Free Energy is so Easy!

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 1.7K Views
  • Last Post 14 December 2024
Chris posted this 06 August 2024

My Friends,

Oh My Goodness Me, Free Energy is SO EASY!!!

There are Teams of Dumb Bastards out there trying to Lie to you! Tring to keep you from the Truth!

I have given you the True and Correct Information, right here, showing you, with many Independent Replications, showing you the TRUTH:


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Dumb Stupid Idiots flood the Forums, claiming to be Guru's, and the truth is, they have no idea what so ever, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282



The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided an entire Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment and 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already!



Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Technically, My Friend Wistiti was the first, but for undisputable numbers, we have to see Tinmans effort.

Tinman was the first: COP = 1.7

 

Others followed, like Captainloz: COP = 1.9

Hey Chris,

If people watch your videos its all in there. My experiment is proof of that. I was feeling very frustrated for a long time but then I stumbled on to your youtube channel and it inspired me to keep going. I actually have your book from way back, I wish now just stayed with it but I went down the Ruslan and Akula rabbit holes for too long without understand Asymmetry and the re-gauging process. Anyway mate I'm just trying to say you should be proud of yourself. You are doing a great thing here!

Cheers,

Loz

Ref: Captainloz COP = 2.0

 

COP = ∞

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

Others have also achieved Above Unity, Marcel has also shared with you all, freely:

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

We ARE Truth, its right here:

 Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

 

You need to focus, and do the experiments, learn what I have given you, and this, once thought impossible technology, will become second nature, like Breathing is!

It is easy, it is cheap and its definitely NOT Magic! There are No Secrets, I have given you Free Energy!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 06 August 2024

My Friends,

Every single Researcher should have a singular Logical Approach and should start by asking a series of Questions:

 

  1. What is Energy?
  2. What's the Mechanism that causes the "Work" done? When "Generating" Energy.
  3. What's required to over come the "Work" component? When "Generating" Energy.

 

These three questions all have answers, here on this Forum! By now, you should all know this! You should know what the Answers are!

If you already know the Answers, as many here do, then building Free Energy Machines is a whole lot more simple and achievable!

Energy = Power x Time. Power is typically given in Watts (like a light bulb), time is usually given in seconds, and energy is usually measured in joules.

 

There are a lot of very very Dumb People out there, most having No Idea what so ever on these topics, some being PHD, or Dr's of the Field. Some very Dumb smart people exist!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 08 August 2024

My Friends,

Basic Electromagnetic Induction, High School Science, is a Requirement to know and understand!

 

At this point, you must understand, this Science is Incomplete! This is only Half of the real, the true Scientific Truth!

You might ask: "Why, what do you mean?"

Electromagnetic Induction is entirely Symmetrical in todays Science. Except for here on this Forum! We have shown, for a long time, Electromagnetic Induction is Incomplete!

Electromagnetic Induction lacks Asymmetry!

I have shown you for a very long time, how Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction works! In the following video, I explained the information I have shared with you all for a long time in an active experiment:

 

This is Easy, it is Cheap and there is no excuse, a Child could build this and make it work!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Luminerix posted this 08 August 2024

 

Hello Chris,

 

I would like to post some comments and pics here, if this is not the place just let me know and I repost it elsewhere or collect more until it is more mature.

Yes, showing the effect is indeed very easy! I am flabbergasted!

My very first build showed this 'anomalous' effect, and it is a very crude build.

I am excited, a bit proud and also humbled and feel a bit like a dilettante now, but that is ok, because that is the path to learn.

Trying to be concise but informative - the moneyshot:

 

I hope that I am not victim of wishful thinking here, but it looks like asymmetrical regauging to me.

Especially that with this build I initially saw variations of this that were not as clear with the dropping triangle. (some traces further below)

My rig:

 

So these are simply three wires wrapped around a Ferrite toroid. I am using an OPA541 based device as amp for a DDS.

Side note: version zero of this had a 1w toy solder audio amplifier and it already showed an effect (but very crude)!!!

 

DDS and power supply - NB: at 100kHz L_input starts drawing current from the power supply.

This is frequency dependent - interesting.

Also at lower 10s of kHz giving multiple resonances, which corroborates what others have mentioned.

Amplitude on DDS is set to modest 3V. I don't know how exactly the DDS and the OPA interact with each other, and how and why current is drawn from the power supply.

I need to get a more robust Load, but it is a real circuit. By the way: the red strip connector has 1 Ohm which is 10x than mentioned, and it still works! Also, I just grabbed two diodes out of a box without any idea about their parms!

Below, three snapshots of not quite triangle-like regauging, but I think this is interesting because it shows a delayed resonance after a period of silence following cut off of input pulse:

 

This seems interesting to me since it indicates that there is some time delayed flux occurring and of course getting a grip on how to modulate that is important.

As I understand, the re-gauging is a phenomenon that involves a non-rotational magnetic potential that ignores Lorentz gauge and draws energy from the aether, 

and this delay me a result of such 'internal' rearrangements.

 

I would like to ask some questions, and again some may seem a bit dilettante, but stating the obvious can also be elucidating.

Our builds have three components: Input, coils, output.

Going forward to me, I should improve the coils and the output. I think the OPA and the DDS will serve me for quite some time.

So I will make a new coild build, I have components and a few ideas for that. (selection of enamel and other wires, couple of ferrite cores).

Question about the output or Load side: can Chris or anyone maybe give me hints or links to what is happening there and how to rig it such that I can make quantifications of what is happening?

I have used scopes many times before, but as a user in very narrowly defined uses cases and not as an exploratory tool- ofc I have the Rigol manual, and Chris has a Rigol for dummies video (which I haven't seen yet), just to mention that I am not a total noob.

