# Apparatus and Method for Extracting G-Energy from a Defined Space!

• 2.4K Views
• Last Post 21 August 2019
glennmr2018 posted this 19 May 2019

hei guys, the following is my own original writing, and is more practical than you may think at first! You will especially get the idea when you see the illustrations.

====================================================================================

Apparatus and Method for Extracting Gravitational Energy from a Defined Space.

According to earlier researchers (e.g. Vallee*) there exists an amount of negative potential gravitational energy in any given volume of space (air) on the earth’s surface, which is not at all dependent on mass, but dependent only on local gravitational acceleration (g) and the volume of defined space in question:

- “We are thus constrained to admit that the matter vacuum must contain, actually, an important quantity of diffuse energy having a finished density p0 in interstellar space. A simple calculation shows, indeed, that one cubic meter of empty matter space on the surface of the ground contains, in the form of energy diffuses 57.000 Mega joules less than one cubic meter of interstellar space. It is thus well necessary that this energy exists, whether it is in this form or another!...”   (- g2 /8π G)

Taking this at face value, a volume of 1 cubic centimetre would then contain 5.7 x 1010 x 10-6 or 5.7 K-Joules of such potential energy. It must be emphasized that such energy is inherently in a negative (or possibly inverted) state and to be utilised, would need to be activated, resonated and extracted via a cascading of impedances, keeping in mind that the universal impedance of free space (Z = 377 Ohms) still exists within vacuum or air. If such an amount of energy were to be resonated at (say) 7.83Hz (the earth's Schumann Resonance), then the potential Power Output (in the frequency domain) would be:

(2.π.f) En =  6.28 x 7.83 x 5.7 x 103  =  280 KiloWatts

(since Power = the instantaneous rate of change in Energy) and if the Impedance (Z) were engineered down to 377Ω as well, and so likewise the available Current and Voltage Output would become:

I =  √(P/Z) = √[(280/377) x 103 ] = 27.3 Amps and V =√(P.Z) = √[(280x377) x103 ] =  10.3 KVolts,                    if it could be converted as such.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lower frequencies are much preferred for practical purposes anyway, and in any case, ELF (aka prof. Fran de Aquino) is recommended as an initial trial input signal, or even step inputs, in order to carefully monitor the output effects.

Without delving into further technicalities, the proposed excitation pulses could be expected to produce an output at right angles to both the applied E and H fields but in parallel with the solenoids used for said excitation, as the E & H field begins to precess or gyrate under the influence of the applied input signals. Such an output of rotating or gyrating magnetic fields could well be syphoned off via similar solenoids (conical or otherwise) placed orthogonally. See original figures below/attached.

(since improved on!)

==========================================================================================================================

written circa 2012, but substantially re-edited in May 2019 A.D.

G.M.R.

Main Reference:  http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/synergetics.pdf

Rene-Louis Vallee - THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY, MATERIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL (1970)

The basis of Synergic theory - see p. 86 - http://www.rexresearch.com/vallee/vallee.htm

Rene-Louis Vallee - THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY, MATERIAL AND GRAVITATIONAL (1970)

The basis of Synergic theory - see p. 86 -

Hagelberg, P. Physics, an Introduction..., Prentice Hall, 1973, page 622

http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=117

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 19 May 2019

p.s. i had to cut out most of the maths above as there was not sufficient room to paste it all in.

I can share it with anybody who asks.

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 20 May 2019

last part:

Lower frequencies are much preferred for practical purposes anyway, and in any case, ELF (aka prof. Fran de Aquino) is recommended as an initial trial input signal, or even step inputs, in order to carefully monitor the output effects.

Without delving into further technicalities, the proposed excitation pulses could be expected to produce an output at right angles to both the applied E and H fields but in parallel with the solenoids used for said excitation, as the E & H field begins to precess or gyrate under the influence of the applied input signals. Such an output of rotating or gyrating magnetic fields could well be syphoned off via similar solenoids (conical or otherwise) placed orthogonally.  (at right angles)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone wishing to have a copy of my Corrected TABLES is welcome to ask!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 21 May 2019

Hi Glenn
This kind of technique is new to me.
It takes a bit of time to study his concept.
At first it seems to be a device that produces energy from a defined space from orthogonal coils using some special concepts of the golden number and E and H pulses. It can take a long time to understand everything.
Jagau

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 21 May 2019

Yes my friend, it can! and i have taken nearly 24 years to understand and work this out, but now i feel i should share it freely in the spirit of why this forum was founded. Please take it and Run with it!

with my compliments

Glenn

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Atti posted this 21 May 2019

Hi Glenn!

