FringeIdeas's Melnichenko's Effect Replication

  • 995 Views
  • Last Post 16 January 2025
FringeIdeas posted this 05 December 2024

Hello!

Sorry I have been extremely busy with work and family stuff lately. Still going to bed and waking up thinking about this stuff. I have managed to do a bit of forum reading and finally today I got a little bench time which I'd like to share.

Ok, the point I'm at now, and this seems common after reading a few other threads, there is a big lean towards flyback action. I even got a few comments about it on my YouTube videos that it's the flyback. YouTube comments usually mean run the other way 😀 but let's not be so quick to throw away interesting experiments.

Chris says a million times all over the forum that it's not the flyback action, it's forward action. So, I kept clicking and reading. I came across a thread by Jagau, Melnichenko's Effect

And thank you Jagau for all the contributions you have left this forum in the past! Really some good digging and documentation for us who follow.

So Melnichenko dealt with flyback setups, but he himself said they were not the typical flyback. And his aim with his experiments, that he wanted people to replicate, leaned heavily on the separation of fields, not the flyback.

So, in this thread, I'm going to entertain the idea of flyback, with the exception that I will actually be looking for what else is going on. Because I think, like Chris says a million times, there are other things going on. Action, reaction, counter-reaction. Of course, in the end, we need opposing magnetic fields, etc.

So I will start with Melnichenko's E core setup and investigate that as much as I can, then move on to the air core coil surrounding the cored coil. Should be fun!

A few more links:

Melnichenko patent Jagau had given in his thread. Interesting read, here

Melnichenko's Effect 2 (the following)

raivope - Melnichenko replication attempt 

Brian's Melnichenko's Effect Replication

hyiq.org Melnichenko

Melnichenko YouTube video channel "СВОБОДНАЯ ГЕНЕРАЦИЯ Андрей Мельниченко" which for some reason I can't link, so here is a link to the first video in the list, you can get to the rest of the videos through this.

 

above-unity
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
FringeIdeas posted this 05 December 2024

So this first experiment, what I believe to be the first experiment Melnichenko wanted others to replicate, is heavy on the idea of separation of fields. Watch the two videos on hyiq.org linked in the post above. Here is the schematic and parts list that Jagau so kindly put together for others.

 

 

  • IRF9610 mosfet, not a power transistor, highside switch.
  • 200 Hz, 7% duty cycle.
  • E cores gapped with plastic, 1.5.mm.
  • Input is 15V.
  • Lamps are normal 12v bulbs.
  • L1 is 65 turns 0.8 mm wire.
  • L2 is 150 turns 0.8 mm wire.

 

Input, Mean reading on input is around 760 mW. This is energy spent on magnetization of the core only, no bulbs are lit during this time.

 

 

Output on L2, RMS shows about 1.4 W. Mosfet is off at this time, this is the de-magnitization phase.

I'm sure there is an error somewhere 😉 but even if the bulbs were only at about 1W each, which I'm sure they were around there somewhere, it would still be a COP of 2.6.

Interesting side story, I had blown one of the channels in my scope. I luckily found some forum with some guy that had the same scope same problem, and he found out it was a jfet on the front end, and he even gave a link for a replacement part. I figured I'd take a shot in the dark, ordered the part, and somehow manage to hand solder something the size of a grain of rice.

 

That's my fingernail next to the fet! And it worked, got my scope channel back 😎

Anyhoo, interestingly enough with this E core setup, when the gap is closed and the L1 bulb is removed, everything dies off and the COP drops to about 0.95 or so. I guess in the range of a typical flyback transformer.

Here is a video for those who like to watch videos. Sorry about the audio, I did have a mic clip on. But for some reason the phone's internal mic was in use.

I'll poke around with this setup a bit more before moving on, and post anything interesting I find. After this setup I'll move on to the cored coil surrounded by the air core coil experiment. Anybody is free to jump in on this as well. The forum has been a bit too quiet lately. 🙂

Thanks!

Marcel

FringeIdeas posted this 07 December 2024

CORRECTION TO MEASUREMENTS:

Hey! I wanted to correct my measurements that were given in the video. I had mentioned, and showed on the scope, that the output on the L2 bulb was 1.42 W. This did seem a bit high to me to be honest. The light output did seem a bit more around 1 W to me. So, I fought for a little bench time and played around with different probes, recalibrated the the scope, etc. And came out with measurements that I'm a bit more comfortable with.

