Walter Russel Device

  • 654 Views
  • Last Post 22 February 2018
Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

I would like to thank Walter Russel dot com for the pics. (Thank you) 

I also would like to point out i have not personally pursued this device yet as i am tied up with the Figuera device and thus will start the pursue after i finish with what i have on my plater. i have studied intensely but have yet to build a demo, soon though.

 I have been intrigued with Walter Russel and his device for many years. i first read about his accomplishments and was literally blown away at the sheer genius of this man and his Psychic connection to the cosmos thus the energy and information corridor supplied to us from God himself. his enlightenment's lasted as long as 30 days and the information that was passed to him allowed him to excel at EVERYTHING he tried.

He was so Psychically connected like that of Tesla it allowed him to be a master at what ever he tried. he was an accomplished Artist, Philosopher, Musician, Sculptor, Architect, Writer, Motivational Speaker, Scientist, Builder, Theoretical Physicist, Ice Skater and the list goes on.

He had repeatedly stated that man folly was the way he wound his coils and that from this the 100 % E field was (LOST)  reduced to 50 % E field and 50 % magnetic field. in his work he showed that the north and south is actually the axis of rotation and the loops of force is from east and west.  thus man has been wiring them wrong for 150 years being fooled by our senses that the path of travel was from S to N.

I have been grasping at the free energy device he built and powered Swannanoa in Waynesboro Virginia that was a huge estate with many rooms. for many years i have pondered  this device wondering how in the world did he wire this device only to hit a brick wall. the device was recently found hidden away and now the cat was let out of the bag

a few months back i was pondering the device i printed out when the paper fell on to the floor and landed on something i had sitting there. when i picked up the paper then seeing what it had landed on an immediate light bulb lite and every thing fell into place. the object it fell on was a toroidial core sitting on the floor.

I was never able to get just how in the world he could get the loops of force to travel in the same direction when trying to figure out how to wind it. after seeing the toroid wound all the winding on the inside were the same direction thus solving my two year dilemma.

Thus this thread will be my presentation of my findings of the Walter Russel device which amplifies the loops of force themselves and not the magnetic field. what we think is a magnetic field is actually loops of force around the wire.

look at the picture, the device is larger at one end and smaller at the other. WHY ? you ask. the large end is the Cathode and the small end is the Anode. i will dwell on this later. 

 

Marathonman

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • KalvinJames
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

 

Here is the folly of man. even though the way we wind them at present has advanced man it is still a loss for man to not to pursue such information from such a gifted person.

in the first pic you will see the loops of force traveling down the wire. the axis of rotation is the S-N axis and the E-W are the loops of force. in a standard wire the is no amplification of the loops of force because there is no change in the parameters of the system to amplify.

the second pic is mans folly....... using the axis of E-W to power our coils loosing 50 % to magnetism. look at the pic above that, it is our world spinning on it's S-N AXIS and NOT E-W.

is this not a clear cut clue we are wrong.

The magnetic field and loops of force are two different things. loops of force is the E field (the driving force) and the magnetic field is the controlling mechanism so the loops of force do not get out of hand. sort of like a safety mechanism.

Edit;

I am actually at odds with this top pic as either main stream science is wrong about the E field or Russel made a mistake with this graph. either way investigation is warranted.

 

Marathonman

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Vasile
  • Chris
Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

 

The above pic is the illusion of motion. 

from the days of Faraday we have been fooled by our senses of reality of the travel of motion. our senses tell us that the travel of motion is from S-N or N-S but in reality the S-N is actually the AXIS of rotation and the loops of force is from E-W or W-E.

If we were to study our own planet we live on we will see that the AXIS of rotation is right in our own faces and that is S- N so why in the world has this eluded us for so long.

two words...... STATUS QUO.

The loops of force travel E-W or W-E and are NOT RELATED to the magnetic field. these are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

Marathonman

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Vasile
  • Chris
Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

 

I posted the wrong pic sorry.

Always remember the E field is 90 degrees off set to the magnetic fields thus the folly of man thinking the magnetic field is the field we should be focusing on instead of the actual cause of force which is the E field loops of force.

Walter Russel used these loops of force to his advantage amplifying the loops of force beyond what any man has done to this day with very little magnetic foot print.

