Timing

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 1.3K Views
  • Last Post 03 June 2018
  • Topic Is Solved
Chris posted this 30 July 2017

 

Bucking Coils are used in many ways. One example is “Common Mode Chokes”, an example that has perhaps clouded the entire concept of Electromagnetic Induction. Let’s look at the “Common Mode Choke”

 

A common mode choke is where both line and neutral windings are wound on a single core. When using a current compensated choke to decrease common mode noise, (the interference pattern or the unwanted noise) you want to have a high impedance at the unwanted frequencies to knock down that unwanted noise.

 

Figure One: Common Mode Choke Diagram

 

 

Figure Two: Typical implementation of a Common Mode Choke

  

Let’s think, what’s is the actual purpose in Common Mode Chokes? What are they designed to do? What are they particularly good at doing? Think really hard at what they are doing. Because it is really important to understand!

 

Any Coil carrying a Current will always have a Magnetic Field. The Magnetic Field is defined, by Amperes Law, as: B0nI  

Where:

·         B = Magnetic Field in Gauss (CGS) or Tesla (MKS)

·         μ0 = The Permeability of Free Space, or Permeability of the Core Material μr

·         n = is the number of turns per unit length.

·         l = The length.

 ref: see Magnetic Fields Produced by Currents: Ampere’s Law

 

You can see, the term Ampere Turns: AT = NI, which is Turns (N) x Amperes (I). This means the more Current through the more Turns we have, the more Ampere Turns we have, this is part of the above equation, thus, the more Magnetic Field we have!

 

Kirchhoff’s Current Law states that the Current In to a Node, must be the same as the Current Out of the Node, and so we have the same Magnetic Field in each Coil in our Common Mode Choke! Each Field is Equal and Opposite.

 

There is a problem with the way we understand Magnetic Induction, that may already be apparent. We see the exact same requirements that are necessary in Electromagnetic Induction, but yet we see none, we see the opposite! We see the reduction of Transients, surges, and the like. Thus the design and use of the Common Mode Choke.

 

But why?

 

 

The answer is surprisingly simple! Because the Magnetic Fields are being held steady, they are not allowed to change, the Current is Equal and Opposite, it is a locked, a Rigid System

 

This is NOT what happens in an Electrical Generator! The Magnetic Field is aloud to Change over Time in respect to the timing of the System. This is not the case in the Common Mode Choke! The Magnetic Fields in an Electrical Generator dynamically change, at any one point in time and the “Generating” Coil can vary with Load, so the total System is dynamic, changing, not held steady.

 

So, delay one of the Coils Magnetic Field relative to the other in the Common Mode Choke and see what happens… Wow we have a completely different System! No longer any good as a Common Mode Choke, not serving the purpose of a Common Mode Choke anymore.

 

Bucking Coils, or I like the term Partnered Output Coils, can and do "Generate" Electrical Energy! You need to let the System Breath, bring it to life!

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 31 July 2017

In the very first Tariel Kapanadze Device, the Kapagen, we saw a timing. A timing that was very evident if one has done any work on Tesla Coils especially.

 

 

In all Resonant Tank Circuits with a Spark Gap, the Spark Gap will Arc over and Spark at a certain Time during the cycle, normally this is at peak voltage.

This is a part of the Kapanadze work and has been for a long time! It was seen in most of his devices.

   Chris

Chris posted this 31 July 2017

Tom Bearden's MEG was a very unusual device, appearing to be very simple, and reported by many that is does not work, when infact is does.

When Tom Bearden used the term "Non Linear", this term meant Timing. Timing of the Coils, the Interactions between them and that it was very important to make sure the MEG was Non Linear in this way!

It took me a while to understand this. Something I read on the JLN website put me in the right direction:

a MOV (Metal Oxide Varistor) is REQUIRED for getting the output datas measured above

- JLN Labs - The MEG Project

Now for some here, this may make sense. But for others, I was one of these ones, I needed a bit more information.

 

 

A MOV is non Linear, meaning that is is an OFF device until a Voltage Potential is reached. At this point, the MOV Conducts, is now On, it becomes a Switch if you like, a Voltage Controlled Switch!

Above, the Diagram depicts a MOV that starts Switching On at around 250 Volts, it conducts at 250 Volts!

So Conduction might typically look something like this:

Note: This wave form does not apply exactly to the MEG.

All MOV's are Rated, have different ratings, and ratings can be very different. Some voltages might be 18 Volts. So make sure you know what youre using!

So the Timing here, it is again what we saw before. It is sensible! There is a Timing at a particular Voltage, this Voltage triggers Interactions Between the Coils on the Core at this time!

 

   Chris

Chris posted this 31 July 2017

Many other devices have shown this very same required Timing!

Ruslan, Akula, many others, lets look at one of Ruslans:

 The Image above has been something shown many times by Ruslan alone. It is taken from the following video:

 

 

Another example from Ruslan:

 

 

So, what's with the Timing we see, and have seen for so long? Many others show the same thing! Graham Gunderson is another!

