Negative Power

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 1.9K Views
  • Last Post 11 December 2022
Chris posted this 04 September 2022

My Friends,

We have covered this many times, in many threads: Negative Power

You must understand and observe Negative Power, to be able to achieve Free Energy Machines!

First, you will not find this topic covered anywhere! Its a Forbidden Subject! Taboo! Negative Power is NOT Negative Energy! I believe many have confused this very simple subject however!

The easiest way to understand Negative Power, it if one of the Values you are using is Negative! In the following Argand Diagram, you can see this a little better:

 

Four Quadrant Power Flow Argand Diagram

 

The Four Quadrants represent a Two Dimensional Axis of a Three Dimensional problem, Power in Time. Each Quadrant has a Meaning, marked, Capacitive or Inductive, Positive, and Negative! The Centre Cross is meant to represent Zero, which is not marked as such! The drawn Power Triangles does represent this however.

Focusing on the term: "Negative Effective Power" gives us a clue as to what is required to solve for this Scientifically Sparse subject!

Here is a very basic, poorly drawn, image that shows a Phase Angle:

Ref: Argand Diagram - Quadrants help

 

If you have not yet already worked this out, the Applied Voltage is assumes Positive, and we have a Phase Angle difference to this Voltage. Here we see the Phase Angle θ is 198.43 Degrees. Is this correct? We have 360 Degrees in a full Rotation and we see just over one half Rotation don't we!

When you measure the argument of a complex number you go counterclockwise from the x-axis.

 

NOTE: The Y Axis is Imaginary. The X Axis is Real. This is Number Wise! 

 

Power Factor

The very simple application of Power Factors also show you further how this works! In our Aboveunity.com Calculator:

 

Here you see Mathematically: 1 x -1 = -1. Very simple Math to show you, the Volumetric Quantity of Power can be Negative!

Here is an example:

 

Where:

  • Purple Trace is the Math, showing Positive and Negative Power.
  • Pink Trace is the Gate Signal to the Mosfet.
  • Yellow is the Input Voltage.
  • Teal Trace is the Input Current, both Positive and Negative.

 

I must apologise, I have better examples of this, but do not wish to confuse everyone. This example is sufficient to show what I am talking about.

 

Again, marked in Red, Positive Voltage and Negative Current, you have Negative Power. Not Negative Energy, Negative Power, I hope people do not confuse this as I believe people have in the past.

I hope this helps others when doing experiments, knowing what to look for is very important!

Remember: This is the very reason you can NOT Use RMS Measurements on the Input! See Measurements Thread and see the above Figures:

  • Average: 95.7 mW
  • RMS: 1.28 W


A Huge error here! 1.28 - 0.095 = 1.185 Watts. 13.474 times!

A MASSIVE: 92.5234375% Drop because I have more Power Coming Back to the Input!

RMS is totally Wrong! Remember, your Zero Graticule Line is very important:

  • above: Positive
  • below: Negative

 

Its worth noting, there is 1.28 Watts in the System.

Meaning, the Power in Purple Above the Zero Graticule Line:

 

Is more than the Math in Purple Below the Zero Graticule line:

 

By: 0.095 Watts.

We need to understand Negative Power! It's Important! It is how Free Energy Machines Work!

Another example:

 

Why does the Input drop 68% when Under Load?

Fill this thread with your comments! It will be interesting to see what we can come up with here!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 05 September 2022

My Friends,

As discussed above: One Volt x One Amp = One Watt, Positive Power, however: One Volt x -One Amp = -One Watt, is Negative Power! 

How does an Insulated Wire have a Voltage Polarity on One Direction, but allow for a Current that can move in Two Different Directions at different times? Surely a Conundrum in the world of Science! Yes?

Kirchhoff's Current Law ( KCL ) states:

for a parallel path the total current entering a circuits junction is exactly equal to the total current leaving the same junction. This is because it has no other place to go as no charge is lost.

In other words the algebraic sum of ALL the currents entering and leaving a junction must be equal to zero as: Σ IIN = Σ IOUT.

