Free Energy is Easy - YOU Can Do It!!!

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 694 Views
  • Last Post 28 January 2025
Chris posted this 09 January 2025

My Friends,

I want to tell you: You are perfectly able to achieve Free Energy through these machines we have given you!

I will help you achieve this task!

Its real, it works, we have shown all of the world how this works and why this works!

Voltage, Current, where 6.241509 x 1018 Electrons, Stationary is One Volt, or One Coulomb if stored, or if moving at a rate of One Second, is One Ampere.

What makes Charge Move?

A Changing Magnetic Field!

 

We have shown you, Magnetic Fields arranged in an Asymmetrical arrangement, can give you a lot more Energy Output than you have to Input! Its only when you have a Symmetrical arrangement of Magnetic Fields, that you are bound to Below Unity Machines, because: Output = Input - Losses, = Below Unity!

 

@30:13 minutes, you will see:

 

This is very simple, if you read this post carefully, you can very easily see the commonsense, and the logic here to why this works! You can easily do this, you can have your own Free Energy Machine! You can see right there on the bench, something that Science has tried to tell you for hundreds of years, cant be done! We have done it, we are doing it!

I have shown you, what the other forums never ever showed:

We have covered before, the fact that the Input Coil sends Power Back to your Input! This is directly related to the Argand Diagram:

 

We can have Positive Voltage and Positive Current for Positive Power!

Inversely, we can have Positive Voltage and Negative Current, for Negative Power!

Here is an example:

 

Where:

  • Purple Trace is the Math, showing Positive and Negative Power.
  • Pink Trace is the Gate Signal to the Mosfet.
  • Yellow is the Input Voltage.
  • Teal Trace is the Input Current, both Positive and Negative.

 

I must apologise, I have better examples of this, but do not wish to confuse everyone. This example is sufficient to show what I am talking about.

 

Again, marked in Red, Positive Voltage and Negative Current, you have Negative Power. Not Negative Energy, Negative Power, I hope people do not confuse this as I believe people have in the past.

I hope this helps others when doing experiments, knowing what to look for is very important!

Remember: This is the very reason you can NOT Use RMS Measurements on the Input! See Measurements Thread and see the above Figures:

  • Average: 95.7 mW
  • RMS: 1.28 W


A Huge error here! 1.28 - 0.095 = 1.185 Watts. 13.474 times!

RMS is totally Wrong! Remember, your Zero Graticule Line is very important:

  • above: Positive
  • below: Negative

 

Its worth noting, there is 1.28 Watts in the System. An analogy, inaccurate as it stands, is, Power Delivered to the Coil might be in the order of 1.28 Watts. Then the Coil returns 1.28 - 0.095 = 1.185 Watts back to the Power Supply. So the Total Power used is only: 0.095 Watts. Power Returned, is not Power Used! 

 

This is Reactive Power Conditions, except V and I are in apparent phase. We have 1.28 Watts of Work Done for the Cost of 0.095 Watts. I hope this makes sense? Please understand, the example is not giving accurate Power In and Out, only using figure seen in this Analogy for simplicity.

I believe, 1.28 - 0.095 / 2 = 0.5925, is the In and Out power. I am sure others here, perhaps YoElMiCrO, Jagau, Vidura, or someone can correct me here?

Meaning, the Power in Purple Above the Zero Graticule Line:

 

Is more than the Math in Purple Below the Zero Graticule line:

 

By: 0.095 Watts.

Ref: The Input Coil

 

No one, ever, has shown you this effect, they could not, because they simply just did not know what they were doing, they were Plants, in a pot, there to hold you all back and stop you from discovering anything important! Well, what I have shown you above is astounding and it very important to understand!

I have been here, doing this for a very long time now, my Character has been attacked at every level by Trolls, but they have never once proven me wrong, because they cant! My Track Record speaks for itself, many have achieved what I have given them! Many have done the impossible, because its actually very easy and relatively cheap to achieve!

In 1831, Michael Faraday was always supposed to give you the complete picture, but for some 197 Years, it still isn't clear! Well, my web pages show you the complete picture, and why we have seen, through out history, so many people show machines that just cant be explained:

 

These demonstrations exist because they were real, but hidden from you! Stupid people acting like idiots, spreading fake nonsense about these machines, because they cant stop, and logically work them out. Far to many people with Ultra Egos and a God Complex, when in fact the complete opposite is true! It was satan worshippers keeping you from this!

Floyd Sweet was my Hero, and I have studied him for a long time!

We have resurrected the VTA Technology, and we have shown where so many lied and spread fake nonsense about it!

Truly: This Works and You can do it!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 09 January 2025

My Friends,

I have shown you examples of Electromagnetic Induction, in many videos, showing how the Changing Magnetic Field: "Generates" a Voltage, and a Current will flow when the Voltage has been: "Generated".

Partnered Output Coils shows you this:

 

Voltage is the action of Charge Separation, moving the two different Polarities of Charge to the associated Terminal.