 

There is a basic answer, it is to do with Work. I have been looking at this for years. On my website, I have posted many pictures, in different circumstances, showing this: 

Showing the Points of the wave where to trigger some sort of switching events.

Your Input is doing Work as if it is Climbing a Hill, from Zero, to Peak. This is the part of the Cycle you do not wish to disturb, remembering the Common Mode Choke is designed to Stop this Behaviour! Otherwise your Input is Impeded too Much! Your Input is Choked Off, Restricted by Lenz's Law. This is a Symmetrical System, One on One, Equal and Opposite!

On the other hand, After the work has been done, we can use Gravity, or Natures way, to bring a System back into Equilibrium, Zero State. At Rest. So from Peak to Zero, there can be as much work done in this area as you can fit in! Its a Roller Coaster ride of Electromagnetic Induction, an Unimpeded path of adventure! Remembering we have a Maximum Magnetic Field at this point in Time!

 

In my early research, I did not understand at the time, the importance. Now I do, I hope you do too!

   Chris

Vasile posted this 31 July 2017

Bucking Coils, or I like the term Partnered Output Coils, can and do "Generate" Electrical Energy! You need to let the System Breath, bring it to life!

It looks very similar to Mr. Preva experiment.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 31 July 2017

Sorry all, have been busy, and have put the posts in that I wanted.

@Vasile - Yes, it is, and now I entered the last three posts it may make a bit more sense why the MrPreva Experiment by itself is not Above Unity.

Its very close though, a very efficient Electromagnetic Induction Experiment when tinkered with long enough.

@All - The Idea of the Timing, is to get the Magnetic Field to absolute Maximum, for the smallest input, then bring in your Partnered Output Coils at this point!

  • Input is switched in and from Zero to Peak, POC/Bucking Coils are open Circuit.
  • At peak Input, Switch in Your POC/Bucking Coil, One Coil now assisting the Input!

Timing, its why these devices work, Timing makes these devices Asymmetrical!

Tom Bearden's "Non-Linear"

 

Note: Wave Propagation, when done right, can do all this for you and this is looked after by the perhaps unknown parts of the Wave propagation Theory. That's why not all devices are switched, some are just LC Tank Circuits with the correct Wave Propagation techniques applied. 

 

 

   Chris

Vasile posted this 01 August 2017

Related to what you said earlier,I was searching the web the other day,for akula principle and found this link:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2358.1075

There is this user there ( T-1000) witch appears to be very knowledgeble.He says something interesting and I'll just quote him:

the capacitor C28 charge is on positive cycle half and the LEDs are on BEMF spikes in negative cycle half.
When BEMF reach maximum value he turns on transistor for positive cycle half which gives big pulse to capacitor C28 charge when mixed with BEMF. So he will be charging cap not from 9V but from 30-60V spike + current from primary coil.

He is talking in regard to the circuit attached.He says basicly that the spike that appears in his secondary when current is turned off from the primary,can be enhanced by another current pulse(low voltage,high current preferably) induced on the right time in secondary and in the right polarity with the spike or the Collapsing EMF.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 01 August 2017

Hi Vasile, We have done some work here on the Akula Circuit. I studied it in depth when Akula started sharing that information. There are a few threads here on this.

My opinion is the very short pulses are Electron Spin Resonance, a way to get the Electrons Excited and start them to Flow.

Akula uses Bucking Coils. This from his own mouth! See Link provided.

We did have someone hwo claimed he was working with Akula join us in our work at one point, seemed to have inside knowledge also, so we took his word for it.

CD_Sharp is perhaps the best person to comment on the Akula stuff: Akula's 30 W lantern and Akula's 30 W lantern replication

You see, we have two things going on, we have a Trigger - This gets things going, some Electromagnetic Induction to get the Flow of Charged Particles occurring, and of course the Voltage required for Current to Flow. This is Kinetic Energy!

Then we have the Asymmetrical part. Kinetic Energy is the Motion of something, in this case it is the Motion of Charged Particles:

Figure One: Conventional Current Flow - Kinetic Energy

 

Also, we have something else, most important of all, we have a Magnetic Field, at value   X   Above Equilibrium.

Nature and all its beauty wants the Magnetic Field to dissipate, move back to an equilibrium state! But now we have Bucking Coils, with two things in place, High Magnetic Field and also Current and Voltage, one of the most beautiful combinations In Science!

   Chris

 

Vasile posted this 01 August 2017

So we need to blend voltage and current in a efficient way.

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 01 August 2017

I like the idea Vasile, but the practical implementation is not immediately obvious. Is there an experiment you can recommend to illustrate?

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 01 August 2017

Hi Vasile, apologies, I have marked the Image above: Figure One: Conventional Current Flow - Kinetic Energy

What we are looking at is Timing.

Like the Minute hand on the Clock increments one minute when and only when the Second Hand has counted 60 Seconds...

We are not doing anything funky with Voltage or Current as such.

