Electromagnetic Induction - Asymmetrically

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 468 Views
  • Last Post 11 hours ago
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

I have seen much confusion over Electromagnetic induction lately. You need to know:

  • Timing.
  • Delayed Conduction.
  • Mutual Inductance and Coupling Coefficient basics.

 

I want to try to get a clear message across.

 

Remember: 1, 2, 3 is not a Symmetrical process!

Please, I ask, get on the bench, learn the basic function of Electromagnetic Induction.

   Chris

 

P.S: I am absolutely sure I am being monitored. My Computer Systems and phone. I will leave it at this for a while.

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

great video Chris

i appreciate

jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • glennmr2018
solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Nice work Chris!

A little blurb of my understanding of Symetrical versus Asymetrical Transformers. Could be way off however...

A Symetrical - Ordinary - Transformer

In ordinary, or semetric, transformers, due to the fact that not only the primary circuits induce on the secondary circuits, but also the secondary circuits induce on the primary, and in the form of counter-emfs, such a situation is created that the power and energy of the primary and secondary circuits are the same. Given the energy costs of the primary circuit for active and inductive resistances, respectively, the power of the primary circuit, defined as the energy consumption, is slightly higher than the power received on the secondary circuit.

Generally these ordinary transformers follow Ohm's Law where the power does not change - Voltage increase => Current decrease and vise versa, but Power does not change except for some minimal Power reduction at the output due to resistance and thermal losses. The primary input power requirement closely tracks the output power requirement based upon the load being driven.

Thus, a conventional transformer is a device with an efficiency <1.

An Asymmetric Transformer

Whereas free energy devices use transformers with asymmetries in the operation of primary and secondary circuits, due to the correct use of phases and clock cycles of the induction of secondary circuits. This makes it possible not to create counter-emfs on the primary circuit, and thus the power consumption on the primary circuit of the transformer becomes much less than the power received on the secondary circuit output.

Such transformers are refered to as transformers with asymmetries of the primary and secondary circuits, or transformers without secondary counter-emfs. Their principle of operation in terms of asymmetry is similar to the principle of operation of electric machines without counter-emfs. For they also work due to the electromagnetic asymmetry of the interaction of the primary and secondary circuits.

Generally these asymetric transformers do not follow Ohm's Law since the power does can change - a Voltage increase is not tied to a Current decrease, thus, there can be an increase in Power output also. There can still be some minimal Power reduction at the output due to resistance and thermal losses but the power gain can be large and these losses are not importantin the overall scheme. Power gain in asymetrical transformers is achieved by mitigating the counter-emfs. The primary input power requirement does not track the output power requirement based upon the load being driven; in fact often the input power requirement decreases as the output load increases.

Thus, an asymetric transformer is a device that can achieve an efficiency >1.

Asymmetric transformers in excess energy electrical devices, in fact, are often the main sources of additional energy for many electrical circuits created by various inventors. Since the operation of these transformers in circuits often occurs at very high frequencies, these transformers are often made without cores.

This can be seen, for example, in the Don Smith, Tariel Kapanadze and Ruslan schemes with higher frequency coreless transformers. These also tend to be higher "Q," linear (no core saturation), and wider bandwidth (multi-wave length/harmonic friendly) than core types.

SL

Attached: An unscrubbed unedited long read...

 

Attached Files

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey SL,

A video response if you don't mind:

 

I hope this is useful, sorry I did ramble some what.

   Chris

solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Chris - EXCELLENT [tie-together] video - great information!

Everything is in there, evident even from a "first, quick pass" viewing.

Thanks x 100  (might well become an AU classic in the near term)...

Scrolling around the site a bit was quite interesting and educational as well.

SL

 

 

 

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

I want to post about the Input Coil.

Normally the Input Coil will have very few turns. This is an important fact. We need the input Coil to have a fast response time to the entire System. Few turns means many things, low Reactance, lower resistance, and a fast response time.

 

Like a Water Pipe, we have a Terminal that allows Current to Flow Through the Coil at a rate that is very fast, the Impedance is low. We have few turns, so a short Duty Cycle at a reasonable Frequency is required.

The Depth, or Length of the Coil makes a difference also. An example:

// Turns: N
double N = 20.0D;

// Length in Meters: l
double l = 0.01D;

// Turns Density per Meter: n / m
double n = (N / l);

// Amperes: A
double A = 1.0;

// Display Result:
MessageBox.Show("Answer: " + Math.Round((4 * Math.PI * Math.Pow(10, -7) * n * A), 7) + " Tesla");

 

The Answer is: 0.0025133 Tesla

Now, change the Length ( l ) to 0.001

Answer: 0.0251327 Tesla

WOW! A difference of: ‭0.0226194‬ Tesla! We have the same Turns ( N ) and the same Current ( I ), only the Length ( l ) has changed!