.. hahaha loool - and never an Android based scope with a touch screen🥳 only CRT based ones

Question about the input side: I am a bit confused about the elaborate switching devices thread - am I correct to assume that a DDS with a decent amp like an OPA541 will take me quite some distance to get a rig going, and that at some later stage it will be more efficient to move to a dedicated MOSFET based fast switching circuit?

So my schedule to move forward would be:

1 Make alternative coil rigs

2 understand and improve Load side

3 map out measurement and system parameters

and input side or exciter circuit with switching devices can wait ..  

I hope this is of interest to you, and would appreciate some hints!

Cheers

Luminerix

Chris posted this 11 August 2024

My Friends,

There is a period of confusion that sets in, once you have completed experiments up to a certain point, because the workings of this machine are very Un-Conventional! We have a System that does not follow the Enforced Symmetrical Convention!

Questions, can be thought about a different way, in a way that can be more beneficial to the end result:

 

What interactions need to occur, in what order, to make for a result that is beneficial to the working process of the machine?

 

Then, we break this process down, into the smallest possible components, Diakoptics, invented by Gabriel Kron, Floyd Sweets Mentor:

 

Asymmetry

In every Asymmetrical System, we must always have components of Symmetry! In other words, Symmetry in a system is a precursor to an Asymmetrical System! This maybe part of the reason that Asymmetrical Systems can be somewhat difficult for some people to grasp?

Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction works like this:

  1. The Input Coil is turned on and has a ΔI / Δt change in Current, thus the Magnetic Field shows us the same Change via ΔΦB / Δt, at Right Angles to the Current I.
  2. POCOne Opposes your Input Coil, there is a Symmetry here, similar to the Input Output of a Conventional Transformer via ΔΦB / Δt.
  3. POCTwo Opposes POCOne, there is Electromagnetic Induction occurring here, via ΔΦB / Δt. POCTwo introduces Asymmetry to a Conventional Symmetrical System.

 

You can see, POCTwo must assist your Input Coil! There is no other way for this to work!

 

The VTA Description is as follows:

 Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two magnets.

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

 

Newtons Laws of Motion

Pretty much the basis for Science today, Newton Invented Conventional Science in a very short time! However, the interpretation/understanding has been either been ignored or forgotten, if one knows about the true Story of Newton!

 

The Third Law currently reads:

For every Action there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction.

 

Is an incomplete statement, because this Law does not account for Systems that are NOT Symmetrical! In other words, Asymmetrical Systems, and there are many, the Symmetrical Law is inadequate to describe what truly occurs!

The Third Law needs to be amended to read:

For every Action there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction, and for every Reaction there is an Equal and Opposite Counter-Reaction.

 

now corrected, so that Asymmetrical Systems can be described accurately, we have a whole new half of Science that opens up for us!

 

Input Coil

Newtonian descriptor: Action

A Magnetic Field in the System: ΔΦB / Δt which Floyd Sweet referred to as "the excitation coil", this coil is a control mechanism, regulating System Frequency and bringing the System into Operation: 

 

The Input Coil has some very unique properties when the System is running, it can very easily be shown, the Input Coils Impedance can change drastically, sometimes increasing in Impedance by thousands of Ohms! We have shown this many times here on this Forum!

 

POCOne

Newtonian descriptor: Reaction

A Magnetic Field in the System: ΔΦB / Δt, that can be measured, changing over Time t, that is a Source for Electromagnetic Induction to occur.

The combination of Turns, Load Impedance and the Voltage Generated gives you a Specific Magnetic Field Generated.

POCOne Generates POCTwos Voltage.

 

POCTwo

Newtonian descriptor: Counter-Reaction

A Magnetic Field in the System: ΔΦB / Δt, that can be measured, changing over Time t, that is a Source for Electromagnetic Induction to occur.

The combination of Turns, Load Impedance and the Voltage Generated gives you a Specific Magnetic Field Generated.

POCTwo Generates POCOnes Voltage.

 

Magnetic Resonance

POCOne and POCTwo must be in Magnetic Resonance! This means at time t, the Magnetic Fields of POC One and Two must always be Equal and Opposite! In Magnetic Resonance!

 

This requires the Turns, the Voltage and the Load Impedance all be equal in Magnitude!

When we have Magnetic Resonance, we have a standing Wave of Current, 2 x I, the Magnetic Fields B and H Cancel, if you do vector Math on them, and the Gate to the Dirac Sea is open, we have an Output Power, provided by the Motional Electromagnetic field: E.M.F = -ΔΦB/Δt

 

Observing Currents

When the Currents of POCOne and POCTwo are Equal but Opposite, then you know you have Magnetic Resonance, if:

  1. Turns are both the same.
  2. Load Resistance is both the same.
  3. Voltage Generated is the same.

 

Defining a Magnetic Field in a Coil

The Turns N, Current I, Length L, Relative Permeability μr, and Permeability μ0, define the Magnetic Field using Amperes Law.

 

// Permeability:
Permeability = RelativePermeability * VacuumPermeability;

// Turn Density:
TurnDensity = N / L;

// Magnetic Field:
B = Permeability * TurnDensity * I;

 

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 August 2024

My Friends,

The Polarity of an Asymmetrical Electromagnetic System is very important!

Always use the Right Hand Grip Rule and Conventional Current, remembering Applied Current, and an Induced Current are different things, and need to be understood as such.

So, using the Right Hand Grip Rule on the Input Coil, to gain the Pole Direction, applying the Right Hand Grip Rule on POCOne to make sure the Pole Directions Oppose, and again for POCTwo, to make sure POCTwo Opposes POCOne.

 

Therefore, Your Input Coil is Opposed by POCOne, POCOne Opposes POCTwo, Which means POCTwo must be additive, assist your Input Coil, and this is what pushes your Input Coils Impedance up very high.

