MIT - Graham Gunderson

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 159 Views
  • Last Post 2 weeks ago
Chris posted this 07 July 2017

Perhaps the best Above Unity demonstration ever done, Graham Gunderson, a person I have known for a few decades now, has, for sometime now, had several Working Devices and has demonstrated some.

The MIT was shown to produce a COP > 4

 

With 8 Watts output and only 2 Watts input, measured, Accurately, on both Tektronix Oscilloscope and also Clarke-Hess Power Analysers - Very Expensive, world class Test Equipment!

Graham has also demonstrated other devices, similar:

 

This device was also shown at one of the Conferences, and measured to be Above Unity!

Graham is a first class engineer, he has spent much of his working career measuring devices, Metrology is his profession!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 07 July 2017

Some images were kindly shared, by Reiyuki - Close Ups of the Partnered Output Coils:

Originals via Google Drive

 

documents-export-2016-07-12.zip( 68.5 MB )

documents-export-2016-07-19.zip( 111 MB )

 

   Chris

Chris posted this 12 July 2017

 

By looking at the Current Wave Forms, one can see what's going on in the Core, Hysteresis, this is Electromagnetic Induction.

Below, in light Green, we see the one of the Output Current Wave Forms:

The wave itself looks like this: 

 You can see, the Current changes Polarity, Very Fast, almost at Mid Cycle: (Green Arrow)

A lot os questions can be asked, most all have very simple answers! 

From the Peak of the Current Wave form, where it Very quickly changes polarity, to the actual change in polarity, is about 4 Micro Seconds. Very fast!

Because we know that Graham Gunderson uses Partnered Output Coils, and we know that the Coil being measured, Flips polarity, very quickly close to the Peak Current, we know at this Point that the Magnetic Fields Oppose, as the Currents must also Oppose at this point, between the two Output Coils.

Graham is holding the Coil Polarity in one Direction, until close to Top Dead Centre of the Current Wave Form, then Dropping the Polarity with a Switch, a Mosfet. This circuit we know already:

It turns out, this is a similar method of Operation as Bradleys RT. This is a type of Resonance, where we are bringing about, by means of a Timed Response, Maximum Electromagnetic Induction for Minimum Input. The Input is doing work on the Core, and getting Electrons Flowing in the Coils, but then the Polarity Flips and this is when the Magic Happens.

Note, this is a 1/4 Wavelength, you may see some Correlation to this Image now:

 

You can read more here: Electromagnetic Waves if you want more information.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
alohalaoha posted this 12 July 2017

Too little output power for a such big device. Lot of cooper, ferrite and expensive transistors and components for such misery little output. No need to mention oscilloscopes and power analysers worth 50 000 bucks,

Floyd Sweet's VTA have had almost the same dimensions but real 5 kwt output power.

This is what I calling real overunity machine - VTA and real first class engineer Sparky Sweet.

i think we need to concentrate our mind power on VTA and similar class high power devices

Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 12 July 2017

This is true, but we must remember, Floyd Sweets first version was 6-19 Watts!

Scaling is easy, knowing the basic principles and how to get there are critical.

The Concepts are exactly the same.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Chris posted this 20 July 2017

Its not very often Opportunity Knocks! It is smart to grasp it, hold it and not let it go!

Team, Graham Gunderson has given us the absolute best Demonstaration in History. This is an opportunity we should never let go!

I have purchased the Video, but because of Copyright, I can not rebroadcast it. The Video can be purchased here - Don't make Aaron rich though! Don't buy it!

We could do some private thing that does not break Copyright? Viewing only privately? Any Ideas?

Team, a Lot can be learnt here! Graham's Device is almost exactly the same as Bradleys RT! They work the same.

   Chris

P.S: Why do I say this? I don't have the equipment or the level of Expertise that Graham has to take these sort of Measurements. I know it works, and can talk till I am blue in the face, but people like to see Independent Replications, then this is the best ever!

  • Liked by
  • Vasile
Vasile posted this 20 July 2017

I have little spare time but I want to help.With the hope that we will find a working principle,you can count me in.