Voltage is just an Accumulation of Charge, Current is the Rate at which the Charge Flows in time t, normally in Seconds.

This is all High School Science and nearly all of you know this stuff. Which gives you a good start, a good background to understand this Technology:

 

Everyone should know this:

 

I have done a Series on Electromagnetic Induction:

 

Q:   Why did I do Three Videos?

A:   To give you a subconscious message, that Three is Asymmetry, its the Number that represents an Asymmetrical Arrangement! The number Two is the number of Symmetry! Partnered Output Coils shows you Asymmetry!

Q:   Why is Asymmetry Important?

A:   Asymmetry of Force is Important, because if we have a Symmetrical Force Arrangement, we will never see any Gain in Total Action. Lets do an experiment to show this:

If we ask two kids to move a box, asking them to push the box 3 Meters to the East, but one of the kids does not what way East is, and both kids have the same strength and weight, we get:

 

We get a Force Cancellation: 10 Newtons + -10 Newtons = Zero Newtons. We have Symmetrical Forces, Equal, but Opposing, so one is a Positive Force, one is a Negative Force.

Simple Right?

Lets change this around a little and think 'Outside the Box', pardon the pun, if we get another Child to help, and add their Force to the arrangement, like so:

Now we get a Force Cancellation: 10 Newtons + 10 Newtons + -10 Newtons = 10 Newtons. We have Asymmetrical Forces, no longer Equal, so two Positive Forces, one is a Negative Force.

We have 10 Newtons of Force to the East and the Box will now move, a difficult way to make the Box move, but this gets the analogy across.

Simple Right?

So, Coils and Transformers work with the very same analogy! Typically we would always see a Conventional Transformer have the very same first analogy, where the MMF of the Input Coil is opposed by the Secondary Coil, and the total Force works out to be the same, Cancellation of MMF.

I have shown the world, we don't have to have this arrangement and we can be smarter than this, if we just use Asymmetry, as I have shown:

 

@30:13 minutes, you will see:

NOTE: With a smart Design, we can eliminate almost all of the Negative Force that the Input Coil would see from the Secondary Coil in a Conventional Transformer - We have shown many times this is true, we have seen varying degrees of Reduced Back MMF, some may understand the term: "We have circumvented Lenz's Law" and obtained Free Energy, but this terminology is very wrong and we desperately need to correct these unbelievable bad terms and meanings! They are terribly wrong, which makes it hard for anyone to navigate through this pond which has been deliberately muddied!

 

My Friends, many here have working machines, here is a small sample:

 


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Dumb Stupid Idiots flood the Forums, claiming to be Guru's, and the truth is, they have no idea what so ever, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282



The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided an entire Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment and 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already!



Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Technically, My Friend Wistiti was the first, but for undisputable numbers, we have to see Tinmans effort.

Tinman was the first: COP = 1.7

 

Others followed, like Captainloz: COP = 1.9

 

Hey Chris,

If people watch your videos its all in there. My experiment is proof of that. I was feeling very frustrated for a long time but then I stumbled on to your youtube channel and it inspired me to keep going. I actually have your book from way back, I wish now just stayed with it but I went down the Ruslan and Akula rabbit holes for too long without understand Asymmetry and the re-gauging process. Anyway mate I'm just trying to say you should be proud of yourself. You are doing a great thing here!

Cheers,

Loz

Ref: Captainloz COP = 2.0

 

COP = ∞

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

Others have also achieved Above Unity, Marcel has also shared with you all, freely:

 

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

 

I ask you, please approach this with an open mind, please think carefully and clearly on what I have given you for Ten Years now, and imagine if every Human being on the Planet has working Free Energy machines, the world would change in an instant! Imagine the Future we can build for our Children, because they are so unbelievably important! Utopia is not a far off dream, it can be achieved tomorrow if all of you make the necessary changes in the thinking patterns of Yesterday, we don't need to live by the dumb law: "survival of the fittest", or "Kill or be killed" because that's an Ignorant way of thinking that satan worshippers have enforced on you for thousands of years - Its Wrong and we never needed to think that way!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 January 2025

My Friends,

The Electric "Generator" was said to be complete and perfected by Sir Richard Feynman back in the 60's. Sadly, this statement is about as wrong as he ever was! The Electric "Generator" may be complete and perfected if one only takes Symmetry into account which Richard Feynman was a fan, as all scientists were in those days, however, if one really wants a true and correct picture, then Asymmetry has been entirely missed!

In point of fact, if one only looks at the Symmetrical aspect of Electromagnetic Induction, we have been able to achieve very high Efficiencies, 95, 96, 97, 98% and in some of the big machines, 99% Efficiency. So yes, there is a portion of truth to Sir Richard Feynman's statement, of course it depends entirely on the point of view one takes. 