Three is the Magic Number! We have a System where all of the Coils are Working to Open the System up to the Dirac Sea! We have a Classically Open System!

When all the Coils work together in this way, we see both Partnered Output Coils Impedance reduced down nearly to Zero, thus a Superconducting arrangement, the more Power that is drawn, the more the system moves toward a Superconducting arrangement, Zero Net Impedance, and the Input Coils Impedance is pushed up very High.

Polarity is just ensuring you have the Coils working the way I have described, and yes sometimes its the Polarity of the Diodes, but you have to get this correct from the Input Coil first. If the Input Coil has been connected backwards, again has the wrong polarity, then we will see the Input Power go up when the POC are Loaded. As you know, this is not the goal! Input Power must go down under Load, because POCOne + POCTwo = 0, the Net Magnetic Field Vector Summation is Zero, Superposition! This means, your Input Coil does not have any load on it and actually more power is returned via the Input Coil than is conventionally seen.

We have covered before, the fact that the Input Coil sends Power Back to your Input! This is directly related to the Argand Diagram:

 

We can have Positive Voltage and Positive Current for Positive Power!

Inversely, we can have Positive Voltage and Negative Current, for Negative Power!

Here is an example:

 

Where:

  • Purple Trace is the Math, showing Positive and Negative Power.
  • Pink Trace is the Gate Signal to the Mosfet.
  • Yellow is the Input Voltage.
  • Teal Trace is the Input Current, both Positive and Negative.

 

I must apologise, I have better examples of this, but do not wish to confuse everyone. This example is sufficient to show what I am talking about.

 

Again, marked in Red, Positive Voltage and Negative Current, you have Negative Power. Not Negative Energy, Negative Power, I hope people do not confuse this as I believe people have in the past.

I hope this helps others when doing experiments, knowing what to look for is very important!

Remember: This is the very reason you can NOT Use RMS Measurements on the Input! See Measurements Thread and see the above Figures:

  • Average: 95.7 mW
  • RMS: 1.28 W


A Huge error here! 1.28 - 0.095 = 1.185 Watts. 13.474 times!

RMS is totally Wrong! Remember, your Zero Graticule Line is very important:

  • above: Positive
  • below: Negative

 

Its worth noting, there is 1.28 Watts in the System. An analogy, inaccurate as it stands, is, Power Delivered to the Coil might be in the order of 1.28 Watts. Then the Coil returns 1.28 - 0.095 = 1.185 Watts back to the Power Supply. So the Total Power used is only: 0.095 Watts. Power Returned, is not Power Used! 

 

The Full Time Idiots over on the other Forums have never ever pointed such Simple Engineering experiments out before! Because they are PAID to Hide such things!

Some of these Full Time Morons tell you: "You must use RMS on your Input Measurements!" 

What Idiots they have proven themselves to be! And they offered to "help me", hahaha what a joke! They have no idea whatsoever! They cant even help themselves! I have shown these idiots to be Brain Dead Fools!

So, polarities are just the Method of Operation of the Coils, all working together. Each Coil adding to the System, so we get an MMF Equation that becomes:

Input CoilM.M.F + POCOneM.M.F + POCTwoM.M.F = Input CoilM.M.F

 

We have more M.M.F in the System, an Asymmetrical Arrangement of M.M.F! An OPEN System!

The difference is, in a Conventional System, we have:

PrimaryM.M.F + SecondaryM.M.F = Zero

 

Nothing left over! Superposition gives us a Net Vector Summation of Zero, totally Consumed! A Symmetrical Arrangement of M.M.F! A CLOSED System!

If you follow what I have given you, your Input Coil does not see any Load, because the Net Vector Sum of M.M.F's reflected back on your Input Coil is Zero. You have circumvented Lenz's Law, and your Input Coil never see's a Load! WOW amazing you might say? No its BASIC Science and we have been showing you this for many years, and many ignore this very simple Science!

Ignorant people refuse to see the Truth of this very simple independently proven Science! How bad does it look? When societies Self proclaimed Guru's Ignore and refute the most simple Science ever provided to Humanity! ZERO Credibility Dumb Asses! I could name 50 Names right now, but in time, we will see these idiots fall from their perch!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Luminerix posted this 19 August 2024


Hello again Chris& Friends -

I would like to give a small update on my work. This is still thread 'free energy is easy', 
I think it can be here because my stuff is not mature enough to get its own thread.
However, I think there is an interesting detail I can contribute, despite a gazillion of questions.

If this is editorially not the right place, please just let me know...

I made a new build, and I introduced magnets into the flux conductor (re. 'transformer core')
Two reasons: 
1) I needed space to wind the coils so I just used some Neodymium magnets
2) in some of the many Tom Bearden MEG replica videos I saw mention of permanent magnets 

so to pass the time until more Ferrite toroids arrive (I have only three atm) I did just that.

My new build:

stacked ferrite toroids

 


1) Good to have that LED test load -  from a car repair kit, should use 12V and 3-5W max.
Lucky Strike: it seems to me that those LEDs can cope with just about every weird ass frequency or wave form that is thrown at it!
Highly recommended! Glowbulbs are much more inert it seems!

2) I am happy to have the coils neat: There are two layers of paper wrapped around the core,
and the 0.4mmm enamel is fixed every 5 turns or so with superglue (that soaks into the paper)- that allowed proper winding, 
without some method of mechanical fixation, the windings won't stay in place!

LEDs not picky about frequencies

those LEDs work at very high frequencies - using a video cam gives weirdest sparkling patterns on the screen

 

MAGNETS

 


I am really happy about just attempting this: Weirdness galore!!!
Eleven stacks of magnets in between the three Ferrite toroids - 4 each in the lower, 3 each in the upper story
(ran out of that particular size)

regauge

 

not the classical regauging. BUT: seems POC_out has hearty resonance during mute input intervals!
23 Vpp - but I don't know to how much Amps and Watts that turns out.

