Why 'C' is equal to One in these Devices

  • 204 Views
  • Last Post 27 January 2018
Chris posted this 26 January 2018

Today has been awesome!

I have had a breakthrough in my attempts to put this into theory. So I can give you a set of figures with plans and say go for it. I am getting closer, but still not there yet.

Today I discovered the reason why the Constant C, the Speed of Light, is no longer needed in the theory. The Speed of Light becomes One - Which is what I have suspected for a long time now - But why?

In a standard Electromagnetic Field, when in Magnetic Resonance, we see this relationship:

 

Most should be familiar with this, its the standard Electromagnetic Propagating Wave, B is at Right Angles, and at the same Magnitude to E.

But, where we differ, and we have known for a long time now, is that we need a Standing Wave, B, the Magnetic Fields MUST Oppose! When they do, we get quite a different Relationship:

 

 

Perhaps one of the most important Images I have ever posted! Two Waves, propagating in Opposite Directions, the Electric Field (E) doubles from E/2 to E as we learned from Floyd Sweet, according to the formula, which we have tried tested and proven in The Mr Preva Experiment:

 

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is: (See Below Equation)

Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

Floyd "Sparky" Sweet - P.2 The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator

 

 

Where:

  • a+ is the Rate of Change of Current to the Right
  • a- is the Rate of Change of Current to the Left

 

Experimentally proven in the following Video:

 

Floyd Sweet wrote in his paper:

 

So, what is: C = 1/sqrt(μ0 * ε0

  • μ0 - Vacuum Permeability = 4 pi x 10-7 Henrys per rmeter
  • ε0 - Vacuum Permittivity = 8.85 x 10-12 Farads per meter

Vacuum Permeability = the ratio of B to H and H + -H = 0, therefore μ0 = 0, and, anything times Zero = Zero, also, convention states, the Sqrt(0) = 0, but often this becomes One in the Equations, or is entirely removed.

C still exists, its still a Constant, but as shown, mathematically one can cancel the other.

This is not uncommon, it is often the case that Physicists set C = 1 when doing their equations.

The Wavelength Equations are:

  • v = f x λ
  • f = v / λ
  • λ = v / f
  • c = λ × ν

Where:

  • λ = Wavelength in meters.
  • f = Frequency in Hertz.
  • v = Wave Velocity in meters per second.
  • c = The Speed of Light: 299,792,458 meters per second.

So, when working out the Wavelength, this Equation now is: 

  • Length = 1/2 λ Where λ is the wave length of one of the fundamentals.
  • v = f - Actually, small possibility v = 0, but does not work.
  • c = 1 or cancels out. No longer required in this situation.

 

 

NOTE: I have defined E in Green as the Current aspect of the E Field, simply because most Engineers do, as I believe Floyd Sweet also states, and also, I believe it is easier to view conceptually. E is supposed to be Voltage, as one most likely already knows, at Magnetic Resonance, Voltage and Current are approximately 90 Degrees out of phase. However, as Floyd Sweet stated, no Magnetic Field exists if the Charges are not moving; i.e.; a Current. The Electric Field is Defined by Wikipedia as:

An electric field is a field that surrounds electric charges and attracts or repels other electric charges by exerting force Mathematically the electric field is a vector field that associates to each point in space the force, called the Coulomb force, that would be experienced per unit of charge, by an infinitesimal test charge at that point The units of the electric field in the SI system are newtons per coulomb (N/C), or volts per meter (V/m).

More coming soon.

   Chris

 

Chris posted this 27 January 2018

I just want to point out, what I am covering is not new its something that been said on many occasions before by other people.

On the other threads related to this one:

 

Please remember what we have been told by those before us:

We now have, when the current and voltage windings are excited, another set of fields virtually in quadrature with the fields (alternating) initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitude. 


As polarity may be maintained constant , that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, and at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for The conversion process. It’s obvious; we have a self-regulating machine whose inherent magnetic properties will provide energy conversion conservation to the Nth degree.

Floyd Sweet - Space Quanta Modulator

 

Don Smith:@3: 30

 

Ah, the devices I have invented, which there are a number of them, they all, ah, actually, accelerate Electrons. They're Electron Accelerators.

Don Smith 1998 Office Interview Part 3 @3: 30

 

Our Primary Goal is to increase Charges Flowing as much as we can safely, thus an Electron Accelerator. What we have been told. We do this with Opposing Magnetic Fields. Charge can be set in motion by the Lorentz Force 

 

 

 

In a Transformer, Flux Linking is a little different, but the fundamental is the same:

 

   Chris

 

Please Note: This is perhaps one of most important threads yet.

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • cd_sharp
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close