Observation

  • 498 Views
  • Last Post 10 hours ago
Chris posted this 11 July 2025

My Friends,

You have been lied to, mislead, and swindled, by self proclaimed gurus, you those members of other forum's, they are absolutely NOT qualified, never will be, yet they have had a grasp on your direction for decades. 

The Power of Observation, key to understanding and furthering our technologies, advancing as a Species, hopefully together.

We all know the Floyd Sweet VTA Schematic, we have seen it a million times, but have we closely studied and made critical Observations:

 

A short list of some Key Observations:

  • P1 supplies a Voltage and therefore a Current to one coil in P2 and vice versa.
  • At-least two signals at any one time is present, one from FB1/2 and another from the opposite Power Coil.
  • The Arrows indicate the Bucking, which ties in with the below quote.
  • The VTA was started by a battery, and stopped by momentary disconnection of the Power Coils.

 

Quote



FIELD SUPER-POSITION AND THE VACUUM TRIODE

Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there is no magnetic field. This is due to the superposition of the fields. However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric field surrounds it. When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.

The principle of superposition states that; "In order to calculate the resultant intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually as though the other were not present". The resultant is obtained by vector addition of each field considered singularly.


Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils...

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.




Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically: E = (B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )



You will note: E = (B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V ) is this statement, in long form:

 

Quote



If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.


 

 

My Friends, can we Cross Reference these observations? Yes we can!

Andrey Melnichenko's GLED uses the very same facts, also the same with Kapanadze's machines.

I already tried to show you all, Tinman's RT V3 also uses the very same effects by injecting a small current into one POC at the right time:

 

I said:

Look For Effects - I have always said this, this is how I found this path! Some effects to look for:

Ref: Chris

 

I gave you all, a very simple experiment a long time ago:

Some of my Pulsed DC work was documented here: Akula0083 30 Watt Self Running Generator.

 

The CLOSE Observation of this experiment was a real blessing for me! I found some very important aspects to Bucking Coils in the experiment! Other very bennificial Experiments also helped!

You will obtain success if you follow these key observations, which are Intuitive yet contrary to what we know. I will have more on this very soon!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
skzt234 posted this 3 days ago

Does anybody know how transformers work? 
Why does the primary take more current when the load current is increased?
How does it know to increase the current?

There is no electrical link between primary and seconday.
The only link between input and output is the magnetic field in the core.
If you can answer the question why the primary takes more current when the secondary takes more current then this is a starting point for moving forward.

Of course the answer is that the load current generates a magentic field in the secondary coil which is opposite to that from the primary.
Thus, as in any linear system, the superposition theorem applies and the two fields (forward and reverse are summed together).
Thus the primary field is reduced as the secondary back mmf is subtracted from it.

But the field cannot go to zero because then there would be no reverse field to cancel the forward field, so it goes to some lower value.
Thus the net field is reduced for the same input current therefore the input iniductance (ratio of current to field) is reduced, hence the input takes more current.

Okay! How can we get around this?
THe secondary field only cancels the primary field because they are at the same frequency.
If a voltage at frequency f is applied to the primary, the magnetic field is at frequnecy f and so is the output emf.
And there is no law that says you can't take a million amps from the secondary .
Faradays law only states that a changing magnetic field will generate a changing emf, it doesn't specify the maxmimum current in any way.

So our output emf is at frequency f - we cannot get around this. But we CAN engineer the current to be at a different frequency.
What if we switch the output sine waveform to chop out the middle third of each half-wave. 
Then we generate a waveform with a strong 3rd harmonic component. 
Apply bandpass filtering at 3f so the load takes current at this frequency.
Apply bandpass filtering at f at the primary side so that the generated 3rd harmonic at the secondary sees a high impedance at the primary and does not drive into the source.
Switching the output waveform makes the circuit relatively simple and minimises losses in generating the new frequency component.
There will be many other harmonics generated by switching of course, but to a crude estimation you would have generated a different frequency which then will not clash with the primary frequency, and hence the secondary field will not cancel the primary field.

Comments? suggestions?
Will it work?
Thanks for reading!

  • Liked by
  • Drasko
skzt234 posted this 3 days ago

Wait .. no. It wouldn't give third harmonics. I think only 2nd and 4th so it wouldn't work. But anyway you get the idea- you can play with the load current to try and generate other frequencies

  • Liked by
  • Drasko
skzt234 posted this 10 hours ago

A couple more thoughts. 

Why does the turns ratio rule always appliy to transformers, whether open-circuit or loaded?

An open circuit transformer is an inductor, effectively. So you would think that if you double the frequency of the input voltage, the primary current would be half (due to the reactance being double), therefore the magnitude of the magnetic field will be half and hence the output voltage would be half. But why doesn't this happen?

It is because the output voltage is proprtional to rate of change and hence is doubled due to this, hence the turns ratio is maintained. Isn't it interesting though how it always maintains the voltage!?

Also remember that a transformer works both ways. Just because we call one side 'primary' and the other 'secondary' doesn't really mean anything and this just arbitrary. A current in either coil will produce a magnetic field in the core and hence a voltage (emf) at the other winding(s).

Thus current in either coil will contribute to the magnetic signal in the core. Multiple magnetic frequencies can co-exist in the core at the same time, just like currents at multiple different frequencies can co-exist in a wire, without interfering with each other.

The current in the coils is like the 'input' to the magnetic core and current translates directly into magnetism. And the 'output' from the magnetic core is the voltage developed at the winding (all windings in fact) due to the rate of change of magnetic flux - at any and all frequencies present in the magnetic domain.

 

 

We're Light Years Ahead!
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

Past Visitors: 0 | Live Visitors: 0

3D globe widget by: Chris Sykes

Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:
N. Tesla

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close