He stated that these are the loops of force but i think the graph was a mistake as the field presented is the magnetic field but who knows.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

As you see from the above pic man is out of sink with nature. nature amplifies the loops of force by reducing from the Cathode to the Anode.

Picture A to the left is nature at it's finest amplifying the E-W loops of force on the S-N AXIS. ie E Field.

picture B is man's blunder. using the E-W as the AXIS loosing 50 % to magnetism immediately thus reducing the E field to 50 %.

imagine that !

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

This picture is of nature at it's finest bending the the same shaft of wheel work so suit it's needs unlike man that has NOT learned how to do this yet.

It reminds me of the limbs and root system of a large tree bending the shaft into many, many smaller shafts like that of thousand small streams leading into the HUGE Mississippi River flowing into the ocean.

the amplification from the cathode to the anode reducing as it travels to the anode thus achieving amplification X 2 at each step along the way.

NOTHING in nature is EVER in a straight line. at least nature bends the shaft and uses it multiple times.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 16 February 2018

Yes (BUT) there is no amplification in the Faraday disc unlike the Walter Russel device which amplifies X 2 at each section of reduction.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 17 February 2018

If you observe the pic you will see the reduction of the wires from the large Cathode to the small Anode just like that of many streams leading into one large stream. the wires start with many small wire and reduce at each section getting thicker and fewer the closer it gets to the Anode multiplying voltage and currant at each section of reduction.

in any other system man has built there is no amplification because the system parameters do not change throughout the system so no amplification takes place. in this device there is a X 2 amplification at each section of reduction reducing the wire count to half of the previous section causing said amplification. since each section is reduced in wire count plus the loops of force are applied to each section there will be an amplification of the loops of force X 2 so by the time it gets to the Anode the process of reduction and the added loops of force are applied at each section the magnitude of the voltage and amperage has been amplified many orders of magnitude higher than the original applied voltage and amperage allowing this device to be looped back to it's self being self sustaining.

If you observe the large Cathode end the wires are many, 8 wires with 64 strands each for a total of 512 wires. in the next section you have 4 wires with 16 strands each for a total of 64 wires. in the third section you have 2 wires with 4 strands each for a total of 8 wires. in the last section you have 1 large wire or rod. at each section the wire count gets smaller but the thickness of the wire gets larger to handle the larger voltage and amperage.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 17 February 2018

Here is another depiction of the device showing two devices butted together for added voltage and amperage amplification using the loops of force as nature intended. 

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 17 February 2018

In this pic is NATURE AT IT'S FINEST amplifying the loops of force as it is reduce from the large Cathode to the small Anode. at the top (CATHODE) the loops of force are at 40 or so MPH but after the amplification the loops of force at the bottom (ANODE) are well over 300 MPH.

there is no other finer example than this to exemplify the Russel device. amplifying the loops of force with almost no magnetic properties or very little.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 18 February 2018


Here is another depiction of the device but this has five sections. Walter Russel stated that the core geometry we use is wrong and the iron core needs to be moved to the outside of the coil that way we amplify the loops of force and not the magnetic field. this will leave the device with an amplified E Field and little to no magnetic field.

The loops of force are collected by the wires and amplified as it travels from the Cathode to the Anode X 2 at each section.

I have a very good suspicion that BEN TEAL used this very concept to amplify the force in his motors with the core on the outside.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 18 February 2018

In this depiction of the Russel device i have 5 sections. the winding's on the outer core of the device is wound on a toroidal core. if the wire was wound around the whole core the loops of force on one side would oppose the loops of force on the other thus negating each other. so by winding and individual toroid at each section it would not only be easier to build but easier to wind having all the loops of force in one direction with the core in the outside of the inner winding amplifying the loops of force up to 50,000 times.

each section can be made like this to slide a toriod over the amplification wires and as you get closer to the Anode the toroid can be made thicker like the depiction of Russel's device in the previous post.

as i have said from previous posts the wires are reduced in numbers and thicker the closer it gets to the Anode as the currant and voltage are doubled at each section.

So according to the pic above the magnetic field stays in the core and the Electric field is in the inner part that core exposing the wires to the electric Field thus amplifying at each section of reduction.

