Hi Chris, when I say Transverse and Longitudinal waves I'm actually referring to something different, furthermore I don't follow the common mainstream model of Electricity or the Electron but rather the Aetheric model as the conjugate of Dielectric and Magnetic fields as Tesla and Steinmetz used, there are too many problems with the particle model of the Electron for me to ever accept it.
The electrical giants of the past all disagreed with the definition of an electron as a “negatively charged particle”. Even JJ Thomson defined it as “the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction”. They all agree to its existence, but never accepted it as a “particle”. They fully reject the terminology of “positive” and “negative” charges.
William Russell may have said it best here: “To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.” – W. Russell
Then there's Steinmetz, someone as important to the current electrical grid as Tesla and one of the smartest electrical engineers to have ever lived. The "Wizard of Schenectady": “Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, (the electron), on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, (the magnetic and dielectric). This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)
Oliver Heaviside, the guy who invented the coaxial cable, created vector calculus and reworked all of Maxwell's equations into a much better and currently accepted version. He took Maxwells at 20 equations with 20 variables and reduced those to 4 equations with 2 variables and we should all be calling them Heavisides Equations. He said the idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor is a psychosis. He said the same of relativity.
Maxwell was a real genius though and deserves credit for what he contributed to field theory and “science” in general. He showed that electric and magnetic fields travel through space as waves of a perturbed medium moving at the “speed of light”, and that light was also a perturbation of the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena, Aether/Counterspace. He also disagreed with the definition of a negatively charged “particle”.
Then there's Tesla who basically said the particle model wasn't logical either:
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
“To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble!
Just to mention another improbability, the force tending to tear an electron apart is, in pounds per square inch, represented by the staggering figure of 256,899 followed by twenty-one zeros — and this is 513,798,000,000,000,000,000 times greater that the tension that tungsten wire can withstand! And yet it does not burst! Not even when it is hurled against an obstacle with a speed hundreds of thousands times greater than that of a bullet!" ” - Nikola Tesla Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)
“My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the ‘electron’ leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal.” – N. Tesla
But here is a real gem, you wouldn’t expect Einstein to be in this camp also but he was: “In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to give an account of their nature.”
“For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.” - Einstein on electrons; “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916
There's also Eric P. Dollard too: “JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of Michael Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not an electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – Eric Dollard.
Those people quoted above of the past are responsible for the entire electric grid and most of the devices people in developed countries use on a daily basis. I’ll take their word over the same people who spread propaganda and continue to deny that free energy is a very real reality any day of the year.
The reason I refer to Longitudinal disturbances as Dielectricity over Electricity is because Electricity is the conjugate of Dielectric and Magnetic fields, which themselves are the Aether/Counterspace under tension or torsion and the loss of that tension respectively, if the Aether is Water then the Dielectric would be Ice if it had elastic properties and the Magnetic as Steam. When these 2 mutually destructive fields make contact we get Electricity, with the Dielectric being the Longitudinal Voltage and the Magnetic being the Transverse Amps:
This is what I typically mean when I say Longitudinal and Transverse waves, unless I make a specific note I'm referring to the geometry of the field itself, not a longitudinal wave in direction and transverse as a standing wave but as a wave without absolutely no magnetic transverse motion whatsoever, it's just how I use the language in this context.
A signal that contains magnetism must by necessity contain transverse motions in its perturbation regardless if it is a longitudinal propagation in direction or a transverse standing wave, whereas a purely Longitudinal Dielectric field propagation would not contain any such components or transverse motion of its field movement.
These are Tesla's "Non-Hertzian" waves he kept talking about using over Hertzian Electromagnetic, and is the type of power he was going transmit using Wardenclyffe:
1) From: Branimir Jovanovic, “tesla, spirit, work, vision”, freemental, 2001.
“I was very lucky to discover new and amazing phenomena, such as rotating magnetic field, glowing of wireless vacuum tubes and many other high frequency effects, which amazed the world. but what impressed me as more beautiful than anything else was the discovery of stationary waves, to which I came in 1899, and which showed that that the whole planet on which we live, despite its incomprehensible size, could be made to response with vibration to the lowest whisper of human voice.”
"dear Mr. Morgan, I improved my greatest discovery of all times – wireless transmission of electric energy to any distance, the work that took ten years of my life. it is a long-searched philosphers’ stone. I should only finish the plant I constructed and, in one leap only, the humanity will progress as in ages. i am the only man on this earth today with a special knowledge and ability to realize that miracle, which the others will probably not reach even in hundred years … please help me to finish my work or eliminate obstacles on my way. …”.
2) From: us patent 5 780 – “apparatus for transmission of electrical energy“:
"It is too noted that the phenomenon here involved in the transmission of electrical energy is one of true conduction and is not to be confounded with the phenomena of electrical radiation which have heretofore been observed and which from the very nature and mode of propagation would render practically impossible the transmission of any appreciable amount of energy to such distances as are of practical importance."