Really great work. Is there any experience in practice, visible somewhere? Is there any measurement?
Just what we learn. And most importantly not just the theory.
I assume the practice is because you want so many years (24 years).

Atti posted this 22 May 2019

Glenn.

It's just a blueprint. Is there work done? Is there a measurement?
If there is nothing, it is worth nothing. I'm sorry.

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 22 May 2019

Glenn.

It's just a blueprint. Is there work done? Is there a measurement?
If there is nothing, it is worth nothing. I'm sorry.

An idea can still inspire...

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

dear Atti!

and Others!

i will be very brief and to the point:- Is this a blueprint? - Correct!

Is this worth nothing? - Absolutely wrong! - in the spirit of the open source sharing of this fine forum, my policy has always been to design and SHARE FIRST, then if/when i get time and/or equipment, to work on the design for myself.

I know that i know that i know that this design of extreme worth, and you will not find such quality of detail anywhere else on the web, or possibly elsewhere, so you guys don't know how fortunate you are!

In short: - If you are a fool, then stand there and ask what i have done with it,

If you are Not a fool, then take this free gift and RUN with it!

You will never get such a chance again, rest assured of that!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

Please Note Significant Changes - the Core is No Longer Connected Directly to the Source Outputs!!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 23 May 2019

p.s. but Yes - 'an idea can still inspire" - you are quite right about that!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Chris posted this 23 May 2019

I have tried to be patient, this thread is completely off topic.

State relevancy and why this thread should be kept on this forum! It has nothing to do with bucking coils nothing to do with EM Power Generation.

I am getting tired of nonsense and non relevancy!

Chris

Marathonman posted this 24 May 2019

It is none of my business but this is along the lines of Walter Russel and Lord knows he was as gifted as Tesla. the core are set up to compress the field lines as they are set up which could result in some impressive output if one is cleave.

Just saying, there are way more useless threads then this one. everyone was against me at one time, then through time the madness drifted out and reasoning drifted in.

Regards,

Marathonman

glennmr2018 posted this 25 May 2019

Dear Chris!

I am being patient too, but since you have now asked me specific questions, I will give you very specific answers:-

1stly, you wrote “State relevancy” – OK, here we go: - Please do yourself the favour of actually having a close look at the diagram I have copied below – When you do so, you will clearly see that it has EVERYTHING to do with bucking coils! – Can you see how each coil of the coil pairs is directly bucking the other? – Please check again – it may take a while to actually sink in, but it is exactly what I said.

Not only is it 1 pair of bucking coils presented here, but 2 pairs working together, and both pairs in perfect harmony, with the pulse timing shown at the base of the chart. Now please tell me how ‘It has nothing to do with bucking coils’ ! - I will await your specific answer. ... .. .

2ndly, you wrote: “It has nothing to do with bucking coils nothing to do with EM Power Generation.” –  to this, I couldn’t agree less! – Again, if you take the time, just a few minutes, to actually LOOK at the details in my chart, and study them for a little while, you will actually soon realize that this again has EVERYTHING to do with EM power generation! – Why or How? – again, just see the excerpt below -  the problem here may be once of semantics, in that I may be using terms that are not yet very familiar to you and other readers on the forum, however, that does not mean the terms I am using are irrelevant or non-sensical, it just means some people have some catching up to do! If you actually take a few minutes to FOCUS on details in my presentation chart, you will sooner than later see that the process of EM power generation is literally printed all over it! – thus to claim that it has ‘nothing to do with EM power generation’ is frankly, to use your word ‘nonsense’! Maybe your rash conclusion comes from the fact that I am not just using the usual tired old keywords or that most people are yet used to in this field of research, but am using a wider range of terms that provide fresh insights into the same truths we are all (hopefully) striving towards.

OK, if after all this clarification, you still cannot or perhaps will not see the relevance to the forum’s aims, I will simply take it off and share it on a forum with people of more open mindedness, if there is one, or not at all.  I don’t actually care that much if others can’t  or won’t see it for now, or perhaps never will. That’s their business. Yes I know you founded this forum, and I acknowledge you have done a LOT of hard work and shared nearly everything, as I have endeavoured to, but you don’t have all the insight, and neither do I, but you don’t need to label an alternative or unique approach as ‘nonsense’ just because you are not accustomed to it. You must be a pretty open-minded person to have even started off in this field, so all I would ask of you is to just open up your mind a little more, and give this a chance. If not, it will still be your choice. The call is yours.

Let’s still ‘be part of something better’ -    Glenn  MR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 25 May 2019

It is none of my business but this is along the lines of Walter Russel and Lord knows he was as gifted as Tesla. the core are set up to compress the field lines as they are set up which could result in some impressive output if one is cleave.