   Chris

P.S: Racking my Brain to think of a better way to explain this.

Chris posted this 01 August 2017

There is a reason I termed Partnered Output Coils (POC) and try not to use the term Bucking Coils.

Like I went through above, Bucking Coils typically are a static, or a better term: Rigid System! Partnered Output Coils are not!

The Common Mode Choke, using Bucking Coils, does the opposite to Partnered Output Coils. But at the same time Partnered Output Coils do Buck.

You can not Choke Off your Input! Your Input must do Work - it creates a Magnetic Field and Separates Charges.

The Common Mode Choke, Chokes Off, how we want to start the Coils working. That's it's Job. As I tried to illustrate above.

To avoid this, we Switch in, Activate, our Partnered Output Coils at the Peak of Our Input, We have done our Work on the Input, we have Climbed that Hill, the Magnetic Field is there, we have Charges Separated.

If this does not make sense, please study, please re-read until it does. Please ask questions.

Like I said, in the right situation, using Wave Propagation techniques, this Timing is apparent only by studding the System. DC Switched Systems need to account for this.

The Magnetic Field itself is Symmetrical.

Systems that Buck, Two Magnetic Fields Interacting together need to be Symmetrical.

The Interactions of these Magnetic Fields over Time is where Electromagnetic Induction Occurs!

It is these interactions that need to be Non Rigid, Asymmetrical, or Non-Linear, meaning: not the same at the same Time!

I hope this clears up any Confusion?

   Chris

 

Chris posted this 02 August 2017

Its worth noting, Andrey Melnichenko talked about Timing, many inventors have. but reading some data on the Andrey Melnichenko page, you will quickly see that the Coils he was using were switched.

The Switching.

 

Think of each Magnetic Field as a breathing thing, it just doesn't seem right to Choke if Off. Let them Breath.

Timing is important.

   Chris

Vasile posted this 02 August 2017

I was just thinking and writing something in my notes,just yesterday,after a long time, about Andrey Melnickenko principle and now I see u posting about it.Interesting sincronization

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Vasile posted this 02 August 2017

I like the idea Vasile, but the practical implementation is not immediately obvious. Is there an experiment you can recommend to illustrate?

I don't have time right now to draw a circuit but in principle think of a transformer with a primary and a secondary and a ferite rod as its core.By using DC,you close the circuit on the primary coil,current flows creating a varying magnetic field around it and by this inducing also just a small part in the secondary.Now...when u open the circuit on the primary the field of it collapses and if the secondary is closed upon itself a high voltage pulse will appear.This high voltage pulse in general has a start,a peak and an end and the time interval between its start and its end is very small(use an osciloscope to see it).What u have to do is pulse this secondary coil again(either from the primary or from another coil) with a low voltage high current impulse so that the peak of the high voltage induced by collapsing the first primary current overlaps the peak of the low voltage high current induced by the second impulse.(u can see this overlap with an osciloscope).I judge they will blend and create a powerfull impulse.I hope I explained well,if not please search this discussion and read my second post and also Chriss postings.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
alohalaoha posted this 02 August 2017

Chris and all, some info about this Ruslan's video called An Effect, he has told where exactly at sinus current form we need to kick it to get LONGITUDINAL SCALAR FIELD transition from usual transverse field in grenade coil. He was using HV unipolar pulse trains, with correct duty and pw from his Tesla or Katcher.

Chris, look carefully at each frame where after correct hv-kick-timing interval vectorial transverse field transform yourself to longitudinal and start to slide in sync with unipolar pulse-trains from Katcher. Have seen at X-time axis of oscillograph like sudden move of comple sinusoide. VERY IMPORTANT IS THIS. It means it is not the same Vectorial TRANSVERSE FIELD but has transforemed in LONGITUDINAL SCALAR FIELD which has ability to "suck" high condcution current DENSITY 20-30 A, through thick ground conductor in Ruslan BTG 4.5 kWt.

Ruslan has shown us a SWEET SPOT and how to make VECTOR-SCALAR conversion trick using TESLA SCALAR TECHNOLOGY, precise HV UNIPOLAR DV PULSE, OR MORE PRECISE HV UNIPOLAR PULSE TRAINS WITH STRICTLY PW, FREQ AND DUTY CYCLE.

The system 24000 times in second make strong magnetic H field arround grenade coil and after just-in-timing WITHOUT ANY JITTER, complete energy of vector magnetic field was transformed to Scalar LONGITUDINAL which travel axialy along the grenade coil and suck free conducting elecrons from the heavy ground conductor which was mounted in central axis of grenade tube where Scalar FIELD has maximum and minus sign.

TRY it if you have proper equipment. This work magnificent. But keep in mind proper GRENADE COIL GEOMETRY AND WINDING DIRECTIONS CW-CCW.

Reg.

Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 02 August 2017

Hi Aloha, this is right. We have a set of interactions here, where the interactions are such that Electrical Energy is forced, the very Flow of Current induces more Flow of Current.

It is about the Timing as you say.