Input: measured this time near the caps by the power supply, to get a more stable reading. Came out to be 880 mW, Mean value. This would include the switching losses this time. So not much of a change here, before I had said 760 mW.

Output L2 bulb, measured this time to be 870 mW RMS, not 1.42 mW. Big difference.

Output L1 bulb, not measured. But it was as bright as, if not a little brighter than, the L2 bulb, so we can assume around 870 mW there as well.

So this still leaves the COP to be around 1.9 for this setup, which seems more reasonable. And having the gap at about 1.5 mm gives the best results.

At this point, in my mind, the flyback type action is really only being used to set up the conditions to observe the field separation effects. I do plan on playing with different turn ratios, turn directions, etc. I'll post more when I have time.

So no comments at all from anyone? 🤔 I was hoping for a little discussion. After next week I get a whopping 3 weeks of vacation. Most of which will be dedicated to the bench. A bit of discussion or a few comments would help me come up with ideas of what to study or experiment with, so as to not waste good vacation/bench time. 🙂

Back with more soon, thanks!

Marcel

Chris posted this 07 December 2024

 

Hey Marcel,

Beautiful Work! Thanks for sharing! I want to Thank You Marcel! I very much appreciate your work and efforts to learn this VERY Important technology! Your effort here on this forum is very much appreciated! Many have learnt from you and your experiments! I really do wish others would get off their Lazy Asses and do what you have done!

The ideas here, all were originally from Andrey Melnichenko and his team of Researchers, did a very good job. Also they shared everything necessary to learn from and move ahead.

CORRECTION TO MEASUREMENTS:

Hey! I wanted to correct my measurements that were given in the video. I had mentioned, and showed on the scope, that the output on the L2 bulb was 1.42 W. This did seem a bit high to me to be honest. The light output did seem a bit more around 1 W to me. So, I fought for a little bench time and played around with different probes, recalibrated the the scope, etc. And came out with measurements that I'm a bit more comfortable with.

 

 

This is an important experiment, it shows proof that there is worth effects to Study and that you are doing a fantastic job at doing!

 

Input: measured this time near the caps by the power supply, to get a more stable reading. Came out to be 880 mW, Mean value. This would include the switching losses this time. So not much of a change here, before I had said 760 mW.

Output L2 bulb, measured this time to be 870 mW RMS, not 1.42 mW. Big difference.

 

 

In your video, you show how easy this is! Once one has gone through our Pages and learned to properly measure these machines, you can very easily show Above Unity Effects! You have done this very clearly!

 

Output L1 bulb, not measured. But it was as bright as, if not a little brighter than, the L2 bulb, so we can assume around 870 mW there as well.

So this still leaves the COP to be around 1.9 for this setup, which seems more reasonable. And having the gap at about 1.5 mm gives the best results.

 

 

Very impressive!

 

At this point, in my mind, the flyback type action is really only being used to set up the conditions to observe the field separation effects. I do plan on playing with different turn ratios, turn directions, etc. I'll post more when I have time.

 

Yes, Flyback is only one half of what's going on here, so this machine is not a Flyback Transformer as it stands. It is a Conventional Transformer, turned on its head, it has a Rising Cycle, and a Decaying Cycle, of course, the Decaying Cycle is viewed as a Flyback, and this is what most people incorrectly focus on, because the most important effects do not take place here.

The Turns Ratios will change the device operations, of course starting with Voltages.

 

So no comments at all from anyone? 🤔 I was hoping for a little discussion. After next week I get a whopping 3 weeks of vacation. Most of which will be dedicated to the bench. A bit of discussion or a few comments would help me come up with ideas of what to study or experiment with, so as to not waste good vacation/bench time. 🙂

 

I expected this comment to stir some Trolls:

 

DO YOU SEE: What sort of people these people are???

NOTE: Jagau was not able to make this machine operate and was unsuccessful, so speaking to Jagau would be pointless! Marcel is clearly Light Years Ahead of them!!!

