Hey ElectroMike,
Yes, there is a dynamic across the internet, where a group of people are Paid to Troll and Mislead other people, so much so that they just give up in the end!
People need to be careful, fake identities, information that may have 70% truth but 30% Lies and Propaganda to gain credit in the community, its a time where so many just cant be trusted! Poster "MerLynn" turned out to be Ex Banned and Disgraced Member CD_Sharp. So he was banned for trying to mislead others in the community!
As for Ex Banned and Disgraced Member "fighter" I wont even say what happened there! Its on this forum if you read through the pages.
Look, to be honest, I agree with 90% of what you said, but I would add, the issue is, as you started to point out:
For fun i asked a friendly retired professor in EE down the road to investigate the above, he was sceptical and full of jokes, after playing with the ideas himself, he said to me, he didnt think the day would come where he would be googling for days to understand something conventional science should be able to explain.
He cant find answers in conventional literature or papers
Most people just refuse to learn and take advantage of the pages like we have here in this forum. This forum has been very strictly Moderated and we have made a very special effort to Bann and Delete the Rubbish that other Forums suffer from, the never ending Trolling and CIA Spoofers!
This means, majority of the threads here on this forum have valuable content that sets the standard for Open Source Research in the Community. Other forums started to take the same approach, the Forum: "https://mooker.com/" started to take this same approach, getting rid of the Spammers and Trolls that really are a total embarrassment to the Human Race!
We, here at aboveunity.com single handedly eliminated the Trolls in less than 12 months!
The issue still remains, there is not enough people that take this seriously, and the massive money and effort to FLOOD YouTube with Fake Hoax Videos, its no wonder why people are skeptical! That's a good thing, people should be Skeptical, but not to the point where they automatically Dismiss a Technology, simply on a Invalid Belief System!
Remote Viewers have seen the Future:
Video:
@19 minutes or so
I don't understand what they're telling me for instance in terms of energy they talk about up a box with a new technology and it gets warm but not hot and you get a different size box to
power a building or to power a car so I don't know what the box is it sounds like a battery no I don't think so I think it's a new technology but I didn't know enough when I first heard this to ask them to describe it in Greater detail this is an insane comment but there was a breakthrough at Livermore about a month ago with Fusion technology but I'm not sure that could be compartmentalized and put in anybody's home but maybe I don't know maybe it's that I don't either that's the point so that's why I want to do this third iteration because I have all these questions
So, we do get there in the end, we do WIN and the Trolls, I have 99% of their Identities collected and saved, I will Expose them when the day comes, for what they have done!
Beware those that befriend you and try to be your best friend, sometimes even offering you money, these are the most dangerous types. They are CIA TROLLS and SPOOFS!
AI is now becoming the new avenue of Propaganda! AI has Replaced the Trolls and Spoofs, and Grok especially refuses to see any Logic at all!
Me:
Grok, is the Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field effected by the Gravitational Force of the Earth?
Grok:
No significant direct effect, but yes indirectly through the processes that generate and sustain Earth’s magnetic field.
Me:
Does the Magnetic Field have Mass?
Grok:
Yes — in the sense that a magnetic field carries energy, and energy is equivalent to mass (E=mc2 E = mc^{2} E=mc2).
Me:
If we had 1 Kg of Magnetic Field and 1 Kg of Apples, and let them fall from 100 meters above the Earths Surface, would the 1 Kg of Magnetic Field and 1 Kg of Apples have different Terminal Velocity?
Grok:
Yes — they would behave very differently with respect to terminal velocity.
Me:
So, the Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field effected by the Gravitational Force of the Earth?
Grok:
No direct effect, but an important indirect one.
So, you see, AI is simply a tool for the Propaganda Machine, it can NOT see reason and therefore the ONLY threat it currently presents is filling the Minds of Stupid People with Non-Sense!
Remember:
Well, perhaps we now see why Science has remained so Holly!
Me:
So, youre telling me, The Magnetic Field is related to Gravity, but is NOT Affected by Gravity?
Grok:
**Almost — but the precise distinction is this
*
### 1. Magnetic fields *are related* to gravity
- A magnetic field stores energy. Energy is equivalent to mass (\(E = mc^{2}\)), so a magnetic field has a tiny equivalent mass and therefore contributes (extremely weakly) to gravity.
- On Earth, gravity is essential to the *origin* of the planetary magnetic field: it drives the convective motions in the liquid outer core that generate the field (the geodynamo). Without gravity-powered buoyancy, there would be no sustained geomagnetic field and no secular variation.
### 2. Magnetic fields are *not significantly affected* by gravity in the direct sense
- Gravity does **not** appear in Maxwell’s equations as a force that changes the strength or the rate of change of a magnetic field the way electric currents or changing electric fields do.
- Once a magnetic field exists, Earth’s gravity does not meaningfully stretch, weaken, or alter its \(\partial B/\partial t\) in any practical way. The gravitational influence on the field itself is negligible.
- In free fall (vacuum), the energy of a magnetic field follows the same gravitational geodesics as ordinary mass, in accordance with the equivalence principle — but that is the field *falling with* gravity, not gravity changing the field’s intrinsic properties.
### Clean summary
| Aspect | Relationship to gravity | Directly affected by gravity? |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Energy content of B-field | Has equivalent mass → contributes to gravity | Yes (tiny gravitational effect) |
| Generation of Earth’s B-field | Gravity powers the core convection (geodynamo) | Indirectly yes |
| Existing B-field strength or \(\mathrm{d}B/\mathrm{d}t\) | No term in Maxwell’s equations | Essentially no |
So the accurate statement is:
**The magnetic field is related to gravity** (through energy–mass equivalence and through the geodynamo), **but an existing magnetic field is not directly or appreciably affected by gravity** in the way people usually mean when they ask whether gravity changes the field.
We had a Tool, for a short time, that was useful, but now we see its just another Bent and Crookard Tool for the machine, to control the Minds of the Weak and Stupid!
Best Wishes,
Chris
