Ruslan's Flashlight Without Batteries

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 2.1K Views
  • Last Post 19 September 2019
Chris posted this 11 October 2017

Thanks to Aloha, and a bit of searching we have a bit more information on Ruslans Lantern:

 

 

NEW:

 

Both English Translations of whats being said are below:

   Chris

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 26 October 2017

A little more information from a friend:

 

Some words of Wisdom:

Kind time of day. Maybe here we will find a common language. At once I will say that I do not sit at forums much. No time ! However, now for the 5th time I am collecting Akulin for a capacity increase. There are ideas .... But in fact the people are looking for a bit of everything is not right. All these systems operate on the basis of standing and traveling waves. It is necessary first to catch the motion of particles in the coil. Those. as Kapanadze does with a tester or an ammeter. Only at HF frequencies no ammeter will help and you will need to catch an oscilloscope. The first rule: Wind the coil 40 meters. 2. Find out its resonant frequency (1/4 wave) Inductor 1/4 = 10 meters of the same wire (for example, 2.5mm) Connect the generator to a 10 meter coil, drive the rectangles at a frequency of 1 MHz and crawl higher until 40 meters do not appear sinusoid. The maximum amplitude. The generator is desirable to take a normal, laboratory! With output adjustment from 0 to 20 volts. We achieve maximum amplitude and move tenths of a kilohertz until it starts to dance. This is your wave resonance !!! We fix the frequency and voltage. It is for this all have to do the generators. Further ... Tesla we shake under this frequency that the effect has turned out. Then we do everything as I did or the Shark. In this case, everyone wants to repeat this device. Forward! We fix everything beautifully and stiffly, without forgetting that the resonance and effect can escape in the case of fastenings on the snot. We need to get the effect itself and work, and not a ready device. Once you begin to understand what to do next, you can already move. So .... Tesla, as we know, also wets the sinusoid. Suppose your frequency is 1.821MHz. The frequency, but alas. It is necessary to adjust Tesla on it. The shark used a critic between Tesla and the toroid (Antenna) over the inductor. This is just an accurate adjustment. It is needed before launching. Then the system holds and no matter what has slipped in not large limits. But! Again ... What where? On the Inductor we feed the signal of rectangles with a frequency of 1/50. Consider: 1820: 50 = 36.4 kHz pumping a rectangle through the junction (Pot) with 23-29 turns of wire 2.5 squares. I repeat, you need to make the voltage on this harmonic not 10-20 volts, but higher by an order of magnitude. Approximately up to 50-60 volts and get the same dancing effect at the output. Further ! Do not forget that Tesla does not need strong power. Do not let sparks run and wet so that it breaks through. This is not necessary !!! It's better to make a controlled Tesla. Continue: The output voltage will be 195-200 volts. This voltage will not be higher. Why? Later we will return to this. It is necessary to rewind the transformer-reactor (Coil) so as to obtain the desired voltage. This requires experiments. Remember that we push the current in the reactor with a transverse wave. Created by Tesla. In the coil another wave is formed under the action of pumping by rectangles. The particles of which constantly rotate left and right. By giving them the movement of the pulsating Tesla, we disperse them in the very conductor. This is a gemmoroid understanding, but a fact. Tesla must operate in one half-cycle or one arm of the transistor. It is advisable to manage the Tesla pack - pulse generator. When everything is clearly adjusted, you will see how the effect manifests when changing the width of the pack. Consumption Tesla is scanty, and pumping does not strain at all. The current at the output is up to 7 amperes and the voltage is 200-209 volts. Bulbs and PSU pulses work well. Now for removal: 1. The coil is connected via a diode bridge. No parallel capacitors !!! 2. You need from Tesla only one half wave. Otherwise Tesla will take what she gave, back !!! Therefore, and put the diode from the ground to the very take-off coil (40m) The shark did this at the reception. He removed one part of the sine at the reception itself. Because Tesla. No one knows this and -bip-tsya to this day, nichrome does not work. It's clear! You need to swing the swing in the coil of energy removal. It is there that we push the current. By the way, the surplus from Tesla and the frequency setting of the Shark used a simple light bulb. Since the Inductor is galvanically isolated from the entire circuit, the light bulb serves as a resistive load to suppress surplus from cords and pickups. You can not bet, but do not rock Tesla very much. Do not ! Remember that the current is subject to voltage. This I see from experiments that I spent 2 more years ago. Next: The diode on the receiving take-off coil destroys one half-cycle and so we swing the oscillations without hindering them by the negative Tesla period. This, too, many do not know and continue to sculpt. That's why Roman (Shark) says that he is eating ground ... Everything is right! Because it kills the half-period pulse at the reception, which is grounded. This can be seen in all his settings! I wondered for a long time why he decided to use this solution and realized that it's easier to pick up BB diodes. Since interference at such frequencies in Tesla will lead to its improper operation. In other words, it will not be possible to cut off the half-period. Kapa solved this issue with an arrester and rectifiers at low frequencies. There everything is simpler, but more wires .... So on the German installation the diode is small, Tesla is far away, the grounding cable is long. By the way is equal to the length of Tesla !!! Do not forget about grounding .... On this installation it is important and without good support (grounding) will not work. Do not forget that the systems use high voltage. As we know, it moves even in the air. That's why grounding is necessary. Plus wave resonance and safety .... Like that .....