 

 

At the point of the Junction, we have 2 Currents in, Positive Currents into the Junction! From the Junction, we have one Current out of the Junction, a Negative Current, which must equal the Sum of the Input Currents.

Which is very easy to understand: 0.5A + 0.5A + -1.0A = 0A. Right?

So, at the point of the Junction, there is no loss, what has come in, goes back out again!

Kirchhoff's Voltage Law ( KVL ) states:

the algebraic sum of the potential differences in any loop must be equal to zero as: ΣV = 0. 

 

 

Again, very easy to understand:

  • BatV = 2V
  • R1 = 1.0Ω
  • R2 = 1.0Ω

 

Knowing Ohms Law, we get a voltage drop over R1 of 1 Volt:

 

Across R2 we get a Voltage Drop of 1 Volt, and after R2, at the negative side of the Battery, again, we must have Zero Volts! Right?

 

This means, we get 1 Amp of Current flow! Right?

This is a very interesting post to Quora:

Kirchoff's Laws of circuital analysis are the embodiment of the two fundamental laws -

  1. Conservation of energy
  2. Conservation of charges

Conservation of energy is nothing but Kirchoff's Voltage Law.

Conservation of charges is nothing but Kirchoff's Current Law.

These two are always valid irrespective of the type of element in the circuit. One is only required to satisfy the necessary conditons to apply these equations. Infact, Kirchoff's Laws are written in the form of a differential equation which governs the field analysis in transmission lines that is even more profound and fundamental as compared to the lumped element equations.

Ref: Are Kirchhoff's circuit laws valid for circuits that have active elements?

 

I agree to a point, but there are situations where this statement may not hold entirely. A Circuit Element is considered either Active, or Passive:

 

Here, you see, an Inductor is not considered an Active Element! What happens if the Inductor becomes an Active Element?

 

And now, we are back to our Argand Diagram:

 

So, back to our topic, how does the Input Coil have Current that can flow in both directions from a DC Power Supply? The Answer is VERY Simple!

In most situations, an Inductor is considered a Passive Element! It is never considered an Active Element! An absolute Horrendous assumption considering an Electric "Generator" supplies energy from Inductors! Right!

My Friends, focus on turning your normally Passive Inductor to an Active Element, and you will see a route to Free Energy! Its easy, the answer is here, and in the last line: "an Electric "Generator" supplies energy from Inductors!".

This process is behind Tom Bearden's Negative Resistor:

 

Building Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Machines can very easily turn your Inductor Active! A Supplier of Energy! Then you get this occur:

 

Positive Voltage, and Negative Current equals Negative Power!

NOTE: After Mosfet TOff, the Voltage actually Increases, is higher in Amplitude than the Input! This must occur, or the Current can not flow backwards! The Higher the Voltage that is "Generated", the more Current will flow backwards!

 

Which is 92.5234375% Input Reduction in your Input Power for the Same Output Power! Which destroys the Power Balance Equation: PIn = POut.

Yes the Haters and Sceptics will not believe this, that's why I have given you the proof with the data! They Suck at being Haters and Sceptics when their Arguments are totally Illogical!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 05 September 2022

Kirchhoff's second law based upon the law of the conservation of energy.

The total voltage across a circuit loop is equal to the sum of the voltage drops across the devices in that loop. The energy you put into the circuit equals the energy you get out of each circuit loop.

If you are in a closed system, and you're boxed in, Ohm's law work! This is on the electrical side.

But when you move over onto the counterpart of magnetic side, none of those laws apply!

have a nice day!

Jagau posted this 05 September 2022

 

Hi Chris

A very good thread here, it is really topical and important to grasp.
Asked you, why the EE places so much effort to completely eliminate negative energy?
Answer, because he does not master it and does not understand why it comes from, no explanation, only Lenz Law and it is a nuisance for them, fortunately not for us.
Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Jagau posted this 05 September 2022

Another example here of magnetic flux harvesting is that of Bill Alek EE and his invention of the magnetic flux transformer.
Interesting to read, it reminds us of various experiments in progress here.
Jagau

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 10 September 2022

My Friends,

Aboveunity.com has threads that no other forum has ever even realised! Scientific Fact, that other forums have never even discussed or even seen! We are Light Years Ahead of the other Forums! We always will be!

