• MrPreva based generator SUCCESSFULL COP=3

MrPreva based generator SUCCESSFULL COP=3

  • 632 Views
  • Last Post 05 February 2025
el_fuego333 posted this 29 January 2025

Hello,

I was experimenting with MrPreva 2 coil on one core current multiplication.

I created this device with success around COP=3:

MrPreva's video at the beginning of the forum demonstrated, and subsequently, my experiment with multiple transformers also showed that when transformer coils with unequal windings are connected, current multiplication occurs. In the transformers I tested (one with 7 turns and another with 11 turns, as seen in the video; another transformer with 150: 300 turns), the current was multiplied approximately 3-4 times during the pulse—compared to the supplied current in the circuit. This indicates an accumulation of magnetic field energy in the transformer core.

After the pulse ends, the core magnetically oscillates (ferroresonance), and this energy can be captured by an additional third coil, on which a short but very strong pulse appears. On the 7:11 turn transformer, I added a third collection coil with 10 turns. At input pulses of 8.6V and approximately 30mA, around 300V appeared on the collection coil in a short pulse. Increasing the turns on the collection coil (up to 25 turns) did not significantly increase this voltage but extended the collected pulse. This proves that after the input pulse ends, the collapse of opposing magnetic fields propagates through the ferrite core as a wave rather than a simple decrease in magnetic induction.

Coil resonance is not necessary; it works over a wide frequency range.

So I tried using a different ferrite core with input coils of 40 and 70 turns and a collection coil of 250 turns. I connected the collection coil to a 1.5W LED bulb rated for 240V. The output, compared to the input, was 3 times greater, depending on frequency and pulse width settings.

I found a very similar solution on YouTube from quite some time ago, so I probably didn’t invent anything new. However, in that case, identical coils were used for excitation, which may not be as efficient (I haven’t tested it), but the principle and circuit are essentially similar:

Here is my circuit diagram:

Potocky toroid based on MrPreva

 

This is what a waveform looked like - 88% duty cycle: (yellow is pickup coil and blue input current on 1ohm resistor)

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 29 January 2025

Hello V,

First of all, Thank you for sharing your work.

You need to be careful, spreading Miss-Information is a task Trolls are very good at, The Mr Preva Experiment is NOT Above Unity, because it is entirely Symmetrical. It cant be Above Unity, while it holds a Symmetrical only approach.

I try really hard to make sure My Forum does not mislead people, but because we are still learning, some things are hard to get across clearly, and sometimes even some confusion enters. I wish there was nothing but clarity, but we have to work with what we have.

I can assure you, The Mr Preva has a lot of Gems in there, lots to learn, but The Mr Preva Experiment by itself in Not a COP > 1.0 Machine!

We do have COP > 1.0 Machines here, and we have had them for 20 odd years now!

 


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Dumb Stupid Idiots flood the Forums, claiming to be Guru's, and the truth is, they have no idea what so ever, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282



The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided an entire Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment and 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already!



Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Technically, My Friend Wistiti was the first, but for undisputable numbers, we have to see Tinmans effort.

Tinman was the first: COP = 1.7

 

Others followed, like Captainloz: COP = 1.9

Hey Chris,

If people watch your videos its all in there. My experiment is proof of that. I was feeling very frustrated for a long time but then I stumbled on to your youtube channel and it inspired me to keep going. I actually have your book from way back, I wish now just stayed with it but I went down the Ruslan and Akula rabbit holes for too long without understand Asymmetry and the re-gauging process. Anyway mate I'm just trying to say you should be proud of yourself. You are doing a great thing here!

Cheers,

Loz

Ref: Captainloz COP = 2.0

 

COP = ∞

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

Others have also achieved Above Unity, Marcel has also shared with you all, freely:

 

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

If you are interested in learning how these machines work, then you can follow the links in the above Summary.

I look forward to you sharing your progress, and your experiments, and when you achieve what we have shared, then we will add you to the list of Successful Researchers and Mark your Experiment "AboveUnity".

I hope you are ready for a fun and exciting ride, because from here, everything is about to change forever for you!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
el_fuego333 posted this 29 January 2025

Hello Chris,

I am searching the free energy scene since 2007 and I tried many setups of various things. I have never measured COP above 1 till this scheme I posted. I measured COP 2.5-3 depended on frequency and duty cycle. So I share it. I tested it many times with various toroid cores and turn ratio. If somebody will be interested and will try it experimentally, I will accept my fault in the case of different results of measurements done experimentally.

