Patricks Replication

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 231 Views
  • Last Post 2 weeks ago
Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

I have moved Posts out to your own replication so members can easily see your progress.

Its great to see someone building, sharing, and working so hard to make a real difference in the world!

Keep up the good work Patrick!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Wistiti
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

I still have not seen the effects.  but i can imagine plenty of working theorys.  -  30 of them. which is great,

i am trying to do so whilst following as fewer rules as possible. 

  1. use short input dc pulses too the primary, so-as not too burn power. and
  2. 2 reflect the resultant flux between the secondaries in various physical geometries.     ...  globes and scope too monitor power output. = so far one thing remains constant. - using more of the flux, on one side, - means less light on the other side.

i feel the circuit it ok though,... with 555's and opamp, we can read the primary pulse. and start a timer too determine the conduction delay...  and at the end of that delay,  we trigger the second 555 too set the main shorting output pulse.   - 

diagram`ish at the very end of the video.  - at this stage, i want too start looking at the actual transformer again.  one i more confident in.  flyback ferrite may be best, - although i did want too work with iron.  @18:48

Patrick,

 

patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

so the magnetic flux wants too collapse and reverse. but is not allowed too..

but in the case of puled dc. ( positive offset only ) . - does the negative spike play any part ?. or just let it do its thing ?

Patrick,

 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

also please comment on my finest work.

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

wow ive had much inspiration tonight, cant wait too do some more building, but its already 3am... arrrgg.     i am thinking in terms of positive offset only, square wave input,   (atm)

and the first output coil. conducts immediately before the second.  - however because they are wound apposing, the rebound from the first, acts too assist the second.

although it sounds simple, its something i have yet too try.  - but i dont know if there is any greater gains from a particular frequency.  ... yet,  - i have done a napkin circuit, - i think i can trigger all 3 pulses off a sine wave, - AKA trigger each of the 3 pulses from the varying amplitude of a sine wave.

Jagau posted this 3 weeks ago

Hi Pat

  If I look at the timebase of your oscilloscope it seems you work in very low frequencies.

laminated metal Core  works relatively well at low frequencies.


great work and  thank for sharing


jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

lol you are correct, i work at low frequencies in every way ;-D.     but after i learn wtf,  evolution is the flavour of the day, -  i have alot of catching up too do.

patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

interesting results, - i have the frequency @ about 10hz,

what i see, on the scope, is 2 positive offset square waves, that are each, 15 % duty cycle., - and they are touching eachother, - so basically a single 30% duty block with a color divide. ....     they are the output coil.s   , - and i have a third wave, positioned exactly between and overlapping the first two, - this is the input coil.  ..    and when the input coil, is smack in the middle ,  the transformer makes almost a cracking sound @ 10hz, but does not generate much light on either output globe,  - however as a rotate a pot, and move the input coil backwards and forwards on the scope,  from  within the 1'st output coils trigger period, too the middle, and finally too fully within the second output coils trigger period,  the sound alternates too a normal 10hz transformer.   and produces plenty of light on each globe alternatively ,  

but in the middle, where i was hoping the action would be,  - is a very distinctive noise, and about 2v per globe,, so bad that it seems like the output coils are out of phase, - so i switched one of the terminals, electrically, and its twice as good as terrible, -   -

 

btw the outputs are counter wound of course, - and fack me,  i have never managed too blow a big transistor like this on 10watts, - let alone, a darlington pair, and the opto isolator via a 1k resistor    - w - t - f...   and the input coil isnt scary at all - its about 250turns at a few ohms.

