What is B x V?

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 1.2K Views
  • Last Post 08 March 2022
Chris posted this 10 January 2021

My Friends,

I want to point out, in several posts now, I have posted the following quote:

Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets. 

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically: E = ( B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something

 

I have asked people to: "Focus on: 2 ( B x V ), this shows you the path forward!"

NOTE: the x in the Equation is the Cross Operator, here is the Definition:

The cross product a × b is defined as a vector c that is perpendicular (orthogonal) to both a and b, with a direction given by the right-hand rule and a magnitude equal to the area of the parallelogram that the vectors span.

 

This, E` - E = V x B, is directly related to The Lorentz Force!

 

In January 16 2015 I started my own thread: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy, that was great as a kick off.

I posted these two videos as: "Required Study" 

 

and

 

NOTE: The use of the term "Extra Electric Field".

 

The Electric Field E = the Magnetic Field B x Velocity V. Remember Floyd Sweet told us:

The nature of the motionally induced electric field is quite unique;

in order understand it more fully we must start by parting with a few misleading paradigms. When magnetic flux is moved perpendicularly across a conductor an electromotive force (E.M.F) is electromagnetically induced "within" the conductor.

"Within" is an artefact of the commonly used analogy comparing the flow of electric current within a wire to the flow of water within a pipe. This is a most misleading model theoretically. The true phenomenon taking place has little been thought of as involving the production of a spatially distributed electric field. We can see that the model's origins likely arose from the operation called "flux cutting", a most deceiving and misleading term.

A better term, "time varying flux modulation", does not imply any separation of lines of flux. Truly, lines of flux are always in closure upon themselves and are mathematically expressed as line integrals. It is fallacious to use the term "cutting", which implies time varying separation which does not in fact ever occur.

A motionally induced E-field is actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux described above.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

The Force F = qv x B. This is the force on the Charge in the Wire.

Where: q = n e l

  • n = Number density of Electrons.
  • e = Charge of Electrons.
  • l = Length

 

REMEMBER: Floyd Sweet required TWO of these V x B's!

  1. One is Negative!
  2. One is Positive!

 

This definition required Magnetic Fields Opposing!

This in combination with the old school term: bifilar, or clearer, more meaning full term: Partnered Output Coils should make a lot of sense to most people now! You now will be able to see why we need Two Output Coils:

 

We have done this, we can see, we can easily achieve: Three Sources of Energy in our very simple Circuit, where we only have to put One Source of Energy into the Circuit: Chris's Non Inductive Coil Experiment is the answer.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 13 January 2021

My Friends,

Lets define:

 

Where:

  1. Green Coil is the Input Coil: L1.
  2. Gold Coil under L1 is an Output Coil: L2.
  3. Gold Coil next to L2 is another Output Coil: L3.

 

Each Coil is a Source of Energy! L1 is the only Coil you have to put Energy Into, but most, if not all and more, you get back: p + -p = < 0.

This means, you have Energy coming out of all Coils! Three Sources of Energy!

Here is what I have: ( Some speculation here )

 

L2 Output:

If we achieve an Output Voltage of 10 Volts. If we can achieve a Current of 3 Amps. Then we can design out Coil to create a Magnetic Field ( B ) That Changes in Time ( t ). Lets work out the Magnetic Field:

  • Length: 3 cm or 0.03 meters.
  • Turns: 200 Turns.
  • Permeability: 1.0, for the moment.
  • Current: 3 Amperes.

 

With 10 Volts, and 3 Amps, we need a Load Resistance ( R ) of: 3.33333 Ohms

Calculating: 

// Vacuum Permeability of Free Space:
u0 = (4 * Math.PI) * (Math.Pow(10, -7));

// The relative permeability of magnetic iron is around 200.
k = 1.0;

// Relative Permeability:
u = k * u0;

// Turns:
N = 200;

// Length in Meters:
L = 0.03;

// Turn Density:
n = N / L;

// Curent:
I = 3.0;

// Magnetic Field:
B = u * n * I;

 

Gauss ( B ) = 251.3274, so L2 has a Changing magnetic Field, from 1.0 to 251.3274, over Time ( t ), a Source of Magnetic Field to Invoke Electromagnetic Induction in L3.

 

L3 Output:

Using our Calculator, we can Calculate the Voltage output on our L3 Coil. Here is an Example:

Now, a lot of answers can be gained here! If one study's and has a good understanding of the Electric "Generator", then one can see:

  • L2 Coil = Rotor Coil.
  • L3 Coil = Stator Coil

 

in an Electric "Generator"! The Analogy here is exactly the same! There is no difference what so ever!

 

L1 Input and Output:

The L1 Coil is the Analogy of Shaft Rotation, invoking the requirement of Change of Magnetic Field in Time! Essentially, this Coil is simply an Exciter Coil! Exciting the arrangement to perform its very own Work, via well known Laws!

I have shown already, the Input Coil must have some attention paid to it, its easy, follow the very simple instructions, all her know how this works! Your Input Coil must match the Frequency, an alst the Resonant Frequency for Ideal Operation! When done, you get large Negative Currents come back to charge your Source Power Supply, I have given an example already:

See: The Input Coil.