 


closeup of how the oscillation continues to the next impulse, and an adorably weird high freq. resonance during the exciter input pulse

 

 

resonance decays depending on duty cycle

 


hitting the right input parm combo does not show ring, but goes full on saturation with Vpp ~ 40V and modest 2.5V-3.5V pulse amplitude

Note: green trace is POC_aux that is mostly silent, except it gets one massive whack at each input pulse

 


some weirdness: Triangle waveform also works!!!

 

 


with POC_out doing rollercoaster resonance whacka-doodle! but POC_aux being mostly silent except for one jolt when exciter crossing zero from above (POC_aux has a small smoother cap on it, but without is mostly the same)

 


interesting: the LOAD-bearing part of the tri-circuit does not even need to close on POC_out!!!
One end can go DIRECTLY to ground! - Note the white connector on the scope ground - POC_out has one terminal grounded!
Has anyone seen that before? 

Sometimes these open ground loops are mentioned with Tesla coils?

 

 

Yikes. Now I am confused. How to continue?

I see two construction sites:

1)

  • Measuring the Amps and Watts that go into the rig

 

 


my power supply talks about 470 mA but a regular voltmeter only sees 11.9mA -
I would rather distrust the $30 household Ampmeter for being slow, besides the heatsink on my amplifier heats up to ~35-40`C

Can anyone give me hints on how to measure that?
I have some power Resistors, would that be a method? Unfortunately, they do not seem very precise..

How crucial is it to have backflow stoppers like caps and diodes on the input side?


2) 

I need to go next level on the output side. Much more robust hardware (incoming),
And I need a way to quantify and harvest what is going on there. Also, will build some form of those measurement blocks.

I have some high power resistors but they don't seem very precise -  I have one that says 0.1 Ohm (100Watts) but my meter says 0.2 Ohm.
I have a few more in delivery that allegedly should have 0.1 Ohm, but I will see.
Guess I will try to actually measure their R values myself, with some textbook calibrated setup if I have to - 
calculating Amps with a potential error of 100% doesn't sound like fun to me..
Can anyone give me hints?
Any other methods of measuring Amps other than V over R ? I have some coil and digit Raspian-Robo meters, but I have a hunch they will be munch too inert to give meaningful values..


Also, what really matters is getting a power reading, and harvest some of it!
So I will do a 4-diode rectifer and some Volatge stabilzing, and see what I can get.


hmmm what else? Seems writing a report and narrowing it down to most relevant questions helps...
Sorry about the ugly screen images btw, I am really at a loss with the RIGOL.
It is a nice scope, but I have not succeeded in getting the actual screencaptures that it makes off the actual device!!
Am I stupid, or what? I don't think quite so daft, I'd rather blame the OS of the device.
There is USB slot there but I can't seem to transfer the jpg from the internal storage to external, and I can't set the location to the USB device...

Anyway, I will post additions as come along, and will be grateful for comments! 
 

 

  • Liked by
  • Alex ⋐˙⋮⋮˙⊃
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 20 August 2024

Hey Luminerix,

You really should not be using a DMM for Voltage and or current readings. You should follow our measurements thread and the recommended protocols. Also the thread: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines would be worth a read, and a bit more study in my opinion.

If you follow what I have given, a man with your background will have this running in 5 minutes flat!

Thanks for sharing.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

Adam posted this 21 August 2024

Chris posted this 27 August 2024

My Friends,

I hope you can see, why I banned the members that used to be here, you can see, they have learned, and amounted to NOTHING! They are braindead and are just Trolls under cover! They are No Hopers!

One forum, made up of Ex-Members from here, they have absolutely NOTHING! The time they spent here, they achieved nothing! They have gained no ground, just as I predicted! That's part of the reason I banned them! They are just Leaches!

Other Forums, they also have nothing! Absolutely useless, decades and decades of No-Progress! A Statistical Impossibility!

These people work very hard to try and keep you all DUMB! They are very good at what they do!

I know many people that have Machines Working, but choose to stay quiet, similar to I have, keep your progress to yourself and just keep going.

I have shown you all how its done, its entirely up to you if you choose to Action what I have given you!


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Dumb Stupid Idiots flood the Forums, claiming to be Guru's, and the truth is, they have no idea what so ever, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282



The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided an entire Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment and 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already!



Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Technically, My Friend Wistiti was the first, but for undisputable numbers, we have to see Tinmans effort.

Tinman was the first: COP = 1.7

 

Others followed, like Captainloz: COP = 1.9

Hey Chris,

If people watch your videos its all in there. My experiment is proof of that. I was feeling very frustrated for a long time but then I stumbled on to your youtube channel and it inspired me to keep going. I actually have your book from way back, I wish now just stayed with it but I went down the Ruslan and Akula rabbit holes for too long without understand Asymmetry and the re-gauging process. Anyway mate I'm just trying to say you should be proud of yourself. You are doing a great thing here!

Cheers,

Loz

Ref: Captainloz COP = 2.0

 

COP = ∞

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

Others have also achieved Above Unity, Marcel has also shared with you all, freely:

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

We ARE Truth, its right here:

 Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

 

You need to focus, and do the experiments, learn what I have given you, and this, once thought impossible technology, will become second nature, like Breathing is!

It is easy, it is cheap and its definitely NOT Magic! There are No Secrets, I have given you Free Energy!

Its up to you, if you want to stay Fat Dumb and Silly like the Dumb Asses over on the other Forums!