Ref: Ruslan K

   Chris

Chris posted this 26 October 2017

 Some Critics have appeared, and some good points have been bought up.

  • The IC is not powered (Apparently)

However, there is one fact, that Critics over look:

  • The Device Works,

Ruslan walks around, the LED's Light. There is no Battery, no sign of hidden wires, no sign of faked demonstration.

Please note: I believe the above layouts, are incomplete. So please investigate further.

Please see the attached pdf document below.

   Chris

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Chris posted this 27 October 2017

Hi Team - This is a Live Post (Change at any Time)

I have started redrawing the Flashlight Without Batteries from Ruslan. I noticed some inconsistencies in the above layout, and when I get on a bender I cant stop. This may not be 100% correct, so please study and point out any mistakes!

I have copied directly from the videos and these images:

 

I have done the best I can, studying the Videos, to be as accurate as possible, I may have made some mistakes however. 

 

 

 

If you study "Audio Oscillator Circuit" you may see some resemblance here. Also, there is a lot in common with the "Blocking Oscillator" AKA Joule Thief.

This Circuit has so much that most EE's would say are wrong and cant work. However we see it working.

Last Updated:
  • Images: 30.10.17
  • Attachment: 29.10.17

Hope this helps others!

   Chris

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Zanzal
Chris posted this 29 October 2017

I have updated the above post. Some small corrections.

I have a Circuit I have posted also.

Please check out the new videos I have posted in the first post. We have four now.

Please point out any mistakes you can find. I am fairly confident this is pretty close!

Where I have marked "possible connection", it is possible there is a connection there. However, it is also possible there is No Connection there. If there is no Connection, the Voltage Regulator has a Floating Ground, or Reference Pin. This pin is 3.37 Volts with 9V applied. The IC will run with 3.3 Volts, other wise, the IC is not powered and also redundant circuitry.

The IC is not doing anything any way! Not as far as I can tell. Its job was supposed to switch the Transistor, and its not doing that!

You can see lots of redundant circuitry. One has to wonder why its there? Is there an effort to confuse? Or is there an effort make evident simplicity's? Making obvious the redundant Circuitry? Four Videos is a pretty good effort for one device!

Also, please take the time to read the above quote, it is from: Ruslan Kulabuhov

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Chris posted this 29 October 2017

I am not very familiar with the TO126 Package. I have corrected the above Circuit.

The Transistor comes in two configurations:

or

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Chris posted this 07 November 2017

For All:

I may be wrong here, and if you see a mistake, please point out! I believe if one were to take out all the redundant circuitry, then this circuit would be something like so:

 

Now there may be an internal diode in the Mosfet that may play a role, but less all the redundant circuitry, this is pretty close!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 09 November 2017

Hey Chris,

It looks interesting. I went over images in the video and compared very carefully and I can't really find any mistake you made in Rev 3. 