This thread is one such thread! Never seen or discussed before, in such explicit detail, on other forums: Negative Power

Questions must be raised:

  • Why are the other forums so far behind?
  • Why have they never covered such topics?
  • Why have none of them ever even shown a scope shot of Negative Power?
  • Why will they still not discuss it, even using examples I have provided?
  • Why do they go to such lengths to avoid so many very important topics?

 

In a field where there are such a wide gap between us and them, one must ask, will they ever catch up? Its not hard to be the only world leader in Energy, when the other forums and groups are so far behind and never seen topics that we have covered now for years! How embarrassing for them! The so called Guru's are truly:

Masters of Fakery!

Masters of Bull-Sh*t!

 

Here at www.aboveunity.com, we have been showing How Free Energy Machines Work for many years! Many Independent Replications, showing Negative Power, where you see this occur:

 

When the Machine is Loaded, the Input Power Drops, it goes down, under Load and does NOT Go Up, like Symmetrical Electromagnetic Machinery does in todays Infantile Scientific World, where not a single Scientist can currently comprehend why this occurs, we have been showing and explaining how this works for a long time!

The Kiddies that play Guru, over on the other Forums, are so wrong, so completely confused about these simple things, that they are wasting their time even getting out of bed in the mornings! Yes, a small percentage of people, that cant be bothered thinking for themselves, are awestruck by these Kiddies Playing Guru! We are lucky its only about 3% of the community!

Perhaps in another Decade, the 3% might start thinking:

Hey hang on, you have never achieved any success, and you're still preaching how this can/cant work! WTF!!!

 

Of the 3% in the community, some do not even have a goal of Powering a Load for Free! They have no idea what they want, so some are lost to the Winds of Time! As are the Kiddies Playing Guru!

No, I am no Guru, I am a Student, and always look forward to learning more! I think that's why we are so much further ahead!

This thread shows you things, that will never be covered on Other Forums in such Detail for the simple reason: We have Working Free Energy Machines!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

scalarpotential posted this 10 September 2022

Negative power occurs when current leaves the positive voltage terminal. According to this definition a battery is negative power.
I have been thinking: why does the reactive 90 deg input power of a transformer consume power when the in-phase output power is consumed?
My unchecked answer is that back EMF is in phase with the input current, it adds to the 90 deg shifted input voltage, it's no more reactive only.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/viascxzvqk

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 11 September 2022

Hello Scalarpotential and all Readers,

Um, No, No and sort of. With respect, you're thinking about this entirely wrong. I suggest re-reading this Thread several times to make more sense of this very important information.

First, I have always spoken in terms of Conventional Current.

 

 

We are going to stipulate Voltage Polarity as always Fixed, in other words, a DC Voltage Source. Voltage marked above is always going to be Positive ( + ) and Negative ( - ), on the Respective Terminals. Voltage Polarity never changes.

Again using Conventional Current, we always have a Current Flow from Positive to Negative, this will never change, if the Voltage Source has anything to do with the Circuit! This is Positive Power!

 

Positive Power

Positive Power is:

  • Positive Voltage.
  • Positive Current.
  • Mathematically: +1 Volt x +1 Amp = +1 Watt, or V x I x cos ( 0 )

 

Negative Power

Again, I have given the definition of Negative Power:

  • Positive Voltage.
  • Negative Current.
  • Mathematically: +1 Volt x -1 Amp = -1 Watt, or V x I x cos ( 180 )

 

In this example, multiplying a Positive Number by a Negative Number gives a Negative Result, so you can see, Voltage or Current can be Negative, mathematically, but I have never seen experimentally, the Voltage change Polarity, only the Current. Here is another example of Negative Power:

 

This is on the Input Measurement Block: -1.63 Kilowatts!  Of Negative Power, not Positive Power, Power in the Spike going back to the Power Supply!