Ruslan and many others have given so much, they are legends!

In my effort to keep things at the most simple possible, I liken this entire process to the Electrical "Generator"! As this is what we are doing.

   Chris

Chris posted this 03 August 2017

It is important to Note, at Peak Cycle, we have the exact same things required for Electromagnetic Induction:

  • A Magnetic Field.
  • The apparent ability and necessity for this Magnetic to Change over Time.
  • Coils in the same Proximity as this Magnetic Field.

So, if we are smart, we want to bring in as much Electromagnetic Induction as we can!

Remembering that the Magnetic Field is Symmetrical! Its a Symmetrical Structure! So we need Two Magnetic Fields at this Time. Thus Partnered Output Coils!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • alohalaoha
Chris posted this 06 August 2017

To avoid this, we Switch in, Activate, our Partnered Output Coils at the Peak of Our Input, We have done our Work on the Input, we have Climbed that Hill, the Magnetic Field is there, we have Charges Separated.

I want to point out some data I have read before, many years ago, but not realised the importance until now.

The recent posts to this thread and another helped Cross Reference some Data, and as a result is helping with an understanding:

We shall, briefly repeat this argument for the case of variation of the self-inductance.

Suppose that a current i. is flowing in an oscillatory system consisting of a capacitance C, ohmic resistance R, and self-inductance L, at some instant of time which we shall take as the starting instant.

At this moment we change: L, by, ΔL, which is equivalent to increasing the energy by 1/2  ΔLi^2

The system is now left to itself.

After a time equal to 1/4 of the period of the tuned frequency of the system, all the energy transforms from magnetic into electrostatic.

At this moment, when the current falls to zero, we return the self-induction to its original value, which can evidently be done without expending work and again we leave the system alone.

After the next 1/4 period of resonance oscillations the electrostatic energy transforms fully into magnetic and we can begin a new cycle of variation in L.

If the energy put in at the beginning of the cycle exceeds that lost during the cycle

This piece of Text is amazingly insightful! This is in the context of AC LC Resonant Systems. Specifically the Current Waveform.

I hope this brings a light to the Dynamic System we need to create, the one we have been shown for so long, by so many.

   Chris

alohalaoha posted this 06 August 2017

Chris Sykes, keep in mind geometric configuration of yours partnered bucking coil.

Looking from axially perspective, you have two coils with same or different number of windings, one wounded in CW and other in CCW. Both coils make symmetric configuration of vectorial magnetic fields H. From our point of view due to current change direction at 180 degrees due to opposite winding direction to initial current, both H+ and H- configuration. It further means we have two bunches of magnetic particles which present in fact non-inertial mass of some kind of substance. Our task is to transform two banches and their masses in equivalent masses but other kind, called it scalar magnetic mass. Only way to release that scalar mass is to strike both vectorial fields H+ and H- in proper timing. + and - signs, means that we have 2 phases of current, 0 degrees initial current and 180 degree reverse current due to windings direction change. Adams called that striking moment, ZERO timing moment. It means not zero time, but a such moment where both magnetic whirpools start forming before they come back again in same position after complete toroidal whirpools cycle. Onw whirling is at 0 degrees, other phase shifted in respect to first at 180 degrees.Similar like two arrows fly to each other and spin around main direction axis. Zero time moment of truth is a moment of contact. Or much precise it is a such moment where two magnetic whirls draw-well whirling each at own whirling phase. After direct hit each other scalar magnetic mass is released from vectorial magnetic mass and due to high inertial forces preshaped to longitudinal bunch of highly preassured and accelerated scalar particles by mighty Coloumb forces. At one side looking from our sight of view we have highly accelerated stream of highly inertial scalar mass while on other same mass but decelerated. Any charges which enter in such highly kinetic area will for sure accelerate these charges and make high conduction current due to interaction on Coloumb forces levels. This i my point of view at current level of understanding and i have found another more confirmation at Adams motor patent and his coil switching in Zero system time - whirling .

Chris if you wind your coils axially for example at old radio ferrite rod you will get Hopper- Melnichenko configuration exactly.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 06 August 2017

Idea for Sparkey VTA machine.

wind two pairs of axial coils in Hooper manner and put both pairs in antiphase loaded with same medium - ferrite or soft-steel or similar. Excite both pairs with pairs of quadratute excitation coils - 90 degree apart with proper pulse shape and timing or maybe pulse trains.

I AM PRETY SURE THAT WAY IS CORRECT SPARKY CONFIGURATION AND WILL WORK.

p/s. Hooper manner is - start winding form our eyes point for example in CCW direction step by step winding, till the end of cardboard form. Than stop, fix windings and from the same point looking from our eyes sight, start winding in CW direction back. Than repeat procedure for any number of layers.

one more variant on toroidal core

aloha

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 10 August 2017

Hi Aloha, sorry for the late reply.

