Falcons COP Experiments

  • 548 Views
  • Last Post 5 weeks ago
CaptnFalcon posted this 21 January 2024

Hey All,

Starting a thread for my Experiments, need some help with a few things before I post any findings of any sort, I really want to figure this all out and I am not going to give up until I do, free energy for the world is a necessity. 

I am having a bit of difficulty trying to understand how to get the right frequency and what I should do to find it. I am getting a bit confused on what I need to do to get the correct frequency, do I do the Open-end test from one of Chris' videos? or am I calculating Fr = 1/2π√LC, or is there something else that I am missing? If I am doing either of those methods what are the parameters for testing is it L1 - L2 or L2 - L3, or do I need to add a capacitor into the circuit to calculate the right frequency?

I know that the Voltage of the input and the current of the output need to be 180 degrees out of phase, but I am just getting a little caught up on this specific part. There is a lot of information in the forum and sifting through it all is making me a bit confused.

If I could get some help with this, I would be grateful. 

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 21 January 2024

Welcome CaptnFalcon,

If I were you, I would not focus on Resonant Frequencies yet! I would build the machine and then look at these sorts of things.

 Other things will fall into place when you start building, and you can then try to apply math and theory.

I have most of the theory already down, here in these pages, but some I am still not yet able to 100% explain. Just because some things I can't fully explain, does not mean these machines don't work, it just means Conventional Theory may not be entirely suitable to explain in full, these machines!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

CaptnFalcon posted this 22 January 2024

I will Post my build tomorrow or sometime this next week when I got time. I have it all ready I am just unsure if I am doing it correctly.

CaptnFalcon posted this 14 March 2024

Hey all,

I just wanted to post and update anyone that was expecting something from me a few weeks ago. I got sick for 3 weeks and then work got super busy, so I was unable to spend time on figuring this tech out. I haven't given up and I will not be quick to quit.

Because I am unsure if what I did was enough I have 2sets of coils
The first set of coils has:
L1 has 43 turns of 16AWG magnet wire
L2 has 1200 turns of 24AWG magnet wire 49.8mH~
L3 has 1200 turns of 24AWG magnet wire 49.6mH~

The other set of coils has:
L1 has 20 turns of 16AWG magnet wire

L2 has 400 turns of 24AWG magnet wire 5.8mH~

L3 has 400 turns of 24AWG magnet wire 5.8mH~

I cant remember if using more turns was better but I knew it needed to be more than 100. I am still learning so please bear with me while I try not to confuse myself. Feel free to tell me what I need to do to get better results.

FringeIdeas posted this 15 March 2024

Hey CaptnFalcon,

In general, if you browse through the experiments of others, a couple hundred turns is enough to see the effects being looked for. We need strong magnetic fields = enough turns. However, at some point the physical resistance is going to be a bad thing. For example, 1200 turns I think might be overkill. Just my opinion, and I've never experimented with so many turns, but from what I've read on the forum in other replications I don't think I've seen so many turns.

Check a few replications out on the above-unity thread.

And/or check the builders guide, scroll down to the bottom, and check out the list of successful replications.

The 400 turns might be good to go, maybe play with that. But in my humble, still new to this stuff, opinion, I'd start with around 100 turns on the POC coils (L2 L3), play around, add 50 play around, add 50.. etc. until you see the effects.

For the input coil, again my humble opinion, somewhere between 10 and 20 turns, regardless of the number of turns on the POC coils, for now. I had spent some time taking measurements and cutting down the input coil one turn at a time, and taking measurements. It seemed for my specific setup, that if I had over 24 turns on the input coil, the input started having trouble getting the system to really move.

If I may ask, do you have any pictures of the setup? Would be awesome to see. Thanks for sharing!

Marcel

CaptnFalcon posted this 15 March 2024

Hey Marcel, 

Thanks, I have actually been reading all of your experiments and I have been able to understand a little better. I am not done though, so I do definitely appreciate the advice. I want to do more reading first before I try more and give results of any kind. I hadn't really paid enough attention to the understanding that the device is more like a transmitter and receiver and understanding how they work is something I need to look more into. In the meantime, I am going to try a couple of different experiments that you have also tried. I will post my progress.

I will try to get pictures tonight if I remember and have time to.

I did decrease the turns to 10 on the input of the 400 turn one but I haven't gotten around to testing yet. 

I also was looking at purchasing a different core that I could have the specs for. I saw you had a blueferrite.com nanocrystaline core and I was looking at getting a similar one here in the USA. Sent emails for quotes yesterday.

Again thank you for your help,

Marcus

CaptnFalcon posted this 16 March 2024

Hey guys,

I don't have anything connected right now and I don't have time to run a test, but here is at least, Also I just saw something... I wound one of my POC coils "incorrectly" Its technically fine, but based on all the other replicas I should definitely flip the direction I wound it for better results.