Just saying, there are way more useless threads then this one. everyone was against me at one time, then through time the madness drifted out and reasoning drifted in.

Regards,

Marathonman

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

dear MarathonMan

Well thank you for your inverted compliment! - the fact is that i only briefly looked at Walter Russell's works many years ago, and never properly studied them, so any superficial similarity between his and my work is just that - superficial. He was though as you stated, a very gifted man, and probably far beyond Einstein, who was a bit of a plagiarist.

However, i DO believe we should give credit where it is due, so i can acknowledge some influence from W.Russell, and of course many others. Even Chris's artwork has inspired some ideas for me as well. Just for the record, i have been working on this type of thing on and off for 24 years, and can show records to prove it. That alone is no proof of anything, but as you wrote, i am also trusting that open-minded reasoning will drift in here too and people will get outside of the box in order to look into it afresh! (now that's original too!)

Glenn MR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 25 May 2019

There is no superficial about it, if you do some research on Walter Russel's set up when he actually changed elements into another form with a set up just like this..

as for your setup. it does have possibilities as compressing the field lines on two different planes so keep on keeping on.

also it is possible to get magnetic and electric sensors placed throughout the center area and record various intensities, directions, field interactions and such. a lot could be learned from this as it is right along Chris's work except your compressing from four different angles not just two.

Regards,

Marathonman

• Liked by
Chris posted this 25 May 2019

Hi Glen,

I will allow your thread and monitor as I do with all threads. It is Walter Russel Tech and others may gleam the insight as you have.

I must make an apology as I was under the weather and made comments partially out of context, with other interfering problems also.

We have very little time left, we are at a cusp, if we don't get this Technology specifically, we, the Human Race may never get the chance again! Time is short, so I ask you, give it your best shot and please remember, I also am doing the same and trying to be as specific as I can. So if our paths do not align as I hope, then I can not allow outside distractions that I find could be misleading of others wanting to learn.

We must make, as best we can, Specifics, and state when we are not sure.

Chris

glennmr2018 posted this 26 May 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 26 May 2019

Hi Glen,

I will allow your thread and monitor as I do with all threads. It is Walter Russel Tech and others may gleam the insight as you have.

I must make an apology as I was under the weather and made comments partially out of context, with other interfering problems also.

We have very little time left, we are at a cusp, if we don't get this Technology specifically, we, the Human Race may never get the chance again! Time is short, so I ask you, give it your best shot and please remember, I also am doing the same and trying to be as specific as I can. So if our paths do not align as I hope, then I can not allow outside distractions that I find could be misleading of others wanting to learn.

We must make, as best we can, Specifics, and state when we are not sure.

Chris

hei Chris!
Well thanks for your positive comments today and of course i accept your apologies as well! Yes i can agree that we don't have much time left - i also share a sense of urgency, but Not panic. Agreed that we need to be as clear and specific as possible and to admit when we're not sure - noted. I appreciate your decision to keep my thread on the forum, and am happy to keep sharing freely. Re: W Russell, ok i can admit that it bears perhaps more than a superficial resemblance, if you say so, but honestly i have not read his works for many years. Now i am getting curious as to how it relates to mine. OK, see u on the forum, and again i regard this forum as one of the best - keep it up. regards Glenn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

hei Guys - please see my latest chart revision above! - now much clearer regarding the switching process & timing of both input and output transistors/gates/mosfets (take your pick) + some keys clarified eg. scalar input-> vector output!

BTW - the aerial and earth shown in this scheme are OPTIONAL here, but can be better put to use with an air-cored ground-based system, speaking of which -

This scheme is based on a cubic core made of special composite material, but i have been asked to describe if such a thing could be designed with an AIR CORE - the answer is YES - so my next schematic sketch will show you how! - this will probably illustrate the method and procedure more clearly to many of you.

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

TUNING the GRLC Core:

B = µ0 H  where µ0 : permeability of free space (Henries/meter)

µ0 = 4π x 10-7 = 1.26 x 10-6 H/m  (μr = 1 for air)    (B: flux/sq.m.)

D = ε0 E  where ε0 : permittivity of free space (Farads/meter)

ε0 = 1/(36&pi x 10-9 = 8.85 x 10-12 F/m  (εr = 1 for air)  (D: webers/sq.m.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined EM Energy Product = [√( µ0 ε0). EH.Ad] = EnEH (Joules)

Note: if A = Area = d2  and   A/d = d = depth   ( if core is a cube)

ideal GYRO Electro-Magnetic applied Frequency = ωg (radians/second)

ωg = 1/(me.c).√[h/2. EH]

and PEH : Potential Output Power = ωg.EnEH (Watts) (in the frequency domain)

where me : mass of electron, c: light speed, h: Plank’s constant

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Worked Real-Life Example: (note: 'Voltage' here is Potential Difference!)

