!. In reallity Magnetic Force Field could be so huge, while in the same time, magnetic carriers of these forces has no mass at all.

Unless is it not a humour ?

Besides in the modern relativity books on physics is written that magnetic field has no mass. Precisely Maxwell's hypothesis repeats divB=0 !

and, of course, not withouth instructions of "greatest physicist" ever.

Here also it turns out, as money of the WallStreet , Zurich and London bankers is valid and, of course, has also mass (weight). While with a mass of magnetic field - there is a crunch.

The Truth is come to the rescue by skilled material from the reference book
Grigoriev I.S and Melihov E.Z. - Physical quantities: Reference book. by: Energoizdat 1991 USSR.

In this reference book the dependence of specific resistance of tungsten against the magnitude of cross-sectional magnetic field is given or ρ = f(B)

It is established fact that change B from 102 T(Tesla) to 105 T, ρ increases more than by 7 orders (10 million times - look at the Chart of the Colour) [6, page. 748, fig. 30.24].

Question is what happens to tungsten if his electrical resistance becomes almost like ceramics influented by giant magnetic field ?

If Magnetic filed has no mass, who did this with tungsten - Evil Spirit maybe ?


SolarLab - keep in mind that, this is not exclusieve example.!!!

Those experimetal facts were gathered on several thousands !!!

Best regards

solarlab posted this 18 January 2019

Hi Aloha,

A quick question for you - maybe a long and twisted answer, but let me ask anyway.
As a follower of Dirac and, I suspect, familiar with Maxwell:

Do you have any ideas or specific suggestions regarding how best to integrate Dirac's equation (positron - negatron energy states; an equation with two or four possible answers), with the Maxwell equations?


Also, I try not to discount any theoretical approaches to physics or engineering. Some theories sometimes work better than others with respect to the problem being solved.

For a simple example; Ohms law is good for determining the bias current/voltage for a switching diode even at 4GHz (Kirchoff) but the directional coupler part of the device requires a distributed electromagnetic approach (lines and waves); whereas an optical style (ray trace) approach might be used to analyze the horn and parabolic reflector part of the system. The same applies, in my opinion, to relativity and the other various theories. We don't as yet have the Golden combined "theory of everything." Although I do agree Dirac may have come the closest to it!

The primary point of the "Genesis Project" is simply an approach in explaining that by subjecting the bi-filar coil to an external high voltage (potential) influence, the coil may exhibit a change in characteristics; e.g. negative inductance - no inductance - positive inductance.

This may or may not be the theory of "why" this happens but it has little to do with the General Theory of Relativity, in my opinion, mearly a way of trying to explain the experimental results.

Your comment about "research particle mass, etc.," as I explained above - I try to consider all theoretical approaches. No "one size" approach fits all! It would be very myopic (and detrimental) to do otherwise. The rest of your post is mear history and conjecture, so it goes into the round bin as far as I'm concerned.

Particle Theory versus Wave Theory debate will rage on for many many years I' sure, as will conventional versus relativity - but it's a stupid debate with little to be gained in the end.

Use whatever theory gets the job done, and allows you to move forward - that's what real engineers and physicists do. Leave the debate to the academics - since, as useful as it may be, they are generally capable of little else.

Of course all of the above is just My Humble Opinion.



  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
alohalaoha posted this 18 January 2019

Hey SolarLab

I have no idea about your plan to mix UNMIXABLE stuff - like proved Particle Kinematic Theory against unprovable Einstain&Main Stream "science" Wave Theory !

If you want to make complete new theory maybe i can help you somehow. My personal oppinion is for begining you can try to replicate simple Mr.Preva experiment according to Chris instructions.

Another suggestion you can do with easy - make experiments with isolated charges (both signs) against influence of stationary magnetic field of any neodymium-iron-boron magnet.

I guess you have all needed equipment to make professional job here ?

ps: Answer to your question is yes, but much better i think is making mentioned experiments as a master judge of any theory !





solarlab posted this 18 January 2019


This link may help explain the desire to mix Dirac and Maxwell. This is just one of many but it accents the idea:

Many experiments have been done, including Preva, however the focus is developing a theoretical understanding so that Comsol Multiphysics or similar software can be used to analyze and optimize the related devices.

This is why I posted in the "Theory" section of this forum. My interest at the moment is not any specific experiments but rather attempting to use CAE to characterize a Ruslan or similar device. We have proved they work but are still not able to fully explain and varify why, using technical science. Without the math we will continue to go in circles.

We use Maxwell in our software analysis on an almost continual basis to solve and optimize our electromagnetic problems but it has difficulty yielding any hint of excess energy. Dirac on the other hand appears to open the door to infinite excess energy.

Combine the two and we might possibly have the key to EM analysis with the probability of excess energy optimization! A worthy persuit?



solarlab posted this 20 January 2019

This thesis points out an experimental approach to coil analysis and touches on computer aided engineering at the end.

