JackNoskills CoilCapacitor

  • 1.4K Views
  • Last Post 30 June 2017
Wistiti posted this 01 May 2017

Hi guys!

As I have not much spare time right now, I give a few testing with the concept of "JackNoskills" CoilCapacitor shown here: http://overunity.com/17119/pulling-energy-from-the-ambient-energy-field-using-a-coil-capacitor/#.WQd0Lf0zXIU

 

More test have to be done but here are my quick finding:

"I have do some more quick testing and am able to charge a capacitor beside the blocking diode at the open end of the primary. Much more interesting, I find I could charge ( at the same rate) 2 separate circuits from this open secondary!! <img src="> All that with no apparent effect on the input power...

I don't quite understand how it really work but it does. Power input seem not to be important here... Until now I find just voltage and frequency have effect.

Here are some picture of my test.

maybe we can do the same with the secondary...

ps all my coil are bifilar."

 

 

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vasile
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 09 May 2017

@Wistiti - Any more progress on the Jack Noskills Coil Capacitor?

   Chris

Wistiti posted this 09 May 2017

As usual i have not much spare time to play with it but my quick testing of it are really interesting...

I have share a bit at ou.com on Jacknoskills tread but will report here to as soon i be seriouslly on it...

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Wistiti posted this 15 May 2017

Hi guys! Just let you know I have play a bit with the concept today. I try copper foil as a coil capacitor for the secondary (the etbc of med.3012 at energetic forum) But have not good output.

The best I have until now is with multi layer of bifilar open coil as the output.... more to come when the time permit!

Wish the best to all in your research!

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 29 May 2017

Using an optoisolated arduino to drive a toroid transformer with a single secondary like what JackNoSkills described I was able to reproduce some of the effects. The non-closed loop secondary powered a load and not having a load did not appear to impact power consumption. My tests were not comprehensive and I did not have any reason to test for OU results in this initial first run, but the idea he has put forth is worth exploring. Since my setup significantly deviates from what he described I'm happy to see some interesting results here. I think the next step is probably for me to bring my setup closer to his.

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 30 May 2017

I improved my setup and can report some basic observations - using a 75V GDT, 1kv 750pf capacitor, 12.5V dc input, high speed optoisolated arduino for pulsed DC programmed for 12us on 150us off, a step up transformer around 1:8 (ballpark), and a 12 filar output transformer. After much fiddling and tuning, with different capacitance my best results were about 100mW in 19mW out (12.5V 8mA in and 7.6V 2.53mA out). Now while that may sound like bad results, I would point out that there are a ton of variables here and some of my initial tests were as bad as 2mW out (with something like 60mW in). Load was a 7.6V LED (and 3000uf 16V capacitor) across a bridge rectifier. Some observations:

1) The system is not linear - more of anything does not always equal better. 2) Multiple secondaries with loads were not more efficient - they shared power. 3) Seems to work better when secondary are step down from the primary (of the output transformer), and multiple windings can be used on each of the two rectifier terminals to add power though not linearly. 1 wire on my output might be 1mA and with 4 wires on each of the rectifier AC legs I could get 2.5mA. 4) Using the open secondary never once increased power draw.

Note: I've since noticed that I made a couple errors in my calculations and some component values I've since measured and found that they were not what I had thought. Also I added a capacitor to my load so that I could be more certain about the power output. This post has been edited to reflect the correct figures.

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris
Wistiti posted this 30 May 2017

Hi Zanzal!

Nice to see you are on it!

With the few experiment i have made with this setup i see the results going better when the voltage and the frequency is going higher,,,

 

Maybe you could try this too.

 

Thank you for sharing your results!! 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 31 May 2017

I was initially using his schematic in figure 5 with the coils around the gdt being bucking coils and I was unable to get any improvements from increased voltage or frequency. Not that power output wouldn't increase but rather efficiency went way down even if output went up a little. After switching the spark gap/capacitor to be more like what he has in figure 4 I was able to see much better results with increased voltage and to some extent frequency. For my arduino and transformer 10khz with a 10% duty cycle is about the best I can do. Still in terms of efficiency I am not needing high voltage. After swaping out my rectifier for a schottky rectifier and switching to a 100nF cap my efficiency is up to 37% at 7.6V 9mA in 3.4mA out).. for easier tuning I just matched my input to my load so I just need to compare mA draw. I can also remove the GDT from the circuit since it isn't even firing.

I'm not going to be able to push the frequency any higher with this setup, and more voltage is just wasting power for me. I went up to 50V and while it now scales much better than it did, it is no where near as efficient at those voltage levels (62mA in 7.6V 24mA out - 5% efficiency). I'm out of ideas for the moment, but I think this concept has real potential. I may buy some nanoperm toroids to see if I can push the frequency a bit higher. If not maybe an air core transformer.

I do think this concept has promise.

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 02 June 2017

I've put together a diagram showing the circuit that I ended up with. I was able to boost this particular circuit up to about 45%.

Also by removing the step up transformer L1 and optimizing my arduino code to get very short pulses directly into L2 I was able to get as much as 1.6mA out at 7.6V load and input with around 1mA in. Little did I realize that my scope probe was grounded to the wall outlet and while I am not sure how that impacted the above tests, without the scope ground connected the same was 1mA in was 0.5-0.6mA out. None of these tests take into account the arduino power so the entire system is significantly less than unity. I did measure both input power and output with the same meter.

Edit: I just realized the diagram shows the load led backwards. My bad.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 30 June 2017

Just some final thoughts on this experiment in case anyone is currently playing around with it. Understanding how the output being in resonance impacts the system would be really interesting. Yesterday I found out that there is a significant difference between parallel resonance and series resonance. So now I'm kind of curious how the open ended output behaves in resonance.

If anyone has done experiments along this line and is willing to share results I'd be interested good or bad. Right now I am working on a different replication or I'd probably be doing this myself. 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vasile
We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close