3) From: Canadian patent 142,352 – “art of transmitting electrical energy through the natural medium”:
"It is necessary to employ oscillations in which the rate of radiation of energy into space in the form of hertzian or electromagnetic waves is very small. to give an idea, i would say that the frequency should be smaller than twenty thousand per second, though shorter waves might be practicable. the lowest frequency would appear to be six per second, in which case there will be but one node, at or near the ground-plate, and paradoxical as it may seem, the effect will increase with the distance."
4) From: “Nikola Tesla on his work with alternating currents and their application to wireless telegraphy, telephony and transmission of power”, an extended interview, leland anderson, editor.; published 2002 by twenty-first century books:
"The apparatus which I devised was an apparatus enabling one to produce tremendous differences of potential and currents in an antenna circuit. these requirements must be fulfilled, whether you transmit by currents of conduction, or whether you transmit by electromagnetic waves. you want high potential currents, you want a great amount of vibratory energy; but you can graduate this vibratory energy.
By proper design and choice of wave lengths, you can arrange it so that you get, for instance, 5 percent in these electromagnetic waves and 95 percent in the current that goes through the earth. that is what I am doing. or, you can get, as these radio men, 95 percent in the energy of electromagnetic waves and only 5 percent in the energy of the current. the apparatus is suitable for one or the other method. I am not producing radiation in my system; I am suppressing electromagnetic waves. but, on the other hand, my apparatus can be used effectively with electromagnetic waves. the apparatus has nothing to do with this new method except that it is the only means to practice it. so that in my system, you should free yourself of the idea that there is radiation, that energy is radiated. it is not radiated; it is conserved."
These Dielectric currents and their non-magnetic nature bring a whole new soup of possibilities with them, including extremely far wireless power transmission and the ability to prevent the formation of heat in your circuit.
You asked how I would go about powering a POC with it and the answer is in the operation of a Hairpin circuit, a properly designed Hairpin circuit (which should include the magnets) produces these propagations at the spark gap, "an event" as Tesla called it, the stout bars basically act as a transmission line, by hooking a hairpin driver circuit into the Primary L1 of a POC I should be able to induce it with Dielectricity/Radiant Energy over regular Electromagnetic Electricity, which is also how the original Tesla Coils were meant to be used.
The Tesla coil was never meant to use magnetic induction as it is used today, it was meant to be induced with Dielectric Impulses:
"Tesla stated that voltages could often be increased at an amazing 10,000 volts per inch of axial coil surface. This meant that a 24-inch coil could absorb radiant 24 2 shockwaves, which initially measured 10,000 volts, with a subsequent maximum rise to 240,000 volts! Such transformations of voltage were unheard with apparatus of this volume and simplicity. Tesla further discovered that the output voltages were mathematically related to the resistance of turns in the helix.
High resistance meant higher voltage maxima. He began referring to his disrupter line as his special "primary', and to the helical coil placed within the shockzone, as his special "secondary". But he never intended anyone to equate these terms with those referring to magneto-electric transformers. This discovery was indeed completely different from magneto-induction. There was a real and measurable reason why he could make this outlandish statement. There was an attribute which completely baffled Tesla for a time. Tesla measured a zero current condition in these long copper secondary coils. He determined that the current, which should have appeared, was completely absent. Pure voltage was rising with each inch of coil surface. Tesla constantly referred to his "electrostatic induction laws", a principle which few comprehended.
Tesla called the combined disrupter and secondary helix a "Transformer". Tesla Transformers are not electromagnetic devices; they use radiant shockwaves, and produce pure voltage without current. Each transformer conducted a specific impulse duration with special force. Therefore each had to be "tuned" by adjusting the disrupter to that specific impulse duration. Adjustments of arc distance provided this control factor. Once each transformer was tuned to its own special response rate, impulses could flow smoothly through the system like gas flowing in a pipe." -The free energy secrets of cold electricity by Peter Lindemann
Dielectricity propagates without magnetic rarefaction until it experiences losses, that's when the magnetism forms and why circuits produce magnetism in the first place, the loss of the dielectric potential (Voltage) transforming into the Magnetic. Master Ivo has talked about them extensively on his channel but the basic principle is that they are made from ultra-fast voltage impulses, 100 Microseconds or less in duration. There are also some books written about it which I found very valuable in further understanding them, being "The Secrets of Cold War Technology" by Gerry Vassilatos and "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity" by Peter Lindemann.
If the POC is induced via Dielectricity over Electromagnetic (and provided the circuit configuration is optimized) the inducted fields of the POC won't contain Magnetism, and since magnetic resonance of 180 degrees is a very important factor in how these machines work I wonder if the over unity effects will occur.
On one hand, it's possible the opposing dielectric fields would also be180 degrees out of phase like magnetic resonance and interact like the magnetic fields do, on the other perhaps perhaps the lack of Magnetism will mean it can't induce the required tension and thus prevent it from giving Above Unity results?
I don't know, but I'm looking forward to trying it out after verifying regular EM induction gives a COP > 1 on my own POC, just have to find a suitable Oscilloscope that won't break my very limited budget first...
(I tried to include more images but the site wouldn't let me, I hope I was able to explain what I'm talking about clearly)