Although their objective is to examine insulation failure in transformers; it has some good introduction information regarding transients (high voltage spikes and waveforms), resonances within the coil windings and several measurement techniques. The author also discusses relationships with respect to standing and traveling waves in the coil. Link:


Review the paper while keeping in mind his objective is to investigate harmful transients and mitigate excess energy, whereas our objective is to instigate transients and promote excess energy. Generally note that many papers are like this - what they try to avoid, we try to create!


Reading between the lines, so to speak, it appears that a 'continual' introduction of transients within a coil by certain 'waveform shapes' does indeed cause excess energy and thus transformer insulation failure. But the process is complex to describe technically and even more so to design, control and sustain.

A long read, however contains some good information.


BTW; Here's a Vector Network Analyzer that covers 1Hz to 50MHz (a bit pricey - about $5K US or so) but it works really well. Low frequency coverage, quality, VNAs used to be rare, they probably still are (?). Or sweep generator and storage scope with ch2 ref.



  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Aetherholic
solarlab posted this 20 January 2019

To assist in gaining a further appreciation of the external disturbance pulse shape on a coil's inner workings (see the paper above re: "VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION ALONG REACTOR WINDING UNDER VERY FAST TRANSIENTS").

This link to Gorchilin's website has some explainations and interactive graphs where you can set the harmonic content of a 'disturbance pulse' and see, in graphical form, how the disturbance pulse waveshape determines the standing and traveling waves found amongst the coil windings. Although presented as a 'long line,' consider it an unwrapped coil for demo purposes. However, the actual wound coil interaction is even more interesting - this is were a good CAE EM analysis is very handy! Translate (upper right - flags) and go to Articles [Notes], then the first set of topics.

Of interest is that by unique pulse harmonic selection, you can move from a standing wave to a traveling wave.

Note: Some browsers do not set up the examples cited in text properly - therefore you have to review the "numbers" in the URL and relate them to the parameters entered into the graphic. Gorchilin's web page has quite a number of interesting items. Follow the hot links (blue) to the demonstration graphics calculators.

For example: (in this URL the L=0.5 , Q=100, g=0. g=81... relate to the slider number settings on the left hand side; set these to see the actual waveform to be demonstrated as per the text).


solarlab posted this 30 January 2019

This is a long post and involves some of my observations (my opinions only). It initially was to be a response to another forum thread but evolved a bit. It is for information discussion only and contains unverified postulations. Consider it of value; or not.


F.Y.I.  [CAUTION - This is an ongoing "Work-in-Progress" rough draft]

GENERAL THEORY/OPINION - EXCESS ENERGY Version: 0.0.2 (Revised 21Jan19) Draft.

There are two parts to the following discussion: (1) How some parts of the Ruslan type device appear to work, in a general sense, and (2) a scheme that will greatly assist in the system's technical understanding, development and fabrication [using an off-the-shelf modified Internal Combustion Inverter Generator].

[[RA]] An alterative approach to that of the "Zenneck" method is given below. Zenneck may well be viable but other methods are also worthy of consideration; especially when they are easier, logical, achievable and more understandable up front. This alternative approach is provided for informational consideration only.

Part One - How it all might work, in a general, but very brief, sense.

[[RP]] Whether you use a Schumman/Zenneck/surface wave to trigger your system (hit the bell with in order to get it to ring [excess energy]) or you create an artificial source (an efficient pulse generator); it really does not matter, as long as the bell is periodically rung or the standing/traveling wave is initiated and maintained or the swing is occassionally pushed or the grandfather pendulum clock spring is wound once in a while. Consider potential and kinetic energy while observing dv/dt, di/dt; rapid impulse versus meandering wave. A stone thrown into a lake, a sumani, nature does it all the time; mimic nature.

Do not confuse a resonant structure with an oscillator; however a resonant structure can/will oscillate with a single stimulus and, if the "Q" is very high, it will continue to resonate/oscillate through many (n) cycles. In a resonant cavity (a helical coil, for example) a standing wave will move forward and return many times (n) with a single stimulus (pulse).

The excess energy created is then n-1. A cavity without loss (infinite Q) would yield infinite energy, and it would add up at a 4 times (4X) rate as the wave phases coincided as they cross each other (in phase - power). A traveling wave has similar characteristics and can be formed by simply including the correct amplitude and phase of the stimulus signal harmonics.

You need an intial power source [9VDC battery for example] to "start" the system; you need an super efficient scheme to resonate and/or use on-going waves that require very little power or a low repetition rate imputus to sustain the cycles, due to inherent losses; and you need an isolated method of drawing off the excess power without disturbing (killing) the excess power generating mechanism(s).