Yes, this scheme does work, although I replicate the following, slightly different:

This was published in 1995, and was given by the people that worked with Floyd Sweet in the early days:

You can find the entire document here: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/fic/N/N199503s.PDF

Hope this helps some!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • alohalaoha
Zanzal posted this 17 August 2017

Someone made this video that compares two different approaches. Shorting the coil at max amplitude, and opening the coil at max amplitude.. Very interesting results...

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Wistiti
Chris posted this 18 August 2017

A good video! Perhaps not enough information...

What's Coil Un-Shorting - Anyone?

If you study this and understand it, you will see Graham Gunderson uses this exact same technique on one of his coils while the other one is standard Induction.

A very fast change in Magnetic Fields in the Proximity to a Coil, creates a very high EMF in that Coil, Electromagnetic Induction!

This can be the second Induction Cycle and the first can be Standard Induction in the other Coil.

 

This guy is mostly correct, he has missed the fact that there is a Non-Linear Inductance introduced upon Shorting the Coil!

The Inductance changes with the Magnetic Field, as the Inductance changes as does the Magnetic Field! Creating Oscillations.

The Oscillations are because of Non-Linear Inductance.

 

 

 

Because the two Magnetic Fields Oppose for part of the Cycle, there is no Reactance, this means we see very fast changes in time.

Believe it or not...

   Chris

Zanzal posted this 18 August 2017

What's Coil Un-Shorting - Anyone?

Looked at the video a second time. I guess what he meant by unshorting is that the coil is normally shorted, and when the amplitude would be max he ends the short. So essentially going from a dead shorted to loaded generator coils and back twice per cycle. Considering how little time the generator coils are feeding the cap that is quiet impressive that it actually results in faster charging. The cost was 20%-30% more power consumed. However it looked like an improvement in efficiency to me.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 18 August 2017

I think the Clue is in the Wave Forms.

 

Coil Shorting:

 

Coil Un-Shorting:

 

Without knowing the Circuit, it is hard to say for sure, but we can see some things that are inherently different.

  • Zero Voltage in between the Spikes.
  • Spike Amplitude is very much higher.
  • The repetition rate/Frequency inside the Spike area is different.
  • The Spikes appear to be sharper, but much wider. Time Constant is visible.

After more study other things will be apparent also. Again, as I pointed out, this is what Graham Gunderson does, same, but inverted, Green wave form:

 

Of course, RLC Time Constant is much different. Showing a much longer Time. Akula also shows this same Time Constant:

 What does History have to say about this situation? Who else do we know that has already done this and shared this technology? Andrey Melnichenko has given freely all this data for nearly two decades.

  

 

A simple Coil Un-Shorting Circuit like this could be an example. Mosfet RDSon must me multitudes less than the DC Coil resistance of L2:

 

By Un-Shorting L2 (Mosfet Off) we have effectively switched L2 into the Circuit, it can now do work, its Magnetic Field can interact with the other existing Magnetic Fields. Electromagnetic Induction, for the Second Time!!!

   Chris

alohalaoha posted this 19 August 2017

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 19 August 2017

Zero current  - maximum brightness - experiment for sure not match to official cabal msm "sciene" and mindless shnobel prize winners theories.

THE TRUTH HAS OWN PERFECT RULES

 

How does it possible - zero current with COP >1, an impossible harvest of ETHER POWER. But where the ether is ???????

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 21 August 2017

Tune above schematic by slowly moving old radio ferrite rod in LF choke and modulate it with HF katcher impulses.

SECRET TESLA had revealed here

  Tesla:

"...it became apparent that the fireballs FREE ENERGY resulted form the interaction of two frequencies, a stray HF higher frequency wave imposed on the LF lower frequency oscillations of the main circuit.... This condition acts as a trigger which may cause the total energy of the powerful LF longer wave to be discharged in a infinitesimally small interval of time and the proportionately tremendously great rate of CHARGE movement which cannot confine itself to the metal circuit and is released into surrounding space with inconceivable violence. It is but a step, from the learning how a high frequency current can explosively discharge a lower frequency current, to using the principle to design a system in which these explosions can be produced by intent."

-N. Tesla

P/S.Every Tesla system with unipolar impulses have had high power adjustable LF-choke, and for sure not for dumping free oscilations in his primary circuit. Also position of magnetic quench spark gap is very important, so much important like winding directions of his coils. Katcher is Mr. Brovin electronic variant of Tesla mag.spark-gap.

 

Brovin.Katchers.zip
https://yadi.sk/d/WbpBln2BdaFz3

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 22 August 2017

Nikola Tesla:

"...it became apparent that the fireballs FREE ENERGY resulted form the interaction of two frequencies, a stray HF higher frequency wave imposed on the LF lower frequency oscillations of the main circuit.... This condition acts as a trigger which may cause the total energy of the powerful LF longer wave to be discharged in a infinitesimally small interval of time and the proportionately tremendously great rate of CHARGE movement which cannot confine itself to the metal circuit and is released into surrounding space with inconceivable violence. It is but a step, from the learning how a high frequency current can explosively discharge a lower frequency current, to using the principle to design a system in which these explosions can be produced by intent."