Sorry for the cluttered mess, I will make it look pretty when I send progress photos. Also For the coils Ignore the arrows they are not correct ATM.
Best Wishes

Marcus

FringeIdeas posted this 16 March 2024

Hey yeah nice pics, thanks for sharing!

That core you have looks just fine to me, and honestly I think I'd rather have that one My core is nice but it's soft inside, so if I took the plastic it would probably fall apart. And it is one piece, not cut in half. So winding is a pain.

And the core I would not worry about too much. Looking back I never realized some of the greats didn't even have ferrite or nanocrystalline. Ferrite came about around 1930, nanocrystalline around 1984 or so. So technically not even necessary. A lot didn't even use cores. But for this experiment, I think what you have looks easy to work with, so I'd say just stick with that.

But yeah looking nice. Thanks again for the pics, it's nice to see. And don't worry about the mess, it's the mark of an artist some say.

Marcel

CaptnFalcon posted this 26 March 2024

Good Day All,

So I was able to find time to test a coil I had initially made with 0.8mm wire for POC coils. Heres the setup



The POCs have ~270 turns of 20AWG wire and the input has 10 turns of 16AWG wire, Heres a picture of what it looks like.


I have been trying to utilize Marcel's findings and how he conducted his experiments, I haven't done the Secret to Resonance test from the video because I don't think it is necessary right now, I am trying to find the affect and wiring the coils up correctly with my Load and Diodes. 

The circuit I made was directly based on the picture below from Marcel's experiments because I was having an issue with visualizing how the wire the coils up.



So after following this diagram I got better results, not good results but better. I recorded a video showing that shorting the POC2 makes the bulb brighter vs making it dim and increasing the current on the input. I am starting to think that I need to shorten the width of the coil. I saw on a post that it may help to increase the magnetic field. 

Here is the video, I will make better videos in the future when I get better results, I just wanted to show the progress at the very least and receive any feedback I could get before I commit to doing something time consuming.

https://youtube.com/shorts/RooHElFvmxM
(Not sure how to make the youtube link work. I saw it on the forum somewhere but I don't remember where I saw it.)

I am at work in this video, I have had a lot of down time in between projects here at work so I decided to bring my stuff in. 

I also wanted to state that I am not really worried about the O-Scope and waveforms at the moment I just wanted to see the desired effect before I tried to fine tune the design.

Let me know what I could do to progress further. I will likely print a new holder for my core that is not as wide, I have a different  different core that is probably better but I am not going to worry about it for now. I want to focus on adjusting the current core and making it as best I can.

Thanks, 
Marcus

FringeIdeas posted this 26 March 2024

Hey looking good!

Regarding the YouTube link, I usually just copy and paste it, and it embeds it automatically. Maybe it's treated different because it's a short?

My drawing that you show there, that was no optimal actually. I have that set up so the input coil is wound on top of POC1, BUT it doesn't interact with POC1, it interacts with POC2. Then the magnetic field that comes back from POC2 interacts with POC1. Optimally you would want the input interacting straight with POC1 because, being wound on top, the coupling is much much better.

I could not get mine to work well the correct way, and I still have not figured out why it was like that. I'll get back to investigating at some point. Anyway, to get your input to interact with POC1, like in the original experiment by Chris, just reverse the input + and - on my drawing, pulse the other side. See if the effects change, better or worse. Or you could also just turn both diodes.

I think your idea of shortening the coil would be a good direction too, maybe even half the width of what you have there, same amount of turns.

But it looks like you are starting to get one POC coil assisting the input (light gets brighter when POC shorted), that's awesome.

And very nice to see, thank you for sharing.

Marcel

CaptnFalcon posted this 26 March 2024

Hey Marcel,

I actually did do that, or rather that is how I had it before I changed it to that drawing, it did indeed have better results with a difference of up to 100mA change, rather than a 10-50mA change. I had it wired exactly the same except I had POC1 wired as if it was POC2 and vice versa. I will make up my prints and get them printing sometime here in the next few weeks, work is about to get crazy later this week and next week but I have a week off to see the solar eclipse so I will work on getting some results then.

Thank you for the advice, and I look forward to reading more of your replications, and experiments.

Marcus.

CaptnFalcon posted this 5 weeks ago

Hey all,

So I did change one thing about my set up that has helped tremendously. I was having a Massive amount of noise in my circuit and it was mostly because of my power supplies. So in order to remove the noise I added a 470uF 25v capacitor on the input of the 9V powering the switching part of the h-bridge circuit from the reliable switching system thread, I might increase that but for now it has definitely helped. I also put 7 - 100uF 50V caps in parallel with the input voltage that goes to my coil along with 2 diodes just like how Chris has in his videos except I don’t have the money to buy a big bus capacitor at the moment. I did however purchase 12 - 2200uF 63V electrolytic caps to replace the 7, all so I can reduce the noise completely from my input voltage to my coil.

Here it is, its janky but it does the job. I don't get the new caps in for another few days or so. Ill also post a pick of that when I get it all soldered in.

That’s the only update for now

Thanks

Marcus

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close