Asymmetrical Regauging

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 726 Views
  • Last Post 11 hours ago
Chris posted this 18 April 2018

For a long time, Tom Bearden has talked about "Regauging".

Various terms have been bought up:

  • Asymmetrical Self-Regauging.
  • Symmetrical Regauging.
  • Gauge Invariance.

More terms were used.

I think this thread should be started with the example Tom Bearden gave:

 

 

Epilog

In a strange sense we just wish to free the overunity EM power systems the orthodoxists already build and strangle, since they invariably design the systems to fight themselves to the death.  There really is a hidden free energy genie in the "escalating energy crisis" bottle, waiting to be released.

See Figure 26.  In a more humorous vein, I recently checked with my friend Rajah, in India, who moves logs with elephants in his logging business.  Rajah is an expert on asymmetrical self-regauging systems called "elephants".  His elephants forage for their feed, freely taking on excess energy from their environment and storing it, thereby asymmetrically regauging themselves.  Then Rajah takes one elephant (one net force with some regauging energy to expend) and uses it to lift and carry one or more logs. He has to pay a little to direct the elephant, of course, by hiring the trainer.  But the elephant produces far more work output than the work done on the elephant by the trainer/rider.  In fact, the elephant expends some of the free energy it has received from the environment in its foraging and asymmetrical self-regauging.

I discussed the problem of Lorentz symmetrical regauging with Rajah, and explained that in his business it would require that he always use his elephants in opposed matching pairs, straining fiercely one against the other.  He exclaimed that such a scheme was utter nonsense, because then he himself would have to furnish the energy to drag both the struggling elephants and the logs to the loading dock!  It was immediately obvious to him that such a proposed system was the worst of all possible solutions.

Rajah was astounded at my suggestion for such a thing, and asked me what on Earth prompted the Western scientists to make such a strange proposal.  I explained to Rajah that all our own Western power systems were already built that way, and the electric companies were very proud of the fact that they therefore continually burned fuel by the trainloads to keep the Western "logging operations" and "paired elephants inside the generators" going furiously to move the loads.

Rajah looked at me intently for a long moment, saw that I was not joking even though my eyes were twinkling, then laughed uproariously for an extended period.

"That is very, very strange!" he exclaimed.  "Never have I heard such a bizarre tale.  I think that I will never understand your Western science and its insane way of trying to use its elephants!"

Rajah then asked a simple question, "How many logs have they moved with their elephants alone?"  And I replied, "Not a single one!  They constantly drag two opposing elephants and their load of logs around at the same time, sweating and puffing and blowing and burning fuel to do so.  And our universities continue to assure us that such is the will of God and the laws of nature."

When I left, Rajah was till laughing uproariously, as he approvingly watched his own elephants working steadily and efficiently in singles.

Tale of Rajaha

 

 

So to make a complicated subject simple, to Regauge is a period of Time where the System Charges, or Resets, and then a following period where they system expends that work. Another example, a Rechargable Battery, Charge Time is Regauging, then usage Time is Work Time. 

 

A Graphical example:

The above Image is from: Here

 

It is always best to see examples, its a lot easier to make sense of! So, have we seen this before? Yes

 

The above example is very important! As the title says, this is "Asymmetrical Regauging"

The definition: The Energy required to Regauge during the Regauging Period, is much lower than the Energy expended in the Work Period! Because we have Energy enter from the Environment! From the Atomic Structure, because we are smart, and know how to! The Mr Preva Experiment is an example of the underlying principles!

As the Hydraulic Ram Pump appears to be a Perpetual Energy Machine, using Gravity as an input from the Environment to keep the Water Pressure sufficient, for operation!

The Hydroelectric Power Plant, the Water pressure again is used to turn the Turbines!

The Environment add's Energy, because of the System Design!

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 18 April 2018

Other example's also exist, my YouTube Channel contains examples, also on my Website: www.hyiq.org

My Thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT is also another example!

There is examples everywhere! The trick is to make the System Asymmetric, to have the Regauge Period a lot lower than the Work Period!