 

 

Seen in Circuit form:

 

Where:

  • The Red LED Indicating Positive Power: Positive Current.
  • The Green LED Indicating Negative Power: Negative Current.
  • The Grey Area marked "Dynamic Circuit Element" would be your Input Coil. A Simple Inductor, normally considered as a Passive Element. This Element can become an Active Element!

 

NOTE: In an Ideal Circuit, Zero Power is Used to Power the Load! All Power Delivered, is then Returned again! Negative Power is NOT Reactive Power! Reactive Power = V x I x cos ( 90 ) = ZERO, which is No Power at all! Negative Power is Pure Power, Active Power!!!

Mathematically, again, as covered above: cos ( 180 ) = -1, thus we have a Negative Component here. Those that have continued to ignore this very important aspect show their ignorance, because the Negative Signs cannot be Ignored anymore! We need them!

This is why ones Input does not go up under Load!

Your Input goes Down!

Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction!!!

 

This is really simple, but one needs to make steps to first understand this concept that is not taught any where in Conventional Textbooks!

You can see why we are Light Years Ahead of the Other Forums now cant you!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

scalarpotential posted this 11 September 2022

Hey Chris, I agree with what you wrote, it is in line with what I stated, to clarify:

If a voltage drops through an element in the direction of the current, the element is a load, energy consumption positive power, voltage drop is positive, current is positive.

If a voltage rises through an element in the direction of the current, the element is a source, energy delivered, negative power, the voltage drop is negative, in other words voltage rise is positive, the current is positive.

We mainly use the convention of voltage drop in circuit laws. If you put a scope on an element, it measures the voltage drop, negative voltage is voltage rise through the element in the direction of the current, it becomes a source consuming negative power, or delivering positive power.

A load can be resistive, dissipative or reactive. Note that a current through a battery is in the direction of a voltage rise. 

 

 

src https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-15/magnetic-fields-and-inductance/

https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/kirchhoffs-voltage-law.html

 

An inductor is passive because it doesn't add power (normally )

Why are capacitors and inductors passive elements? A passive module is not capable of power gain and is not a source of energy. A typical passive component would be a chassis, inductor, resistor, transformer, or capacitor. Generally, passive components are not able to increase the power of a signal nor are they able to amplify it.

Circuit laws are compatible with active elements. A AU device can perhaps be modelled like this one day: Pin=0.001Pout. Output coils can be modelled with active current dependent sources.

 

Cheers

Chris posted this 11 September 2022

Hello Scalarpotential and all Readers,

An Inductor, considered a Passive Circuit Element, becomes an Active Element for Part of the Cycle, the same as a "Generator's" Output Coil does.

 

If an Electric "Generator" had no shaft torque, it would be an AU Machine! Right? So, how to negate the Shaft Torque? Which is an after effect, a by product of Induction!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 16 September 2022

If an Electric "Generator" had no shaft torque, it would be an AU Machine! Right? So, how to negate the Shaft Torque? Which is an after effect, a by product of Induction!

 

The ONLY physical Phenomena linking the Rotor to the Stator, is the Magnetic Field! Right?

So, can we use Superposition to Negate the Magnetic Field? Allowing the Shaft to turn Torque Free and still have Power on the Output!

Wow what a World Changing Concept, well, we have been doing this for over a Decade now, its not new and yes it works! This forum shows you how!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 18 September 2022

My dear Chris

Allow me to add this photo from Bill Alek's site
who approves of everything you've been saying for years,

 

You are right my friend to educate people this way.

You will notice next to the red arrow the law of squares, in other words the scientific representation of a P.O.C.
A remarkable website visited and above all very instructive.

http://intalek.com/

 

Jagau

Chris posted this 20 September 2022

Hey Jagau,

Thank You My Friend!

Some fundamental problems exist in the above image that we have overcome:

  1. Voltage Amplitude on the Output should always be Higher than the Input.
  2. The Input / Output Harmonic should be shown using the fundamental and not a Sub Harmonic.
  3. Charge q x Charge q means Zero Net Charge, where B x V + -B x -V = 2 B x V is much more meaningful!

 

Remember: B x V = E which is the E.M.F

 

Simply, flipping the polarity of one of the two Output Coils gives 2 V x B!