The Magnetomotive Force between the Rotor and Stator Coils is the Symmetrical aspect of Electromagnetic Induction, Equal but opposite. Also the Primary to Secondary Coil Magnetomotive Force is the Symmetrical aspect of Electromagnetic Induction, again Equal but opposite.

NOTE: Both of these Magnetomotive Forces you have to pay for!

What if you did not?

 

All of this is directly, the result of Magnetic Fields working on Charge, normally random and scattered, inside the Insulated Copper Conductors:

 

This gives us Free Energy, because we can arrange the Induction of Magnetic Fields Asymmetrically.

We all have a choice to make:

 

You can choose to be better, to believe in something better, open your eyes, please trust I have given you Truth, this works, and many here have shown you this!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 12 January 2025

My Friends,

Most of you will already know this:

 

Where:

  • The Y Axis is in Magnetic Field Strength in Amperes per meter.
  • The X Axis is in Coil Length in Meters with increments of 1mm, from 1 meter to 5mm

 

You can see, the Magnetic Field Strength is not Linear vs the Coil Length!

Here is the data:

Length (m)   Magnetic Field Strength (A/m)   Magnetic Field Strength (Gauss)
0.1 100000  1256.64
0.099   101010.1    1269.33
0.098   102040.82   1282.28
0.097   103092.78   1295.5
0.096   104166.67   1309
0.095   105263.16   1322.78
0.094   106382.98   1336.85
0.093   107526.88   1351.22
0.092   108695.65   1365.91
0.091   109890.11   1380.92
0.09    111111.11   1396.26
0.089   112359.55   1411.95
0.088   113636.36   1428
0.087   114942.53   1444.41
0.086   116279.07   1461.21
0.085   117647.06   1478.4
0.084   119047.62   1496
0.083   120481.93   1514.02
0.082   121951.22   1532.48
0.081   123456.79   1551.4
0.08    125000  1570.8
0.079   126582.28   1590.68
0.078   128205.13   1611.07
0.077   129870.13   1632
0.076   131578.95   1653.47
0.075   133333.33   1675.52
0.074   135135.14   1698.16
0.073   136986.3    1721.42
0.072   138888.89   1745.33
0.071   140845.07   1769.91
0.07    142857.14   1795.2
0.069   144927.54   1821.21
0.068   147058.82   1848
0.067   149253.73   1875.58
0.066   151515.15   1904
0.065   153846.15   1933.29
0.064   156250  1963.5
0.063   158730.16   1994.66
0.062   161290.32   2026.83
0.061   163934.43   2060.06
0.06    166666.67   2094.4
0.059   169491.53   2129.89
0.058   172413.79   2166.62
0.057   175438.6    2204.63
0.056   178571.43   2243.99
0.055   181818.18   2284.79
0.054   185185.19   2327.11
0.053   188679.25   2371.01
0.052   192307.69   2416.61
0.051   196078.43   2463.99
0.05    200000  2513.27
0.049   204081.63   2564.57
0.048   208333.33   2617.99
0.047   212765.96   2673.7
0.046   217391.3    2731.82
0.045   222222.22   2792.53
0.044   227272.73   2855.99
0.043   232558.14   2922.41
0.042   238095.24   2991.99
0.041   243902.44   3064.97
0.04    250000  3141.59
0.039   256410.26   3222.15
0.038   263157.89   3306.94
0.037   270270.27   3396.32
0.036   277777.78   3490.66
0.035   285714.29   3590.39
0.034   294117.65   3695.99
0.033   303030.3    3807.99
0.032   312500  3926.99
0.031   322580.65   4053.67
0.03    333333.33   4188.79
0.029   344827.59   4333.23
0.028   357142.86   4487.99
0.027   370370.37   4654.21
0.026   384615.38   4833.22
0.025   400000  5026.55
0.024   416666.67   5235.99
0.023   434782.61   5463.64
0.022   454545.45   5711.99
0.021   476190.48   5983.99
0.02    500000  6283.19
0.019   526315.79   6613.88
0.018   555555.56   6981.32
0.017   588235.29   7391.98
0.016   625000  7853.98
0.015   666666.67   8377.58
0.014   714285.71   8975.98
0.013   769230.77   9666.44
0.012   833333.33   10471.98
0.011   909090.91   11423.97
0.01    1000000 12566.37
0.009   1111111.11  13962.63
0.008   1250000 15707.96
0.007   1428571.43  17951.96
0.006   1666666.67  20943.95

 

This is why we have a thread: Coil Geometry, I was hoping someone would help and point some of this stuff out.

The Coil Length is important and the reason we see very short Coil Lengths in Generators, is simply because the less Length, the Stronger the Magnetic Field:

Ref: https://www.aboveunity.com/thread/5kw-generator-teardown/

 

Its worth having a read of the thread: Coil Geometry also, as I have covered this there in detail also.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 12 January 2025

My Friends,

The Magnetic Field is an amazing thing! The Changing Magnetic Field over Time, in other words, a Magnetic Field at Frequency, this means, at an applied Amplitude, Duty Cycle at a regular Cycle, or Frequency.

