Increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 3.9K Views
  • Last Post 04 September 2018
Chris posted this 08 April 2018

My Friends, I have shown in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and Some Coils DONT that I can change the Rate of Kinetic Energy at no extra cost at the Source - A huge deal for anyone that knows Science!

I have seen very little interest in this topic, and I am dismayed to be honest as the possibilities moving forward are not just astounding, but World Changing!

So what is Kinetic Energy and why did Nikola Tesla make such a big deal about it?

The definition of Kinetic Energy is:

In physics, the kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion. It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.

Newtons Laws of Motion: F = m · a

Kinetic Energy is Current, Charge in Motion! This is the ability to do Work! What is Work?

The Definition of Work is:

in physics, measure of energy transfer that occurs when an object is moved over a distance by an external force at least part of which is applied in the direction of the displacement.

Newtons Laws of Motion: S = V · δt

Displacement (S) is equal to the Velocity (V times the change in Time (t)), normally in Meters per second.

Torque is where real Horse Power is noticed today, the definition for Torque is:

a force that tends to cause rotation.

Newtons Laws of Motion: T = F · r · sin( θ )

The unit for Torque is newton metre (N⋅m) or the unit joule per radian. The unit newton metre is denoted by N⋅m or N m.

So you can see we are seeing real Horse power now, Newton Meter, or Joule per Radian, Watts is also a measure of Force, the definition of Joule is

A unit of work or energy, equal to the work done by a force of one newton when its point of application moves one metre in the direction of action of the force, equivalent to one 3600th of a watt-hour.

The Joule (J) is equal to the energy transferred to (or work done on) an object when a force of one newton acts on that object in the direction of its motion through a distance of one metre (1 newton metre or N⋅m).

From Newtons Laws of Motion we see most of our common Units of Energy Derived!

One Joule (J) is equal to one Watt Second (W) which is the Product of Voltage and Current V · I = W, and if sinusoidal wave forms have a Phase Angle greater than Zero, then a cos( θ ) adjustment will be required.

Simply put, more V · I = more Joules, more Energy, more Work, more Force, more Torque, because we are increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy which directly relates to Current, the Motion of Charge and to increase I even further, we can very easily increase V because I = V / R and the Resistance of the Wire will be negligible, to zero, due to my already shown Zero Impedance Effect (P.14 Guidelines to Bucking Coils).

 

I plan to release a lot more, but you need to show that you have replicated and understood, recommended and my existing works:

 

 

When I see people have caught up and are actively sharing their work with others, I will also share more and give more data.

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Wistiti posted this 30 April 2018

Guys, you are really awesome!

Thank you!

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 30 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

I have not been able to simulate, however, with the right application and the time, with the right params, I think it would be possible.

   Chris

I understand the disconnect now. After running many simulations I realize I was looking at the problem from the wrong side of things. I made a better simulation to fully examine the problem from 3 different angles and that led me to understand my simulation was not overunity. This simulation better illustrates the idea: Step Down Problem

What I saw initially was that I performed a transformation that was 600% more efficient than a comparable passive solution. That observation is not incorrect, but rather it omits a material fact that my passive solution I was comparing it too was simply 1000% inefficient. Stepping down voltage and stepping up voltage both incur a cost. I can lower cost depending on how I approach the problem I can do things really poorly, or I can do it very efficiently. But no well known transformation strategy will result in a net gain from one voltage level to another. [I still believe the secret is out there, but its not found in the equation R^2 < 4L/C as far as I can determine.]

So anyway I've learned something incredible useful, just not something that any experienced person didn't already understand intuitively or otherwise. It certainly does raise some other questions like, would I even recognize overunity if I saw it?

Note: My percentages are all ballpark relative to the baseline comparison using a 12.8V battery.. Even than simulation is not 100% efficient and wastes about 40% of the power....Efficiency is not an absolute thing.. its very much relative.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 30 April 2018

In my opinion this is our guide to understanding the universe and is required reading. Tesla and many others were okay but men like T.H. Moray, Viktor Schauberger and Walter Russell laid the groundwork for a universal understanding.