Bill Alek is correct is his approach! Bill Alek is also friends with Graham Gunderson. Another who is also correct! I am not saying we have 100% solved the entire problem, but I believe we are all very close! Close enough to be able to build machines that work and produce results!

I honestly cant believe more people are not catching on to this! Perhaps the Shadow Banning we are experiencing, perhaps the Trolls are being some what effective even in the face of Evidence? Perhaps People are just to busy to take the time to learn what it is we are sharing?

Symmetrical Electromagnetic Induction is relatively easy to understand! However, Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction is not so! Every Single Magnetic Field Changing in time is a Source of Induced Voltage, aka Parasitic Inductance in some cases, a Natural and Absolute Phenomena! The Secondary Coil has its own Changing Magnetic Field, and its Ignored and never used in Symmetrical Electromagnetic Induction!

I have given Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction in my Series: Chris's Non Inductive Coil Experiment:

 

I have given my time freely, to help anyone that wants to progress!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

scalarpotential posted this 21 September 2022

Some things I have noticed and like to share:

v x B = dA/dt because:

A = [Tesla/m]

B = [T/m^2] = [A/m]

v = [m/sec]

v x B = [m/sec] x [A/m] = [A/sec] = dA/dt

Next, I was looking at the mrPreva experiment to see if I can understand it and if it can be explained in terms of phasors, impedance etc., then I realized that at resonance, the input equivalent impedance is zero, input V and I are in phase, V relative to I1 is +90 deg and relative to I2 -90 deg (I think I have mixed up the signs), in other words: I1 lags and is inductive, i2 leads and is capacitive. -90 deg, -jw on the complex plane means capacitive, the generating coil becomes capacitive.

Then I1 and I2 relative to each other are 180 deg out of phase.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/tlfpoqnorq

Then I found this quote which to the community isn't new:

Kron, Gabriel. . "When only positive and negative real numbers exist, it is customary to replace a positive resistance by an inductance and a negative resistance by a capacitor (since none or only a few negative resistances exist on practical network analyzers.)" Gabriel Kron, "Numerical solution of ordinary and partial differential equations by means of equivalent circuits." Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 16, Mar. 1945a, p. 173.

And I encountered this theory, I extracted the relevant parts which can be used to model mrPreva experiment and to calculate the optimal inductances, reactances at a chosen resonant frequency. Recall that M=k.sqrt(L1.L2), X=wL, Z=R+jX and w=rad/s=2pi*frequency

 

 

Please correct if it is wrong, maybe I had incorrect assumptions.

Best regards

Chris posted this 21 September 2022

Hello Scalarpotential,

I believe you are correct in your post, for the most part. Of course, a simple Experiment and Circuit analysis would give you the answer!

For Partnered Output Coils:

 

Relative to the Input Coil L1, L2 is 180° and L3 is 360°, of course this is why Magnetic Resonance is important. Efficiency reduces as the degree of phase shifts! There is a way to completely avoid this tuning problem, and for those doing the study and research, I have already given this answer!

A Phasor Diagram can be constructed from this information.

Yes, the Impedance changes with Phase Angle, but beware, be very careful about assuming of which direction of change occurs!

Impedance inside the field goes way up to hundreds of thousands of ohmmeter, only thing limiting the current out of the oscillator.

Ref: Floyd Sweet Lab Notes

 

Of course, the Input Coil was: 

coil #18
250 turns 1 ½" dia

 

Current limited by wire impedance only which increases dramatically in the oscillating field to several hundred KΩ ( Calculated Z = V / I ) – from impedance external to field of 2-3Ω (measured) at 400hz (loads down Oscillator). XL almost = Z. No Explanation.

 

Oscillator put 143µa, 7v of power at approximately 400hz 1mw into the Excitation Coils

 

Once understood, this is very easy to achieve! Flipping the Conventional Transformer Operations is how this is done. At the same time, we have the Symmetry of a Transformer. So, more accurately extending the Conventional Transformer Technology is where we must help others head!