I have been busy, so have not spent much time on the Forum in the last few weeks. Still, looking this morning, I see the Trolls have taken this opportunity to get out of bed and do what they do best! Scum of the Planet, trying to Thieve Members, what Scum they continue to prove they are! Scum Bags!

Its obvious, they have made ZERO Progress in the time they were Banned from here! They are just too damn Dumb! I mean really, Adams motor is they best they have - Hahahaha

🤡Clown Village Inc

where the Dumb Trolls gather is groups of two, with a strict no progress policy...

 

It appears Marcel has already Banned fighter, because he is a Scum Bag! Hahaha!!! Dumb Dumb, aka fighter, his comment has not been approved and is not visible on Marcels Post! This dumb scum bag posted this openly on his forum, advertising how dumb he really is!

When they say: "move forward" this means Shut you down and shut you up, stop you and others from Achieving! Like the Mouse, dangling a bit of cheese under its nose and hope its not smart enough to realise its a Trap!

I banned a bunch of people for simply Trolling the Community, you know the history, and a small group of people were really just Bad People, doing everything they could to disrupt my work and efforts, trying to take my forum offline and spreading lies and BS rumor's about me, which all failed, because the only people that have seen my bad side are the people that have wronged me. A little bit of this can be read here: 

My Friends,

Banned and disgraced ex-member, fighter, aka Aurelian Iordache, Professional Plagiarist, see Here and Here and Here, has started all sorts of lies against me, he got caught Here, scraping my forum, when he was told not to, and Here, he got caught doing it again!

fighter, aka Aurelian Iordache, is the reason the pdf site backups were stopped! Read above for the proofs!

However, I have decided to catch Aurelian Iordache, under his fake account that he has signed up, I believe he has more than one fake account, and expose him again for his very bad behavior again!

Here is the proof, this is a Member Only Section:

 

Ask yourself:

  • Why would he go to so much trouble, accessing this sort of information?
  • What else is he desperate to access?
  • Why is he so Desperate?
  • To what extremes do Desperate people go to?

 

The SHAME this person would have, if there was a rational normal mind and consciousness present!

So, I will be bringing back the PDF Backup Service again.

The Backups will be running again soon, all of you will have access to download the Backup when it is complete.

EDIT: Backup is working/operational! Please report any issues!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

Again, I want to Thank You Marcel! I very much appreciate your work and efforts to learn this VERY Important technology! Your effort here on this forum is very much appreciated! Many have learnt from you and your experiments! I really do wish others would get off their Lazy Asses and do what you have done!

We have had so much Success here on this forum, our list of Successful Replications is massive now!

Its nearly been Ten Years that I have been actively sharing this, and many good people have come and learned the TRUTH, some get tired and move on, because either:

  1. Not enough interest from others.
  2. Too many Idiots nagging and pestering for help and details.
  3. Time and Money issues.
  4. Family issues...
  5. and the list goes on.

 

The truth is right in front of everyone's eyes and we have nothing but a good track record, Zero Lies, 100% Truth, so many more people should be grabbing this with Both Hands and Running with it! Alas, so many just don't care! As long as they have their TV's and Packets of Chips, they are happy to stay Fat Dumb and Stupid.

You continue to show, that those Dumb Bastards still tell everyone is impossible, well no its not, we show you how to do it!

Only a small percentage of us care and want to learn more.

We are truly Light Years Ahead of the other Idiots!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Elvis posted this 08 December 2024

Hello Marcel, Chris. 

The trolls are just jealous and trying to deter you both. they have lost control, and they have nothing. that's how idiots behave when they loose it all.

all the best - E

fyi your forum is the best on the whole net. best content, best people, best everything. they dont even come close 

FringeIdeas posted this 08 December 2024

You know, reading Fighters comment there reminded me that I completely forgot to say a thank you to Andrey Melnichenko. Him being the original source of these experiments.

So Andrey Melnichenko, thank you for the original videos and for trying to get people to experiment!

Is he still lurking around somewhere? That patent was 2022 so I would guess he is.