Andrej

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 30 January 2025

Hey Andrej,

My Friend, we can work together if you wish, to achieve this task, to correctly measure: COP > 1.0

Apologies, I have added the video links to my last post, if you wish to go back and reread, and view the videos. They are now in the post and working, they were not at the time you posted your last post.

I will help anyone that makes the honest, genuine effort to help themselves, you will have to bear with me, I have been BURNED by many Trolls, many times, so I can be very skeptical sometimes, about some people.

My number one goal is to give people, the public, Genuine, Honest, verifiable Information, and for the most part, I believe I have done this. From time to time I have stated, that I am also learning, and sometimes I have not been sure on some things.

In saying this: I have shared Real Working Free Energy Machines with the public that have been verified by many people! 

If you wish, I will guide you through the process of building a Real Working Free Energy Machine:

  1. Follow my advice in my pages here: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines - Given to us from the Almighty!
  2. Once you understand the basics, I will help you in an experiment that can measure: COP > 1.0
  3. Then we can explore making improvements.

 

I will help any and all genuine people wanting to learn more!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Drasko
  • Augenblick
el_fuego333 posted this 30 January 2025

Hello Chris,

I would like to show You my input from the battery to the coils.I would like to know Your opinion how to calculate the input power from the battery. CH1 - yellow - is a voltage across the input terminals to the "MrPreva style" coils. CH2 - blue - is the current into coils.

50% duty cycle. Pulse starts with 8.95V and current rises. After the pulse there is a very powerfull spike -129V with real current back to the battery. For the total consumed current from the battery we can not use Vrms, because there is backward current back to the battery with is calculated into Vrms. So lets look on Vavg +32mV which is the same reading as my multimeter shows. The same principle should be used for the main voltage on CH1 - Vavg shows -995mV... LED is flashing strongly. If it would work as a standard flyback transformer or joule thief the strong spike to the battery would not be there. I know the correct way here is to use data analysis. But what is the correct way to calculate the power from data in this case ? It is not so simple by multiplying each row of the datafile and by the + or - mark of the result decide if it is a "from battery power" or oposite. There is a situation when during the cycle where the voltage is positive, but less than "offline" battery voltage and the current is flowing from the coils to battery, also than the voltage on the input terminals turn oposite and current is flowing the same way - into battery. And the multiplication result of values in such cases has different +- marks and both cases is the flow to the battery. So, whats Your opinion? How to calculate approximal and exact power consumption in this case?

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Chris
el_fuego333 posted this 30 January 2025

Hello Chris,

sorry for the second post, I was reading the forum and I found You wrote, that there is no extra energy on mr preva circuit because there is a voltage drop. If You place the resistors like MrPreva showed, Yes, there is a volage drop. But putting resistors in his diagram was only to show people there is a current of oposing directions and multiplied current in another resistor. But resistors are not a place to extract the energy. Try to measure it without resistors, scheme like this:

The only place You can measure the voltage is on the knots. May be I measured wrong, but I did not see any voltage drop with two coils compared with only one coil. Resistors were used by MrPreva just to show the fenomenon. Without resistors It is the closed loop where during the external pulse the current is creating the oposing magnetic fields where the energy is stored not only in just magnetic induction, but also the pressure between two oposing magnetic fields, which colapses quicker than just one magnetic field. And by current multiplication, the total magnetic field induction is higher compared with 2 coils on self core each. That is in my opinion the source of extra energy I measured. 

@builders

use battery as a power source, it spikes back like crazy, otherwise You ruin your powersource. I used old car battery with only around 9V, backwards schottky diode on the mosfet to allow backwards current, and You see the scope shot  with -129V spike back with load (LED lamp) connected.

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Chris
Chris posted this 30 January 2025

Hello el_fuego333,

I would really appreciate posting a Circuit Diagram with your test points clearly marked:

 

Please read our Measurements Thread, this is important to get a grasp of what it is, that we are doing, and how to correctly measure these machines.

Lets start at the start:

I would like to show You my input from the battery to the coils.I would like to know Your opinion how to calculate the input power from the battery. CH1 - yellow - is a voltage across the input terminals to the "MrPreva style" coils. CH2 - blue - is the current into coils.

 

Key Word here is "Battery", of course, any Battery is only ever capable of delivering DC to its source, so current and voltage can only ever have a single specific Polarity from the Battery, Positive and Negative, the Batter can not deliver anything else! This means, anything else you see on the Input Measurement, must, and can only be, coming from the DUT, Device Under Test itself.