Let d = 10cm, thus A = 100 cubic cm = 10-2  so A.d = Volume = 10-3 m3

E = 100 V/m so V = E.d = 100 x 0.1 = 10V but E.d/2 = 100 x 0.5 = 5 V

H  = B/µ0 = 45uT/1.26 u-Henries/m =  [45x10-6 ]/[1.26x10-6] = 36 A/m !

Thus combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH].(A.d) since [√( µ0 ε0)] = 1/c

so EnEH = ...  micro-Joules  (not very much!)

Solution: Add Magnetic Potential - eg. magnets to upper and lower plates!

(but don't use ferrous plates so mag. field can penetrate into core)

Typical modern Neodymium magnets have B ~ 1Tesla but H ~ 1KA/m !

So again: combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH]. Ad

Now, if ideal GYRO Electro//Magnetic applied Frequency = ωg (rads/s)

i.e. ωg = 1/(me.c). √[h/2. EH]   where me = 9.11x10-31 , h = 6.63x10-34

(a mistake was found by yours truly - to be corrected and filled in sooner or later)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To achieve this power output under the above-mentioned conditions, such a high pulsation frequency of nearly 1GHz would need to be used - not normally practicable, so an air-core is not recommended, and should be substituted with a core of specially prepared composite material as already described! - so that the εr and μr can get multiplied in to the EnEH potential equation in order to increase it, but while at the same time, the E and H inputs can be lowered (eg. 12V/m and/or 1KA/m) to allow a lower input frequency! Lowered frequency and less EH but higher εr . μr would then tend to then cancel each other out but still allow a similar Power Output! -

Motto: Do the Maths!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Vidura posted this 27 May 2019

Hey glennmr, Respectfully, as math's is not my strong side , if I may ask if you have build such a device, are there some experimental results to show the expected effect? Regards Vidura.

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 27 May 2019

Simplified (Non-Maths) Version:

Believe me, real models are coming, and i now have contact with my old coworker-associate in NZ, who is an electronics technician. The foundation via mathematics must first be laid in order to know how to proceed properly!

In order to obtain real electrical power output from pulsing into a defined cubic space via 2 pairs of bucking coils at right angles, it is better to not use an air core!

What about gravitational (g) energy? - how does it relate to this?

ANY space on the earth's surface contains g-energy due to its volume! In order to make use of some of it, it is required to counteract it with applied EM energy and to thereby resonate it via vector-zero pulsation at right angles, however it is NOT necessary to activate ALL of the available g-energy as it usually more than required, so the amount of EM Potential energy applied is used to calculate the amount of useable electrical energy to be extracted and converted to power.

Can a cubic air-core be used for this purpose?  - Yes, but the frequencies required for air-cores is too high for the practical purposes of home-based handymen. Therefore it is much more recommended to construct a core of special composite material that is high in magnetic permeability (μr ) as well as       electrostatic permittivity (εr )! -

What do these 2 terms mean? - μr is the ability of a material to absorb or transmit magnetic potential energy, while εr is the ability of a material to transmit or absorb electrostatic potential energy.

These types of materials are not difficult to find and may well include: - welding rod coatings, certain ferrous sands, ferrite powders, ceramic and cermet type materials etc - once mixed though, they will need to be compacted and set hard by the use of resins etc. Don't forget to insert the central plate first!

I trust this helps!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Chris posted this 28 May 2019

Use the [Ix] Button to clear any unwanted Copy Paste formatting you need to remove.

Thank You.

Chris

glennmr2018 posted this 28 May 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Jagau posted this 28 May 2019

Just a suggestion Glenn.
The images are difficult to read, could you put it in attached file
there is a button for that
so that we can enlarge it ??

Jagau

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 29 May 2019

hei Jagau - that is exactly what i have been doing!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 31 May 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 24 June 2019

btw, i now have an expert ex-associate in NZ working on assembling these models out of pyrothene and magnetite etc,

and will be able to show real pictures soon! .. Meanwhile, take a look at this mini-lesson in simplified format! -

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Marathonman posted this 27 June 2019

I see the the pace between the cones and the upper and lower magnets  a very highly compressed state and the possible output could literally melt wire like no tomorrow so it seams to warrant thick wired coil. compressing from three different plans is very interesting and i can not wait to see the reaction of highly compressed space. even switch like Graham's step switching you should hit well over 1000 volts possibly.