 

i have improved it by inserting a 4;th transtor, irf840 into the darlington, -   ive upped the voltage, and still playing,    -  kind of scared of what the future holds,  - chris;s idea about playing with arduino seems very good indeed, especially at the thought of cascading more ICS  too give me negative offset pulses also, - already using 4 opamps, and 3   555's in my circuit. 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

exciting project, - but im in these projects too win, so im abit anxious and it taking forever,   ...

but with this one.   The Suspicion was, - i am burning abit of power on the input pulse, just too long for a square wave,  - so i halved it, exactly,  - and the power input dropped by 66%?...,  and the power output dropped by ( guessing here because its globes,). about 40%, at most.

center tap output, - globe and switch on each end.

i wonder if it matter, - weather the input coil, is in phase with the leading, or trailing, output coil.

frack 4am again, - will have too find out tomorrow,

peace and love.

 

 

patrick1 posted this 3 weeks ago

 

My efficiency has improved alot, and im beginning too understand why i have heard it said, - that for this technology, you want too use big transformers.   - very big transformers.  .    MOT just wont cut it.   although it must be said, that i have seen 10 replications with tiny transformers, and only 1 with a large transformer, - so there is alot of BS around.

Thankfully i have access too such massive transformers, from the medical industry,. - less crude than welding transformers. and still about 2 - 3kw .   but i dont know if i am ready too scrap such a wonderful transformer.

anyways, this is definitely displaying LENZ free behavliour, because it is given no choice. but still only 50% efficent,

patrick1 posted this 2 weeks ago

Vidura posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Patrick1 Nice experiments you have posted . When I was watching the video an idea occurred to me, you have a very high impedance in this windings, which will limit the current and torque of the motor. Well it's just a idea, but as you have the setup you could give it a try. When the magnetic fields of the coils are opposing, you have the reduced impedance effect, almost only I2R losses. If you feed a short pulse in this configuration the current will be large, then immediately disconnect or short one of the coils ,there could arise a interesting interaction of the coils, very similar to the delayed conduction experience.Of course this needs timing, duty and RPM. Great work, Keep it up. Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Vidura, thx for the input, - " you have a very high impedance in this windings, which will limit the current and torque of the motor"

- actually i did not mention, although there are 2 coils, - they are in series, and not opposing, - too create a single large field, - which may prevent your idea from working ?.  - also - yes the high impedance does limit current. - - but not torqe.  -  

Actually the current, according too ohms law, - (metres wont read with magnets near by).  Voltage is 600v x 600ohms. = 1amp or 600watts.

but only when stationary, -   when the motor is spinning @ 600v, - the input watts drops from 600watts. down too 4.5 watts. because of the generator effect of the newman magnet. ;-D

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Chris
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Patrick,

Re:

My efficiency has improved alot, and im beginning too understand why i have heard it said, - that for this technology, you want too use big transformers. - very big transformers.

 

No, not true, not yet anyway!

If you had read my posts, I say all the time, start small and cheap! The bigger you go, the MUCH harder it is to work with and the MUCH more dangerous it is.

Good experiments, thanks for sharing!

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 2 weeks ago

Yes i agree,  i have ovoided large transformers for all of your reasons, - especially  because they are time consumers, and because the high power drive requirements are more troublesome....   however after putting afew days into tuning my circuit for ferrite torroids.  - too remove inefficiencys of poory constructed iron transformers... - it was harder than i expected. - but now that its finished. the waves look u-beut. - 2 of them anyway....

yellow is primary. , blue is trigger period of the 1st secondary. which is currently charging capacitors..  - sitll working on it,

however one bit of advise i have not used yet chris, - that i read last night, was that i should be using closer to 10 turns on my pri, instead of 100, - which i guess is true.  and especially a different turns ratio.   mine is 1:1.  and obviously. that could be better. - especially since i have 3 transistor juntions eating 1v each. blehh..

still very promising overall, - and i actaully have a chance of beating COP1 with this setup.,  actually i fully expect too if i count the bemf from the primary.    

the coolest thing, is that i am trying too learn a far out thing, which will take a while,  - that i actually believe in.

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
patrick1 posted this 2 weeks ago

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Chris

Please Support Us

All Visitors: since Nov 27 2018
Members Online:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Weeks High Earners:
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Support Us (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Support Us (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Close