This means, if your measurement procedures are correct, and you see Negative Voltages and or Currents, then these must be coming from the DUT!

You can read: The Input Coil for further information on this topic! What you have is a Non-Linear Load and you need to account for this in your Measurements as we have laid out in the threads mentioned.

You need to take into account the numbers, for Negative Power, you need Positive Voltage and Negative Current. So 12.0V * -1.0A = -12.0W Instantaneous Power.

 

50% duty cycle. Pulse starts with 8.95V and current rises. After the pulse there is a very powerfull spike -129V with real current back to the battery. For the total consumed current from the battery we can not use Vrms, because there is backward current back to the battery with is calculated into Vrms. So lets look on Vavg +32mV which is the same reading as my multimeter shows. The same principle should be used for the main voltage on CH1 - Vavg shows -995mV... LED is flashing strongly.

 

That's correct, you must NOT use RMS, because a Battery is a DC only device and if you have Alternating Currents, this is NOT coming from your Battery! 

The fact that you are getting +32mV and -995mV respectively shows to me, that there is an issue somewhere. One of the numbers should be Battery VoltageAverage ( 12.4 VoltsAvg ) for example. So your voltages are way to low, giving me some indication there is a problem somewhere. Now, if I have got this wrong, and these numbers should be +32mA and -995mA respectively, you need to make this clearer.

Looking at your scope shot, the big Negative voltages, do not mean Negative Power, if you do the math, -129V * -1.0A = +129Watts, Positive Power. For Current to flow Backwards, you need a Positive Voltage, greater than the Battery Voltage, and then a Negative Current will flow backwards.

 

If it would work as a standard flyback transformer or joule thief the strong spike to the battery would not be there. I know the correct way here is to use data analysis. But what is the correct way to calculate the power from data in this case ? It is not so simple by multiplying each row of the datafile and by the + or - mark of the result decide if it is a "from battery power" or oposite.

 

Instantaneous Power Measurements from the scope are sufficient, if you have enough cycles on the screen, and yes ideally a Waveform Analysis approach would be nice, but you will get an idea using Instantaneous Power Measurements. Don't confuse Positive Power with Negative Power, and Remember, what's above the Zero Graticule Line and what's below the Zero Graticule Line, is Power, so the Instantaneous Power at Time t, is what the scope calculates: V x I.

 

There is a situation when during the cycle where the voltage is positive, but less than "offline" battery voltage and the current is flowing from the coils to battery, also than the voltage on the input terminals turn oposite and current is flowing the same way - into battery. And the multiplication result of values in such cases has different +- marks and both cases is the flow to the battery. So, whats Your opinion? How to calculate approximal and exact power consumption in this case?

 

Yes, its possible, you can check the standing Voltage of the battery, rest the battery for One Hour, measure the voltage, then run your machine for Two Hours, let the battery rest for an hour, and then measure the voltage and see what the difference is.

Use a 1AH battery or smaller, if you use a 7AH or bigger, you wont get an idea of what's going on!

Reading your post, you really don't want to reverse the Battery's Voltage, the Terminals should not change Polarity, the same polarity should be maintained, so a Positive Terminal should stay positive and the Negative Terminal should stay Negative, you will damage the battery and or yourself, the Battery could Explode. I don't recommend doing this, its dangerous.

To properly "Charge" the Battery, the Positive Voltage Terminal should see 2-3 Volts Higher that the Battery's Rated Voltage, so the Positive Terminal always stays Positive. Again, the idea, to properly Charge the Battery, is to keep the Positive Terminal, Positive, about 2 to 3 Volts above the rated supply Voltage. -V * -A is still +watts, not negative!

I was reading the forum and I found You wrote, that there is no extra energy on mr preva circuit because there is a voltage drop. If You place the resistors like MrPreva showed, Yes, there is a volage drop.

 

There is more to it than this. Study the Common Mode Choke, and you will see why there is a Voltage Drop. This is too complex for one post.

The MrPreva Experiment, by itself, is not Aboveunity. The Circuit:

The MrPreva Experiment Circuit

 

Measuring either side of the Coils, gives you the Capacitor Voltage at Resonance, the Load, of which there is none, can not be measured, unless one adds a Load, and there is only one real position to add a Load, which is in between the two Coils, at one of the Nodes, if one does this, then you will see a Voltage drop, which is significant.