Regards,

Marathonman

glennmr2018 posted this 28 June 2019

hei Marathon Man! Thanks for your sensible comment~but rest assured.... I've already prepared the circuitry to cope with excess heat outbreaks!.. See how the second load below is a Counter Load..designed to Absorb heat instead of Disipating it! 🌝

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Marathonman posted this 04 July 2019

If anyone would like to see where this thread,  along the lines of Water Russel,  is leading PLEASE!  read this link thanks to Jahau that got me searching.

http://www.resonantfractals.org/PCC/Dual_Cones.html

this material is literally the cutting edge Physics of human understanding as we know it. i think it will simply blow you away.

i can not stop reading and have printed in  PDF form from Bull Zip Printer on my computer for safe keeping and further study.

amazing Glen at the possibilities to come. KEEP ON TRUCKIN !

Regards,

Marathonman

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 04 July 2019

Thanks again Marathonman for your informative and intriguing comment and link! - we have since made some considerable progress on this GRLC device, and 2 cores have been poured and set, with a quad set of pancake coils on each!

The truncated conical windings are still to be made, but i can show you some basic pics soon!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 04 July 2019

first-fruits !

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 04 July 2019

When you spoke a few posts ago referring to materials to use were you referring to Fe304 and such which can be used at extreme high frequencies and retain zero magnetization.? i also have 10 lbs of high purity iron powder @ 99.5 % purity. saving that for a  possible Robbert Adams build pending results of the core.

just curious.

marathonman

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 05 July 2019

hei MM - another good question - The whole point about this is that the core material should be a COMPOSITE material with both its Magnetic and Electric properties pretty much balanced out, or as much as possible! - so for this kind of material, pure iron powder would Not necessarily be very suitable, as it doesn't have much Permittivity to Electric Fields! - a better choice is Magnetite powder and/or welding-rod coating powder! - the latter is easy to get and to crush up, and exhibits both properties pretty much! - i hope that helps!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 06 July 2019

Here are the first proper GRLC cores prepared and poured by David Ball, NZ - good On ya, David, ol' mate!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 06 July 2019

and just before pouring - (after pouring, the weight came to almost 630g)  - dimensions are 4x4 (sq.cm.)

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 11 July 2019

Testing for mag. permeability and dielectric permittivity !!..

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 11 July 2019

testing for mu & epsilon again ..

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 26 July 2019

Worked Real-Life Example: (note: 'Voltage' here is Potential Difference!)

(this was published on the AboveUnity Forum back on 28th May,

but needed correcting, which has now been done)

Since this example uses an AIR CORE, then  µr = 1 =  εr (!)

Let d = 10cm = 10-1, thus A = 100 cubic cm = 10-2  so A.d = Volume = 10-3 m3

E = 100 V/m so V = E.d = 100 x 0.1 = 10V but E.d/2 = 100 x 0.5 = 50 V

H  = B/µ0 = 45uT/1.26 u-Henries/m =  [45x10-6 ]/[1.26x10-6] = 36 A/m !

Thus combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√EH].Ad since [√( µ0 ε0)] = 1/c

so EnEH = [1/3 x 10-8 x [100x36x10-3]0.5 ]= 20 micro Joules  (not very much!)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORRECTION: combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH].(Ad)    (NB)

so EnEH = (1/3 x 10-8) x [100x36]0.5 x 10-3 = 0.33 x 60 x 10-11 = 200 pico Joules

Solution: Add Magnetic Potential - eg. magnets to upper and lower plates!

(but don't use ferrous plates so mag. field can penetrate into core)

Typical modern Neodymium magnets have B ~ 1Tesla but H ~ 1MA/m !

So again: combined EM Pot. En. Product = 1/c. [√ EH]. (A.d)

so EnEH = [3x108]-1 x [100 x 106]0.5 x 10-3 =   0.333 x 10-7  = 33.3  nano Joules (!)

µr (still) = 1 =  εr  (result is a bit better!) so … .. .

Now, if ideal GYRO Electro-Magnetic applied Frequency = ωg (rads/s)

i.e. ωg = 1/(me.c).√[h/2. EH]   where me = 9.11x10-31 , h = 6.63x10-34

then ωg => [9.11x10-31x 3x108]-1 x [6.63x10-34 x 0.5 x 100x106]0.5

=  [9.11x3x10-23]-1 x [6.63x0.5x 10-26]0.5 => 979 Mega rads/sec !