We have seen this before, see Don Smith, 4 Turns of perhaps 5mm Wire.

   Chris

glennmr2018 posted this 2 weeks ago

that's the kuehlest pic ov a coil that I've eva seen yet~ great artwork Chris! 🍎🌝🤓💪

Behold the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 1 weeks ago

My Friends,

Any progress to report?

I have had reports of strange Computer issues. I have to say I have had the same! Very odd issues on my PC, my network and my files.

I honestly believe we are being monitored! I believe 100% we are under surveillance electronically. Keyboard is definitely being logged. Lots of very odd activity. So lets keep our heads down for a little while. We know the Elite are absolutely terrified of us, we have by passed several levels of their Technology protection in only a few days of easy work!

I personally think the elite are dumb and I don't know how they got where they are - All a little luck I think!

Anyway, we are making head way, so keep your progress rolling, the recent videos I have released will help!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 4 days ago

My Friends,

 

I hope this helps some more!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • cd_sharp
solarlab posted this 4 days ago

Hi Chris, re: your:

The Secret Revealed - A Charge Pump - Fundamental processes video

After reviewing this rather long video in detail - IMHO there does NOT appear to be any SECRET REVEALED, sorry!   And, where's the "Charge Pump" part?

I hesitate to comment, especially when it might be conscrued as negative; but to label a video "SECRET REVEALED" when it's not even close to revealing anything of directly applicable AU value is somewhat mislabelling a best.

All be it - it is somewhat related; unlike Westey for example, where his nonesense is purely meant to directly mislead and confuse - however, there are no secrets revealed in this video, nor by any of Westeys ramblings. Do Not fall into this trap no matter how tempting it may first appear!

Other ad-hoc comments (only a few of many that could be sited). This is one approach that works


Review Ruslan's videos and schematics [there are fundamentally only two schemes]

 * Read for comprehension the many Solarlab posts (scattered throughout the threads);

 * Partition Ruslan's device and carefully analyze each component in detail [what does it do & how does it work];

 * Get access to a professional CAE system through a school, or by other means;

 * Model and simulate each of the individual components, then step-wise integrate these to form a system;

 * Bench test the components and compare the results to the CAE analysis [CAE reveals unseen characteristics];

 * Two proven techniques that will work; (1) elimination of BEMF; (2) employment of HV pulsing (Maxwell's Displacement Current), these can be used individually, or together, with proper phasing and timing;

 * Mitigating BEMF includes, but is not limited to (1) bi-filar, (2) phasing (Ruslan), and (3) spacial seperation (Melnichenko);

 * Study these, and other, methods and techniques in a piece-wise fashion, on the bench and with CAE;

No secrets, just an understanding of the concepts, common sense design, intuative development, a lot of trial and error, and hard work! 

SL

 

Chris posted this 4 days ago

Hey SL,

Thanks for your post!

 

After reviewing this rather long video in detail - IMHO there does NOT appear to be any SECRET REVEALED, sorry! And, where's the "Charge Pump" part?

You are right, however, one must think a little more broadly. The Natural interactions inside the Coil are also present between two separate Coils, our conversation prior mentioning the Coil as a Single Turn for example.

 

I hesitate to comment, especially when it might be conscrued as negative; but to label a video "SECRET REVEALED" when it's not even close to revealing anything of directly applicable AU value is somewhat mislabelling a best.

No, I don't take it as negative, more on the second part in the next reply.

 

All be it - it is somewhat related; unlike Westey for example, where his nonesense is purely meant to directly mislead and confuse - however, there are no secrets revealed in this video, nor by any of Westeys ramblings. Do Not fall into this trap no matter how tempting it may first appear!

 

I agree, I was in to minds:

  1. I wanted this video to be part of the same series.
  2. I was struggling for a better name.
  3. Many think Electromagnetic Induction is mystical and they think its VooDoo - I am breaking that Myth!

 

You are wise, this is a trap and I agree it could be damaging to the overall cause! I will rename it at the risk of loosing this video as part of the over all series. Done: "Coil Fundamental processes - Part of The Secret Revealed Series."