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 20 July 2017

We could do some private thing that does not break Copyright? Viewing only privately? Any Ideas?

I believe you can show it privately in a non-commercial setting say to a guest in your home. IMO, you should not take risks and its also a matter of politeness to respect a copyright even if you don't agree with not having shared the information freely. However, you might check the video for metadata you can plug into google and see if someone else already put it up. When it comes to sharing digital information you should also not assume that the sharer cannot be identified.. Digitally watermarking (using stenography) the video with information identifying the purchaser is something I would do if it was my business model.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 20 July 2017

Chris Sykes,

Put that and similar kind videos for example Floyd Sweet, Stiven Mark, .... at https://yadi.sk

Make it private flag, and share only shortlinks to them. Who need it could copy on own https://yadi.sk video space or download to own computer for further analysis.

Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 20 July 2017

I have little spare time but I want to help.With the hope that we will find a working principle,you can count me in.

 

@Vaslie - I can assure you, the principle I am sharing with you all, works!

  • Graham (This Thread) and Bradley's RT use it!
  • It does take some understanding.
  • It is a process that follows all the standard Science Principles. Lenz's Law, Electromagnetic Induction and so on.
  • It is a process that can be cross referenced many times on my Site starting here: Support
  • It is fairly simple, once understood, but still requires some work to make work.

What is the Principle?

We have covered this many times in many different places, but basically:

  • There must be Three Fields, or Sources of interaction. Two is Symmetrical, Three is Asymmetrical and therefore, Newtons Laws of Motion: For every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction and there for an equal and opposite Counter-Reaction for this Reaction
  • Two Fields must be from Two Secondary Coils.
  • One Field must be a small Exciter Field, designed to bring about Field Opposition of the other Two Fields.
  • What does this look like?

 

Once realised, you will see this EVERYWHERE! it is present in all the devices I reference on my Website! It just takes some seeing!

I call them Partnered Output Coils!

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
alohalaoha posted this 21 July 2017

Hi Chris

NOT ALL SO EASY AT FIRST GLANCE. AS YOU THINK.!!!!

Problem of mutual interaction of Vector magnetic potentials A of both partnered-bucking type Hooper coils is begining of story for free energy extraction from highly organized forms of plasma from higher octaves of reality.

Well CHRIS, there is one very big problem with every single transformer whatever how he was wounded and connected. Problem is that there really exist - ENERGO-INFORMATION COPY - of every single transfor, known as MATRI-X'S FANTOM of transformer. He has fine ENERGO-INFORMATION structure at sub femto levels.

 

THE FANTOM

HE IS A MAIN MATRI-X's BLOCK for free energy extraction from A potentials as pure energy sources.

Chris, bring G.Gunderson here to show him how to unblock his device and how to shield MATRI-X's FANTOM in his transformer.

NOT ONLY TRANSFORMERS HAVE OWN FANTOMS - CHRIS. THE PEOPLE ALSO HAVE.... YES .... NIGHTMARE.

SHORTLY WE ARE IN MATRI-X CHRIS AND WE ARE TRAPPED. BUT EXIT REALLY EXIST AND NEVER CLOSED FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO TRY OWN WAY OUT.

 

THE TRIPLEX reality

1. BODY - THE HARDWARE "unwilling gift" from MATRI-X

2. SOUL - OPERATING SYSTEM FOR BODY "unwilling gift" from MATRI-X

3. SPIRIT - SELF AWARENESS. It is only, we are. → MIGHTIEST POWER IN ALL UNIVERSES.

 

Best wishes

Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 21 July 2017

Agreed Aloha - The Matrix is a Mind Set, We all need to Choose: Blue Pill or Red Pill

 

There is a lot of problems! Some are very much more advanced than others, mostly through Choice, freedom of Will. We choose to try harder, think smarter, to progress in our life skills. We all should, but some choose not to.

 I have spoken with Graham once or twice lately, and his mind is in other places at the moment. I detected that he is not wanting to enter endless debate with people that know no better and choose not to.

There are area's of improvement, where small changes can make big differences to the performance! But this is all for another day! Lets get those that choose to progress, progressing! Start the ball rolling...