Which over 2.pi  =  155,892 Mega Herz

Now for potential power output, since PEH = ωg.EnEH ,   µr (still) = 1 =  εr

PEH => 2πf. EnEH = 979x106 x 33.3 x 10-9  = 32,601 x 10-3 = 32.6 Watts !

(However low this result is, the EH values can be regarded as Gateways) ! !

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================

(just in case anyone is interested in my derivations above)

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 28 July 2019

p.s. - the centre plates you can see here can also be regarded as an artificial BLOCH WALL !!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 28 July 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 28 July 2019

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 28 July 2019

Main Equations//Algorithms Used Here Are as Follows: )

Since Speed of Light (c)  =  inverse of √ (μ0 ε0 ) = ( μ0 ε0 ) -0.5 (m/s), then

(1/me).√[(h/2).(µ00.µr.εr).EH] = ωg = (1/mec).√[(h/2).(µr.εr).(EH)]

so then ωg  = (1/ me c). [√(h/2)] . [√ (µr.εr).(EH)]

so ωg = [20100] x [√ (µr.εr).(EH)]

where me = 9.11x10-31 , h = 6.63x10-34 , c = light speed  = 300,000,000 m/s

then Power = PEH = ωg.EnEH => [1/(mc2).√(h/2). √[( µr.εr).(EH)].(Ad)]

= [9.11 x 10-31 x 9 x 1016]-1 x [6.63 x 0.5 x 10-34]0.5 x √[( µr.εr).(EH)].(Ad)]

= 0.0122 x 1015 x 1.82 x 10-17 x √[( µr.εr).(EH)].(Ad)]

so  PEH = [22.2 x 10-5] x √[( µr.εr).(EH)].(Ad)]

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Chris posted this 10 August 2019

Hi GlenMR,

Bold Text Posts and images that you are posting, that only the odd component here and there are made out, is just a distraction to all readers!

When you started this thread I asked you to keep the posts on topic and to loose the Bold Texting of the entire posts.

2. Please post images that are clear and easy to follow!
3. Please fix every post that you have posted!

Currently I see this thread as a distraction and not relevant to anything we are doing, if you can change my mind then it stays.

Chris

glennmr2018 posted this 11 August 2019

Hei Chris!

OK then, but 1stly, let me remind you of a few basic facts about some of your readers and/or contributors (including ME) – Some of us are over 60 years of age, and therefore NEED bold print to read for at least 2 reasons! – 1. to make it clear enough to read, and/or 2. to type as we go, as well as 3. presenting clarity!      Go Figure Man! (that is, it’s a physical necessity for some)

2ndly, I have not, and do not plagiarize off Anyone, including your beloved Walter Russell (hard as it may be for you to comprehend or accept the fact) but 99% of my work is Original, but with admixtures of ideas and design from various people, including artwork from yourself, as you should know by now! I have briefly looked at W.Russell’s works in the past, but found them quite incomplete, in my view.

3rdly, as to Relevancy – Again, you are totally blind to the fact that my presentations are Totally Relevant to your main theme, which is Partnered Output Coils (POC) and if you actually LOOK into my diagrams you will see them presented clearly all over the place (except that I present them as partnered Input/Output Coils, with a double or mutual function). I mean it couldn’t be any more relevant if it were to rise up behind you and bit you on the A*** !

What I think you Really mean is that you cannot comprehend the deeper meaning or application(s) behind these designs, but which as I again remind you, is clearly outlined step by step in my comments and descriptions!! – If you cannot get your head around this, then it’s not My problem! Last time you admitted:

‘’Hi Glen(n),     25 May 2019 ‘’I will allow your thread and monitor as I do with all threads. …I must make an apology as I was under the weather and made comments partially out of context, with other interfering problems also. ‘’ -  so what’s wrong this time? Having other problems? (btw, I don’t drink or smoke, if that’s relevant)

4thly, You are still stuck in your squarish box which is really a 4-D environment, but you can’t see this – All you can see is the plain 2-D square of the floor you are staring at, because you have forgotten to open your windows to enlighten your brain a little more !! You can’t or you won’t see that the 8 points of your box represent 3D progressing to 4-D, let alone being willing or able to step out of the box, which is surrounded by the circle of familiar concepts you have built up around you!          (Go figure again, if you will) There is always a world outside of your world, but you don’t want to see it, because ‘nothing is as painful as a new idea!’!(for you, anyway)

5th, re formatting in general, why does it seem SO much more important to you than the actual CONTENT of the posts?? – Surely the Content is the main thing, isn’t it?