 

THE PROOF OF TESLA WORDS

  • Liked by
  • Chris
alohalaoha posted this 23 August 2017

Nikola Tesla:

 

"...it became apparent that the fireballs FREE ENERGY resulted form the interaction of two frequencies, a stray HF higher frequency wave imposed on the LF lower frequency oscillations of the main circuit.... This condition acts as a trigger which may cause the total energy of the powerful LF longer wave to be discharged in a infinitesimally small interval of time and the proportionately tremendously great rate of CHARGE movement which cannot confine itself to the metal circuit and is released into surrounding space with inconceivable violence. It is but a step, from the learning how a high frequency current can explosively discharge a lower frequency current, to using the principle to design a system in which these explosions can be produced by intent."

 

THE PROOF OF TESLA WORDS

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vasile
perro555 posted this 12 September 2017

this is a patent for a no load generator whereby it works on the principle of bucking coils and the cancellation of normally destructive back magnetic forces. The drag is cancelled to rotors so possible over u is within reach as current no longer affects generator spin.https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US6208061.pdf

  • Liked by
  • Chris
perro555 posted this 14 September 2017

Please note the following on this video. Small printer motor (12 volts) runs a fairly large led lamp with many leds inside and also runs a resistive load, a regular 12 volt dc motor. This is only a prototype but the key factor is observing that the drive belt is very loose so if the rotor had any drag the wheel would not turn.  So despite the fact that the belt is loose it still was able to drive a pretty large load compared to the prime mover.  sorry its in spanish but please observe the key points.  

Chris posted this 14 September 2017

Hi Perro555 - LED Lights require very little Current, remembering Current is the Magnetic Field, so with little magnetic Field there will be little drag. Lenz's Law will be small in other words.

Also, LED's are one way devices, if you like a Diode, so depending on the Circuitry, there will be drag for only half Cycle.

Personally I prefer not to use LED's for these very reasons. I prefer Incandescent Lamps of Load Resistors. Simply because they are Resistive, have nearly no Inductive or Capacitive properties, and the Voltage and Current are in phase as a result.

This way, I can measure V and I and know this is a pretty accurate measurement, not having to take into account the Phase Angle.

Lenz's Law is very real, it is equal and opposite, it is always present, as soon as a current is drawn, and yes, it can be localised so it does not affect the rest of the System, but never cancelled as such!

   Chris

Chris posted this 30 January 2018

Back to the first post in this thread, the Common mode Choke:

 

Figure One: Common Mode Choke Diagram

 

Question: Why is a simple Common Mode Choke not Above Unity?

Answer: Timing, there is No Magnetic Field Difference, the Current and there fore the Magnetic Field are the same at the same time, Equal and Opposite.

Tom Bearden was right, Energy comes from the Time Domain, in the fact that there is Force Displacement in Time, and through clever means we take the Force at a certain Time and shift its usefulness.

As an example, drop the connection on one coil, inject Bmax into the Core, connect the coils again at Bmax and the whole device changes its purpose! It is no longer a Common Mode Choke!

We now have a Force Off-Set, in Time, and now we can do a lot more with this little device!

   Chris

Chris posted this 01 February 2018

An Energy Machine is a NON Equilibrium Machine, weather it be an Electrical "Generator" or a simple Electron Pump, the words used to describe T. H. Morays Energy Machine! Others used the term Electron Accelerator.

At any one time, one force is out of natural balance with another. A race of Magnetic catch-up.

At On Time, a System has a Magnetic Field Injected into it:

 

The System must, at some point in time, allow the Magnetic Field to dissipate:

 

As pointed out in other posts, we do not want to disturb the On Time Phase, this is the Input, and as Floyd Sweet said:

Why the field of a magnet is not the property of the magnet: First the electromagnet – it takes power from a source to initiate and bring to steady state the field of the magnet. Once the field is stabilised and the exciting current is no longer changing, no further power is needed from the source. The only power required is that needed to support the I2R losses due to the ohmic resistance of the conductor comprising the coil of the magnet. This loss appears as heat.


Now we have a magnetic field, a potential source of energy in existence without support of the source of power to the coil. True, the moving charges through the copper conductor are accompanied by a magnetic field, also true this field requires no power from the source. As stated, the only power is that supporting the I2R losses. Then the field due to the moving charges is not a property of the current drawn from the source but a property of incoherent energy quanta in the surrounding space interacting coherently with fields produced by moving charges on the electrons in motion through the coil.

 

A detailed thorough analysis of the above text gives a definite and very accurate meaning to what's actually being said! Basically: Create a Magnetic Field, now we have a source of Energy that can be used if one knows how.

Yes, we do know how!

A Force is the ability to do Work, it is the ability to do something useful and is defined as:

In physics, a force is said to do work if, when acting, there is a displacement of the point of application in the direction of the force. For example, when a ball is held above the ground and then dropped, the work done on the ball as it falls is equal to the weight of the ball (a force) multiplied by the distance to the ground (a displacement).