Graham Gunderson has done more than his fair share, he has provided several demonstrations with very much more than over whelming evidence of Working Devices - His work supports my work 100% it is the same work! Nearly exactly the same:

This is mine, more than 6 years ago:

 

This is Grahams a years ago:

 

The over all difference, very little. His Device does work slightly different. Both reach the end goal but slightly different ways.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • alohalaoha
  • Wistiti
alohalaoha posted this 23 July 2017

Hi Chris

It is not about entering endless debate pont with Gunderson or anybody. Of course i also hate that.

I am talking about very tiny processes which have invisible presence and interact at very fine levels or matter organised by MATRI-X. This is a CARBON WORLD, but before 7500 year IT HAD BEEN A SILICIC WORLD. MUCH MUCH PERFECT than this. And proof for this are at every step. The real human beings just need learn to look and see without MATRI-X filters Chris.YES. MATRI-X is REAL Chris. it is not mirage or someone final fantasy.

 

What i want to tell Gunderson,Chris is this

He has deal with MATRI-X. Tranformer in presence of at least one short-circuited winding remember the previous state. And the core is demagnetized, and there is no more current in the windings, and you can wait for at least a week or more. But the transformer anisotropy is preserved, and only for the first pulse,Chris.If the voltage is applied in the same direction like preserved state remembered, and there is some way to go out, for example, there is a conderser, then it will be charged immediately. And if the voltage is opposite, then it first falls on the inductor, what is interesting moreover longer than usual voltage drop and the same capacitor is not charged fully only weak charged, but remembered process state is turned off.

What is this "artifact" Chris, and where does he live?

Chris you understand that it is the memory of inductive resistance, but only for the first pulse. The friend Phantom called this "pimple".

But this effect is so bright and clear if there is proper pulse potential, which becomes a trigger.

Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 23 July 2017

@Aloha - Apologies, I was generalising, there was no direction to my comments about endless debate. Graham is not an active Forum Participant was more so what I meant. At least not that I know of.

 

If not already done so, the in depth study of the Electrical "Generator" should be our Primary Goal to take the next step forward. Learn how Electricity is "Generated".

  • A Source Magnetic Field with Density B in Gauss (CGS Units) or Tesla (MKS Units).
  • A Change in this Magnetic Field in proximity to an Insulated Wire.
  • The Change in Magnetic Field from the Source Magnetic Field, to the Invoked Magnetic Field, Oppose.
  • Each Magnetic Field and therefore direction of Current are subject to Newtons Laws of Motion: For every Action there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction and for every Reaction there is an Equal and Opposite Counter-Reaction.
  • Two Output Coils MUST Oppose, normally this is a 1/4 Wave Opposition, or is subject to the Current Flow with Wave Propagation Principles similar to that of Radio Wave Theory.

I am still learning, Graham said he does not know how it works, but has some ideas... So we all are in the same boat. We need to work together to nut out the problems.

There is a huge amount of meaning to the Images I posted!

What is this meaning?

Well lets see:

 

    • The long Brown wire is the Primary Coil, with a Frequency: x indicated by a single Wavelength.

 

 

    • A Partnered Output Coil is added, the Blue Wire, this is 1/4 of the Wave Length of the Primary Coil in this Case. So current will be entirely at one end of the Wire according to Wave Theory.

 

 

    • The second Partnered Output Coil is added, the Red Wire, this is also 1/4 of the Wave Length of the Primary Coil in this Case. So current will be entirely at one end of the Wire according to Wave Theory.

 

 

    • Each of the Partnered Output Coils are Wound Opposite, one Clock Wise, one Counter Clock Wise, so that means the Current will be on the opposite ends of the wire at any point at the 1/4 Wave Length.

 

 

 

  • This is the reason that the Fields oppose!

 

Without the Fields Opposing, there can be no Gain in Electrical Energy! We have seen this so many times now, All the major Devices All use these EXACT Same principles! Clemente Figurea, Kapanadze, Lester Hendershot, Floyd Sweet Akula, Ruslan, Steven Mark, Don Smith, All of them... And where you cant see it and have not been told so, then it is likely the secret of the Inventor.