You can also add power boost techniques to increase the excess power output; such as a properly timed and phased potential difference, such as High Voltage pulses; or you can use an inverse current transformer method near the output.

To quote N. Tesla: "Think clearly, not deeply!" {A cute saying but wrot with contradiction - like the forest and tree saying}

At first glance the system appears to be quite complex; however, by viewing each piece individually, as a part of the overall system, the operation will quickly become clear. It's valuable to understand the detailed physics behind the methods, but it is certainly not required to go beyond basic reasoning and logic to appreciate the fundamental system operation.

One example of many [but thinking too deeply, it will get complex very quickly]: Take a coil and unwind it into a long line, for easy wavelength analysis. Stimulate the "near" end of the line with a waveform (sine, triangle, square, pulse - whatever) and terminate the "far" end with a "termination" (short, match, open - whatever). Observe what each combination of input and termination has on the "inter-line waveform."

Each long line will have a characteristic impedance based upon it's wavelength which determines it's "signal" reflection properties. But, keep in mind the coil, when wound, will have additional impedance parameters (a combination of turn to turn inductance and capacitance as well as self inductance and wavelength), although these can all be characterized and/or measured. Matching a line simply refers to terminating a coil or long line with it's corresponding complex condjugate impedance [opposite to the line inductance or capacitance - cancels the complex part (L or C) to yield a resistance only].

However for our purposes we want a line or coil that will reflect the input signal, therefore a mismatch is desired [a short to ground typically]. Refer to Gorchilin's site for an interactive graph demonstration. Note that if the "near" end generator is not matched to the line then the input signal will continue reflecting back and forth and building power as the reflected waves cross each other.

However, thinking clearly about the example above - A coil, cavity, line or other structure can be easily made to oscillate at it's natural resonant frequencies with a narrow stumulus [pulse]; and, if the structures are high "Q" [very low loss] they will oscillate for a long time without any further stimulus. To keep it oscillating - as it dies off - stimulate it again, but consider the phase.

In an ideal lossless LC circuit would a single stimulus (a pulse with the proper characteristics) oscillate/resonate forever? YES. If, however, the circuit was only "very efficient" (minimal losses, but had some slight losses) it would eventually die out, unless it was again stimulated at a future time, and so on. Only perodic stimulations would sustain continual oscillations at circuit resonance. A small periodic input stimulus (low power) will yield a large output power on a sustained basis!

Another consideration is "air core" versus "ferrite/steel core." Frequency, loss and size trade-offs. Recall Tesla's Coil is typically air core; whereas conventional (50/60Hz) transformers are steel or ferrite core; uninteruptable power supplies are torriod ferrite; television flybacks and yoke cores are typially ferrite material. Optimized for the application frequency [including harmonics], losses, size and power?

Lets try an analogy like the swing, or better yet, a merry-go-round. Attached on the outter edges are magnets and surrounding them are circular pickup coils. It's easy to periodically push the marry-go-round but the "interaction" [drag] between the magnets and the coils will quickly slow the circular motion. Akin to creating a low drag hull on a catamaran or a hovercraft versus a deep hull sail boat or cargo ship!

Now the challenge becomes eliminating this "drag." Loose coupling or Bi-Filar windings are effective techniques; or timing schemes where the Lenz/back EMF is isolated at the instant of extraction and the interactive "drag" is reduced or eliminated all together. You must extract the power without affecting the resonance oscillation and not decreasing system efficiency. Tricky but not impossible. Maybe that's where the real secret is? You need the coils to transfer magnetic flux but you must avoid self/mutual induction of this magnetic interaction. This is of primary importance.

Why can "IT" be done NOW? Technology has advanced (efficient, low power, complex devices) along with our understanding and the availability of powerful analysis/design/simulation tools that are now available to us. Some feature open access to the underlying mathematics [formulas] that can be manipulated to include non-conventional approaches.

A look at an Inverter/Generator (Internal Combustion Engine types) MODIFICATION for a Ruslan device:

Quite a lot can be learned by analyzing the operation if these generators when applied to the theory and design of an all Electronic type of Excess Energy Generator (no moving parts) similar to that of Ruslan's devices but easier to implement. But this is only a part of it - on the back end, so to speak.

Circuits used must be as efficient as possible, you still need to create a way to get excess energy, and these combined techniques all need to be coordinated, syncronized and generally isolated so that one does not affect the others.

Efficiencies and techniques should focus, for example, on Resonance (e.g. ringing bell - hit once it vibrates many times [OU]); Standing/Traveling Waves (single narrow pulse with appropriate harmonic content creates a standing or traveling wave in a coil that bounces up/down or forward/backward, building in energy with each ongoing cycle); High Voltage Pulsed current boosting (properly timed burst of excessive potential [and high speed - kinetic energy] stimulates electron movement and growth; Bi-Filar winding techniques (e.g. reduce back EMF - reduced coil winding interaction); Loose Coil Coupling (e.g. Tesla Coil or Melnichenko Coil); and so forth...