Regarding the final circuit, I'm not sure what role C6 plays, perhaps it is redundant too? As far as I can tell its a Joule thief, but an interesting one. Definitely more complex.. Its hard to imagine it running endlessly, but it could run for a very long time. Have there been any other claims of OU involving Joule thief with a Voltage Regulator? For some reason I think maybe I've seen that once before, but I can't quiet recall. If anyone attempts to recreate definitely try with a diode across Q1 (unless the transistor already has one). That looks important.

Its really hard to imagine adding all that extra stuff by accident, and really if you didn't want to reveal the secret you could just cover the bottom of the circuit with masking tape. But who knows, perhaps it is intended to limit the audience to those who put forth the effort.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 09 November 2017

Hey Zanzal, I think its pretty close too. Thanks for checking!

I spend 2-3 days off and on checking.

I agree with you!

C6 could be a decoupling cap, or a snubber cap for the Switch maybe... I left it in there because it also may play a role with the AC on the top end of the coil back to C3. Almost like a filter cap.

I think the point here is, the circuit pretty much is an advanced Blocking Oscillator, or an advanced Joule Thief Circuit. As you point out.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 09 November 2017

I can''t imagine C3 can replenish without a diode at Q1 across the collector emitter. Did you try to anchor the vreg ground to source anode rather than cathode and move D5 to Q1 base yet? Guess I know what I'll be doing this weekend...

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris
Jagau posted this 10 July 2018

QUOTE:

Some words of Wisdom:

Kind time of day. Maybe here we will find a common language. At once I will say that I do not sit at forums much. No time ! However, now for the 5th time I am collecting Akulin for a capacity increase. There are ideas .... But in fact the people are looking for a bit of everything is not right. All these systems operate on the basis of standing and traveling waves. It is necessary first to catch the motion of particles in the coil

 

Hi Chris, happy to be back.
Could you tell me in what context these wonderful and very interesting words were written?

Jack

  • Liked by
  • Chris
cd_sharp posted this 10 July 2018

Hi, friends! I've just found this topic today.

Chris, you have done a tremendous amount of work on this. Thanks for sharing it.

Like Jagau, I'd also like to know where you found those "Words of wisdom" and what's the original version in Russian language.

I might have somebody that knows Russian translate it closer to the truth.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 10 July 2018

Hey Guys, Jagu, excellent to have you back my friend!

The Quote came from: matri-x.ru

Ruslan has tried on many occasions to help others. This is one of many excellent quotes to help! As always, Ruslan was ignored and side tracked. As far as I know he never returned.

Re Translation, please, a better perspective is always welcome!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
Jagau posted this 11 July 2018

Hello Cd I think Chris is better placed than me to answer you.
He replied after my question, I use google translate and if you can I would like to have in the file what your friend has translated with words closer to reality.


Yes Chris is very careful in his efforts I confirm. I had to leave this last month and I was anxious to return to chat with you all. By the way I have a lot of catch-up reading to do and on your thread that you created CD, I could see very beautiful experiences.

jack

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • cd_sharp
sampojoe posted this 12 July 2018

Yes!  I had stumbled across this device once last year on youtube but couldn't find it again, so I decided to build the Smith Gen instead.  It looks like you have captured everything needed for a replication.  I can't wait to teach my grandkids this stuff when they get a little older. But until I cry uncle on the SG, I probably won't attempt this soon.  Fantastic device!  Is it safe to assume that the coils are wound in opposing directions to achieve partnered output?

  • Liked by
  • Chris
cd_sharp posted this 24 July 2018

Friends, I talked to my contact that studied Russian for a few years in school and promised me to try to translate Ruslan's words.

I saw the work and I can say it's close to what Google Translate does and it's not too good, mainly words taken from the dictionary, but without deciphering the sentences full meaning.

I could see that it's very close to the calculations shown in this video which I did not have the time to watch in full, but looks very promising.

mrblobby posted this 25 July 2018

Good man. laughing

  • Liked by
  • Chris
cd_sharp posted this 02 September 2018

Guys, I've just found this video that is not listed in here:

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Hopeful1
Chris posted this 02 September 2018

Nice Find CD!

Pretend for a minute I am H.G. Wells. I have a storey to tell and I wish to tell it backwards to give perspective to the fundamental concepts involved.