Wikipedia - Work

 

To create a Magnetic Field, Current is required to build the Magnetic Field as shown above. This Current is M.M.F or Magnetomotive Force. Similarly, when a Magnetic Field Changes in Time, in the presence of a Conductor, an E.M.F is "Generated" and as a result, if a Load is applied to the Coil, a Current flows which is analogous to an M.M.F, they are the same things. This is Nikola Tesla's Kinetic Energy Statement:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Nikola Tesla - "Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" (February 1892)

 

If one Force is Counter Balanced with another Force, then the summation of the two forces, if equal and opposite is Zero, there is no Work Done, No Displacement and there is a complete Transformation.

The Magnetic Field if Loaded has a Time Constant, and this Time Constant is the Force, M.M.F or the Magnetomotive Force, that is slowing the Time Rate of Change, this is our Copper Tube and Magnet example:

 

But, if the Force is Counter Balanced, then the Magnet, the surrounding Magnetic Field, would see no Time Constant and would fall at the natural rate of descent, terminal velocity. This is so important!!!

I have shown how to do this Here

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Evostars posted this 08 February 2018

Hi Chris,

Great posts on the timing importance! These priceless to me right now, as I'm timing a capacitor discharge into a resonant bifilar coil. Thanks for sharing. In lesson 3, below is explained how timing can produce infinite voltage and infinite current.

In C.P. Steinmetz his book
"Elementary lectures on electric discharges, waves and impulses, and other transients" from 1911,
he describes how electricity works, in a way that is very logical, by using the dielectric and magnetic fields.

It has inspired me greatly.  I'm very grateful Nelson Rocha shared his first edition of this book with me.
It has given me great insights in how a bifilar coil really works, and what we can do with it.

I am making a video series explaining the fundamentals, and how this is translated to the bifilar tesla pancake coil.
These are the first 3 in the series (more to follow, please subscribe on my Youtube channel)

Lesson 01: Fields; electric energy stored in the dielectric and magnetic field

02: Power, inductance and capacity; and how they relate.
03: Infinite voltage and current; and how the time factor plays a role
hope this will inspire more people.
Together these 3 videos hold a lot of information that when combined are priceless.

a quad core computer in my pocket, but a car still needs fuel

Chris posted this 23 February 2018

By now, we all should know, the approximate Timing we require, AC via Sinusoidal Wave Forms need some work with 1/4 Wavelength and so on, however, this also can be invoked by Switching. DC Switching.

Some examples of DC Switching:

This Timing is described in the Thread: "Parametric Excitations n Oscillations". Again we do not want our Input Power Loaded, it is only an Excitation, eg; creates a Magnetic Field, so we can then work with. It also prepares the Coils, inducting a Voltage, or EMF.

I have said before, a Microcontroller can be programed to produce the Signals required. I have done much of this already, already sharing some work in the: "Arduino Uni-Polar Parametric Switch" Thread.

It should be noted, Graham Gunderson gave you his Timing Diagrams in several ways, Scope shots and diagrammatically:

 

So don't touch the Input, let the input do what it needs to do at least while its transforming to Magnetic Field, after that, let Asymmetric Electromagnetic Induction loose! 

   Chris

Chris posted this 18 March 2018

Hey Team, for all following, this is an important continuation from my Thread: 

Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

 

Some pretty simple Math shows some pretty amazing possibilities! All very simple...

But, please, I cant stress enough, if you don't understand what I have shown, and have not been able to replicate this, then moving forward will only complicate this further. Please ask questions, replicate, show how you're going, learn what we have covered if you have not already.

Do you know who this is:

 

Arthur Tränkle, Steho Energy, yes the man that Smuggled Akula away never to be seen again...

Some more of Andrej's GLED:

 

So, my friends, this is truly up to you, you have the last piece of the puzzle, this is it, applying what I have here in my pages, if understood, will yeild excellent results.

Many before us have shared, remember, this current bit is from Andrey Melnichenko  - So many have stolen from these people, never giving credit where credit is due. A selfish act that perpetrators would not like don't to themselves!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Zanzal posted this 18 March 2018

But, please, I cant stress enough, if you don't understand what I have shown, and have not been able to replicate this, then moving forward will only complicate this further. Please ask questions, replicate, show how you're going, learn what we have covered if you have not already.

Nice video Chris. Looks like an interesting innovation of Preva. One point I was confused about. Does the 3V label denote an input or an output?

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 18 March 2018

Hey Zanzal, no, we have only One Input, the 1V Terminal, the 3v label is the Induced Voltage via Electromagnetic Induction.

Its: E.M.F = -ndphi/dt - Electromagnetic Induction. Transformer Primary @ 1V and stepping up to 3V because we have 3x the Turns.

This basic, poor budget simulation I have shown is how all these devices work.

Timing is critical, AC Timing is harder, but happens in a similar way.