This is really basic Electrical Engineering and to be honest is not even really a topic for this forum. Its not even something we should discuss in detail, a quick sentence is all that is required to cover this.

 

LCR Resonance by itself is not Above Unity!

The Mr Preva Experiment by itself is also not Above Unity!

 

In saying this, it is possible to make an arrangement with extra Coils and Configurations, go Above Unity! It is possible you have achieved Above Unity, because I don't know the entire configuration. So please don't get disheartened by my observations.

Taking this seriously requires not allowing yourself to be fooled by yourself or by others.

If you are really interested in Above Unity, then you need to read and study the pages we have given you, and work on Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction.

Please go and read the threads I have shared with you, you will get a bit more of an idea what I am trying to point out.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

el_fuego333 posted this 31 January 2025

Hello Chris,

I forgot to say that my scope probes are on the coil junction with the + of the battery and on the 1ohm resistor between the coil and mosfet.

the Vavg= -995mV is because of the large negative spike. Vavg is calculated from the measured voltages by the scope in each bit of time, that why it is so small.

So, if I understand right You said that if I have the negative current and negative voltage, the multiplication of power is positive and it is a suction of the energy from the battery... I will give You an evidence, that it is not like that:

I created a simulation of my circuit in falstad.com circuit simulator. There is a coil pulsed from the battery. On the left scope, there is a voltage on the coil. On the middle scope, there is a current in the resistor, and on the right scope, there You can see the power flow which clearly shows power consumption in positive voltage spike with positive current and voltage, and power flow to the battery with negative voltage spike on the coil and negative resistor current.

Here is the video:

Here is the simulation source code, you can load it in falstad.com:

$ 1 5.0E-6 8.281975887399955 55 5.0 43
s 864 352 928 352 0 0 false
l 592 352 592 624 0 1.0 9.997740427657371E-14
v 928 624 928 352 0 0 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
R 752 224 752 144 0 5 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 688 352 592 352 0
r 592 624 928 624 0 1.0
t 752 224 752 352 0 1 -5.203956881606883 0.0 100.0
w 688 352 736 352 0
w 768 352 864 352 0
g 688 352 688 304 0
o 1 64 0 35 10240.0 0.025 0 -1
o 5 64 0 35 0.0390625 0.025 1 -1
o 2 64 1 35 0.15625 9.765625E-5 2 -1

 

 

 


Some hours later:

I have now clear (I hope) how to measure the input power. Now I measure the voltage on Battery and current through the 1 ohm resistor right behind the battery, not on the coil. The backward spike is not visible there, I checked the diode on mosfet, but it looks good. On the resistor I did not see the backward current. 

I did a data analysis on output and the result is LED consumption 1.79W - I multiplied each row of the datafile and made an average of the absolute values of results. I also did a data analysis of the input on the battery and it gives 0.43W so the real COP=4.16 .

As I am playing with it more, the primary source of excess energy, it looks like it is a way how the magnetic fields collapse.

The key is not consume the pulse by load, but make load active on high voltage spike after pulse. Thats a non linear resistor - like the LED lamp or CFL. I tried to use diode on the load in the way like flyback transformers use, but it decreased the power on the load (just by light lower, didnt measure).

Chris posted this 31 January 2025

Hello el_fuego333,

Re:

I forgot to say that my scope probes are on the coil junction with the + of the battery and on the 1ohm resistor between the coil and mosfet.

 

Again, please post a Circuit Diagram with the Test Points clearly marked. Honestly, by posting only a small part of the data is not very helpful at all.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

el_fuego333 posted this 31 January 2025

I see this forum is often unaccessible. mostly between 13:00 and 23:00 UTC+1 . 

I'm IT expert, I can help you if You are the admin of this site.

Chris posted this 31 January 2025

From time to time we go down, yes.

We are a Off Grid, Website, and depend on many services to keep us up and running:

  • Starlink, wireless via Satellite can have issues from time to time.
  • VPN that is susceptible to intermittent Net Dropouts.
  • Off Grid Power System, sometimes my Power System has an issue.
    • At the moment, I have a Bad UPS, it is tripping out under different load conditions, which right at the moment, I don't have the funds for a new one, as other things have had to be purchased. Simple things like my family using water, water pump kicking in, at night has been tripping the UPS and because I am asleep, I don't get to reset, until the morning.
  • Weather Systems play a role, Storms, we loose Internet, too hot, we have Router/Hardware issues, require continual monitoring and maintenance.
  • Hardware issues is one of the biggest issues, because its hot dry and dusty here, we go through a lot of hardware.