Since you are blind to new (or rather ancient) truths being presented by me in new ways, I suppose there is no other option than to leave this forum behind and not waste my time with it any more! A few have seen the light from time to time though, ‘as in a night mirror, dimly’. I don’t need anybody’s approval anyway, when I know what I’m doing, and am steadily progressing towards it, week by week … .. .

Since you don’t give me any credit for fresh and new ideas etc, except just once back on another forum, where you once described my post as ‘’brilliant’’, I now know that I don’t have to give you any more credit either – fair is fair, mate! I have always stated my known sources of ideas including you, in my published designs, as you should have noticed! From now on, I won’t bother, not that I really need others’ ideas anyway, even less de-constructive criticism! Thus I think I will give you a day or 2 to think about my remarks, and if you don’t like them, just delete my thread. I thought that this was the best forum around for FE research and also because it’s local or at least Aussie-based, we could be proud of it! Now I just wonder if I was wrong. I will just go to find people who are truly open-minded to new truth(s)!

Farewell. Adieu. Godspeed. All the Best, but there is no such thing as ‘good luck’.

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

patrick1 posted this 11 August 2019

haha yous passion is cool,  but much like formatting and punctuation in general,  if it isnt bucking coils, it dosnt float my boat, let alone propel it,  or mankind in general.

thankyou however is very much in order, and good job !!.  i hope you actually build this thing and take some measurements, - however i suspect it will be very difficult too get any accurate readings at those power level,s because of chris;s intense third eye burning out your meters.

girly giggles  **

but seriously love peace and unity.

im on abit of a high after my best results yet with bucking coils....  COP 2...   hmm... i have some catching up too do

merry chrismas all.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 12 August 2019

Hi Glen,

1: If you have a problem with my site formation then please bring it to my attention. A PM would be good.

2: I see where you are trying to link your ideas with mine.

3: What you describe in your posts is nothing like my work!

4: If you feel the need to leave, then that's up to you.

5: My forum is my responsibility, all I am asking is that you make an effort to not make a mess of it. Bolt Posts, and images that have no clarity are just no good for anyone. If you made just a little more effort here, then others would no doubt find your effort more readable.

6: You're  some 50 posts in and have shown no progress.

7: I warned you and you persisted in bolding, you asked for no help. You only ignored my request!

8: What I am showing and what you are showing is not the same.

Glen, let me be straight, I have a responsibility. A responsibility to not let our Forum become like the others!

What sets us apart? We have direction! We have meaning, we have a specific dedicated proven technology!

We are not here showing a bunch of Guess work!

We are not showing Equations of something that might work one day!

We are not showing anything that might be confusing and or illegitimate or irrelevant!

My responsibility is, that every post on my forum has meaning, for years to come, for other readers to know they can read and gain something from it, in a specific direction with context to one single goal! A Working Energy Machine.

Glen, I am sorry, but I have given you a good chance! For the sake of keeping my forum on topic and also credible, I am going to have to delete your thread.

I have no room for anything that may create confusion!

Chris

• Liked by
patrick1 posted this 12 August 2019

well said chris.

although if there is any amazing results, i would absolutely love too see them... but the whole thing looks abit Dr who

• Liked by
Chris posted this 12 August 2019

Lets let the readers vote if it stays or goes.

Cut off is 24 hrs time.

Chris

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 12 August 2019

hei-hallo-goodday CHRIS !

Thanks for your reasonable reply - but obviously you haven't even checked on your own website to see that i have ALREADY UNBOLDED all my posts there!! - Go back in and have a Closer Look, Mann! .. .

(perhaps You are the one who needs to start wearing glasses, not just me and others!

Secondly, i have tended to respond to your requests as and when i have been ABLE to do so - i am not retired, and i do 3 days voluntary work a week, as well as tutoring students online, and am working on 2-3 physical invention projects at Once!!! - in other words, i may not even see your messages or be able to respond to them as quickly as you would fancy! - Get it Now? - i Do respect the fact that it is Your forum and thus your responsibility, so i Do and Have responded to most of your recommendations Most of the time! Right? .. .

Lastly, on your invalid point of supposedly not making any progress, i have to make do here with a single wooden workbench i set up in my bathroom over my washing machine, which is OK, but otherwise, i have to ask my old coworker David B. in NZ to do a lot of the practical work involving model-making, pouring molds, etc -as he is a true old-time and highly qualified audio tech electrical engineer from way back! and BTW, he is a Very patient Man - and doesn't seem to be at all in a hurry for more hurried progress as you seem to be. Yes i realize that progress must be made ASAP, but at the same time, '''he who (really) believeth will not panic unduly'' ! - Please go back in and actually LOOK at the real photos of the REAL models that he has made recently, and you will surely SEE that Real Progress Has been made in recent weeks!