Marcel

Bird_eye posted this 08 December 2024

Hi Marcell,

it is nice practical skill you put in as always, 

Thanks to You, to Jagau who open this thread first here and also to Melnichenko ofcourse ,

But nobody was in trying this setup here and also at the other site,

Normally , it is induspitable, persons who give service by adding his effort to deploy main idea to make more clearer for others is deserving thanks as real value,

This E type core by having small gap was suggesting by Baerdorfer for who want to see result  as much as quick , it is indicated also in some thread i remember,

This type of setup has big potential which is already shown on the some demo by him,

Regards,

fighter aka Aurelian Iordache aka village idiot aka professional plagiarist aka liar boy aka shill looser boy

FringeIdeas posted this 08 December 2024

Hey Bird_eye, 

Thank you. And I'd really rather not derail the content on this thread, but, I am grateful to everyone that has contributed information. There is quite a lot here on this forum, and on YouTube, that has been put together. Regardless if the person had a falling out and left, or whatever. I want to make that clear. I've been with the forum just under two years, and I have learned a lot. Not just about energy machine basics, but even standard electronics/electrical engineering. And I'm very very thankful for that.

And also, just to be clear, and I'm not picking sides here, I think Fighters post might have just got pulled by YouTube. Several times I've tried to comment on someone's video asking them to have a look at aboveunity.com, and the comment has lasted maybe 5 minutes and disappeared. Censored. Censored why? Because there is good valid information here, and I'm very thankful it's not censored or cluttered in nonsense here as well.

Br,

Marcel 

FringeIdeas posted this 17 December 2024

Next Melnichenko setup, three cores!

Not much to really report here. I'm still plugging along with these Melnichenko videos. So many different setups he goes over. Too bad the YouTube auto-translate is so bad. Good enough I guess. Learning the Russian language would probably be the best thing to do 😂

This next setup here comes from this video.

 

Here is a screenshot of the cores he is showing, and the separation of fields with the gap.

 

Here are the cores and coils that I threw together. The core is a pressed steel toroid, which was more like a square almost, which i cut sections out of. Note, in the video the cores do wrap around the end coils. Mine do not. I have a few more core pieces that I need to try that will be more like the original experiment shown. But for now this has been suffiecient.

 

  • IRF9610 mosfet, highside switch.
  • 500 Hz, 9% duty cycle.
  • Cores gapped with cardboard, 0.5 to 1 mm or so.
  • Input is 17V.
  • Lamps are normal 12v bulbs.
  • L1 is 75 turns 0.8 mm wire.
  • L2 is 150 turns 0.8 mm wire.
  • L3 is 150 turns 0.8 mm wire.

The results were about the same, not too much exciting.

  • Input about 1.41 W mean.
  • L1 bulb roughly 1.05 W rms
  • L2 and L3 bulbs were about 0.54 W rms each.

This was also the same as the E core setup, in that one can remove the L2 and L3 bulbs and the input does not go up.

There does seem to still be some relationship between coils though, also pointed out by Melnichenko. For example, when removing the L2 and L3 bulbs the L1 bulb does get brighter. However, pulling L2 and L3 bulbs is a loss of output, of around 1.08 W. The brightness increase on the L1 bulb is only something like 0.1 or 0.2 W increase. This is also pointed out by Melnichenko in the videos.

Anyway, I still need to go over the relevant videos a few more times, so I'll mess around with this setup a bit longer.

I did come across a good article/report, on hyiq.org Harold Aspen. The links don't work on hyiq.org, so here is an alternative pdf that includes all the reports together. I'm specifically talking about No. 1: POWER FROM MAGNETISM: THREE EXPERIMENTS

http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Reports.pdf

Harold touches on the gap, and the gains that can come from it, and why, and shows some very similar experiments. So.. I need to re-read that section a few more times. I'm trying to put that together with the core arrangements in these experiments, and Melnichenko's "vortex around the core". Clever ways to amplify this A Vector it sounds like.

Thanks!

Marcel

Chris posted this 18 December 2024

Hey Marcel,

I wonder if the Idiot Crew will interject on this one?

Did you get all three cores to oppose each other like the image shows:

 

Its the idea as you know and as AM shows.