I have said, for a very long time now: Electromagnetic Induction is Symmetrical, as we understand it in Conventional Science today:

Electromagnetic induction itself is a symmetrical phenomenon, but the resulting effects and applications can sometimes exhibit asymmetry.

 

Symmetry in Electromagnetic Induction

The principle of electromagnetic induction, as described by Faraday's Law of Induction, is fundamentally symmetrical:
\[ \varepsilon = -N \frac{d\Phi}{dt} \]

 

This law applies universally and symmetrically to changing magnetic fields and their interaction with conductors.

 

Asymmetrical Effects

However, the specific applications and implementations can introduce asymmetry:

  1. Physical Coil Design: The physical design of coils and transformers can be asymmetrical. For example, a solenoid coil might have different magnetic field strengths along its length due to its geometry.
  2. Magnetic Fields in Devices: Magnetic fields in devices like motors and generators may not be evenly distributed, leading to asymmetrical field distributions and forces.
  3. Eddy Currents: Induced eddy currents in conductive materials can create asymmetrical heating and electromagnetic effects due to the shape and orientation of the material.
  4. Asymmetrical Loads: In electrical circuits, asymmetrical loads can result in uneven distribution of currents and voltages, even though the underlying induction process remains symmetrical.

 

In essence, while the fundamental law governing electromagnetic induction is symmetrical, the practical applications and physical implementations can introduce asymmetrical characteristics.

 

Calculating the Magnetic Field of a Coil is relatively easy:

The formula for the magnetic field strength \( B \) inside a solenoid:

\[ B = \mu_0 \mu_r \frac{N I}{L} \]

 

Where:

  • \(\mu_0\) is the permeability of free space (\(4 \pi \times 10^{-7} \, \text{H/m}\))
  • \(\mu_r\) is the relative permeability of the iron core
  • \(N\) is the number of turns
  • \(I\) is the current
  • \(L\) is the length of the solenoid

 

Let's break down the calculations for both the magnetic field strength and magnetic flux density step-by-step.

 

Given Data:

  1. Breadth ( Width of Core ): 120 mm = 0.12 m
  2. Width ( Height of Core ): 75 mm = 0.075 m
  3. Length of Coil: 17 mm = 0.017 m
  4. Current ( I ): 200 mA = 0.2 A
  5. Number of turns ( N ): 275 turns
  6. Core Permeability ( μ ): 200 (relative permeability)

 

Calculations:

 

1. Magnetic Field Strength (H):

The magnetic field strength \(H\) can be calculated using the formula:
\[
H = \frac{N \cdot I}{l}
\]


where:

  • \(N\) is the number of turns (275 turns)
  • \(I\) is the current (0.2 A)
  • \(l\) is the length of the coil (0.017 m)

 

Substituting the values:
\[
H = \frac{275 \cdot 0.2}{0.017} \approx 3235.29 \, \text{A/m}
\]

 

2. Magnetic Flux Density (B):

The magnetic flux density \(B\) can be calculated using the formula:
\[
B = \mu \cdot \mu_0 \cdot H
\]


where:

  • \(\mu\) is the relative permeability (200)
  • \(\mu_0\) is the permeability of free space (\(4\pi \times 10^{-7} \, \text{H/m}\))
  • \(H\) is the magnetic field strength calculated above (3235.29 A/m)

 

First, calculate the total permeability \(\mu \cdot \mu_0\):
\[
\mu \cdot \mu_0 = 200 \cdot 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \approx 2.513 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{H/m}
\]

 

Then, substituting the values to find \(B\):
\[
B = 2.513 \times 10^{-4} \cdot 3235.29 \approx 0.813 \, \text{Tesla} \, (\text{T})
\]

 

Summary:

  • Magnetic Field Strength (H): 3235.29 A/m
  • Magnetic Flux Density (B): 0.813 Tesla (T) or 8,130 Gauss (G)

 

 

This is cool, its very powerful, its clear, and we can use this to go a step further! Lets work out some of the nitty gritty, if we want a Voltage of X Generated:

Let's break this down step by step to ensure the design is as precise as possible.

 

Magnetic Flux ( Phi )

First, calculate the magnetic flux:
\[ \Phi = B \cdot A \]

 

Where \( B \) is the magnetic field strength and \( A \) is the cross-sectional area of the core.

 

Magnetic Field Strength ( B )

For a coil:
\[ B = \mu \cdot H \]

 

Where:

  • \( \mu \) is the permeability of the core material.
  • \( H \) is the magnetic field intensity, defined by the current passing through the coil and the number of turns (which we need to design).

 

Induced Voltage ( V )

The voltage induced in a coil is given by Faraday's Law of Induction:
\[ V = -N \cdot \frac{d\Phi}{dt} \]

 

Where:

  • \( N \) is the number of turns in the coil.
  • \( \frac{d\Phi}{dt} \) is the rate of change of magnetic flux.