Review Ruslan's videos and schematics [there are fundamentally only two schemes]

  • Read for comprehension the many Solarlab posts (scattered throughout the threads);
    * Partition Ruslan's device and carefully analyze each component in detail [what does it do & how does it work];
    * Get access to a professional CAE system through a school, or by other means;
    * Model and simulate each of the individual components, then step-wise integrate these to form a system;
    * Bench test the components and compare the results to the CAE analysis [CAE reveals unseen characteristics];
    * Two proven techniques that will work; (1) elimination of BEMF; (2) employment of HV pulsing (Maxwell's Displacement Current), these can be used individually, or together, with proper phasing and timing;
    * Mitigating BEMF includes, but is not limited to (1) bi-filar, (2) phasing (Ruslan), and (3) spacial seperation (Melnichenko);
    * Study these, and other, methods and techniques in a piece-wise fashion, on the bench and with CAE;
    No secrets, just an understanding of the concepts, common sense design, intuative development, a lot of trial and error, and hard work!

 

Agreed! This is exactly that: "a lot of trial and error, and hard work" this is exactly what it is!

We are reducing the: "a lot of trial and error" - Giving people direction, giving them an understanding of what to aim for!

With this knowledge, two thirds of the work is done for people before they start!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 4 days ago

My Friends,

My last video seems to have gotten a bit of a negative response from some people.

 

I want to concentrate on one post in particular:

A few people frustrated, and I understand why they are frustrated. People often want something to sink their teeth into, they want facts, data, more information. I get that, I do to...

I want to show the full post I posted:

There is a very good reason for that. I will share this now: If I am gone, if they get rid of me, then there will be no one to do my job! They have desperately tried! I have changed the rules, we no longer play their game, we play our own game! Rules they loos by automatically every time! We have left them jobless, the CIA Goon Squad now are scrambling, resorted to releasing fake energy machines and supporting them, that don't work to keep people going down rabbit holes! They are still in control, because people let them... You all have the choice! It will continue for decades to come if you let it!!!

 

Its worth going and having a read of the posts, because its interesting to see how the waters are traveling!

You know, it took me many years to learn what I have!

The fastest way for people to learn is to:

  1. Read, study, and understand what I have shared.
  2. Get on the bench and Replicate!
  3. Ask questions...

 

The work is not going to do it, its self! Hands on experience is the best experience of all!

I have said all along, I am not here to do all the work and thinking for lazy people! I have done more than my part, sharing things with the world none have shared before me!

Watch the video, apply the concepts shared in a boarder sense!

Members of this forum have had experiences with what I have shared. They are doing the hard work and they are seeing results.

Imaging: I share all I have shared in one day - Then I am gone. Not to appear on the scene again. Would this benefit anyone?

Many are awakening every day - They have to start from the start.

   Chris

Hopeful1 posted this 4 days ago

didn't know where to post this but thought someone might be interested

Chris posted this 4 days ago

Hi Hopeful1,

Thanks for sharing!

WOW look at that! I wonder, has anyone seen that before, does it look remotely familiar?

 

A First of... His invention... His Idea, His thought...

 

Is it really Bradley?

 

 

I think some people have sense in their minds:

 

Ref: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

 

Brad is the King of Copy Cats! A Thief of everyone else's work! He never gives credit to those that he copy's his work from! He is a Copy Cat Burglar! Hahaha, sorry my bad sense of humour!

Note: Before January 16, 2015, Brad did not have anything at all that was even remotely close to my work!

TrollMan does give a pretty good description of My Work!

The demonstration will be beneficial to all Members and Readers.

Brad seriously needs to learn how to read Input / Output Power!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 4 days ago

My Friends,

I have done another reply post to Murphy Brown. His post is sensible, logical and he deserves a good response!

My Reply:

@Murphy Brown - Go read this post: https://overunity.com/18285/success-and-loss/msg537347/#msg537347 - You will see, the Trolls tried to lynch me over AC and DC Coupling on the Scope.

Before this I made many experiments with Professor Steven Jones, see for yourself: https://overunity.com/10773/physicsprof-steven-e-jones-circuit-shows-8x-overunity/msg289836/#msg289836 - I also know what AC and DC Coupling is and what the difference is.

One troll even admitting that it was not a problem when I confronted them: https://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg436518/#msg436518 - its the first thing they pick on: https://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg436420/#msg436420 - All they want to do is eliminate a DC Offset, and that's ok, but to call someone's measurements wrong, or call measurement error is definitely a Tactic Trolls use to discredit others work! A tactic that so many fall for because they don't know any better! Giving them anything to use as a weapon is not a good idea when in my position. I am better off to help others get up to speed.