The voltage and currant numbers are just theorizing and are not actual numbers from research and testing as i have been working only on the Figuera device but i will do a demo in the near future.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 18 February 2018

Since Walter Russel was basically a Genius i think it would be a wise idea to pursue this device. through his research he identified many more elements on the periodic table that no one realized were there through his octive scale proving the validity of his work.

The loops of force are hidden through the word magnetism which is blindly used  to identify an action that is distorted trough our eyes and brain that gives us a different perception of reality and direction of actual pressure flows and torque directions.

I tend to try to minimize magnetism and try to focus on the loops of force that is the actual torque that moves or does work. it seams through my journey of free energy and my research that maybe Ken Wheeler is right, that magnetism does not even exist but for now i am not thoroughly convinced.

I can not fully explain things as i am in the learning process just like everyone here but what i do know about the Figuera device is very solid backed by science and Physics and so far what i have found out about the Walter Russel device has convinced me that the parameters surrounding this device seems solid enough for me to pursue it further.

thus i find the loops of force rather intriguing and especially the wrong axis of rotation.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 18 February 2018

I can not emphasize the importance of the NS AXIS and the loops of force traveling in the W-E direction. just take a look at our own spinning planet and you will see the AXIS of NS and the loops of force ie... torque is W-E.

nature does not have separate conditions for one part of the Universe and not the other or from the atomic to the Multiverse. it has the same condition throughout the entire cosmos thus it is easy to see we are winding our coils wrong and that we are using the wrong AXIS  OF ROTATION.

something to think about from the words of a Genius, WR.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 19 February 2018

This graph will hopefully clear the air on the relationship of the Magnetic fields and the Electric fields as they are always 90 degrees from one another.

Magnetic fields cut the wire Electric fields follow along the wire.

since the Electric fluid travels on the outside of the wire it seams that there can be no resistance from the wire but from the magnetic field causing drag on the moving charges themselves. the standard way you calculate resistance works by all means but  it is not the wire that causes resistance it is the Magnetic field colliding with the Electric field. the wire being a dielectric reflector has no resistance in it's self other than the magnetic field slowing down the charge it's self.

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 20 February 2018

Yes, this is what i have found out also in my research.

the device amplify's the E field not the magnetic field thus has very little magnetic foot print.

that last drawing i posted really set things into motion for me and i hope it helps everyone here also in trying to isolate or manipulate the E field.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 20 February 2018

I know it is a hard pill to swallow having been told your whole life that the wire causes the resistance on the charges particle but this is not correct. since all conductors are dielectric reflectors and travel on the outside of the wire according to Tesla, Dollard and others. then there is no conceivable way the so called marbles (electrons) travel inside of the wire causing drag. the charge is flowing on the outside of the wire like that of a gaseous fluid so the conductor can not in no way shape or form cause the drag and since this is taking place there is NO other conceivable explanation other than that the direct collision of the magnetic field and the charge it self causing the reduction of velocity.

The Magnetic Field or what ever it really is, is the drag..... ie. Resistance to currant flow.

it is the controlling mechanism that keeps currant in check otherwise the Universe would fry from infinite currant rise.

 

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 21 February 2018

Well not really in my mind. if the magnetic field collides with charges in motion would that not create heat thus transferred to the wire. thus at greater speeds (precession) would cause more heat.

I am sorry for drifting off subject people. maybe that would be a mater of it's own thread of discussion.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 21 February 2018

It also from the latest graph i posted says that currant flowing in a wire is the direct cause of the E field Not the Magnetic field, association is NOT causation.

The currant flowing in a wire causes the E field as they are parallel to one another and the magnetic field, the other side of the coin causes the resistance of the actual charge flow over the wire, ie. the brakes or the controlling mechanism of currant flow which is at 90 degrees offset.

the collision of the magnetic field with the E field and the charge it self causes heat which is transferred to the wire being in such close proximity to the dielectric reflector.

Walter Russel was a sheer genius, even Tesla himself said that the information he had should be buried in the ground 1000 years until man has the intellect to handle it.

just like the Figuera device Walter Russel had this device working in his very large mansion and was hid from Corporate and Government thugs before his wife's death only to be found many years later.