 

Since we need to generate 48 Volts, let's move toward calculating the necessary parameters for this:

 

1. Calculate the cross-sectional area of the core:
\[ A = 120 \times 75 = 9000 \text{ mm}^2 = 9 \times 10^{-3} \text{ m}^2 \]

 

2. Permeability of the core ( μ ):
\[ \mu = 200 \times 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \approx 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \text{ H/m} \]

 

3. Assuming the magnetic field intensity ( H ):
\[ H = \frac{I \cdot N}{l} \]

 

Where:

  • \( I \) is the current through the coil.
  • \( l \) is the length of the magnetic path.

 

Let’s assume \( l \) (length of magnetic path) as 0.17 m (17 mm).

Using \( V = 48 \text{ Volts} \) and the fact that \( V = I \cdot R \), let’s assume \( I = \frac{V}{R} = \frac{48}{40} = 1.2 \text{ Amps} \).

 

4. Voltage generation and coupling:
\[ V_2 = k \cdot N_2 \cdot \frac{d\Phi}{dt} \]

 

Given coupling \( k = 0.87 \), we need the total number of turns \( N \) for the coils to ensure the voltage generation is precise.

Given your load resistance and power requirement:
\[ P = V^2 / R \]
\[ P = 48^2 / 40 = 57.6 \text{ Watts} \]

 

Note that the actual power utilized depends on the effective voltage in use, not exceeding the design limits.

 

5. Turns Calculation:

Using Faraday’s Law, considering a sinusoidal change in flux,
\[ V_2 = k \cdot N \cdot 2 \pi f \cdot \Phi \]

 

Where:

  • \( f \) is the frequency of the alternating current.
  • \( \Phi = B \cdot A \).

 

Assuming frequency \( f \) to be standard 50Hz.

 

From:

\[ V = 2 \pi f \cdot N \cdot \Phi \]

 

We rearrange to find \( N \).

 

Given that \( \Phi = B \cdot A \):

\[ \Phi = \mu \cdot H \cdot A = 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot H \cdot 9 \times 10^{-3} \]

 

Ultimately,

\[ V = 48 = N \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot H \cdot 9 \times 10^{-3} \]

 

Rearrange to solve for \( N \).

 

1. Given constants:

  • Frequency, \(f = 50 \text{Hz}\)   
  • Desired voltage, \(V = 48 \text{V}\)
  • Coupling factor, \(k = 0.87\)
  • Permeability, \(\mu = 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \text{H/m}\)
  • Cross-sectional area, \(A = 9 \times 10^{-3} \text{m}^2\)

 

2. Magnetic field intensity ( H ):
\[ H = \frac{I \cdot N}{l} \]

 

Given:
\[ I = 1.2 \text{A} \]
\[ l = 0.17 \text{m} \]

Let's solve for the flux (\(\Phi\)):
\[ \Phi = \mu \cdot H \cdot A \]

 

3. Combining all variables:
\[ V = N \cdot 2 \pi \cdot f \cdot \Phi \]

 

Plug in the values:
\[ 48 = N \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot \mu \cdot H \cdot A \]
\[ 48 = N \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot \left( \frac{1.2 \cdot N}{0.17} \right) \cdot 9 \times 10^{-3} \]

 

4. Solving for \(N\):
\[ 48 = N \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot \left( \frac{1.2 \cdot N}{0.17} \right) \cdot 9 \times 10^{-3} \]

\[ 48 = N^2 \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot \left( \frac{1.2}{0.17} \right) \cdot 9 \times 10^{-3} \]

\[ 48 = N^2 \cdot 2 \pi \cdot 50 \cdot 2.51 \times 10^{-4} \cdot 7.0588 \times 10^{-2} \]

\[ 48 = N^2 \cdot 5.577 \times 10^{-3} \]

\[ N^2 = \frac{48}{5.577 \times 10^{-3}} \]

\[ N^2 \approx 8606 \]

\[ N \approx \sqrt{8606} \]

\[ N \approx 92.75 \]

 

Therefore, the number of turns \(N\) required is approximately 93 turns for each coil to generate the desired 48 Volts.

 

 

Here, you can see, using Standard, Conventional Science, finding the Holes, and making use of where the holes lay, and filling these holes, we can very very easily change the world! You have a reasonably solid Mathematical Theory, that shows you, that we can do what we have shown many thousands of people for a very long time! It works, and no one else has ever figured it out, and shared it with the world, we have, AboveUnity.com's Members and I have given you Truth and a solid, FREE, Future to look forward to!

Want more?