 

I agree, the book does a great job of making the case of looking at energy as being something all around us to figure out new and more inventive ways of harnessing. Not that we shouldn't ask the question, can I make my battery power my load so efficiently that I don't even need the battery? That's my personal desire but its not the only discovery that one could make. Harnessing that 4-500000 coulombs of charge under my feet, capturing cosmic rays, rectifying heat into electricity. There are so many opportunities we can look for that we will only discover IF we look.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
onepower posted this 30 April 2018

Zanzal

What is a battery but another form of electron pump?. They tell me a battery works because of "chemistry" which is another word for alchemy but I see neither in it. I see molecules having a specific geometry which give and receive particle/fields between themselves which creates a charge/field imbalance  ... I see no chemistry. To make progress one must cast off all superficial contrivance and see things for what they truly are not what others tell us we are supposed to see... we can see for ourselves.

In truth your battery simply creates a field bias compelling free electrons to move towards the negative pole. Likewise if we have moved electrons towards the negative pole there must be a deficit of electrons at the positive pole which defines it as such. As we can see we have altered the internal geometry of matter which they call chemistry creating by-products in the process and this is not the way my friends.

It begs the question... what is the way?, and I can point you in the right direction. Moray did not create by-products which in themselves would require an equivalent amount of energy to transform them back to their original state. Moray's battery was not a transformer of matter however it could create the field bias required to move electrons and this motion constituting our electron current.

If not why then how?, where is our impetus which could cause something to move, the kinetic?... our bias?. Moray's battery would use oxidized metal plates the oxide layer performing the same function as the band gap found in every solar cell. His series or substrate of oxidized metal plates followed the tribo-electric series. Do you see?, each layer creates an electric field bias or impetus in itself and the moment an electron moves within the gradient of force it finds itself within another. Layer upon layer, force upon force, field gradient upon field gradient and it is compelled to move at the slightest disturbance... the oscillation.

We could ask... what is it then?. Why it is nothing more than a permanent dielectric with a uni-direction predetermined periodic bias in one direction due to any form of oscillation. It is nothing more than a glorified check valve acting on the proper scale in which most never thought to question. Many called this artifact of cause and effect Maxwell's demon however I suspect it is no demon... quite the opposite.

You cannot judge a book by it's cover, that was never the intent of the authors nor the story we follow... it is much more than that.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 01 May 2018

 My Friends,

Onepower is 100% correct!

 

The act of Pushing, or Pulling, a different angle, on doing the same thing, moving an object.

The goal is to build an Active Element, meaning turn your Coils into a Source, a supply of Current, don't Drive them!

Bring about the ability for the Coils to supply more and more Current! A Source, they are effectively your Battery! Or your Electrical 'Generator', in the true sense of the word.

In the electrostatics Thread we saw, rubbing a Glass Rod with Silk creates a net Negative Charge on the Glass, it Add's Electrons to the Glass, giving the Glass a greater Negative Charge than Positive, this is Charge Separation at the Base level.

This Rubbing, only creates a Potential and nothing more! It does not Create a Current, that's why its Static, the Charge can be stored, static.

Your Coils Require a Charge Separation, a Potential Difference on the terminals, before any Current can Flow. This is the exact same thing as rubbing the Glass with silk, separate charge, now we have the Potential, for Current to flow, Electrons flying down the Wire! Electrons in Motion, Kinetic Energy!

Learn the Concepts before judging the outcome, as an Experiment has more to give other than just Numbers!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • ISLab
onepower posted this 01 May 2018

Now your starting to see the big picture.

It is important to understand there are not different kinds of electricity there is only one kind which relates to negative and positive charged particle/fields and charge imbalance. However the properties they exhibit change with the charge density or potential. The only difference between the effects seen from a AA battery and the effects seen from rubbing a glass rod with silk is the potential difference they can produce. We could say that with a change in charge density comes a change in properties and the effects they produce.