 

People will have to be patient with me, our Website / Forum is hanging on, with a fine line, due to limited Funds and Architecture.

I pay for this Forum from my own Pocket, I spend my own time and money sharing experiments with you all, from my own pocket, the Power that keeps this Forum running, is Free Energy, again we are Off Grid, we are the ONLY Example of: Practicing what we Preach!

Most people keep coming back here, because they know we are the absolute best Forum on the Net! The Best Information! The Best People! The Best Experiments and the only Forum with Working Free Energy Machines!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

el_fuego333 posted this 31 January 2025

Hello Chris, my pocket situation is the same

This is my schema:

  • Liked by
  • Chris
el_fuego333 posted this 31 January 2025

Here are the datafiles from the scope and excel macro for extracting the data from wav files. You can calculate yourself.

toroid data 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 01 February 2025

Hello el_fuego333,

Thank You for posting the diagram!  Yes, I agree, this diagram could have the potential to go Above Unity and does need further testing and experimentation.

Your Diagram:

Does have some similarity to My Circuit:

Here is another Version here:

As long as you have an Asymmetrical element to the Electromagnetic Induction Process, then it is possible to see a Gain in Electrical Energy over Time, our Joules, because the System has Generated more Energy than was input to the machine.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Plasmonic
el_fuego333 posted this 01 February 2025

Thank You for Your ansver Chris.

It looks it works similarly in principle.

I see the "messages from God" on the right columnt of the page. 

I have got a message for You: Try to read this text https://ideologia-ochrany-rodiny---kluc-k-obnoveniu-jednoty.webnode.sk

It is in Slovak language, so use a google translator. It is a basic text of my people. If You are certain with the information there, see the contact section on that page.

I am from Slovakia but the information is worldwide.

Good luck.

Andrej

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 01 February 2025

Thanks Andrej, I agree, translated and read a bit and I agree.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

el_fuego333 posted this 01 February 2025

After hours of experimenting with various frequencies and pulse durations, lots of dat analysis, I found a corelation between COP and the MrPreva style current amplyfication ratio. For example if the current into coils is 80mA, and inside a MrPreva coil loop flows 70mA in one coil and 210mA in second coil, the ration between input current and sum of coil currents determines COP.

70 + 210 = 280 -> 280/80 = 3.5  and measured/calculated COP around 3.4

So the key to the high efficiency is the ratio between the number of coil turns in primary coil cluster which gives the highest current multiplication. I was searching and consulting with AI, but it says that no such fenomenon as in MrPreva circuit diagram exists....

Is here anyone who played a lot with MrPreva circuit diagram ?

Andrej

  • Liked by
  • Chris
FringeIdeas posted this 01 February 2025

Hey Andrej,

I played around a bit with the Mr Preva stuff. Real good experiment to show what opposing magnetic fields can do. I did try adding a third coil, and tried different configurations to extract any extra energy, but this experiment is not necessarily above unity. And getting it there is, like Chris said, a bit more complicated. Maybe not "complicated" but it's more than just throwing on an extra coil I would assume.

Now I'm just speculating here because I didn't take experiments much further at that point, I'm now just getting back to thinking about these things, and I could be completely wrong, but from what I've been able to soak up from reading I gather that to get this above unity one would need to add some switching in/out of one of the coils. I think Andrey Melnichenko would be a good place to start. Also Chris had just mentioned in Drasko's thread, the thread on timing that has some good info that might be relative. And a lot more, just poke around the forum and hyiq.org, you will start to see the similarities in most of these energy devices.

Nice to see the experiments,

Marcel

  • Liked by
  • Chris
el_fuego333 posted this 02 February 2025

With experimenting with more toroids last I tried a toroid with 5 turns and 8 turns on primary side, and 20 turns on secondary side.

40mm diameter ferrite and heavy gauge wire (1.5mm). 9V on primary, 200V on secondary side. I did a lot of data analysis multiple times and various frequencies and get the COP 2.25 result on the highest frequency that my signal generator is capable (150KHz), and the cop rises with the frequency in case of this toroid I am limited by signal generator with this toroid with few turns.

Device needs to work with the condition that load is not active during pulse on primary, and is active only on the high voltage pulse after primary pulse ends. - non linear resistivity load or use the GDT spark gap on secondary side.

With the linear load active on the pulse on primary it does not work and is very inefficient (standard transformer function). So we can not use the standard theories to explain this. As Boyd Bushman said: we need to do experiments, collect data, and on that data we can form the theory. No theory can refute an experimental results.