All this means is we have the Environment add Energy to our System!

   Chris

cd_sharp posted this 3 weeks ago

Friends, I need to clear some things up about what Graham is saying, for my better understanding.

"The change of magnetic field is the electric field". Faraday's Law of EM Induction states:

E = dΦ/dt, voltage is the derivative of the magnetic flux over time, in other words voltage is the change of the magnetic flux during dt time period.

So, the saw tooth wave we see in here is the time integral of the voltage wave:

Edt = Φ, so the saw tooth wave is nothing but the magnetic flux.

Using a modern oscilloscope's Math function this is easily done for any voltage trace.

But is it correct to say that the magnetic flux is the same thing as the electric current?

Is the saw tooth wave we see above actually the trace of the current? If so, which current?

There are so many things I've been taught in school that don't add up.

Jagau posted this 3 weeks ago

Hi cd


This video is very long. I already look at it is highly technical.
Can you tell me the timing or did you hear that?

MGNETIC FLUX IS NOT SAME THING AS ELECTRIC CURRENT


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

Hey CD,

The Sawtooth Waveform is the Difference in Change of Magnetic Flux, between the Partnered Output Coils, over Time.

Which is Voltage, thus the high Voltage Measurement Probe:

 

 

One Partnered Output Coil is always playing catchup with the other.

   Chris

 

cd_sharp posted this 3 weeks ago

Hi, friends

Can you tell me the timing or did you hear that?

In the above video, this one:

Thanks, Chris, I understand now.

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

@All,

Its really important that everybody learning this technology disassociate a Voltage with a Current.

Just because one induces an E.M.F on the terminals of a Coil, absolutely does not mean that Coil must carry a Current.

If a Current is drawn, then it absolutely does not mean the Source of Current, must be the Primary Coil.

A Conventional Transformer is not what we are building, so we must not follow those rules.

What is solid, is that a Primary Coil must be sufficiently pulsed to induce a sufficient Voltage Potential on the Secondary Coil. That's all.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • alohalaoha
  • cd_sharp
alohalaoha posted this 3 weeks ago

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Aetherholic
alohalaoha posted this 3 weeks ago

Essential Parts for an Over Unity Device by Don Smith


With a conventional Coil and Magnet System wherein multiple duplicate copies of the magnetic system accrues without diminishing the source is thee fourths the way there . Henry Fords magnet and coil system balanced out the forces such that it became self propelled at about 3000 RPM. A mutual agreement between the Ford and the Oil Companies shelved this invention. There have been numerous successful duplications of this technology which special interest slanders. The US Patent Office is particularly aggressive in favor of the Oil Cartel, due to the large income from taxes.

Balancing out the forces is a form of magnetic resonance which is easily attained. Being magnetic excludes it from OHMS and Lenz,s Laws. Therefore a small input results a larger output becomes self sustaining. The access of Energy Present has always been there, ignored and wasted by the special interest. Intellectual masturbation by the establishment further clouds a clear view of the truth.

Magnetic Resonance above 200,000. Cycles Per Second reaches infinity which means you are tapped into the Universe as a source of Energy. To the person with eyes open , the so called over unity is easily attained. As a World Class Authority on The Subject based my personal direct contact, Over Unity is an Established Fact.

 

Atti posted this 3 weeks ago

To declare it is always easier than to obtain evidence.

Zanzal posted this 3 weeks ago

@All,

Its really important that everybody learning this technology disassociate a Voltage with a Current.

Just because one induces an E.M.F on the terminals of a Coil, absolutely does not mean that Coil must carry a Current.

If a Current is drawn, then it absolutely does not mean the Source of Current, must be the Primary Coil.

A Conventional Transformer is not what we are building, so we must not follow those rules.

What is solid, is that a Primary Coil must be sufficiently pulsed to induce a sufficient Voltage Potential on the Secondary Coil. That's all.

   Chris

Asymmetrical Regauging = Don't load your transformer while you are energizing the core and stop energizing the core when you've reached maximum flux because anything more would be wasted input. 

Show More Posts
Close