Electromagnetic Induction is Incomplete! It misses Asymmetry! Aboveunity.com has completed this Hole in Science!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 01 October 2022

I found an interesting article about reactive power

 

COVERED TOPICS:

  • Need of reactive power
• Importance of present of reactive power
• Purpose of reactive power
• What is reactive power?
• Why do we need reactive power?
• Reactive power is a byproduct of AC systems
• How are voltages controlled?
• Voltage must be maintained within acc. levels
• Voltage and reactive power
• Reactive power and power factor
• Reactive power limitations

• Reactive power caused absence of el. supply

• Problems of reactive power
• Profound effects of reactive power:
—– Generation
—– Synchronous condensers
—– Capacitors and inductors
—– Static VAR compensators (SVCs)
—– Static synchronous compensators
—– Distributed generation
—– Transmission side
• Voltage and reactive power planning

 

Source: https://electrical-engineering-portal.com/

Chris posted this 01 October 2022

Hey B,

Reactive Power is where Power is Returned to the Source, yes, but normally, this will be with some Phase Angle!

Cos ( Theta ) will be the Phase Angle, and this is anywhere from 0 to 360 Degrees. 0 Degrees being the point to the Right ( P ) of the Argand Diagram:

 

 

This means, Real Power P would have a Zero Degree Phase Shift from Voltage to Current, or Current to Voltage. Of course, this depends on how one wishes to observe the possible shift, and if Current or Voltage is Observed First.

I think we need, very much so, to observe the definition for Reactive Power:

Reactive power, or VAr, is not really power at all but represents the product of volts and amperes that are out-of-phase with each other. Reactive power is the portion of electricity that helps establish and sustain the electric and magnetic fields required by alternating current equipment. The amount of reactive power present in an AC circuit will depend upon the phase shift or phase angle between the voltage and the current and just like active power, reactive power is positive when it is “supplied” and negative when it is “consumed”.

Reactive power is used by most types of electrical equipment that uses a magnetic field, such as motors, generators and transformers. It is also required to supply the reactive losses on overhead power transmission lines.

The relationship of the three elements of power, active power, (watts) apparent power, (VA) and reactive power, (VAr) in an AC circuit can be represented by the three sides of right-angled triangle. This representation is called a Power Triangle as shown:

Power in an AC Circuit

Ref: Reactive Power - electronics-tutorials.ws

 

Lets be honest, MOST EE's do not know what Reactive Power really is! You could say, if power is VAr, then its Reactive Power, it its Active or Real Power, its NOT Reactive Power!

Some call Reactive Power, Ping Pong Power, but truly, it is only if there is some sort of Phase Shift! If there is some sort of Imaginary Number involved! In Real, or Active Power, however, there is not! Its Real Power! Its Pure Horse Power!

EDIT: If the Y Axis has Zero Value, there can be No Reactive Power Component in the Power Triangle! Cos ( 0 ) = 1 or Cos ( 180 ) = -1!So V x I is Pure Power! The Equation for Reactive Power is: Q = V x I Sin ( θ ), and Sin ( 0 ) = 0, and Sin ( 180 ) also = 0, so Zero x V x I = Zero Reactive Power.

That's a handy link you posted! Thank You, but I merely wanted to point out, Reactive Power is not, please I cant stress this enough, not Negative Power!

If there is no Imaginary Number, its not anything but Active Power! Positive or Negative.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 01 October 2022

hi chris,

i think if someone read this thread from beginning she should know what we are talking here 🙂

because we showed how to convert reactive power into active power on your forum somewhere.

have a nice day!

Chris posted this 01 October 2022

Hi B,

Completely agree! I only wanted to make sure other readers were not confused by the term: Reactive Power 😉

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 03 October 2022

Yes a very good link Bearn thank you

Did we look at how it handles reactive energy?

the apparent power is the addition of real and wasted reactive power. It is clearly shown in the power triangle that the wider the power factor angle, the more reactive power will result and less real power. In contrast, the less the angle it gets, the more real power and less reactive power will result.

 

That's what engineers think, wow


Jagau

baerndorfer posted this 03 December 2022

Because this is about negative power, i like to show you a 3 phase system. this is how the waveforms look like.

