Not sure why someone can see a red flag about Nigel and do not see a red flag on those who make eronate conclusions like Robert Murray Smith. With my little understanding I managed to replicate some of his setups … if I could have access to all files he published probably I could replicate almost all his setups.
Also his statement about yttrium is correct to be used instead of gallium for enhanced performance … just look at specialised semiconductors where gallium have been swapped for yttrium.
I think he is the first one whom managed to show how to use permanent magnets instead of bucking coils. Mainstream science does not admit that permanent magnets have their own energy. If anyone bother to read old patents, inventors say that instead of iron core, permanent magnets can be used. But, if permanent magnets are too strong a piece of iron must to be interposed between them. See, David Davis Jr Manual book experiment with bucking coils on one iron core where single pole is created in the middle and can be either south or north depending on polarities applied to the coil. North pole magnetic indicate where output should be and you can collect in middle point or extremities depending on your needs. Anyway in this case a second source of the opposite polarity should be employed, which can be air or earth ground.
Many people get confused about alternative current and currents that alternate, like when current alternate means switching polarities at input or keep the same polarity but interrupt.
In one of the experiments of Nigel using 2 iron nails, 2 permanent magnets, 1 coil and 2 different ground connections … he just don’t disclose switching mechanism, but show electric energy generated in both forms as AC and DC in the same time and despite high voltage of 60 V an ordinary LED don't burn. His explanation is just common sense and logic outrageous simple where the 2 magnets are placed at ends of iron nails with their south pole facing ground input.
I don’t understand why is so difficult for many people to visualise an iron bar with (at least) 2 windings on it and powered up in consecutive sequences will just simulate a movement of a magnet inside a coil and depending how is power up we can simulate in-out or just one way like a diametrical polarised ring magnet which rotate inside a coil. It seems that almost everyone are looking just to electric flow and utterly ignore magnetic flow … only speaking about induction instead of analyse magnetic
