Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment

  • 565 Views
  • Last Post 4 days ago
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

I am going to show a small experiment, one that follows the works of Andrey Melnichenko and even Tariel Kapanadze's works and as we know many others.

 

 

We have discussed here before, the fact that H3 is H3 simply because H1 and H2 cancel out: H1 + H2 + H3 = H3, why is this so, because H1 is Positive and H2 is Negative! We have seen this equation before: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1.

I think with Fighter's success recently, its time for some hands on!

  • First Layer: 88 Turns.
  • Second Layer: 43 Turns.

 

Layer One:

 

Layer Two:

 

Turns Direction:

 

Layer One Inductance:

 

Layer Two Inductance:

 

Non-Inductive Connected:

 

Layer One Resistance:

 

Layer Two Resistance:

 

Closed Loop Resistance:

 

My Coil, like Andrey Melnichenko's, is 0.33 + -0.33 + 0.33 = 0.33.

Two thirds of my Coil is canceled out. My Circuit looking like this:

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive.
  • L3 is Inductive.

 

If this Coil is carrying 1 Ampere of Current, and exactly one half of the Coil is Non-Inductive, then Turn for Turn, only 45 Turns will create an M.M.F, which is considered as 45 Turns x 1 Ampere = 45 Ampere Turns or 45At.

Science tells us, that Turn for Turn, where we have Non-Inductive part of the Coil, this part of the Coil does nothing! Creates no Magnetic Field, therefore does nothing.

However, from Experiment, we know that this part of the Coil DOES do something! Remember Floyd Sweets paper: Nothing is Something, this is the same!

At Resonance, we have a perfect Standing Wave! We know this as Magnetic Resonance! Where each Magnetic Field is 180 Degrees out of phase:

 

Now, straight away, we should see a problem! Why? Kirchhoff's Current Law says the Current must be equal at every node, but we have Turn for Turn, one Coil that is Inductively Zero, and another Coil that has only a part of the Induction canceled!

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is:

I = da+ / dt + da- / dt

Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

Each node does not equal the other, so the Circuit must balance out, Current is Increased as the Standing wave shows us.

Remember what Induction is? See here: Non-Linear Inductance

Induction gives us an approximation on the Coils ability to carry a Current: L = ε / di / dt

By Bringing a Coil arrangement like this into Resonance is our task.

Where each Electromagnetic Wave travels in opposite directions. One through the other in the same space.

THE NATURE OF SPACE

Space itself is the ability to accommodate energy. Consider for a moment the following illustration:

A signal (energy) is transmitted from point A to point B. A and B are separated by a finite distance. Consider three periods of time:

  • The signal is launched from A.
  • 2) The signal resides in the space between A and B.
  • 3) The signal arrives at B.

If (3) occurs simultaneously with (1) we say that the signal has traveled at infinite velocity. The signal has never resided in the intervening space and therefore there exists no space between A and B. A is virtually at the same point in space as B. For real space to exist between A and B it is necessary that a signal travelling between them be "lost" with reference to both points for a finite period of time.

Now we know that for real space to exist between two points a signal travelling between them will propagate at a finite velocity c, ( c = 1 / √με )

If a signal will not travel between two points, as in the case when c = 0, then we can also conclude that there is no link or intervening space between them. 

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

Floyd Sweet tried very hard to make c = 0! What does this mean? It is simply a Standing Wave, a Team Wave was used:

It is a simple matter using the equations E / H = √με and c = 1 / √με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

I have pointed out: Why 'C' is equal to One in these Devices.

We have a lot of data!

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

I am going to show Transformer Coupling, to drive my Experiment.

Input Coil Turns: 2 Layers 37 + 39 = 76 Turns.

The Input Coil:

 

Input Coil Inductance:

 

Input Coil Resistance:

 

You can see, I have less turns than the single Layer on my Output Coil, first layer, but the Inductance is higher:

  • 84 Turns compared to 76
  • Inductance of 395 compared to 412

 

Geometry, the Length of the Coil plays a role here.

The Resistance is almost the same: 0.4 compared to 0.4, no visible difference.

Next, I will show the drive on the Coil, from my Switching Unit.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Excellent Chris

I think the junction between L2 and L3 will give you double the input power?


Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

When you say:

I think the junction between L2 and L3 will give you double the input power?

 

I think the Current will double, but double from what to what, I will show more soon.

Best wishes

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Sorry I thought it was a replication of melnichenko when he said this

 

Since the current in the coils of the same, we believe the resulting voltage in the time T2 is twice to the accumulation of energy
expended at the time t1.