In fact I read one patent which claimed free energy where the inventor had lined the stator of his generator with rabbit fur. Now what do you suppose he was trying to accomplish rubbing rabbit fur across copper windings at high speed?... contact electrification I would think.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 01 May 2018

To Pump, is to create Stress, or Pressure:

An electrical generator is in the true sense not a generator. It creates nothing. Electricity is not made by the generator, it is merely captured or pumped.

T. H. Moray - The sea of Energy in which the Earth Floats

 

The Thread, Asymmetrical Regauging shows the importance of this Pump Action:

  • The Potential ( Voltage ) is bought up.
  • Work is done, dissipating the gained Potential. Kinetic Energy: Electrons moving, Current..
  • The process if repeated.

This is Regauging, doing it Asymmetrically is important, this is the Rate at which Energy can be Gained!

The above Image is from: Here

 

The Ramp down is the Current Phase, work is being done here! This is a critical phase, but can only occur if there is a Potential for this Current to Flow, which must be created first! As stated above.

Exactly the same fundamental process as the Magnet Falling through the Copper Tube:

 

Graham Gunderson shows this process:

 

  • Sharp, short Voltage Spike, is the Potential being bought up.
  • The Triangle Wave, ramping down, this is the Magnetic Field,

 

The magnetic Field, or the Current, which is Equal and Opposite on each Coil, which is fundamentally, a Lenz's Law Effect, the Equal and Opposite Magnetomotive Forces creating a Stress, between the two Partnered Output Coils, this I have shown many many times now.

Please see the Concepts, not anything else, there is a very good reason I have done what I have done. This will become clear later on. 

Remember:

In a mechanical system, the greater the inertia the greater the tendency of the body to keep in motion once it is set in motion. In an electrical circuit, the greater the inductance with resistance cut to a minimum, the greater the tendency of the electrical energy (current) to continue to flow once it is started.

 

    Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 04 May 2018

My Friends,

Changing Magnetic Fields Act on Charged Particles. The very basis on much of our Science today!

In my Thread: Reduced Impedance Effect, I show how a Coil can dramatically change the Time ( t ), taken to charge to maximum Magnetic Field for the applied Voltage. Normally, where we would see a Charge and Discharge Current like so:  

 

Charge Equations:

Discharge Equations:

 

We go from normal Charge Current:

 

to a dramatically faster Charge Current:

 

When the Magnetic Field of each coil opposes each other, there is a Reduced Impedance Effect. This is entirely dependant on the Magnetic Field Strength. As a Transformer can burn out is the Transformer is pushed into Saturation, the Coils loosing all their Self-Inductance, allowing huge Currents to flow Unimpeded, Partnered Output Coils also exhibit the same characteristic. 

If Free Electrons are Accelerated and more Electrons Liberated from the Binding Forces in the Atom, then they can Increase the Rate of Kinetic Energy. We see an Increase, or an Amplification in Electrical Current! The Mr Preva Experiment and also my Thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT, show this effect.

We have seen before, this very fast swing, exactly as I have shown:

The Green Waveform, the very fast transition from Positive to Negative, Shown here again, in solid Blue, but a little easier to see the very fast change:

At this point, marked, the Coil completely flips polarity. Also, important to note, the Amplitude is very much greater on the Negative half of the cycle. By approximately twice.So, How would one achieve twice the amplitude? 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Marathonman
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 07 May 2018

My Friends,

I want to share a post that caught my eye else where:

How does an INDUCTOR work? Why is its behavior so counter-intuitive? Compared to CAPACITORs?

Although CAPACITORs are very intuitive to understand ( I = CdV/dT ), inductors are almost never even taught in circuits classes, although, they are equally useful and irreplaceable circuit elements (if not MORE). The fundamentals are almost identical. Whatever you are thinking about VOLTAGE in C , think the same actions in CURRENT in L ( I=LdI/dt ). As far as energy storage, same thing : 1/2 CV2 vs. 1/2 LI2. Can't be more similar.