Again i am sorry for the stray of the topic.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 21 February 2018

By wrapping our wires in a coil around a core the way we do now we get a static division of the 100 % E field dividing it to 50 % Electric field and 50 % Magnetic field thus is the folly of man.

using the information provided by Walter Russel we can get back that division, the lost 50 % to magnetism to attain our original 100 % Electric field and amplify that Electric field X 2 at each section of reduction like that of a tornado ending with the ability to self loop thus the device will run our houses cutting the cord to Corporate controlled electricity.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 21 February 2018

Just like the movie the Matrix.

I can only show you the door, it is you that has to walk through it.

i can post all the info i have gathered through my research and even if it was sent to you directly from God himself  it doesn't amount to a hill of beans if you are not willing to build it or do the research yourselves to find out how this device works.

sitting in a movie theater watching a good movie is exciting but it does not tell me how the movie was made.

I had a really evil and cheep father and to this day i still dislike him but the lesson he taught me was invaluable. he said if i wanted a bicycle i had to get a job and buy it. well since i was in the fourth grade there was no way i could get a job as most people do not take a nine year old seriously so i began to acquire bicycle parts from the dump. over the next month i had so many parts i built my own bicycle and painted it myself. i was so proud of my accomplishments but the fact of the matter was i had no clue how to build or repair a bicycle until i jumped in with both feet. sure i messed things up but eventually i got it right and was peddling my ass off with the rest of the kids on the block.

soon after that all the kids in the block came to me to repair their bicycle because they could not and their parents were pissed they tore it up.

long story short don't under underestimate your abilities to build something as the biggest hurdle is to your accomplishments is YOU.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 22 February 2018

Here is a crappy Graph illustrating the E Field in relation to the wires. notice the E Field travels along the wire unlike the Magnetic Field that is at 90 degrees to the E Field.

If any one has info on the Walter Russel Device please come forward as i need to know as does the world.  this device along with the Figuera device and the Coutier device can literally change the world as we know it. it could very well create civil wars with Corporate world but who cares if the outcome saves humanity. so if you have any information please let me know on this thread or through a PM.

 

Marathonman

Attached Files

Marathonman posted this 22 February 2018

Here is another graph illustrating the theory of the magnetic fields imposing drag on the charge itself.

I know this is off topic but does relate to the device.

Since the charge flow has been said to flow on the outside of the wire then it is impossible for the wire ( A Dielectric Reflector)  to have any resistance what so ever imposed on the charge. since the magnetic field is colliding with the moving charge it would seem the magnetic field is the governing aspect of currant flow not the wire itself.

lets say i have a 3 foot piece of wire that is say 26 awg and a 10 awg piece the same length. both pieces of wire will have the same amount of magnetic field associated with the wire but the thinner wire has less area for the currant to flow without colliding with the magnetic field surrounding it so less currant will flow (resistance). now take the 10 Awg wire, it has much more area for the currant to flow thus less currant impedance than that of the thinner wire which has the exact same magnetic field as both pieces have the same amount of magnetic field per the three feet of wire.

so the larger wire will allow more currant to flow than that of the thinner wire because both have the exact same amount of magnetic field associated with the length of wire colliding with the charges thus the larger has less impedance. 

this is something i was wrong in the past but realized through studying that no matter what size the wire it has the same amount of magnetic resistance no mater if it is 3 feet of 40 awg or 3 feet of OO aught.

since the straight wire will have E fields along the wire which are quite smaller than that of the graph as that is just to illustrate, it will have a very week E field associated with that piece of wire. now take that same length of wire and coil it up, you will now have all those tiny E fields combined as one very strong E Field giving the secondary a much stronger E Field than that of the straight piece of wire. now add a ferromagnetic core and the associated E Field is amplified up to 50,000 times the original E Field.

So that leads me to my final bit of information about resistance. when calculating resistance you are actually calculating the amount of circular mills to the amount of magnetic resistance (ie Ohms) per foot of wire. the larger the wire the less resistance to currant flow per foot of circulating magnetic field around the wire. when you run more currant through the wire then the magnetic field can control you will get a pop thus the wire is burnt in half.

this is just some things bouncing around in my head and i have made a mistake in the past like EVERY human has but i just wanted to post it to get a feel of what people think.

I still think this device is just as awesome as the Figuera device as is the 1932 Coutier device.

Marathonman

 

Attached Files

Aboveunity.com awesome starts here! - Thank You L0stf0x
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Recomended Protocol:
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close