The Energy Density of these machines is very very high, if you convert to the same units, compared to anything else ever open to the public:

Power Density:

Power density is the power per unit volume. Assuming the coil volume \( V \) is given by:
\[
V = \text{Cross-Sectional Area} \times \text{Length}
\]
\[
V = 6.669 \times 10^{-3} \text{ m}^2 \times 17 \times 10^{-3} \text{ m} = 1.13373 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m}^3
\]

Given the load power:
\[
P = \frac{V_s^2}{R} = \frac{48^2}{40} \approx 57.6 \text{ W}
\]

So, power density:
\[
\text{Power Density} = \frac{P}{V} = \frac{57.6 \text{ W}}{1.13373 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m}^3} \approx 508,256 \text{ W/m}^3
\]

 

 

To give you some comparison, here is an example: Approximately 250-300 Wh/kg

Lithium-Ion Batteries

Example: Tesla Model S Battery Pack

  • Energy Source: Lithium-ion cells

  • Energy Density of Battery Pack: Approximately 250-300 Wh/kg

  • Use Case: Electric vehicles

  • Why It's Impressive: Lithium-ion batteries store a large amount of energy relative to their weight and volume, making them perfect for applications where both efficiency and portability are crucial, such as in electric vehicles and portable electronics.

 

This post should absolutely astound you! This post IS the answer to the worlds Energy Crisis that never was! satan's children have always been the Crisis on the world, nothing else have ever been a Crisis except them!

If you want to go and check through the Math, and work out what I have shared, please feel free and please point any mistakes if you find any!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 13 January 2025

My Friends,

Want some more Math?

Hey, I am learning, I have said this all along, but here is what I have come up with, with a bit of help:

First identify the key physical equations and parameters for the design:

 


 

Required Information

  • Frequency (\( f \)): \( 50 \, \text{Hz} \)  
  • Voltage Required (\( V \)): \( 48 \, \text{Volts RMS} \)  
  • Load Resistance (\( R_{\text{load}} \)): \( 1 \, \Omega \)  
  • Core Permeability (\( \mu \)):  
      \( \mu_r = 200 \) (relative),  
      \( \mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \, \text{H/m} \),  
      \( \mu = \mu_r \cdot \mu_0 = 200 \cdot (4\pi \times 10^{-7}) = 2.513 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{H/m} \)  
  • Core Cross-Sectional Area (\( A \)): \( 117 \, \text{mm} \times 57 \, \text{mm} = 6.669 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m}^2 \)  
  • Core Length (\( \ell \)): \( 17 \, \text{mm} = 0.017 \, \text{m} \)  
  • Coupling Coefficient (\( k \)): \( 0.87 \)  
  • Approximate Magnetic Flux Density (\( B_{\text{peak}} \)): \( 0.1 \, \text{T} \).

 


 

Design Goals

1. Turns (\( N \)) Calculation:
   Use Faraday's Law of Induction to calculate the number of turns needed to generate 48V:  
   \( V = N \cdot A \cdot \omega \cdot B_{\text{peak}} \cdot k \),  
   where \( \omega = 2\pi f \) and \( B_{\text{peak}} = \frac{\mu H_{\text{peak}}}{k} \).  

2. Power Density (Watt-Hours per Unit Volume):
   Compute the energy density in the core based on magnetic field and coil design.

3. Magnetic Field Strength:
   Find the maximum magnetic field (\( B_{\text{peak}} \)) using the coil current and core geometry.

4. Inductance (\( L \)) of Each Coil:
   Use \( L = \frac{\mu N^2 A}{\ell} \).

5. Impedance (\( Z \)):
   Compute the total impedance of the coil, combining reactance and resistance.

6. Wire Sizing:
   Determine wire gauge based on current density and resistivity.

 


 

Step-by-Step Solution


Step 1: Turns Calculation (\( N \))

Using Faraday's Law of Induction:  

\[
V = N \cdot A \cdot \omega \cdot B_{\text{peak}} \cdot k
\]

Rearranging for \( N \):  
\[
N = \frac{V}{A \cdot \omega \cdot B_{\text{peak}} \cdot k}
\]

Where:  

\[
\omega = 2\pi f
\]

Substitute values:  

\[
\omega = 2\pi \cdot 50 = 314.16 \, \text{rad/s}
\]
\[
N = \frac{48}{(6.669 \times 10^{-3}) \cdot 314.16 \cdot 0.1 \cdot 0.87}
\]
\[
N = \frac{48}{0.18249} = 263 \, \text{turns}
\]


 

Step 2: Power Density (Watt-Hours per Unit Volume)

 
Energy Density in Core:

The energy density stored in the magnetic field is:  
\[
u = \frac{1}{2} \frac{B^2}{\mu}
\]

Substitute values:  
\[
u = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{(0.1)^2}{2.513 \times 10^{-4}}
\]
\[
u = \frac{0.005}{2.513 \times 10^{-4}} = 19.89 \, \text{J/m}^3
\]

 

Core Volume:

\[
\text{Core Volume} = A \cdot \ell
\]
Substitute values:  
\[
\text{Core Volume} = (6.669 \times 10^{-3}) \cdot 0.017 = 1.134 \times 10^{-4} \, \text{m}^3
\]