But yet, in circuits education, inductors are treated as the bad kid that nobody likes, nobody cares about, and nobody understands. Can the reason be that,


a) it is very easy for humans to conceptualize ELECTRONS ACCUMULATING to store energy, rather than, ELECTRONS TURNING INTO MAGNETIC ENERGY TO STORE ENERGY ? ... or ,

b) the fact that, when you store electrons in a capacitor, ignoring leakage, they will stay there FOREVER, whereas, the INDUCTOR cannot stop the current flow, so, the magnetic energy will have to be immediately dissipated, otherwise, the voltage will reach a million volts until something pops on the circuit board. Is it possible that, this "unstoppable continuity" making the inductor difficult to conceptualize ? ... or ,

c) the inductor is bulky, and difficult to make ? This is why the circuits education went the least resistance path of teaching (no pun intended) and chose the capacitors ?

Research Gate

Reading the above thread, there is a lot of very intuitive answers! There is one answer I want to focus on here:

it really isn't that difficult if you can comprehend what a MAGNETIC FIELD is ...

I think, our education system ignores the importance of MAGNETIC FIELDs early on in high school, which makes it difficult to comprehend the inductor later at undergrad ...

If you think of it like a capacitor, where energy is STORED, you won't be able to explain it. When you change the DeltaI in an inductor, the magnetic field is created which is the TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING. When you stop pumping current into the inductor, it wants to keep that current going. This is how you STORE energy in an inductor.

Since the energy is stored in a capacitor using an ELECTRON, it is natural human tendency to think, energy is stored an an inductor via a different particle like MAGNETRON , but, it is really the same electron storing the energy, this time in a different mode of operation.

To summarize, if you apply an electric field on an electron, you elevate it to a different POTENTIAL (i.e., Voltage), thereby STORING ENERGY. .

if you create a magnetic field with an electron by changing its flow rate (i.e., current), they have the tendency to stay flowing in the same NEW RATE, thereby STORING energy.

Tolga Soyata - University at Albany, The State University of New York

 

NOTE: A detailed study of why Inductors have a "TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING" gives rise to a new and fantastic possibilities! 

First we see a Charge Time:

 

The Voltage is applied across the Coil, the Current ramps up as shown previously:

 

The Voltage is switched off and we see the Decay Phase, this is where we see the Inductor: has a "TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING", the equation is: I=LdI/dt 

So, the Electrons in the Wire want to keep moving at off time, but we are not supplying any Electrons into the Circuit!

Like the Magnet in the Copper Tube experiment, we see the Change of Magnetic Field falling down the Pipe, creates a Voltage and the Current can then flow, but the Voltage is very small and the Current very High, this is because the Impedance is very low, for maximum Current Flow.

The same is true of the Decay Phase, we see the Magnetic Field Collapsing:

 

The magnetic Field decaying in Time is keeping the Voltage, or the E.M.F, or the Potential High. We see the same in the Mr Preva experiment but because we have a lot more Stress, more Current can Flow, we are Accelerating and also Liberating Electrons from the orbitals.

Opposing Magnetic Fields "Generate" Electrical Energy just like the Amber Rod has Electrons removed, becoming positively Charged, by rubbing Cat Fur on the Amber Rod, we are displacing Electrons, Current can then Flow to balance the Charge Difference, 

Today, we know how to Amplify Current, the goal is to Amplify it further! I = V / R is how this is done!

   Chris

Jagau posted this 08 May 2018

Excellent Chris, very good video to understand.

I like the 2 videos of youtube on time and off time, wonderful image that also confirms that the maximum of energy as much as off time is maximun at the center of the coil.

quote:

If Free Electrons are Accelerated and more Electrons Liberated from the Binding Forces in the Atom, then they can Increase the Rate of Kinetic Energy.

What do you think of Don Smith's expression that tells us that electrons exist in the form of a doublet?
Does it sound like what Paul Dirac said in the 1933s that the electron has a positron that he called antimatter reverse-polarity electrons?

Jack

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 08 May 2018

Hey Jack,

I also find the graphical representation helpful, they are good videos.

I am not sure on the Electron, I have a few ideas but I just do not know enough to say for sure.

@All readers:

In saying this, covered in part above, what we measure as a Waveform has more than one part. There is always two sides: Light/Dark, Matter/Antimatter, Push/Pull...