Where:

  • Purple Trace is the Math, showing Positive and Negative Power.
  • Pink Trace is the Gate Signal to the Mosfet.
  • Yellow is the Input Voltage.
  • Teal Trace is the Input Current, both Positive and Negative.

 

Positive Voltage multiplied by Negative Current = Negative Power: 1 x -1 = -1

Too many people make complication here when there is None! Its not complicated, do not confuse this! Follow Members here, most are successful and have this Working Already in one form or another!

Force your mind to think Simple! Ignore those that question and refute simple Science, they are just trouble makers!

Each and every Coil in this System is a Source of B x V, so we have our 2 ( B x V ) in L2 and L3 but also see B x V in L1 after the point of switch Off.

NOTE: B x V is old school terms, been replaced by The Magnetic A Vector Potential now. Thus: Connecting the dots to Energy - The A-Field

Best Wishes,

   Chris

deleted posted this 14 January 2021

Can I post this?

If it's too offtopic, feel free to delete it.

A Treatise on the Magnetic Vector Potential

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-52222-3

(use sci.hub to check it out)

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 14 January 2021

Hi Alan,

Yes the Magnetic A Vector Potential, having two components, A ( Electric Field with Curl ) and Phi ( Magnetic Field ), is important to learn about!

Floyd Sweet said:

Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there is no magnetic field. This is due to the superposition of the fields.

However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric field surrounds it.

When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something

 

Floyd Sweet then goes on to explain the first quote in the first post.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 04 March 2022

My Friends,

To reiterate on the topic of this thread some, B x V, what is it, and how do we get TWO of them? One Positive, and one Negative!

Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets. 

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically: E = ( B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something

 

Simple: POCOne is one B x V and POCTwo is the second B x V, so each Coil, Each Filar of the Bi-Filar Coil has a B x V, so we call this Partnered Output Coils!

 

Floyd Sweet gave us a Technology that 99.99% of the population was simply unable to Comprehend, because they choose to stay Ignorant to the most important aspects of Science, specifically Electromagnetic Induction! Its time we try to grasp an advanced version of Simplicity, dont you think?

The 1%, the Bottom Dwelling Scum, has to be removed for their Forcefull Insistance of Ignorance! Traitors are Hung by Tradition, how about we be a little leanient, or merciful, and let them live out their lives in a Pit of Mud and Darkness!

My Friends, its time we progress and put Ignorance to Bed and Sleep well with Knowledge we should have had over 100 years ago!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

P.S: In a Conventional "Generator", there is only One B x V, not two like we see in this thread!

Chris posted this 05 March 2022

My Friends,

B x V is the Magnetic Field B Crossing the Conductor at Right Angles, with Velocity V. Thus B cross V.

 

To be able to achieve 2 B x V, one Positive, and one Negative, simply a difference in Polatiry, which was predicted, and Mathematically shown by Floyd Sweet, we need to Expand Electromagnetic Induction just a little, moving from Symmetrical Electrical Electromagnetic Induction, to Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction!

This I have shown you all in the Series: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment

 

This is a very simple task, simply because Experiment shows us, ANY Changing Magnetic Field can be the Source of an EMF, even if it is the Secondary Coil in a Conventional "Generator"! Normally Not Used and thrown away! Wasted Energy! Incomplete Science, Incomplete Engineering! The willingness to accept a Doctrine installed and insisted on by Oligarchs!

A shame, Humanity has lost over 100 Years due to Arrogance, Ignorance, and Blind Faith in Non-Sense!

When one finds Magnetic Resonance, Equal in Magnitude and Opposite Magnetic Fields in Direction, between your Partnered Output Coils, you can observe Above Unity Results quite easily! Simply, your Input drops down by Magnitudes of Amplitude, due to MMF Imballance of the Asymmetrical arrangement! MMF of Each Coil has Imballance! Non-Symmetrical!

My Friends, In the Thread: Coil Geometry, you can find a secret that has taken me a while to solve, but there is a relationship that no one has ever been able to nail down and share with Humanity ever before! Floyd Sweet did know this secret, and hinted at it, but did not ever explain in any detail.

Energy Density comes from the Magnetic Field in the specified Area, and Changing in Time:

 

There is no Storage, there is Extraction, from The Copper Cu Atom, each Atom containing 29 Electrons, each Electron suscetpable to Orbital Change due to Magnetic Compression, or Field Intensity, another area in Science that leaves Holes for those exploring!

There is Charge Separation and Charge Acceleration Only! Thus a Charge Pump!

  • The Conventional Symmetrical Electric "Generator" is a Charge Pump! But Below Unity!
  • Partnered Output Coils are an Asymmetrical Charge Pump, and can go Above Unity, when one finds Magnetic Resonance!

 

This is so simple! Anyone can do this! Start small and cheap, move forward slowly, focusing on Observation and Exploration only!

We are so far ahead of the other Forums, simply because we have the Answers that the others simply Dont Have! We are World Leaders in Energy!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Forelle posted this 08 March 2022

Hi everyone Lately I am not very active on the forum but i have not given up. I only want at least to thank Chris and all others for the effort they are putting in.I am very glad to be part of this forum even if i am not very active at the moment. Thanks again. Oliver

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close