These methods provide the required efficiencies; where a small energy input can yield a much larger energy output.
Study resonance, especially where resistance theoretically becomes infinite (resistance/impedance equals loss) at the system resonant frequencies. NOTE: A resonant oscillator would oscillate forever if there were no losses and it remained in resonance - resonance must not be destroyed or interfered with - it must remain as isolated as practicable - and is must be fed from time to time to make up for any inevitable circuit losses. This is true for all highly efficient, high Q, circuits.

Removal of the excess energy from the system, without disturbing the energy producer, becomes the challenge. Some, or all, of the methods mentioned above have been employed successfully. There are likely many others. Think bits and pieces as well as the system as a whole. Voltage creates current, current produces magnetic fields, magnetic fields produce voltage, voltage produces current, current and voltage produce power, resistance is loss, impedance (phasing) can also be a friend, and so on.

Study OHMs Law (simplified but useful for understanding); I=V/R, current is proportional to voltage, but according to P=VI or I=P/V shows that current is inversly proportionl to voltage, changing R or P will increase or decrease V or I. If you increase V by keeping the source power constant then the current would decrease. When V increases, I decreases because P remains constant. I is proportional to V if R remains constant and Temperature remains constant. This is how transformers function (simplified). But, if the Power is improved then both V and I will increase. Draw OHMs Law circles and play with the values.

Part Two - Possibily a very good design and development Aid.

An AID in developing an excess energy generator - much of the work is already done in the Inverter/Generator. Study the schematic in the following article. Replace the Engine and Alternator with a high frequency, efficient, electronic (Ruslan style) device. And, keep the capacitor charged. It's so easy, you will laugh! Or not!

To quote in part from the article: "Inner Workings

A conventional generator rotates two large coils inside its core, and each full engine rotation produces one complete ac sine wave. By design, the engine must spin the generator at 3600 RPM to produce the desired ac output. If, because of varying loads, the generator spins faster or slower, the voltage and frequency of the output vary in step.
In an inverter generator, the core uses multiple coils and multiple magnets. Each full rotation of the engine produces more than 300 three phase ac sine waves at frequencies up to 20 kHz, which produces more electrical energy per engine revolution. A microprocessor-controlled inverter module converts the high-frequency ac to dc (about 200 V in at least one unit) before “inverting” it back to clean, stable 120 V, 60-Hz ac power.

Typical inverter generator regulation specs are 3% voltage, 1% frequency and 3% sine wave distortion. That’s essentially “power company” ac in a hand-carried unit!

Compare that to the other types of generators in Table 1. ..."

Schematic and Operation Theory:

Replace the Engine and 3-PH Alternator with a Ruslan type high voltage pumped grenade coil that feeds the bridge diodes which, in turn, feed the Capacitor. Keep the Capacitor charged at high frequency. This Capacitor in turn feeds a precision 120/240VAC 4KW electronic inverter (IGBT INVERTER using PWM CONTROL). You are no longer restricted to 3600 RPM and can drive the bridge/capacitor with high frequency pulses (e.g. 20KHz - internal diode frequency limit dependant).

This is a modified commercial off-the-shelf inverter type gennerator. Just add a means to keep the capacitor charged (Ruslan or similar device), the remainder of the inverter/generator provides a very clean 120/240V sine wave AC with all the AC plugs and battery included.

General Inverter/Generator Articles:

Lazar's Power Electronics Guide - an excellent source of information:

[[RA]] Good luck and have a productive week! Note: This is a "Work-in-Progress" rough draft.



Zanzal posted this 30 January 2019

Thank you Solarlab, a fine write up, I spotted a lot of gold nuggets in there. I will need to go back and study what you wrote some more in detail later as there were a several points which I was not familiar with, but which my intuition says is good.

Perhaps you already know this and if so another will find it useful. A very efficient means for generating a "surface wave" is to drive the transmission line [my preferred term for a conductive wave guide] directly with a mosfet driver (using only the driver itself not a mosfet). Specifically the IXDN602PI has been personally tested by me and operates very well at moderate frequencies (<200kHz) at between 7 and 35V input. The main benefits are low operation cost such that most of the current drawn is through displacement and not switching transistors and low voltage and low weight (no transformer needed).

solarlab posted this 01 February 2019

Some possible "useful" background technical information:

Waves and oscillations

Acceleration with alternating electric and magnetic fields

Of particular interest might be: Standing-wave resonant accelerating structures
and Longitudinal particle motion with an accelerating field.

The above from the Home page: Build a (Virtual) Particle Accelerator

Have an interesting, but relaxing if possible, weekend!


  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
Show More Posts

Support Our Effort

Since Nov 27 2018
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Weeks High Earners:
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Support Us (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Support Us (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!