My Friends,
Electrical Energy is Volumetric, and is calculated: Power P = Voltage V x Current I and: Energy J = Power P x Time T. Or Power P = Energy J / Time t.
Water is also Volumetric, and a Water Flow is calculated: Flow Rate F = Volume V / Time t.
Where: Volume V = π x r2 x Length L for a Cylinder or a Hose.
We can see, there is a mathematical Analogy here, manipulating the equations above we can see, and a Mechanical Analogy also!
Floyd Sweet was quoted in saying:
Vector quantities of field guiding/directing quanta are analogous to a pipe guiding water
So Floyd Sweet thought the same way! Using analogies, to understand, un-observable by naked eye, phenomena.
As we have covered many times, Current is defined as: One Ampere = 6.241509074×1018 Elementary Charges per Second, and One Coulomb is: 6.241509074×1018 Elementary Charges. One Coulomb is equal to One Volt, thus, one Coulomb / Second is equal to 1 Watt / Volt and Amperes I equals charge, Coulombs, per second. Thus, One Volt x One Amp = One Watt.
So by definition, Charge, has Volume and Rate, which is the same as Water has.
Charge is required to have:
- Magnetic Field
- Mass
- Spin
Spin gives us a concept that is required in Electrical Energy "Generation":
In condensed matter physics, spin–charge separation is an unusual behavior of electrons in some materials in which they 'split' into three independent particles, the spinon, the orbiton and the holon (or chargon). The electron can always be theoretically considered as a bound state of the three, with the spinon carrying the spin of the electron, the orbiton carrying the orbital degree of freedom and the chargon carrying the charge, but in certain conditions they can behave as independent quasiparticles.
The theory of spin–charge separation originates with the work of Sin-Itiro Tomonaga who developed an approximate method for treating one-dimensional interacting quantum systems in 1950.[1] This was then developed by Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger in 1963 with an exactly solvable model which demonstrated spin–charge separation.[2] In 1981 F. Duncan M. Haldane generalized Luttinger's model to the Tomonaga–Luttinger liquid concept[3] whereby the physics of Luttinger's model was shown theoretically to be a general feature of all one-dimensional metallic systems. Although Haldane treated spinless fermions, the extension to spin-½ fermions and associated spin–charge separation was so clear that the promised follow-up paper did not appear.
Spin–charge separation is one of the most unusual manifestations of the concept of quasiparticles. This property is counterintuitive, because neither the spinon, with zero charge and spin half, nor the chargon, with charge minus one and zero spin, can be constructed as combinations of the electrons, holes, phonons and photons that are the constituents of the system. It is an example of fractionalization, the phenomenon in which the quantum numbers of the quasiparticles are not multiples of those of the elementary particles, but fractions
So nothing new here! Charge Separation is very well known!
Again as we have covered, Charge moves, or is Accelerated on the Interaction of Magnetic Fields.
The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.2418 electrons ⁄ second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes. I2R Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.
The primary goal or objective of Aboveunity.com is showing others How this is done!
My Friends, YOU Can Do This! Its not hard! Magnetic Flux has similar Volume!
Best Wishes,
Chris