 

Total Energy Stored:

\[
U_{\text{total}} = u \cdot \text{Core Volume}
\]
\[
U_{\text{total}} = 19.89 \cdot 1.134 \times 10^{-4} = 2.256 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{J}
\]

 

Power Density:

The power density is the energy density times the frequency:  
\[
P_{\text{density}} = U_{\text{total}} \cdot f
\]
\[
P_{\text{density}} = 2.256 \times 10^{-3} \cdot 50 = 0.1128 \, \text{W/m}^3
\]


 

Step 3: Magnetic Field Strength

The magnetic field strength (\( H \)) is related to the magnetic flux density (\( B \)) by:  
\[
H = \frac{B}{\mu}
\]

Substitute values:  
\[
H_{\text{peak}} = \frac{0.1}{2.513 \times 10^{-4}} = 397.79 \, \text{A/m}
\]


 

Step 4: Inductance (\( L \))

The inductance of a coil is:  
\[
L = \frac{\mu N^2 A}{\ell}
\]
Substitute values:  
\[
L = \frac{(2.513 \times 10^{-4}) \cdot (263)^2 \cdot (6.669 \times 10^{-3})}{0.017}
\]
\[
L = \frac{0.115}{0.017} = 6.76 \, \text{mH}
\]


 

Step 5: Impedance (\( Z \))

The inductive reactance is:  
\[
X_L = \omega L
\]
Substitute values:  
\[
X_L = 314.16 \cdot 6.76 \times 10^{-3} = 2.12 \, \Omega
\]

If resistance is negligible, \( Z \approx X_L \):  
\[
Z = 2.12 \, \Omega
\]


 

Step 6: Current and MMF

The current through the load is:  
\[
I = \frac{V}{R_{\text{load}}} = \frac{48}{1} = 48 \, \text{A}
\]

The magnetomotive force (\( \text{MMF} \)) is:  
\[
\text{MMF} = N \cdot I
\]
\[
\text{MMF} = 263 \cdot 48 = 12,624 \, \text{A-turns}
\]


 

Step 7: Wire Sizing

The cross-sectional area of the wire depends on the current density:  
\[
A_{\text{wire}} = \frac{I}{J}
\]
Assume \( J = 5 \, \text{A/mm}^2 \):  
\[
A_{\text{wire}} = \frac{48}{5} = 9.6 \, \text{mm}^2
\]

This corresponds to AWG 8 wire.


 

Recommendations for Improvement

1. Increase Magnetic Flux Density (\( B_{\text{peak}} \)):  
   Using a material with higher saturation flux density can reduce the number of turns required.

2. Optimize Coupling Coefficient (\( k \)):  
   A higher \( k \) value (e.g., \( >0.95 \)) improves efficiency and reduces energy loss.

3. Increase Core Volume:  
   A larger core can store more energy, allowing for higher power density.

4. Cooling Systems:  
   High current may lead to significant heat dissipation. Adequate cooling or wire insulation is recommended.

5. Frequency Increase:  
   Operating at a higher frequency (e.g., \( 60 \, \text{Hz} \)) increases power density proportionally.

 

 

Enjoy, this template, gives a pretty solid fundamental base to work from!

Soon, we will see what holds water and what does not. Now, if I can do this, anyone can!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Luminerix posted this 24 January 2025

well ok so I struggled a bit with myself and came to the conclusion that it is simply best to simply get on my duncecap and just ask.

I simply can not put the calculations into context - can you provide some context please, Chris?

I understand they were done with some kind of ai tool- chatbot or something like that (chatgpt, grok, et al)

The calculations read to me as if pertaining to a transformer setup with  _two_ coils, driven by a sinusoidal.

Do I misunderstand this?

The arithmetic is all pretty straightforward, only some details kept me awake last night:

In the first example, the R_load is 1 Ohm (pretty common for any length of coil wire) yielding 48 Amps for 48 V,

in the other one it is 40 Ohm yielding 1.2 A for 48 V - where does the 40 Ohm R_load come from compared to the 1 Ohm?

Also, the coil length fluctuates between 0.017 m and 0.17 m , ie 17 cm vs. 17 mm.

17 cm could be the coil height of a classical em generator like a wind turbine or a car (like on one of the images),

but 17 mm will be difficult for anything larger than 0.3 mm max.  

17 cm is ample room for quite a number of turns, but 17 mm tends to be a bit.. Bonsai tree, depending on AWG.

Which brings me to those 93 turns and 263 turns and those AWG 8, which has a diameter of a whopping 3.2 mm -

what kind of a setup does that refer to?

But my real challenge is the principle - is this a three coil system with partnered output coils and PWM DC,

or a variation on 'regular' 'transformer' systems?

You mention the coupling constant k, which also would indicate two coils.

And with the 48 V desired output voltage, what is the input voltage?