We see an effect in the Coil that must be seen from two angles:

We count everything below the Green Waveform as Current in this case. From Zero ( 0 ) to the peak Amplitude at time ( t ).

We completely ignore whats above the Green Waveform. What is above the Green Waveform?

The answer is the Magnetic Field, this is what the Current Creates, a Transformation, a storage phase, a Flow of Electrons, Transforms into a Magnetic Field.

At the completion of the storage phase, turn off, the Magnetic Energy is released and the Coil is expose to Electromagnetic Induction and as a result produces an E.M.F, this, if a Load is connected, a Current Could Flow, which is the Decay Phase we see, the ramping Down.

NOTE: The Decay Phase is identical, but in reverse to the storage phase, if the decay phase were to be flipped vertically, the storage and decay phases would be identical. 

NOTE: A DC to DC Converter uses this exact concept and good Converters are around 98% efficient.

I think it is important we think of Dualities where everything we do, has an equal and opposite pair, as pointed out above, Light/Dark, Good/Bad, Up/Down...

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • ISLab
p75213 posted this 03 September 2018

@All readers,

Today, we commonly see four Forces in the Fundamental Interactions.

  • Strong Force
  • Weak Force
  • Electromagnetic Force
  • Gravitational Force

 

Of course we are specifically focusing on the Electromagnetic Force. The only force we have at our disposal to interact with the Universe at a Subatomic level.

Partnered Output Coils use Magnetic Interactions, specifically, Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F, to Force Current, via the Lorentz Force, down an Insulated Copper Wire. This Current we would never see normally, it is Free Current. The best base Experiment to show this effect is The Mr Preva Experiment.

For this to occur a Voltage potential must first be produced. A basic analogy, 10 Volts applied across 10 Turns, would Induce 50 Volts across 50 Turns, an increase in Voltage Potential of: 5 times.

Note: It is the Magnetic Field Interactions that gives rise to an excess in Electrical Energy!

   Chris

 

Hi Chris,

 I am confused about the following statement "Partnered Output Coils use Magnetic Interactions, specifically, Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F, to Force Current, via the Lorentz Force, down an Insulated Copper Wire."

I am wondering how the lorentz force could force current down a wire as it acts at 90 degrees to the current.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 03 September 2018

Hi P,

Please see our thread on The Lorentz Force:

Any and all Charged Particles, that are free to move, in the presence of Electromagnetic Fields, are subject to a Force, the Lorentz Force. Of course a "motion" is required to start this process away, but once started, this effect can be seen on the bench! 

CRT's use this effect, Magnetron's Particle Accelerators, Science is pretty up to date on these simple techniques.

 

 

 

 

Ref: https://www.coursera.org/lecture/particle-physics/3-1-principles-of-particle-acceleration-srCR7

I hope this helps some!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Marathonman
  • ISLab
Marathonman posted this 03 September 2018

Actually Maxwell had that equation when Lorentz was 8 years old and i have wondered why Lorentz got the credit for it.

YES, the Maxwell/Lorentz force hard at work.

Very good post Chris.

Regards,

Marathonman

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 03 September 2018

@All following,

I perhaps need to clarify a few things:

We know an Electric Current is defined as 6.24 x 1024 Electrons per second, moving past Pt0. This quantity is One Coulomb of Charge. We know that an Electron is a Negatively Charged Particle,  each Electron having 1.602 x 10-19 Coulombs of Charge. The symbol for the Coulomb is: ( C )

At this stage we have satisfied two fundamental requirements for Particle Acceleration, we have:

  1. Charged Particles.
  2. The Charged Particles have Velocity, of: 6.24 x 1024 Electrons per second, moving past point Pt0.

 

Charged Particles in motion constitute a Magnetic Field, B which is Orthogonal to E, the Electric Field. They are the same things viewed from a different observational perspective! We must not forget, we have this entire situation twice, 2x fold which is Partnered Output Coils!

  1. Coil one has Current moving to the left, Coil two has Current moving to the right...
  2. Coil one has a Magnetic Field Vector Inwards, Coil two has a Magnetic Field Vector inwards...