The LED's have a specific requirement to produce photons or visible light, they require a Voltage Potential, and a Current that follows after the potential is applied.

 

This requirement is Electrons, or Coulombs of Charge and the ability for this Charge to Flow as a Current. The LED's specifications are:

 

Wait, this sounds like a Capacitor! A stored Charge, where this Charge can flow as required to power a Load at a particular Rate of discharge at the Potential.

Well, It is a Capacitor of sorts, the reason is simple. All Current Sources have Capacity, this is determined by the Impedance of the Current Source.

A Current Source with infinite Impedance, has Zero Capacity! Inversely, a Current Source with Zero Impedance, has Infinite Capacity!

Behind the LED's are a simple Capacitor and Coil arrangement, very simple at first glance, but more complex when one starts to understand the requirements for this arrangement to produce the required Charge and Charge Rate! 

Lets not forget, a simple Electromagnetic "Generator" is simply a Coil of Wire, having two Terminals and a Changing Magnetic Field in the proximity of the Coils of Wire. Taking into account, this simple arrangement powers today's world!

A short sharp pulse produces a Voltage Potential on the Terminals of the Coils of Wire, it also creates a Magnetic Field, this Magnetic Field must Change in Time, fall back to Equilibrium. Arrangements of Two Coils, that interact together to produce an excess Electromagnetic Induction.

Electromagnetic Induction is the Current Source, there is a Capacity that is determined by the Impedance. Change the Impedance and thus change the Capacity!

We know already that the Impedance changes with the Magnetic Field and the Interactions of the Magnetic Fields of the Two Coils, or Partnered Output Coils. This change in Impedance is a function of the Magnetic Field Strength! More Magnetic Field, stronger Magnetic Field the less the Impedance.

The Less the Impedance, the more Capacity, thus the more charge and Charge Rate becomes available. This is an automatic Feed Back / Feed Forward system, as Floyd Sweet said:

 

The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulating machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

 

Why the Nth Degree? This is something that I did not find the answer to for quite a few years.

The field energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the total electromagnetic field. As a result, the simple addition of the energy fields of the total field can be many times the energy of the initial fields separately. This property of the electromagnetic field is non-additivity of the energy field. For example, when added to a stack of three flat circular permanent magnet energy of the total magnetic field is increased to nine times!

 

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons.

 

We must learn from those before us, learn what we have been told for so long! When we have, machines like this will be common place! 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Vasile
solarlab posted this 18 September 2019

Hi,

Reviewed this thread looking for the "theory of operation" of Akula's (Ruslan's replication) flashlight. Found some schematics and videos but nothing technically in-depth regarding the detailed "how does this thing work" discussion or presentation."

So, attached is a detailed technical paper that [might] explain the operation - the why and how this thing works, including a good math analysis. Circuit and EM studies are not included to save space.

Hope some of you fellows will find it of value. Have a good day!

SL

 

Chris posted this 18 September 2019

Hey SL,

In all my experiments, all my work, I no longer have any [might] thoughts.

It is evident from experiment that a minimum of three actions occur:

  1. Input Pulse - A tickle under the chin magnetically.
  2. Secondary Action: Equal and Opposite Magnetic Field.
  3. Tertiary Action: Equal and Opposite to 2, but assistive to 1.

 

The above can be done with Two Coils, but the Action is the same.

It is very simple once one has a few small simple experiments to verify these actions, the trick is fiddling to get the best result! Time and Magnetic Fields Interact in special ways! Force is not related in any way to ones Input once one has achieved the fundamental process above.

I personally believe EM Modeling is never going to give you answers, not like Experiment does. Most certainly Fighters work shows this fundamental fact!

   Chris

 

P.S: Tom Bearden said, Energy comes from the Time Domain:

All EM energy in 3-space freely comes from the time domain

Ref: The Tom Bearden Website

 

Why? Why is this said? What does Time have to do with Energy? Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Fields? Electromagnetic Induction?

  • Liked by
  • Fighter
solarlab posted this 18 September 2019

Hey Chris,

Over 30 functional Beta sites and dozens of prototypes beg to differ...

It's all in the detailed engineering design - like pretty much everything technical!