Surely evidence is more than enough to show what I have given you is ample to get started? If this is not the case, very simple, you have not done your home work and know SFA about this field and need to go back to Kindergarten!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 28 August 2024

My Friends,

Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction is Incomplete! Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction lacks Asymmetry, it is entirely Symmetrical! Symmetry is the Ignorant Assumption that Science has always applied to Systems, even if the System is not Symmetrical by its Nature. Symmetry is always a SUBSYSTEM of any System, but not always the absolute functionality! It is not always how the System Operates!

 

Example One - The Conventional Electrical Transformer:

The Conventional Electrical Transformer is designed and operates within defined Symmetrical Standards! We always look at this System as: Output = Input - Losses, always a Below Unity System!

 

What is said, it is very important to understand this basic science:

Lecture - 17 Transformer Basics - 39:16.

There are two types of losses in the core of the transformer. The losses in the core of the transformer one is called the hysteresis loss, the other is called the eddy current loss; these are the two losses that occur within the transformer. So, if you take this core material so there is going to be input energy here going through into this port so ep ip and then there is going to be es is which comes out of the secondary port. But in between inside in the core there is one the hysteresis loss the hysteresis loss Ph and the eddy current loss Pe.

Further there is going to be some finite resistance in the coil of the conductor and i square R is going to be lost ip square Rp is going to be lost in the primary, i square R is going to be lost in the secondary. Now this occurs in the copper that is called the copper loss Pcu. So what occurs at the secondary es will be the primary power minus these losses, which would be Ph Pe and Pcu. So it will not be exactly same as the primary power what would you get at the secondary side, it would be less by an amount equivalent to the losses which are encountered like hysteresis loss, the eddy current losses and the core losses these are called the core losses and the copper loss. So keep this in mind that in a practical transformer the power output is going to be slightly lesser than the power input by an amount equal to the losses: the core losses and the copper loss; and the core losses composed of two main components: the hysteresis loss and the eddy current loss. 

 

We can see, and on the bench, we can do the experiment: Output = Input - Losses

This is an entirely Symmetrical System! Output depends entirely on the Input, and the Input and Output Coil Impedances change depending on the Load placed on the Secondary Coil. See Lecture - 20 The Practical Transformer, around the @5:10 mark, specifically the "Reflection" back on the Primary.

So, how do we change this System?

 

 

Example Two - The Non-Conventional Electrical Transformer:

I like to define this machine as an Electromagnetic Charge Pump, because technically, this is what the Machine is doing. However, a Non-Conventional Electrical Transformer is how we must recognise what we are doing!

First: This is SO Simple, don't over complicate this very, very simple machine!

In this video, I detail how Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction works:

 

See at the 30 minutes mark.

 

People should be pissing their pants with excitement! The problem is, so many researchers on the other forums are just too damn Dumb!

Tick the boxes:

 

In the above Videos, on the Conventional Electrical Transformer, we see the mention many times of M.M.F on both the Primary Coil and on the Secondary Coil, M.M.F is just Bμℓ or H/ℓ

Lecture - 17 Transformer Basics - 306.

B and H; B is flux density, H is the field intensity which is basically the motive force for generating the flow of flux. However, these two are related. Ideally if we plot B and H there should be a linear straight line B and H this is how it would be vacuum of free space, this is flux per unit area, this is M.M.F, NI by path length Amps per meter, this is Tesla or Weber's per meter square.

 

All we need to do, is circumvent the "Reflection" that is conventionally exerted on the Primary, we use this "Reflection" as a Source, and "Generate" an E.M.F on another Coil. This Coil, it assists the Primary Coil but opposes the Secondary. Opposition is the first part of the Cycle, in Faradays Law, actually Lenz's Law, see Figure 1:

 

So, we have a Force Imbalance in Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction, that's used to achieve Gains Above Unity!

This is how we achieve the success we have:


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Dumb Stupid Idiots flood the Forums, claiming to be Guru's, and the truth is, they have no idea what so ever, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282



The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided an entire Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment and 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already!



Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Technically, My Friend Wistiti was the first, but for undisputable numbers, we have to see Tinmans effort.

Tinman was the first: COP = 1.7

 

Others followed, like Captainloz: COP = 1.9

Hey Chris,

If people watch your videos its all in there. My experiment is proof of that. I was feeling very frustrated for a long time but then I stumbled on to your youtube channel and it inspired me to keep going. I actually have your book from way back, I wish now just stayed with it but I went down the Ruslan and Akula rabbit holes for too long without understand Asymmetry and the re-gauging process. Anyway mate I'm just trying to say you should be proud of yourself. You are doing a great thing here!

Cheers,

Loz

Ref: Captainloz COP = 2.0

 

COP = ∞

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

Others have also achieved Above Unity, Marcel has also shared with you all, freely:

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

 

I have given you ALL of the answers! You 100% should be able to build machines that Output Power more than you put into the System! With a little bit of work! Many have already done this! Many!

We ARE Truth!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Luminerix posted this 29 October 2024

Hello Chris& Friends -

High time for a post from me. I am sorry for the long delay.
I went with what I had and could figure out myself, and tried a lot of things in order to preempt redundant questions here.
Also, of course, each day only has 24 hours, and other things need attention too.
Having said that, I have some hopefully relevant questions, and also some aspects that may be new to readers here.

[Chris- if this is not the right place, please just move it or let me know what to do with it]

 

So what can I present:

1 - some measurements with LEDs in the mW range suggesting a possible POC > 1

2 - long term operation of large-ish numbers of LEDs with batteries that supposedly should not have enough mAh to sustain this

3 - incandescent light bulb operation with measurements suggesting POC > 1 but subject to some doubt.

 

Good news first: There is 'asymmetrical regauging' in my setups- I am on #9 already, and learn.

 

Fig.1 regauging after exciter pulse on open circuit

Fig.1 regauging after exciter pulse on open circuit

 

Alas -this is on the open circuit. As soon as I connect a load, it mostly collapses and the load will not be energized.