Dr WHO stuff?? – well just Maybe I should take that as a compliment –

Thanx bro! ): L J ):

i now rest my case. yours sincerely

(except that i will show proof next that i really DO work in real models in my free time!)!

GMR

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 12 August 2019

p.S. - and Don't try asking me what ALL of this is/does/ or whatever, unless you are

also willing to pay me a Month's supply of COFFEE, Mann !!..!!.. etc & so on.

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 12 August 2019

& p.p.s. - i see that this post of mine has attracted 1.1K Views !!

- better than a poke in the proverbial eye with a burnt stick,

heh M8!? ..

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

patrick1 posted this 12 August 2019

im never sure how too judge people crazzier than me, - but if you really are john hutchinson !!! fantastic !! and do you still have the levitating ball ?. and that dress you wore with russ greis ?.  ... we could have a charity auction...

which is a good thing, - it looks like you could use one.

thumbs up

tell me more ;-D

who dosnt love a fairy tale*

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 12 August 2019

I think that should have another chance to speak.

Chris has very well explained the rules of the forum and I think he understood them well,

as we all can make mistakes, so let glen another chance to speak on the forum

Nobody is perfect

Jagau

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 12 August 2019

hei MM - OK, i shall  bring your suggestion to the attention of my highly-trained tech mate in NZ and get him to put a sensor into the centre as you suggested , since yes the field(s) will be getting compressed in 3 (if not 4) D !! !!

thanking you,#

Glenn

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no superficial about it, if you do some research on Walter Russel's set up when he actually changed elements into another form with a set up just like this..

as for your setup. it does have possibilities as compressing the field lines on two different planes so keep on keeping on.

also it is possible to get magnetic and electric sensors placed throughout the center area and record various intensities, directions, field interactions and such. a lot could be learned from this as it is right along Chris's work except your compressing from four different angles not just two.

Regards,

Marathonman

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 12 August 2019

August Update - please note that feedback is thus provided to the original source caps

which feed and are fed by the source batteries!! - Also note that a double earthing is used,

and that the Source CORE and its Counterpart Core are not directly connected to the pulsation circuitry!

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Chris posted this 12 August 2019

Glen,

Some here use a product called Circuit Wizard. Made by: new-wave-concepts.com

It is easy to use and cheap for what it is.

It may be of use to you in drawing your diagrams to make them easier to read.

I hope this is of some use to you.

Chris

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 16 August 2019

OK then, Thanks CHris for this good suggestion, which i have only just read now, and i will go and check it out when i can!... .. .

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 16 August 2019

Yeah OK MM, maybe W. Russell really Did those things with this kind of apparatus, but i 'dunno' , so we shall have to see what happens when my colleague has the time to assemble everything and do a thorough trial exp!..

That will be rather exciting, by the sound of it!!..

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 16 August 2019

Hi glen

This researcher works in the same field as you

http://www.resonantfractals.org/WalterRussellCones/WalterRussellCones.html

Jagau

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 19 August 2019

OK Jagau - Noted! but i am actually too busy to connect with him, to be honest, but perhaps you can invite him to look over here!(?)

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

glennmr2018 posted this 19 August 2019

Can't afford to buy it! - can you suggest something Free out there?? - surely there must be many of such! .. .

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

patrick1 posted this 20 August 2019

wow Glen Mr amazing sir,   truly has the feel of a gyroscopic particle energy source,

You know i am building newman motors, - 5 so far, and they are very successful.  - Mr newman long spoke about gyroscopic particles,   - the general implication being that his massive stator coil, or bipolar magnetic rotors, are doing the same kind of thing.

i can tell you, my replicas are testament too Newman being onto something, and he does things BIG !

• Liked by
glennmr2018 posted this 21 August 2019

hei Patrick!

I get your humorous points, which is OK, as long as we are larfing WITH and not AT each other! (tho' larfing at ourselves is ok, i guess - after all, the Irish do it all the time, as so did the GOONS - my favourite old radio comedy!)

OK, thanx 4 your ref to Russ GREISS - i had heard of him but forgotten in the haze and maze of things happening here, but will soon look him up - he and his approach seem ideal to me, and so does his FORUM! hmmm, ok, Cheerz, GMR

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

im never sure how too judge people crazzier than me, - but if you really are john hutchinson !!! fantastic !! and do you still have the levitating ball ?. and that dress you wore with russ greis ?.  ... we could have a charity auction...

which is a good thing, - it looks like you could use one.

thumbs up

tell me more ;-D

who dosnt love a fairy tale*

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Recomended Protocol:
Our Above Unity Machines:
Start Here:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).