Gaining Understanding

Chris my post was generally aimed at those that get the right tools to see theses technologies we work with but don't understand how to use them. Science is by it's definition always changing as a theory is only good until a new better theory comes along and explains it better. Somewhere down the line someone came up with these "Laws of Science" which goes against the definition of science altogether. Science: The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. This is the definition of science and it tells us that one must experiment and also be observers. 

Good science is good observation. In my early days when I was a mechanic I was taught how to troubleshoot problems and over time I became very good at it. I used this know how to solve the mystery of this water for fuel technology. I had to learn how to build things correctly, how to use the tools needed to get the technology up and running correctly, and how to do many other things like calculus, physics, chemistry, electronics, strength and materials, drafting, CNC machining, and the list goes on. A lot of times when I speak I do so anticipating that everyone that I am speaking with also knows a lot about these things. The reality though is not many understand these things but like to appear as if they do. 

When I was working with Max Miller I learned this the hard way as we had our setups set up the exact same way so we could work in parallel. I told him that I was seeing the temps rise, which means we have to go back and do it again, and he told me that his wasn't so something wasn't right as how could that be if both our setups were the same? I had to conclude that he simply wasn't being truthful with me through troubleshooting the problem of our different observational results of the same thing and I stopped working with him for if you aren't going to listen to what your experiments were telling you then what's the point? It didn't make matters any better when he showed a video with good enough quality where I could actually see the heat waves coming out of the resonant cavities. You see I witness accounts of Meyer's technology working talked about the technology running for a half hour and the temperature hadn't changed. Thus if the temperatures were rising in my experiments as that tells me that I had to go home and do it again as I obviously wasn't doing something right. Since Max wasn't being truthful I dropped working with him like a hot potato as you can't advance your understanding that way as you will not be asking the right questions anymore because of the lie.

Long story short Max stayed where he was in his understanding of this technology and I ended up solving it as asked even more questions and figure out why the water was getting hot and Meyer's wasn't and it all has to do with the graph I shared showing the red a blue colors of the waveform. Understanding the math behind that waveform shows clearly that is Meyer's primary method of amp restriction but not his only method. But I had to first learn how to read the readings of the oscilloscope and do the math in order to understand this. I also had to not just look at the pictures and carefully read through Meyer's PDF file for in writing Meyer talks about the waveform having both positive and negative components to it but in the photos all he would show was the positive waveform which many tried to copy in their work which lead to failure as they didn't understand what the reading on the oscilloscope was showing them.

Now the reason why this observation is important comes from eye witness accounts of Meyer's work in this video: 

Anyway, I thought those videos would be helpful as they help people learn to make use of the tools they have properly so that they can benefit from them the most. 

Edward