Again I urge all following, go back and read the original documents I have shared: http;//www.hyiq.org/Reference/

We live in a very special time, where we, a small number of dedicated Human beings, can change the entire Future! But, we MUST do it together! Every single Child on the Planet will have a better way of life because of what we are doing right now.

Always, we see, Greed, Selfishness, Lack of Love for our Fellow Brothers and Sisters, a way of life that clearly does not work!

We MUST Force Change! Or, we will perish, we can not continue on this destructive Path!

I now call on all of you: Lets Change the World!

   Chris

Chris posted this 20 March 2018

This post is in regards to my last post in this Thread, specifically my last video, posted again below:

 

As you already know, Power is Volts x Amps, the product of V and I is Watts/Power, so by increasing one or both of these quantity's beyond whats needed to start this process off is desirable: Above Unity!

Using what I have shared, Amplifying Voltage and Current, Current is especially important, because this is the Work component, then its only a little work to continue on to make this successful enough to see amazing results!

Because ohms law works, we can plug some figures in to see if we get the Current and Voltage up enough, we very quickly see gains.

Any method of amplifying, with reduced, to zero, adverse affects, is always going to be desirable! I have shown that in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

Perhaps people have missed this?

 

I = V / R

 

@ R = 1 Ohm.

@ V = 1 Volt.

I = 1 / 1 = 1 Ampere.

 

 

@ R = 1 Ohm.

@ V =  3 Volts.

I = 3 / 1 = 3 Amperes. (A Gain of 3x).

All at no extra cost to the Input as I have shown in the: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

I have said this before, this thread is one of the most important I have ever posted, its the only locked Thread on my Site. Locked for a reason.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • mrblobby
Wistiti posted this 21 March 2018

Excellent video my freind! even with your eavy metal voice. ;-)

It is well explain!

Thank you for sharing.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Antimony posted this 21 March 2018

Hey Chris, i just wanted to say that I saw your latest video on youtube on Timing, and i it was very informative. Thanks for compiling, and sharing this information.

I am just starting to learn the POC basics, and i am now trying to understand what is up with the Preva experiment.

I have an oscilloscope, but I am new to this, so i cant make sense of what i am looking at, yet. Maybe i will post a pic or two in the Preva thread and you guys can guide me what I am doing wrong, and tell me what I should look for.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 25 May 2018

My Friends,

We started this topic off using the Common Mode Choke as an example:

 

A common mode choke is where both line and neutral windings are wound on a single core. When using a current compensated choke to decrease common mode noise, (the interference pattern or the unwanted noise) you want to have a high impedance at the unwanted frequencies to knock down that unwanted noise.

 

 

 

Common Mode Noise:

Common Mode Noise is an E.M.F that is "Generated" in the same direction on the two wires. This is because the plane of the two wires are both being exposed to changing magnetic fields at the same time, but importantly in the same direction.

 

Differential Mode Noise:

Differential Mode Noise is an equal but opposite signal in two wires in the same plane, where the direction of the signals are travelling in the opposite directions in the two wires.

 

Electric Wave:

 

Please take into account, t2 is electrical Cancellation:

 

Note: You may see a correlation from what Floyd Sweet said:

Similarly, if two signals flow through each other in such a way as to give the appearance of a steady magnetic field as a result of their E-field cancelling it is easily shown using the above equations to cancel out H and c so that: 

ε = ½ μH2 or ½ BH

 

Now, in reverse, Floyd sweet told us:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields  remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

 

We know to work from our replications on The Mr Preva Experiment:

 

The Current in the Coil determines the Magnetic Field in the Core Material. The Change in Magnetic Field determines the Voltage, and the Voltage determines the Current.

Current in a Coil has a Rise and Fall Phase:

Note: We see two totally different Phases, one where the Coil requires a Current Source, and one where the Coil becomes a Current Source. From a Passive to an Active Component

Now, the Rise Phase, marked as Storage Phase, is where the Current is building, Ramping up, thus the Magnetic Field is building, or Ramping up, and because we have equal and opposite Current, on the other Coil, we have Equal and Opposite Magnetic Fields. This should be perfectly obvious to most following.

As we have seen in our study of Magnetic Resonance the Currents are held steady and at a minimum if the Currents are not in Resonance! Some may call this Damping.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Vidura posted this 03 June 2018

Hello Chris

this is really interesting . the reversal of current in one coil, also the magnetising curves, tey are equal or similar to the charging curves of capacitors. This make me think that mayby in both cases the aether might be compressed, in bucking magnetic fields and between charged capacitor plates. in the case of capacitors , according to eric dollards theory a disruptive discharge occures at >C, might this apply to bucking magnetic fields also?

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 03 June 2018

Hi Vidura,

Coils have a Capacity, not often discussed or thought about in this manner.

The equation for a Transformer gives a hit toward this Capacity:

 

Where Bmax is the storage medium and other factors being the factors detailing the volume.

The Curves, DC Swictched Coil are almost exactly the same as a capacitor, in-fact the equations are the same basic ideas also.

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Close