Cheers My Friend

FringeIdeas posted this 18 December 2024

Hey Chris,

No recent friendly concerns from complete strangers about me being in the wrong place. The post is still new though, so let's be patient. 😁

In regards to the cores opposing each other, in this specific setup I believe they do not. I have seen a bit of what you might be referring too, going through some of Melnichenko's papers, etc. But in the video list I'm still back in the 8 year old section. A few more dozen to go. And I'm still kind of focused on this field separation at the moment.

So as I understand it, during Ton the outer cores/coils try to oppose but diodes do not allow it. Toff the magnetic fields in the outer cores switch, if I'm not mistaken, and so the whole group of cores during Toff would be N-S, N-S, N-S during de-magnitization. Standard flyback if I'm not confused. I'll add, I have not really tried tying together any of the coils yet. So far each coil has been it's own isolated circuit.

Though looking at some of Melnichenko's more elaborate circuits, where these coils might be connected and/or switched in and out from each other, I can see how they could be made to oppose at certain parts of the cycle. Is this what you are referring to?

Thanks,

Marcel

Chris posted this 19 December 2024

Hey Marcel,

 

No recent friendly concerns from complete strangers about me being in the wrong place. The post is still new though, so let's be patient. 😁

 

Oh, yeah, well I hope they manage to keep their trollyness to themselves from now on!

 

Though looking at some of Melnichenko's more elaborate circuits, where these coils might be connected and/or switched in and out from each other, I can see how they could be made to oppose at certain parts of the cycle. Is this what you are referring to?

 

We all know, Lenz's Law is Sine Opposite, so every time any Electromagnetic Induction occurs, we have a Sine Negative component from Source to Target.

In the Coils:

 

The Fields curling back in toward the Cores, where there are small gaps, show an opposition of Magnetic Fields, as you know, for the most part, lines will join and become larger if we have a N S N S N S, the Field will grow and become one large field.

If we have S N N S S N then we get curl ins to the Gaps.

Magnetics are fun!

The Generation of a Voltage is Faradays Law, the Pumping of Current is, for the most part, Science less! Nothing in Science accurately describes the completeness of Currents flowing in an Insulated Wire. Amperes Law gives you the Force at Right Angles, but does not describe the Current Flow. Amperes Law gives some Science, after the Current has been established.

Science is a total Sham in so many areas!

Best Wishes

   Chris

FringeIdeas posted this 12 January 2025

Hey,

Vacation is over. It was mostly a wash, very frustrating. I had maybe 3 days out of 3 weeks where I actually got some time to think and get to the bench. I spent some time thinking about what Chris had asked a few posts back.

Did you get all three cores to oppose each other like the image shows

I figured I would work on the topology of the coils for now. In one Melnichenko's more recent videos he was using two T cores, which I was planning on trying. Bu then in a different video this layout caught my interest.

 

 

 

And at the same time I had been re-reading a bit about Paul Raymond Jensen and the UDT. There seemed to be some similarities. Amazing how much Jensen said in so little words.

Anyway, so I went and got a few more E cores, a bit bigger than my last ones. https://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/871-B66894GX197

The CSA is obviously not the greatest, but at 27 euros a pop it will have to do for experiments.

I got a little time today while kids were napping, and cut the middle leg out of two of the E cores. Then glued the inner pieces together with ceramic glue. Then printed a few spacers. The middle core has a gap on the top and the bottom, both gaps around 1 mm.

 

 

So this week I will try to find time to print some bobbins and get some coils wound. I ordered 1 mm wire, but I might do this in 0.8 mm just to save space. And I think I will do it this way, to get shorter length coils. Rough drawing, my apologies.

 

 

I'll post a few more pics once I get it all together and play around with it.

More to come soon!

Marcel

Chris posted this 13 January 2025

Hey Marcel,

Thanks for sharing!

If one studies Electromagnetic Induction, at t = 0, and B = 0, to B = Peak, the Magnetic Field of the Primary opposes the Magnetic Field of the Secondary. This is the Neo Magnet falling Slowly down the Copper Pipe:

 

This is the effect you get.

Of course, this phase is important! Why?

Because this is where you Generate the Voltages required to Pump Current, the higher the Voltage the higher the Output Current because I = V / R. Whats required to Generate a Voltage? I just went through all this here: You are perfectly able to achieve Free Energy!