 

Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Sorry I thought it was a replication of melnichenko when he said this

 

Since the current in the coils of the same, we believe the resulting voltage in the time T2 is twice to the accumulation of energy
expended at the time t1.

 

Jagau

 

Hey Jagau,

Yes, you are correct in this situation! As we have 2x the turns on the First Layer and the Capacitor is directly connected through the Diode, then 2X the Voltage will be present at the terminals.

 

This is of course only true when the Coil: L2 is shorted in the above diagram. When L2 is un-shorted, then the Circuit will only have the Voltage of a Single Coil.

I have a little more to add soon.

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

I was called away, sorry.

We have some open doors with the above circuit, it is not clear, and in-fact it is confusing as to its operation. I want to specifically show something. The Circuit above compared to this circuit:

 

We are looking at some circuit differences! In fact, we have several different Circuits in the document here: Генератор на нелинейной индуктивности

What we know to be true, is the Circuit used is more like this:

 

Which as we know was the working model, when it was stated:

A working model by Valery, free-energy@list.ru.

Improving the coach, you can create the perfect coach, but first-class car - barely. (Edward de Bono)

Energy generator in the nonlinear inductance

Developed and assembled the unit with an efficiency of greater than 1. Working in self-maintaining, with the releasing enormous amounts of energy it takes to glow lamps. Valery.

 

We know this to be in-accurate! We know from research the circuit was the Circuit pointed out above, and again here:

 

 

You can find a lot of data here: Akula's circuits- is this the principle?

 

The quote:

The essence of the research: obtain convincing theoretical, computational and experimental evidence for the possibility transgeneratsii electricity from non-additive (non-linear) properties of the energy of electromagnetic fields and waves. The experiments are quite simple and easily reproducible in any special laboratory. This work is the development of some interesting ideas about the physics of Tesla radio and the possibility of generating energy from non-linearity of the energy field. The work is not contrary to modern physics, electrodynamics, well grounded in theory.

Ref: Andrey Melnichenko - Common-mode interference of electromagnetic waves and transgeneratsiya energies.

 

The point, I am trying to make is, we must follow the path of proof. Proof, hard data is going to be where we make huge leaps forward like we already have!

The document: Transgeneratsiya electromagnetic field energy, make a huge effort to deal with Electromagnetic Waves and specifically:

So we see that for the addition of two opposite-traveling electromagnetic waves resulting electromagnetic wave power increases by four times.

 

The method of operation is Electromagnetic Waves in Opposition.

I hope this research helps some!

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

Its taken a while, I have been pulled away a few times and also had a few other problems to deal with.

The following Video is Long, so beware. Its also a video aimed for beginners!

 

I hope these experiments prove to be useful to others!

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

Another Video, this time a bit of understanding on what we saw in the Experiment in the first video.

 

I hope this video is useful for all!

   Chris

Vidura posted this 2 weeks ago

Very well done this video, really good and simple explanation of the principles, I recommend to all to watch it, it is also good for those with advanced understanding to keep in mind the basic mode of operation, the goal to reach. Vidura.

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

As I said in the last video, I needed to drop my turns down on my Input Coil. This is an Image:

 

So now I have an input Coil of: 12 Turns.

This is a difference of: 76 - 12 = 64 Turns. Also because, as was also stated, we have whats called Unity Coupling now, we should get much better Coupling from Input to Output.

Remembering, we do only have an effective 45 turn to 12 turn Coupling. So that's a step up of: 3.75

A video is currently being processed.

   Chris

Chris posted this 6 days ago

Hey guys,

Well, the last week has been very busy!

I must Apologise. This video is very bits and piecy! Many distractions and a few technical problems has led to a video that may hold value, but will require a patient viewing.

 

A lot of info in this video, much of it is known, some is to try to encourage forward thinking.

The next video will be more helpful!

   Chris

Chris posted this 6 days ago

My Friends,

I ask you the question: "Whats the biggest problem we have seen in my videos"?

 

I let you ponder this...

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 6 days ago

Hey Chris,

excellent video to make our brain work.
One of the recurring problems that I see is taking measurements with the right tools and the right technique.


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 6 days ago

Hey Jagau,

when you say:

taking measurements with the right tools and the right technique.

 

Would you mind expanding what you mean? 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 6 days ago

In the thread of Vidura ''measures'' we talk about it extensively but it is good to refresh our memory.
A good link for the technique:
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/average-voltage.html

For measuring devices, some voltmeters are not at all effective and often can be misleading depending on how they are built.
Towards the end of your video we see it at 31:50 the oscilloscope is more accurate than the multimeter.
Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 6 days ago

Hey Jagau,

Yes, Digital Multi-meters ( DMM's ) are a very rough estimation and should not be considered accurate if one is working at reasonable frequencies.

in the mean time, how about:

"Whats the biggest problem we have seen in my videos"?