Knowing the theory is the real key and you can not get there without exhaustive EM analysis.

Sorry but the "tickle under the chin magnetically, and the rest of it, makes no sense to me at all...

It's working for us, and many others, that's enough!

Regards,

SL

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Fighter
Chris posted this 18 September 2019

Hey SL,

The scientific approach to Electrodynamics is all based around Symmetry. The original Newtonian approach was introduced by the establishment as Action Reaction, Symmetry. Missing entirely: Asymmetry!

What determines Current?

Impedance and Voltage: I = V / R

What determines Impedance?

Wikipedia tells you this:

The impedance of a circuit element can be defined as the ratio of the phasor voltage across the element to the phasor current through the element, as determined by the relative amplitudes and phases of the voltage and current.

 

Ohms Law: R = V / I, but, this is not entirely correct, it is missing a big part of the entire equation!

We both know what part is missing, its a part of Electromagnetics, if R changes, V or I must also change, mustn't it?

We know from experiment that R can change with the manipulation of Magnetic Fields, its a very simple experiment. I have shown many times: Reduced Impedance Effect

Why does the manipulation of Magnetic Fields reduce R, the Resistance, actually Impedance in our case?

Question: In your Simulation Applications, can you reproduce this experiment, and if so, what does real world say compared to simulation? What are the differences? I believe a big difference from real world to simulation will be found.

What's Missing: The In Circuit, Time dependant Change of R during the Cycle of Action.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Fighter
  • Jagau
Fighter posted this 18 September 2019

Related to this, seems at some point they excluded from physics some "uncomfortable" variables and formulas. By doing this they actually eliminated from our physics an entire category of devices - free energy devices. Most specific asymmetric re-gauging devices, open-system devices capable of harnessing zero-point energy.

This elimination process is very well described by Bearden here:

Unfortunately all of our simulation software is based on the new, "clean" and "orthodox" formulas, personally I don't think our current simulation software is able to simulate this kind of devices. Certainly the simulation software can help but only until a certain point where our current formulas will stop it going further to show the behavior of this kind of devices.

Just my opinion...

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
solarlab posted this 18 September 2019

Hi Fellows,

Attached an info sheet regarding "Parametric Transformers." Could have been posted elsewhere but it does also directly relate to the "flashlight."

Having reviewed all the "stuff" you reference many many times as well as studied physics and engineering, especially with respect to "excess energy" concepts in great depth; our achievments so far in the field speak volumes about our methods, techniques and approach.

Of course there are many ways to attack these problem solutions and no "one size" fits all. Opinions are very valuable, but so are results, and maybe even more so, the technical details that got you there. It will help guide your future trips as well as help those who have yet to make the journey.

Just simply presenting, hopefully, some USEFUL information that can be applied to the discovery of "excess energy." These presentations are more than just conjecture or flashing light demonstrations, but rather, an attempt to explain the roots of what is transpiring within these devices that provides excess energy. This is not some random gobbly gook, but rather, based on solid science and engineering.

If you do not agree with this technical approach - perfectly fine - no big deal - but it is working very well for some of us!

I have no interest in discussing orthadox convention vs tree hugging, or the aether, or any the rest of it - it's simply counter productive IMHO.

SL

 

 

Chris posted this 18 September 2019

Hey SL,

I agree, you made a good point!

There are a lot of benefits to EM Modeling. It does give us todays Engineered EM Machinery, so its benefits are invaluable!

I was giving my opinion based on my work to date. Sometimes opinion is not worth a bucket of water, Experiment is the Truth Teller, all my opinions are based on Experiment.

SL, please don't take offence to my opinions, that's not what's intended.

But, I ask: Is EM Modeling an indication of the complete picture?

This thread is important, it gives us something that we need to observe closely, a method of self looping the Excess Energy.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
solarlab posted this 19 September 2019

Hi All,

Composed this Tech Brief ("Tech Brief - Excess Energy Creation") a while ago as a quick reference aid to assist when trying to quickly answer those "where does the energy come from" type questions!

It's non mathematical, but does include a demonstration example, that requires only simple test instruments with minimal set up. Used the brief with good success at the black board, but never had to do the demo (so far)!

