The Importance of Documentation and Understanding!

Hey Zanzal,

I agree, individuality, I also support this!

I must say, however, it is also just as important to see and treat things for what they are! We must pay special attention to correct the mistakes of the past, ensuring where there was confusion, we have clarity!

We need to have certainty in what we say, in the evidence we present, if we are uncertain we are best to not bring this uncertainty into conversation. At times when we are presenting information, we must ensure of a path of correction, as further experimental evidence opens more doors!

Just as a Permanent Magnet can add Energy to a system, it can also take it away! To reiterate the above links:

Floyd Sweet's analogy:

How does the Space Flux Coupled Alternator appear to operate beyond unity? An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:

Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship. The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity. This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat’s displacement of the medium, water. Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction.

Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless. In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect. This is reactive power – no work is done. The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the  displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship. The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.

In the case of the Space Flux Coupled machine, there is no visible entity. It’s abstract. A steady state coherent force is present when brought under the influence of the electromagnetic controllable forces. It returns to an incoherent state when the initiating magnetic forces are absent (except in the case of a permanent magnet).

Floyd Sweet also looks at both analogies, Positive and Negative Effects. We also must not forget, Floyd Sweet and an early colleague gave us Floyd Sweets early work!

The D.C. flux varies as the square of the current and not sinusoidally as does the voltage and current of the power phase windings, with proper capacitors across the D.C. control voltage. The D.C. flux remains constant sustaining a constant flux during Δt. The flux produced by the moving charges comprising the load current goes through zero, thus the complimentary flux, that is integrated with the coherent flux, aiding the cross flux between the attracting magnets. 

Don't forget, there are many other devices using the exact same technique that do not use Permanent Magnets.

Don Smith, most of the devices we have seen do not use Permanent Magnets! Instead, Don increases the Input, to increase the Magnetic Field Energy: 1/2 Li² to a sufficient quantity to bring the Coils into action! Permanent Magnets not required, the Action is in the Coils!

To say: one is missing something - then imply that something is Permanent Magnets, is wrong!

I have, on many occasions, covered Permanent Magnets. Again, I reiterate, they are NOT required to make this work.

We truly need to stay open minded, not limit ourselves to anything that will bring confusion or distraction! Permanent Magnets are an option that can be introduced later, once people have an understanding, once people see and understand how Energy is "Generated", as dressing is later introduced to the salad if required.

   Chris

P.S: I hope this does not come across as to defensive, this is not my intention, I really want to make an effort to stick to the facts.