 

Bradley Richard Atherton is still trying to lynch others over AC - DC Coupling on the scope: Success and loss

A very good thread! Worth a full read!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
solarlab posted this 2 days ago

Observations:

[Page 4, last paragraph]

"The use of a moving conductive material to break magnetic reciprocity boils down to the Lorentz force that the free electrons of the conductor experience as they move through the magnetic field. In principle, one could re-place the mechanical movement of the whole material by an externally applied electric field, which would force the electrons to move with a constant mean velocity in the conductor according to Ohm’s law. While theoretically correct, this approach is limited by the small mean velocity at which electrons move in metals for reasonable current densities. For copper, for example, the standard maximum current density of 500A/cm2 corresponds to mean velocities∼4×10−4m/s, in contrast to the linear velocities achieved in our setup of ~3.1m/s for ν= 10Hz (see [18] for a detailed discussion using the Drude model)." ...

[Page 10, middle (S87, S88, S89)]

"So for small enough magnetic fields, i.e.||σ/(en)B(r,t)||≈4.3×10−3||B(r,t)||T−1<<1 for copper, this expression isapproximately equal to

j(r,t)≈σ[E(r,t)−(σ/en)E(r,t)×B(r,t)]. (S87)

In this equation, the first term is the linear Ohmic relation between electric field and induced current density. The second term is similar to the expression of the current density induced in a moving conductor discussed in the main text. Actually, if one considers the dipole’s rest frame, the conducting half space moves at a velocity −v along the x-axis. The electric field in the lab frame can therefore be expressed in the rest frame via a Lorentz transformation E(r,t) =−γvex×B′(r′,t&prime, since there is no electric field in the rest frame. For small velocities|β| <<1, Maxwell equations in the rest frame then read

∇·.B(r) = 0,(S88)∇ × B(r) =μ0[∇ ×M(r) − Θ(−z)σvex × B(r)]. ( S89)

By comparing equations (S87) and (S89) one can see how the application of an electric field gives rise to current density term [second term in the right-hand-side of Eq. (S87)] that is analogous to the current density appearing in a moving conductor in the rest frame [second term in the right-hand-side of Eq. (S89)]. By equating these two current densities,one finds that the electric field E0 required to generate the same current density is given by E0 = env/σ = v/μe, where μe denotes the electron mobility.

For copper we have μe ≈ 0.0044m2/(Vs), such that for a linear velocity of v = 3m/s the required electric field would be E0 ≈ 682V/m. This would result in a current density J = σE0 ≈ 4×1010A/m2, which is more than three order sof magnitude bigger than the standard maximum current density for copper of 5×106A/m2." ...

[Page 11, A Finite-element calculations]

"We performed 3D numerical calculations of the moving conductor using COMSOL Multiphysics (Magnetic and Electric fields module). The material was characterized by a constant electrical conductivity σ = 5.96×107Ω−1m−1 and we included the Lorentz term, Jmc = σv×B, with v = ρ2π νˆeφ (being ρ,φ,z the standard cylindrical coordinates). The source coil was represented by a point dipole and the Bρ component of the field was evaluated at different positionsin the dipole plane (z = 15mm)." ...

An interesting Paper/Discovery/Experiment to say the very least IMHO !!!

SL

 

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Chris
solarlab posted this 2 days ago

OUT OF ORDER - should be above the previous post
(things don't seem to work well on this forum from time to time - or maybe it's just me?)

Sorry (sort-of) for the long read but this is "On Topic" and "valuable" information!
THANKS to "leonelogb" or "Chris" or whom ever brought this to our attention
and a big thanks to the Researchers/Physisists/Scientists for their works and insight.

Circumventing Magnetic Reciprocity: a Magnetic Diode

The pdf version (online viewable version):

[[ search: - Circumventing Magnetic Reciprocity: a Magnetic Diode - link will not embed ]]

SL;

PS - to heck with it; posting links and formulas is just more trouble than it's worth frown

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
solarlab posted this 2 days ago

Apparently my attempts to add things (words) are not allowed on this site ???

Whatever....

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this 2 days ago

Unfortunately it has become "More trouble than it's worth!"

Doubt if anyone actually reads the stuff I post anyway - so why bother...

Have a nice day!

SL

 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 2 days ago

Unfortunately it has become "More trouble than it's worth!"

Doubt if anyone actually reads the stuff I post anyway - so why bother...

I read them. smile

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Vidura posted this 2 days ago

Hey SL

I Read most of the info that you post, only when it is very saturated with formulas i simply cant digest it, but this is my fault of course as my skills to handle math's are very basic. In my case a simple experiment makes me understand more. Anyway i found good info in your posts, thanks for sharing. Some practical work would be great to see if you would like to share. By the way how is the work with the kids progressing? I was thinking about starting some educational project with youth also.

regards Vidura.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Show More Posts

Support Our Effort

Since Nov 27 2018
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Weeks High Earners:
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Support Us (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Support Us (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Close