About my setups:
I started with OPA541 devices, of which I martyred two by accidentally exposing them to too much current.
What works better and much cheaper are these MOSFET modules from amazon: 10 pieces for $12.99
I also learned how to rig a MOSFET (std IRFZ44) myself, but I haven't gotten around to fine tuning it yet, bcs this gave me quite some results.
By the way: These 0.1 Ohm cement resistors turned out to be really useful, I made the mistake like others before to initally try the fancy audio power resistors that turn out to be wirewound.

 

Fig.2 0.1 Ohm cement resistor and IRFZ44 MOSFET


Fig.2 0.1 Ohm cement resistor and IRFZ44 MOSFET


From the beginning, I have thus worked with LEDs, there seems to be something involved that is quite interesting.Fig.3  90 LEDs running on one AAA battery 1.56 Volt - 15 parallel rows of 6 LED in series
Fig.3  90 LEDs running on one AAA battery 1.56 Volt - 15 parallel rows of 6 LED in series

What I do get when I put on a load in the form of a couple LEDs is as can be seen in the next figure.
Yellow is the Voltage from POC[out], light blue is current over load resistor out, purple is input voltage and dark blue input current.

 

Fig.4 work cycle on scope


Fig.4 work cycle on scope


Yellow: Voltage on POC[out]

Light Blue: Voltage over 0.1 Ohm cement resistor on GND side of POC[out] displayed as Amps

Purple: Voltage from power supply (+)

Dark Blue: Voltage over 0.1 Ohm cement resistor on (-) side of power supply displayed as Amps


Nice: Observe the input pulse voltage as dent in the purple V trace, and the input current as ramp during the exciter pulse.
0.1 Ohm cement resistors, probe on x1, and probe setting in scope on 10x.

The output (or load)- side has some sort of truncated 'work cycle' as I would call it, that collapses after some time, depending on input voltage, duty cycle and some other factors.
During this duty cycle, there is a current over the cement resistor on the load side, as seen nicely as light blue, coinciding with the yellow 'work cycle' as I call it..

While this does not succeed in lighting up heavy ohmic loads, I have been able to do some marvels with LEDs with this effect.

About the POC > 1 -  I want to be cautious and not make definite claims. Also of course because I don't know how to harvest any energy on that side. 

But: In several arrangements, I can see numerically larger output wattage than input wattage, albeit in the mW range.

[maybe better split this into 3 parts as to not make it too unwieldy]

Luminerix posted this 29 October 2024

Fig 5. Work cycle and input and output wattage

Purple is the output side and green is the input side in the next figure.

So U*I in input side reads 15mW and U*I on the ouput side 37mW

There are several aspects to this method that confuse me, so I won't claim to have understood what is gong on there.

So I made another unorthodox approach estimating power production:

 
I ran 18 LEDs on a AAA battery for 350 hours. AAA battery is supposed to have 1000 - 1200 mAh
This will mean 3 - 4 mA over 350 hours to drive 18 LEDs

Fig 6 350 hours of LED with AAA battery

Fig 6 350 hours of LED with AAA battery

 


Also, running 180 LEDs on 5.48 V and 30 mA can be seen in next two figures:

 


Well, how far can I take this?

93 LEDs, all in parallel, driven by a 25mAh 377 WATCH battery.
Lasted a bit over two hours to drain from 1.55V to 0.9V
25mAh over two hours that would make it 12.5 mA constantly over two hours. 
Operating 93 LEDs on 12.5 mA seems rather .. not possible to me.

I will also be making another long term test with another AAA battery, I was just aiming for the tiniest conventional power source available, lol!
Fig9

 

The '377' - watch battery is in the Lego-block at the bottom right, fresh from the sealed package

Fig10

Fig11

 

93 green LEDs in parallel running for two hours on a 1.55V button cell, 377-type with allegedly 25mAh 

So there is some evidence that suggests there is POC > 1 , but I it is rather tiny, and I am confused about some aspects of the measurements.

I hope that this is not simply a Joule Thief - but I strongly believe not, because there simply should not be enough energy in these batteries to sustain operation of the LEDs over such long period of time, and the 'Joule Thief' can only squeeze the batteries for every last Joule the have and not provide anything extra!

[continued]

 

 

Luminerix posted this 29 October 2024


So I made another coil rig. Ferrite core, I am using ferrtie cores. ca 260 turns on the POCs, and 40 on primary.

With this setup, I finally juice up a resistive load: An incandescent light bulb 110 V 6 Watt nominal:

Fig 12

Fig13

Fig14

Fig15


In Fig 15, green trace is input of 1.3 Watt and purple is output, 5.38 Watt
NICE!

But then - these averages over processes that display huge spikes, which makes it questionable and unsatisfactory at least.

This is a 110 Volt incandescent bulb with 6 Watt nominal.
According to the yellow trace, I have 437 Volts!!! 
And yes, it is 10x on the probe and 10x on the scope setting.

But questions abound - why does it read a _negative_ amperage on the output side?

Why does this not instakill the LEDs that are also on the load side?

There are short power surges after exciter pulse phase- why does that also appear on the input side? 

I will continue to work on this - especially the measurements are confusing.

It seems the standard model of electrical circuits somehow does not quite apply here :-}


I want to express my gratitude and appreciation for what you are doing! Thank You!
Also, I tried to be as brief as possible with my presentation here, of course there are oodles of more pics and stuff, 
but any publication first of all has to be brief and not confusing.

I would be happy about comments and hints - 
Having gone through nine builds now, I will focus on measurement blocks next I will be working on improving my circuitry, i.e. porperly tuned MOSFET etc.