Without a digital oscilloscope and knowing how to do the data analysis it is not possible to claim the valid results.

As I said before, the source of the energy excess will not be the MrPreva current multiplication, but the collapse of two oposite magnetic fields in the toroid. The last few turns toroid I explained is wound in two layers, each layer covered the whole toroid. One layer for the secondary 20 turns and the second layer for the 5 and 8 turns for the primary side.

Adding more turns on secondary does not neccessary means the voltage multiplication, but makes the working high voltage pulse longer. That means the collapse of magnetic fields  in toroid is not just simple decrease of the magnetic induction, but it travels in the toroid like a wave.

It is very interesting behavior. I would really appreciate if someone capable to do the data analysis will try the experiment.

Andrej

  • Liked by
  • Chris
el_fuego333 posted this 02 February 2025

As the load I use the cheapest aliexpress LED bulb - without fancy electronic inside, just LED array in series and the rectifier diodes with ceramic capacitor. The LED bulb with transformer inside will probably not work efficiently.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 02 February 2025

Hey Andrej,

Your Observation:

As I said before, the source of the energy excess will not be the MrPreva current multiplication, but the collapse of two oposite magnetic fields in the toroid.

 

Yes, you are correct, this is while the Input is turned Off, there are two Phases, Rise and then Decay, if one has Magnetic Field Opposition, then yes, there is a possibility of Above Unity Operations!

Some compare this to a Fly-back Transformer, it is not a Fly-back Transformer, however there are similarities.

The fact that the device does more Work internally, that we put into the machine, is not just obvious, its simple and easily explainable, everyone should be jumping on this! Sadly, there are too many that have been burned by the decades of Hoaxes and Lies that Trolls, you know, the satan worshippers, have done. The father of lies!

You have not posted enough information for anyone to do a replication, but I believe your experiment is very close to my work: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment, and you are observing data that does match mine, so you are on the right track!

If you are looking for confirmation, I would look at my thread and videos in a bit more detail and see where your data matches mine, comparing notes if you like.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
el_fuego333 posted this 03 February 2025

I was thinking a lot about this stuff. I tried to speak about it at various forum platforms and I was insulted, ridiculed and deleted. Nobody tried to replicate it

Who wants free energy ? Big companies are one hand with energetic cartels, small producers will not want sell people the device but the electricity or commodity based on electricity. Normal individual will want it just in condition that only he will have it and nobody else, just for profit from it... Every single individual who will have the information about it will supress it automaticly. Others deny it by the "law" of conservation energy.. There are only very few exceptions... So, who wants it? Just marginalised individuals capable to DiY and live off the grid. This will never be publicly available even the information about it is publicly available

This is the end of my research..   

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 03 February 2025

Hey Andrej,

Patience is the name of the game at this point. Many people will find themselves in strife very soon, not being able to afford basic things, and then we will become a necessity. Problem is, many will have left it too long and they wont have basic materials/equipment to be able to replicate it all.

We cant shove it down peoples throats, people will have to want it.

I am sorry you had trouble on other forums! They don't want it either! They are off chasing rainbows so they can have sex with the goblin at the end! You know those types of Sikkos!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

el_fuego333 posted this 04 February 2025

I found I did the dataanalysis bad. The time window on the scope was too wide and data were in low resoltution - too many cycles per data window. So I did a precision measurement with only 3 cycles per data window and calculated the COP 1.22 . Much less, But still above unity.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
el_fuego333 posted this 04 February 2025

I tried another signal generator capable to go over 1MHz (previous was up to 150KHz) with stable duty cycle 50%, so I was able to set higher frequency (it is analog, so I dont know the exact number - it is too noisy to read it from the scope), and the COP I measured now with high resolution data and precisely cutted data for 5 full periods is COP=1.887 .

I have gost just cheapest digital scope on the planet, so I will very appreciate if someone with better equipment will try the same experiment and compare the results with mine.

el_fuego333 posted this 05 February 2025

I checked the few turns toroid (5+8 turns primary, 11 turns secondary) with new signal generator, find the best performing frequency with duty cycle 50% and calculate the COP with high resolution data. to exactly the same value as previous high turns toroid. COP=1.883 . This result is stable.

Next I will try to build a simple Akula style device with included DPS based signal generator and LEDs running on just capacitor bank.

I will post the results.

  • Liked by
  • Plasmonic
We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close