 

Any ideas on what the biggest problem is?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Vidura posted this 5 days ago

Hey Chris, I like the accuracy in your coil build. Regarding the question I would say it is not resonant still, that is the difficulty. Note that the formula for the antenna resonance references to longitudinal waves, I would guess in your experiment the waves are transverse, maybe the energy level is too low to setup predominantly longitudinal oscillation? Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 5 days ago

Hey Chris,

You asked, what is the problem with your videos? That's a very subjective question. The most generic answer is that you need to identify your audience - those who you think will or who you want to benefit from seeing your video - then you need to tailor your content to convey the message you want that audience to receive. Not everyone can appreciate every video, some videos will be more helpful to those at a certain level of experience. People may complain, but those people who complain may not be your audience anyway.

I personally would recommend you just focus on producing what you want to produce and not worry about what anyone thinks, but since you asked, regarding your video for me it spends a lot of time showing what could be shown in a much shorter video. If you wanted to demonstrate 3 different configurations to show which had better results, it could be done in much less time. For me it was 1 minute of new information, spread across 40 minutes. Don't feel bad though, I watch a lot of videos on 2X play speed because it is common for people to be long-winded. That's just me. I think it is nice of you to share your experiments and no need to worry about what anyone thinks.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 5 days ago

Hey Vidura,

Thank You wink

Excellent answer, yes, you are right. However I was thinking a little closer to the operation of the system.

We know in the last video, video three, we could not get the Voltage up, even with a 1 : 3.75 ratio, that there was a choking effect. This was evident on all the coils and in this video, I show a little more, a problem that we could say The Conservation of Energy Law is Invoking at its last possible chance:

 

This is a very important effect, one that produces failures in experiments and gives some a final conclusion, e.g: "it cant be done"... cry

As far as I know, never been shown before, new and previously not noted or documented.

I hope this video is much better received than the last, the last was such a problem to get finished!

   Chris 

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 5 days ago

Hey Chris,

You asked, what is the problem with your videos?

 

Hey Zanzal,

I think you have misunderstood the question I asked?

I meant the Technical problem, identifying technical problems is the goal... not so much the "long winded" problem, but thank you for pointing that out! 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 5 days ago

I apologize Chris. I don't think I understand your question. Since you asked the question multiple times today I figured you must really want someone to try to answer. Maybe you could elaborate on the kinds of answers you are looking for by giving some examples of what you expect we might say?

If you are asking something along the lines of what might we have done differently? I think for me it looked like your secondaries are both wound the same direction. I might have been tempted to wind one of them in the opposite direction. Not sure if that is what you are getting at or not.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 5 days ago

My Friends,

The video: "Non-Inductive Coil Experiment - Video Four" gives us a specialized effect related to a years long problem!

 

Please, for all members, what might be the techniques we could use to over come the worst of the problem we are seeing? To remove the effect from our system, so we can by-pass The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Energy can not be Created nor Destroyed?

Of course, technically, we never create or Destroy, we Pump from the Source!

I don't expect the establishment to ever understand that, not this decade anyway!

   Chris

Hopeful1 posted this 5 days ago

G'day Chris,

Thanks for the video.What I got out of it was a good lesson in reading  an oscilloscope. I have bought a good one but need some lessons in how to decipher what the wave forms mean.So thanks again for spending the time and sharing your hard earned knowledge.

Tony

Chris posted this 5 days ago

Hey Hopeful1,

Yes, for sure there is a bit of a learning curve on scopes. Perhaps we start a new thread on learning the oscilloscope, it is certainly a good idea!

I am certainly not an expert, however we have many experts here!

I am happy to help when I can!

The Magnetic Fields in the Core and the Coils all Interact together, there is a battle, and we need to get the Coils Voltage up so they can carry a good Current!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Fighter
Jagau posted this 4 days ago

hi Chris

 To remove the effect from our system, so we can by-pass The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Energy can not be Created nor Destroyed?

Of course, technically, we never create or Destroy, we Pump from the Source!


You probably meant that we consume and return to the source of energy used?

Jagau

Chris posted this 4 days ago

Hey Jagau

Yes, exactly, there is only ever a Transformation Process.

This Transformation Process only ever Transforms one Energy to another, then a huge circle occurs, from one Transformation to another and so on...

Tom Bearden's Source Charge shows this:

 

I hope we all realise this.

   Chris

Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
Close