Also, I would like to ask a noob electrician question: Chris, can you give me some hints on how to rig those protection capacitors and the input diodes? (of course I have been over your videos meticulously, and also over the 'measurement' threads here, and maybe I missed exactly that part, sorry if I am just being a bit daft)

I have placed diodes but it was not enough to prevent the OPA541s from getting fried and I somehow can't wrap my head around how to do the exact placement of the caps and the diodes - with the MOSFETs I just limit my power supply to 0.3A 
 
An important issue also is - how to harvest the energy?
The ultimate goal will be to make the circuit self sustaining - charging a battery comes to mind but that is clumsy in many ways.
How else could that be done?

Cheers& All the Best!
 Luminerix

Luminerix posted this 29 October 2024

small addendum: I see the mentions in other threads here of negative power and apparent negative current, I include the questions about this for sake of the narrative ...

Chris posted this 30 October 2024

Hey Luminerix,

Nice work, Thanks for Sharing!

I have not analyzed your scope shots in detail yet, but yes, you're right, it is very easy to achieve Above Unity Gains in a machine once one knows the correct Path Forward!

Ironically:

It seems the standard model of electrical circuits somehow does not quite apply here :-}

 

Yes, Sir, the current Electrical Engineering Model is only 50% Correct, there is a whole other half of Engineering that has been deliberately missed! The same is true of all the Conventional Models in  Science today, simply because the unyielding desideratum to make everything Symmetrical, when this is entirely Fictional Science, has made todays establishment a joke! The Dogma insisted upon by foolish people has made Conventional Science Flippant and Laughable!

 

There are short power surges after exciter pulse phase- why does that also appear on the input side?

 

Any Change in Magnetic Field in the Core, will be Transformed in the Coils, as a Voltage, and if there is Magnetic Field Tension, then a Current will be Pumped. 

Tension is the best word I can find to describe the action that occurs in these machines, Partnered Output Coils bring on Cycles of Tension, a Magnetic Compression and Magnetic Decompression, an out of Equilibrium System, that uses Magnetic Fields to Accelerate Charged Particles down an Insulated Wire, a Wave Guide.

 

Also, I would like to ask a noob electrician question: Chris, can you give me some hints on how to rig those protection capacitors and the input diodes? (of course I have been over your videos meticulously, and also over the 'measurement' threads here, and maybe I missed exactly that part, sorry if I am just being a bit daft)

 

Without knowing your current Circuit, I can only give you broad advice. Any time you introduce components, you change the Circuit and operation of the circuit! This may give you negative results.

Typically Conventional Science will Short Circuit the Transient:

At Q1 TOff, the Magnetic Field in the Coil will Collapse, because it is no longer Supported, and the Time Rate of Change, of the Collapsing Magnetic Field, will induce a Voltage in the Coil.

The Voltage Polarity of the Terminals T1 and T2 will flip, T1 will become Negative and T2 will become Positive. When Q1 is On, the reverse is true, T1 is Positive and T2 is Negative. The difference between T2 and T3 is just the RDSOn of Q1, so T2 and T3 are not the same.

Conventional Science tells you to Protect components with a Diode like this:

  

However, we are Shorting out, and burning Energy that can be reused:

 

This is NOT Above Unity as it stands, not by itself! The energy in the Globe is evidence of this.

 

I want to express my gratitude and appreciation for what you are doing! Thank You!

 

You are most welcome Luminerix!

I am so pleased you can see the Truth and can see past the Lies that others push down other peoples throat, with no guilt whatsoever! They are already shown, to many people, to be lying Scum Bags, that have no idea whatsoever!

Aboveunity.com has changed the world and has shown what REAL Science is and how easy it really is!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Plasmonic posted this 21 November 2024

Hey everyone,

Been a while since I have had much to make a post about but I have been thinking along these lines of Chris' latest post above and I think I have some information that I can add to it that may be useful.  If I make any mistakes or am wrong hopefully someone can correct me so don't take this as an absolute truth in it's entirety.

First I want to point out this quote from Chris in the post above

At Q1 TOff, the Magnetic Field in the Coil will Collapse, because it is no longer Supported, and the Time Rate of Change, of the Collapsing Magnetic Field, will induce a Voltage in the Coil.

The time rate of change and the collapse of the coil is sort of the question part of my line of thinking, but here is the thing I want to point out that I hope to investigate before too long.  You can confirm part of my idea in a simulator which is that you can control the fall time of the collapse of the magnetic field in this circuit by using the output diodes and an output circuit with a specific resistance or voltage level.  

For controlling the fall time with an output voltage level would look like using a capacitor of a specific size that would charge to a significant voltage with one inductive collapse of the Primary Coil.  Lets say using a ~1uF capacitor and discharging while it's not being charged to keep it's voltage from going higher than your mosfet can handle.

An alternative could be using a fairly high voltage battery, lets just assume 48-72 volts.

The last alternative I can think of is using a high impedance load paired with a quite small capacitor to assist in only converting voltage to current, not quite the same as option 1 but similar idea.

So the reason this can control the rise and fall of an inductive collapse is that it forces the conversion of the magnetic field into a voltage thus causing the current/magnetic field of the primary to dissipate faster due to the Voltage resisting the momentum of the current instead of freewheeling through a low impedance, which would cause a longer current decay time, making more back EMF which would determine how quickly the coil can discharge.

TL;DR of the last paragraph;  The more voltage the coil has to push against during the magnetic field collapse the faster the current will fall in the coil.

 

So that is the practical bit of my thinking currently related to this, here is a snapshot of a simulation that demonstrates this.  The image below shows 2 different circumstances and the 2 sections of the waveform demonstrating this effect of voltage pushing back on the primary during collapse being able to speed up the magnetic field collapse.