 

Thus, the very definition of a Particle Accelerator has been for-filled and on the bench we now have the most simple form of a Particle Accelerator that I know of. Its been around for more than 100 years and very few people have ever picked up this basic fact!

I urge all following, do your own research, cross reference what I have told you, study and learn for your selves, find the truth for your self, learn from the experts:

 

I ask you, don't to take my word for it, I would prefer you come to your own conclusions! Learning the truth has never been so satisfying! Not a single view on the video since I posted it.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • ISLab
p75213 posted this 04 September 2018

From the video Principles of Particle Acceleration "Electric fields are used to accelerate particles by increasing their momentum. Magnetic fields deflect them from their original direction"

motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field

"So, does the magnetic force cause circular motion? Magnetic force is always perpendicular to velocity, so that it does no work on the charged particle. The particle’s kinetic energy and speed thus remain constant. The direction of motion is affected, but not the speed. This is typical of uniform circular motion. The simplest case occurs when a charged particle moves perpendicular to a uniform B-field, such as shown in. (If this takes place in a vacuum, the magnetic field is the dominant factor determining the motion. ) Here, the magnetic force (Lorentz force) supplies the centripetal force"

Cyclotron

A cyclotron accelerates charged particles outwards from the center along a spiral path. The particles are held to a spiral trajectory by a static magnetic field and accelerated by a rapidly varying (radio frequency) electric field.

I'm not trying to be a smartarse here, but everything I have read and watched leads me to believe that particle acceleration is via the electric field. This doesn't take away from the fact that particle acceleration is taking place.

 

 

Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P, 

I think you missed the fact that a changing Magnetic Field IS an Electric Field? 

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

 

P, I have to ask, have you used another name, specifically: Milehigh?

   Chris

Marathonman posted this 04 September 2018

I hate to be a party pooper but that is exactly how a Cyclotron works,

have you increased your Kinetic energy today.

regards,

Marathonman

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • ISLab
Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Marathonman is correct!

I quote:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to .E

 

I have also shown, exactly how this works:

 

 

You can see, technically, the Magnetic Field ( B ), shown in Red cancels out and would be seen as a flat line with no Amplitude, however I have shown the Magnetic Field with Amplitude so one can see the Magnetic Wave forms are equal and opposite, only one difference is that they travel in opposite Directions.

This is compared to the standard wave:

 

 

The Electric Field ( E ) doubles as a result of the two waves, equal in Amplitude, and travelling in opposite directions, and some math says its more than double, that it is actually the Square of the Magnetic Field strength.

We also see more proof of this in our replications of: The Mr Preva Experiment, showing the Electric Field doubles, or the Current doubles.

 

 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • ISLab
p75213 posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P, 

I think you missed the fact that a changing Magnetic Field IS an Electric Field? 

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

 

P, I have to ask, have you used another name, specifically: Milehigh?

   Chris

I realize that a changing magnetic field is an electric field . That's how induction works.

I have used another name but it's not Milehigh and not on this forum.

Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P,

All are welcome, but we have a very tough Troll policy! Big Red Button sort of thing. Most all of us are sick and tired of Trolls and we will not tolerate them any more!

I do believe we have largely changed the Trolling BS for the better! People are safe here! After all, how does a Troll Troll a Troll? Only on the other forums!

I had to ask! I hope you don't mind.

   Chris

Marathonman posted this 04 September 2018

The most important overlooked aspect is the pressure between the two fields. if you double the pressure between them you increase the output 4 times as it is the square of the two intensities. this specific is being overlooked in the Figuera device also with many replicators failing to get an output.

increase the pressure, increase the Electric field, increase the output.

Did you hear what i just said, "PRESSURE" all electrical systems are pressure related. draw current from a generator causes the regulator to send more pressure to the excitors to increase the pressure in the output and the load. 

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

this is a matter of opinion as i prefer D B Larsen hands down all day long. the silent unsung hero type that got passed up for smoke and mirror type.

Regards,

Marathonman

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close