2502

CH1: Phase1 Voltage

CH2: Phase2 Voltage

CH3: Phase3 Voltage

CH4: Phase3 Current

please focus on the power analysis on next picture...

2425

what we have here is good situation because the phase angle is 110° 😎

when you look at the image above where you can study the 4 quadrants you can see the -P

so in simple terms... this coil acts like a negative resistance.

 

Chris posted this 03 December 2022

Hey Baerndorfer,

My Friend, you hit the nail on the head, but I fear for so many, this still does not Glare Significance:

so in simple terms... this coil acts like a negative resistance.

 

In layman terms, your coils are putting out far more Energy than they are receiving!

Average Input Power: -4.6991 Watts, and the Significance is, you have no Input! You're getting more out than in!

Well done My Friend and Thank You for Sharing! Sinusoidal and at 43Hz!

We are So many Light Years Ahead of the Other Forums!!!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Melendor posted this 03 December 2022

Because this is about negative power, i like to show you a 3 phase system. this is how the waveforms look like.

Hello baerndorfer and thank you for posting.
As always ,  your post are high class.

If and when you have the time , can you please post some experiments with Square wave and Triangle wave ?
We at TRIER I , work with pulsed DC and we have 0 sine wave in our experiments.
Square wave and triangle wave , is a little bit chaotic at times , and some phase angle between the coils under these conditions will be great.

Only if you have time mate.

Thank you very much.
best regards

~~~Melendor the Wizard

Chris posted this 03 December 2022

Hey Melendor,

Technically, you do have a Sine System, but its a VERY prehistoric system now:

 

Sweet was also a transformer designer and expert, and he remarked that he had also observed specialized self-oscillation in certain transformers.

Ref: Energy From The Vacuum by Tom Bearden

 

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282

 

This system is the start of a Sinusoidal Waveform System. There is much more to this and it can get very much more complicated!

The Only difference between Tier I, II and III is the amount of work the Member has done, truly!

This entire effort is about how much work each person is willing to put in! That's All! I have given you all the data you need to make a start! We must all start at the Start!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 06 December 2022

My Friends,

The fact, that we continue to see Evident Ignorance, displayed across the board, on other forums, about Negative Power and other very important topics, is astounding!

 

Why do we continue to see such Ignorance?

Other forums are still debating if Displacement Current exists, and we are showing machines that exhibit Negative Power!

Don't you think that this is a massively more important subject to discuss? Don't you think that the so called Guru's should have a few topics, that cover SOME important stuff, instead of blithering stupidness all the time?

We are showing the Guru's to be Total Dumb Asses across the board and its getting funnier by the day! Some of these Guru's have been in the field of Energy and Physics for Decades! Some, for 60, or more years! We have experiments that totally shut them down and they have nothing! They are Dumbfounded by the MASSIVE Progress we have made!

Do you see why we are

Light Years Ahead of the other Forums

 

now?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 06 December 2022

somebody asked how much the phase angle can be modified. i will say you can have any degree that you want. it only depends on the values from L, C, R at the given frequency.

IMG_20221206_123550

 

4825

this is about 140 degree shift between voltage on CH3 and current on CH4

i use 100mOhm Shunt so the value for -P sould be around 40W 

 

Don't waste your time! Read Chris Documents and switch on your brain 😎

have a nice day

Chris posted this 11 December 2022

somebody asked how much the phase angle can be modified. i will say you can have any degree that you want. it only depends on the values from L, C, R at the given frequency.

IMG_20221206_123550

 

4825

this is about 140 degree shift between voltage on CH3 and current on CH4

i use 100mOhm Shunt so the value for -P sould be around 40W 

 

Don't waste your time! Read Chris Documents and switch on your brain 😎

have a nice day

 

Hey Baerndorfer,

I really wish more people would:

Don't waste your time! Read Chris Documents and switch on your brain 😎

 

It seems so many are happy to ignore the facts! What a shame!

No other forum covers the Main and very Important topics that need to be covered! They are all off chasing rainbows!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close