The first falling yellow line of the waveform is with the coil discharging through a 100 ohm load, the second falling waveform is of the circuit as imaged using a 1 ohm load to cause a higher current and back emf in the coil.

Rise and fall comparison of 100 ohms vs 1ohm

 

I have not done any experiments yet but effectively you have a boost converter as part of your primary output circuit, where you may be able to control the fall time which may be useful to explore but I cannot confirm this.

Hopefully this all made sense, this was kind of a hot off the press idea that's been rattling around for a couple days but then I reread this post and couldn't help but share.  Glad to be back and I hope everyone is doing well.

Be Well All,

matt

Chris posted this 21 November 2024

Hey Plasmonic,

Your ideas are on track, but please understand, this is only a very small part of the total Answer.

We always have:

 

Rise:

  • Ascend
  • Surge
  • Elevate
  • Uplift
  • Escalate
  • Increase
  • Soar
  • Climb
  • Amplify
  • Advance

 

Decay:

  • Deteriorate
  • Decline
  • Diminish
  • Erode
  • Degenerate
  • Corrode
  • Decompose
  • Crumble
  • Disintegrate
  • Wither

 

In other words, we always have a Building Up, and then a Falling Down of the Magnetic Field. This is known conventionally as Regauging, we cover this here: Asymmetrical Regauging

We can use this approach to off set the Direct Opposition, of Generating Electrical Energy. Thus we Circumvent the "Lenz's Law" issue, that governs and is responsible for Conservation of Energy.

This Video shows you how to achieve this:

 

Many threads here on this forum show you how to do this and give answers on the path ahead.

We are here and will help if you need it, so please feel free to create your own thread and make progress.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Plasmonic
  • Augenblick
Plasmonic posted this 22 November 2024

Hi Chris,

Thank you, and I totally agree with you, and I don't claim to understand what I sorta hinted at not knowing, I was in a rush.

I guess what I was pointing out is that you can control the mosfet protection by controlling the output voltage, and pondering the idea that you could match the rise and fall time of your input.  If the rise and fall time matching may help with resonance I don't know but it intrigues me.

I'm under the understanding that you want a sharp collapse, the primary magnetic field basically disappearing.  What I presented could at least may be a method to find a happy balance of mosfet protection with some relatively simple solutions and without TVS diodes while being able to alter the primary collapse time.

I only meant to add to the post that I quoted of yours to point out some details that may be able to be tuned for at least one benefit or another.  While other questions remain to be answered, answers I don't have myself at the moment.  My search for a deeper understanding continues.

I started up your video to review, thank you.

Be Well,

matt

Chris posted this 08 December 2024

Hey Everyone,

For nearly Ten Years now, we have continued to show how completely ignorant other forums and researchers remained for many years on Energy Machines!

 

Fact

It is a Fact, Free Energy Machines, are fundamentally a function of an incomplete Science, today we know as Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction! I have proven this fact time and time again!

Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction is incomplete, simply because it is currently entirely Symmetrical! Zero Asymmetrical component has ever been introduced, until now, I have introduced the incomplete Science here in my pages.

 

Your Freedom

I have to say it, your freedom comes down to one thing: Free Will

Either you choose to Evolve and learn how these things work and make use of Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction, of you stay Fat Dumb and Silly. The choice is yours!

 

Evolution

Sooner or later, you will be forced to evolve! It is a fact, and undeniable!

To Evolve, you must take advantage of the types of Energy Machines that I have shared with you all freely!

 

Where to start?

Start by studying Electromagnetic Induction - It is Incomplete! Know this!

I have shown you where all the holes are and I have given you the answers to the holes!

Learn where the holes are and what's required to fill the holes, and then the Machines I have given you, will make sense! Learn what the definitions of Power, Voltage and Current are, because this will make your journey easier!

Learn what is required to scale up these small machines, and then you will know how to build something useful!

 

Conclusion

This is simple and cheap, I have done all the hard work for you! All you have to do, is utilise what I have given you! Get your head out of the clouds, start thinking more logically and sensibility about the fundamental things, Voltage, Current and how a Changing Magnetic Field in Time interacts with a Coil of Wire.

 

Perhaps the future generations will realise what it is that I have given and maybe they will utilise it?

Your window of opportunity is closing, you need to grasp the Future with all the hands you can get and go for it!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Elvis posted this 08 December 2024

it is very easy, follow Chris's instructions, it works just like Chris told you

E

Chris posted this 14 December 2024

Hey Elvis,

Yes Sir! Its so simple, anyone wanting to start, it does seem like a big effort, there seems like a lot to learn, however, the fundamentals are just, basic, standard Conventional Science, High School Science for the most part!

The parts we have fixed and added to are simply seen on the Bench, in Experiment, and once one understands the VERY Simple Experiments, then Scaling is just the next step into the Future!

Very Simply, everyone knows the fundamental concept; For every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction!

Well, we have taken this one small step further, because this is incomplete, the completion, and shown in Experiment:

For every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction, and for every Reaction, there is an equal and opposite Counter-Reaction.

 

Conventional Science has Ignored every single: Counter-Reaction, and thrown it away. This represents the move from Symmetry to what Nature really is, Asymmetry, Chirality is a property of an object that is asymmetric and cannot be superimposed on its mirror image. The insistence of Symmetry in Conventional Science has been its fall, and the Dogma surrounding this Ignorance, has been has shown who the Ignorant truly are!

When a guy, in his Garage, or Shed, can show how Holey Science truly is in one simple experiment:

 

@29.3 minutes, I show you how completely easy this is!

Think:

For every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction, and for every Reaction, there is an equal and opposite Counter-Reaction.

 

and you will be 75% there!

I truly love Humanity, but there are a lot of Dumb Idiots out there! We need to educate them, but, some are happy to stay Fat Dumb and Stupid!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close