I checked the 'coil geometry' thread ofc, but that didn't make me understand either. 

Is the main point of the exercise to demonstrate the energy or power density of a coil system as compared to Li-ion batteries?

That is quite an impressive difference for sure...

(side note: I shall keep in mind the reminder about short coil length and field strength, thanks!)

 


Sorry for the dumb question- better than not ask it and ignore the posting ... 

Cheers

Lumi

Chris posted this 25 January 2025

Hello Lumi,

I am always happy to help those that make an effort to help themselves! I have proven this for over a decade now!

It would be great if you posted some data, a replication of what we have shared, and if you had, and shared the data for the replication, that it would be so much easier to help... But I see nothing! You have not asked a question that has any relevant context, and not shown any effort to actually Replicate what we have shared.

In point of fact, as far as memory serves, you have not ever shared any of your work! Please correct me if I am wrong?

This is the second time we have seen a post from you, that does not serve any purpose other than Negative Intent.

Lets give you a break for a while, because quite honestly, anyone that reads my pages, can easily answer all the questions and more. It is just not helpful having posts like this on my forum.

If you or other readers want a Go No-Where, lost in Non-Sense, Waste of Time Forum, I recommend www.beyondstupidity.org they are professionals at going backwards!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Drasko
UGiveMeMore posted this 26 January 2025

Dear Chris,

May I ask about 4.step : Inductance. Maybe I missed something. It is written 6.76 mH. But my calculation shows 6.76 H [Vs/A]. Did I missed something? Also relative permeability 200 seems very low (ferrite cores have > 1000, iron 4000, nanocrystalline > 10000). As I said, did I missed something?

Kind regards,

Andy

  • Liked by
  • Alex ⋐˙⋮⋮˙⊃
Chris posted this 26 January 2025

Hello Andy,

I may have made an error in the math, if so, thanks for pointing this out.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Alex ⋐˙⋮⋮˙⊃
el_fuego333 posted this 27 January 2025

Hello,

I tried the transformer case from the russian part of video "The Real Secret to Above Unity Energy Machines - Part One".

It works exactly as described in the video. I used iron core transformer 1:2 (150: 300 turns) and pulsed it at low frequency (around 130Hz). And I used 3 x 1ohm resistors - one for input current checking directly after - connection, and two 1ohm resistors as on the scheme in the video. No capacitor. I measured 50mA on the input resistor and 120mA and 236mA (all three Vrms values on the scope) on the "load" resistors connected to transformer. Is here anyone who took it further?

Andrej

  • Liked by
  • Chris
FringeIdeas posted this 27 January 2025

Hello el_fuego333

If I have my videos correct, I do believe that is the Mr Preva experiment. Many replications on this forum. I might be mistaken, but I think this is the original thread/discussion about it? https://www.aboveunity.com/thread/the-mr-preva-experiment/

There are many other replications as well, on their own threads, if you want to search around. Pretty cool experiment to play around with and learn.

Could you possibly start your own thread and post some scope shots, details, etc? Would be nice to see!

Thanks,

Marcel

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 28 January 2025

Hey Guys,

For those that have not yet seen the videos:

 

I urge everyone to take the Conventional Electromagnetic Induction, study this very old Scientific Principle, know it and understand it inside out, its Symmetry is simply, is purely, conceived from Ignorance and Brain Washing! There is no need for a Symmetrical System! You can make the System Asymmetrical! The System will behave itself accordingly, and the Asymmetry of MMF, of EMF, will show you something amazing and magical, yet, this is very basic Science, that Scientists have simply been to Ignorant and or Lazy to Explore!  

In ALL Asymmetrical Systems, lay Symmetry, but not true the other way around, its not true that in all Symmetrical Systems, there is Asymmetry! Asymmetry lays outside the realm of Standard Scientific Principles for the most part, as Science has been infatuated by Symmetry, that it has become blinded to a Better Way of Doing Things!

Lets pose a Thought Experiment:

We have two Carts, one cart full of Apples at the bottom of the hill, one cart at the top of the hill, in a Quarry, full of Stone, ready to become foundation for a Building.

There is only one person with the apple cart, and there is no way to get the cart up the hill, one person is not strong enough to push the cart up by themselves.

Asymmetry comes along and the Cart full of Stone is attached via a cable, to the Apple Cart, and the person guides the Cart full of Stone, down the hill. Amazingly, the Apple Cart is pulled up the hill, by the offset of force, and no one had to physically put any effort in, except for guiding the carts.

We use the very same analogy in Electromagnetic Induction, making Electromagnetic Induction Asymmetrical, allowing the Change in Magnetic Fields, which is M.M.F, the Current I, through Turns N / the Length l, Magnetomotive Force, to do work for us that normally would not be done:

 

Yes, its real, yes it works, and yes it takes some work to get the maximum effects from this configuration!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

We're Light Years Ahead!
Members Online:

No one online at the moment


What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close