There are Phases, the Magnetic Field changes Polarity and Direction at different stages. The fact of the matter is, there is Opposition from t = 0 to B = Peak. Its all Electromagnetic Induction and its well worth studding!

Best Wishes

   Chris

Chris posted this 13 January 2025

Hey Marcel

My Friend, a thought for you: with a small Core Cross Sectional Area, we have two other variables that we can use to get the output voltage up:

  • Turns - Increase the Turns until we get a satisfactory Voltage.
  • Frequency - Increase the Frequency until we get the Voltage high enough.

 

You may remember, CaptainLoz was way up there in Frequency and his core was a lot bigger than yours appears to be.

Perhaps a little bit of a rethink as to the goals of the machine may be worth while before too much time money and effort is put in? I am sorry, I really hate to be a downer, I hope you can see, I am only trying to help.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
  • Augenblick
AETHERIC_MIND posted this 16 January 2025

Hi Marcel,

Do you have a scope shot of this latest setup? Did you check closely the turn On time and turn Off time of the mosfet? You can improve there too to get a faster dI/dT and increase voltage. Try to find the natural resonnance frequency of the coils first  and match the rise time with a fraction of this frequency.

Nice experiment !

Best wish

''Change is never easy but it's worth inertia''

FringeIdeas posted this 16 January 2025

Hey! Sorry, I have been ridiculously busy with work. I have however managed to 3d print some bobbins and wind a few coils. Little experimentation time though.

@Chris, sorry, I somehow missed your last post there. 

Yes, the small CSA is always on my mind. 14x28 mm on the output coils. Currently I have 150 turns of 0.8 on them, and I'm not seeing much of anything. They do seem to be bucking in this coil configuration, but getting the desired interactions between them really isn't happening. I was trying to decide how to get a bigger CSA without throwing much more money at it. Maybe for now I can up the turns to 250 and see if that helps. Otherwise I'll try to find a place to source a bit of strip metal I can cut for bigger cores, assuming that is cheaper than these ferrite pieces. And of course criticism is never a downer if it leads to learning. Much appreciated.

 

@AETHERIC_MIND hey, thank you.

I do need to get around to tuning these things when I experiment. That is something I've always kind of neglected. I'll add that to the to-do list with this one, I appreciate the reminder! I have a few scope shots for you coming up.

 

So.. here is a pic of the setup coils wound and in action.

 

The output coils are 150 turns 0.8 mm. The input is 65 turns 1 mm. I also have a wider coil for the input, meaning wider inner diameter spaced from the center core about 10 mm, which is also 65 turns of 1 mm wire. The center leg of this is gapped on both the top and the bottom. Roughly 0.5-1 mm each gap. 10 V on the input, pulsed DC only so far. Most experimentation happened roughly around the 200 Hz, 10-20% duty cycle. The power supply says roughly 2 watts. Output coil diodes are set to fire on the de-magnetization.

The purpose for this experiment was really just to play with getting the input coil away from the interactions of the output coils. And to be honest, I'm not seeing the results I was hoping for.

Of course this acts like the other Melnichenko configurations, as I can remove a light bulb from the output, or both, and the input power is not affected. But there are still noticeable interactions with the bulb on the input. Also the voltages on the output are only around 5 V, which is not enough really.

I do notice that when I remove one bulb on the output, the sounds change quite a bit. So it's wanting to buck, but I think it's just not physically optimized to do so.

 

Ok a few scope shots just for fun.

  • Blue is the input voltage.
  • Yellow is the POC2 voltage.
  • Purple is the POC2 current.
  • White is the MATH function, V*I for POC2, RMS
  • Green is POC1 Voltage.

 

Here is rise time for the input coil, V. The blue trace. 208 nS

 

Here is the rise time for the output coils, both V and I, all other color traces.

 

So, yeah, I would have liked to experiment with a few feedback ideas. But first it seems that optimizing these coils is completely necessary. Otherwise, I'd say I kind of like this coil and core layout. Crazy thought I had.. It kind of resembles an inside-out VTA.. use the imagination! 😀

I'll see about getting these output coils up to 250 turns, or more if it will fit on the core area. And then see if I can get any traditional partnered output coil effects out of them. Then and only then, I might start playing with feedback ideas.

Thanks!

Marcel

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close