Print it and keep it handy just in case - it does seem to impresses the financial types...

SL

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 19 September 2019

Composed this Tech Brief ("Tech Brief - Excess Energy Creation") a while ago as a quick reference aid to assist when trying to quickly answer those "where does the energy come from" type questions!

 

Hey SL,

Excellent question: "where does the energy come from"

If I may reply with another question and then an answer?

What is Electrical Energy?

 

I believe the answer to your question becomes very obvious when one answers the second question!

If I told you firing Marbles down a Pipe at the speed of Light, and that 10 Marbles is One Ampere and the Size of the Marbles was the Charge, then would you believe me if I told you that Electrical Energy is simply Matter ( The Marbles ) at a Rate of Velocity down the pipe?

Note: Every Marble is Magnetic!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
solarlab posted this 19 September 2019

 

Hey Chris,

My Tech Brief explains only one of the methods that can be used in electrically generating excess energy.

Of course there are several other known methods but the technique outlined in the tech brief is one that is very easy to understand and demonstrate.

Much of the physics behind what we call "excess energy" appears to be explained quite adequately through the study of Maxwell and Dirac. At least explained well enough so that it's workable.  There are likely other theories that could be cited as well.

BTW - my Tech Brief was not a question - it's the title of the Tech Brief - have a read and it will become clear!
It's quite interesting as well... even if I do say so myself laughing  

Pretty sure we're all familiar with what electricity is and how it's defined, at least well enough to actually work with it to develop a variety of electrical devices, including FE.  And, it's not marbles firing down a pipe, sorry wink

You should have read my thread on the "Ruslan Theory" before it crashed. There was some excellent stuff in it - maybe it will re-surface soon... too busy at the moment... !

SL

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 19 September 2019

Hey SL,

Pretty sure we're all familiar with what electricity is...

 

Apologies, my analogy was not meant to be condescending in any way!

I read every post, posted here. I admit looking back now, I miss understood the sentence and now with this last post it is now clear.

Apologies again!

We should be posting better more usable material, this sort of thing is really not useful in anyway to anyone. Post after post with nothing but theory will not solve the worlds problems, its just a distraction.

   Chris

solarlab posted this 19 September 2019

Hey Chris,

"We should be posting better more usable material, this sort of thing is really not useful in anyway to anyone. Post after post with nothing but theory will not solve the worlds problems, its just a distraction."

Respectfully, I can not fully agree...

 - "OHM's Law" and "FARADAY's Law" were/are nothing more than simple "theory!"  smile

These theories appear to be quite useful, doubtful that anyone finds them "just a distraction." However, now that we know what they are off-by-heart, and how they work, we just take them for granted.

But the theories of "excess energy generation" are not yet at least, that well known, so presenting them is probably still a very worth while effort!  Just My Humble Opinion of course.

All related material is of value - IMHO- except this silly poo poo!

Of course, if you don't want people to be exposed to these theories you can always delete them; this is your forum. We will certainly understand and will adjust accordingly.

SL

 

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 19 September 2019

Hey SL,

I think all here know this stuff already, don't you?

   Chris

solarlab posted this 19 September 2019

Hey Chris,

Perhaps everyone does know all this stuff already, but having searched around in some depth, most of the information that we have published, to date, can not be found - here or elsewhere.

Maybe you can enlighten us with a few links or references.

Every shread of information is always very helpful!

Thanks in advance.

SL

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 19 September 2019

Hey SL,

Try this: Click Here.

Hope this helps!

   Chris

solarlab posted this 19 September 2019

Hey Chris,

Thanks, will look (search) through it all. It's not very specific but it appears like those links might provide some valuable information. I'm sure they do

- but maybe you could point me to a comprehensive outline or overview that goes through a detailed "excess energy" scheme from start-to-finish with a good "this is how it actually works" included, as well as the test equipment required and the methods of implementation - the complete story so to speak.

Hey, if that exists then our work here is complete and we're done! Would be nice, would it not?

 - Will end this discussion here since it appears there is more to this than just technical theory or development of energy devices. Sorry if we've got out of bed on the wrong side!  Did not mean to upset anything, or anyone... just trying to provide good, detailed, useful information!

Have a good one!

SL

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close