Most of you, that have followed the MrPreva Experiment, will see why this is such an Important Experiment to do and understand! Its so close that its not funny!

We know 99.9% of how this works, we just need to 0.1% Fiddling to make the rest work!

   Chris

 

P.S: Graham does all I describe above, by DC Switching.

 

Vasile posted this 24 July 2017

Without the Fields Opposing, there can be no Gain in Electrical Energy!

For me this appears to be the core of your last post and I would like to post myself a video witch I think is somewhat related.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
cd_sharp posted this 24 July 2017

Graham does all I describe above, by DC Switching

This is a hard method. Synchronous rectification is not something I would try soon because I do not have the skills or tools for it. I think there should be at least one easy method to do the same thing.

Two Output Coils MUST Oppose, normally this is a 1/4 Wave Opposition, or is subject to the Current Flow with Wave Propagation Principles similar to that of Radio Wave Theory

Since Q factor is a fifth of the time it takes for a coil to fill up, is this achievable by using a Q factors match between primary and output coils? Is this an easy method to do what Graham did?

Chris posted this 24 July 2017

Graham does all I describe above, by DC Switching

This is a hard method. Synchronous rectification is not something I would try soon because I do not have the skills or tools for it. I think there should be at least one easy method to do the same thing.

Two Output Coils MUST Oppose, normally this is a 1/4 Wave Opposition, or is subject to the Current Flow with Wave Propagation Principles similar to that of Radio Wave Theory

Since Q factor is a fifth of the time it takes for a coil to fill up, is this achievable by using a Q factors match between primary and output coils? Is this an easy method to do what Graham did?

Hi Cd_Sharp - I do not understand your question, can you please explain further.

Q-Factor ( ω ) = ω × Maximum Energy Stored / Power Loss

or

Q-Factor ( ω ) = 2πfr × Energy Stored / Energy Loss

So, in Grahams System, the MIT, we have a Gain in Total Energy, of 6 Watts, which would mean we would need to divide by a negative Number, there is no loss, there is a gain.

This is a Underdamped System, with No Damping, there can be Energy Gains.

Please don't misunderstand me, we still have Losses in the System, but the Losses are over come by the Gains.

Bradley's RT Does exactly the same thing as Graham does! Yes its not exactly easy, but with some fiddling it does work!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Wistiti posted this 25 July 2017

I have little spare time but I want to help.With the hope that we will find a working principle,you can count me in.

 

Nice post Vasile!

Im also like you, "I have little spare time "

But you guys can also count me in!

I think we have the base theories on the working principe; we now need some team builders working on the simplest device we can, so even the new one can easily participate.

 

Sincerlly!

 

cd_sharp posted this 25 July 2017

Hi Cd_Sharp - I do not understand your question, can you please explain further.

Well, I was confusing the time constant of a coil with the Q-factor.

I'm thinking we can achieve what Graham has achieved by properly balancing the primary coil and POC coils. What this means I am not sure. I'm still "fiddling" to find this balance.

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
  • Chris
Chris posted this 25 July 2017

Hi Cd_Sharp - I do not understand your question, can you please explain further.

Well, I was confusing the time constant of a coil with the Q-factor.

I'm thinking we can achieve what Graham has achieved by properly balancing the primary coil and POC coils. What this means I am not sure. I'm still "fiddling" to find this balance.

Hi Cd_Sharp - That's it, it is a balance, there is a little fiddling to this! Its not always easy!

The mind plays tricks sometimes, and it is not easy, but I would pick the best and most well documented and stick to the one project. I have found that Determination is key, self-discipline and a lot of cross-referencing with other data is the best way to move forward.

I had a hard time sorting through the Lies in Bradleys Rotary Transformer, but in the end it was only common-sense and something we had already studied that gave me the info I needed to make progress.

Its frustrating, but I always think of Nikola Tesla and the show of discipline he showed for many years!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Vasile
Zanzal posted this 31 July 2017

I came across this device patent from Graham Gunderson. Not sure if it describes a working device but it is definitely interesting.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Show More Posts
Close