Hello everybody!
I decided to try to make a replication of Chris device with the 3 coils.
This is more or less the thread to remind me to go with the flow and experiment.
The metglas on the photo will be used for the device, it was lying around,
dimensions 100x30x50mm, 1.5kg
Next step is to make coil nubbins from paper and the to wind some copper.
br
Hi Editor,
Melendor is accurate in his post, wise advice was given!
About 4 Weeks ago we spoke about calculation of your Magnetic Fields, did you get around to doing this?
Of course, it is the Magnetic Field Interactions that are key to making this work, as has been advised for many years:
The "Bucking Magnetic Fields" Pumps Current. A COP of 1.7 is not a hard target if one is to follow the advice given and accurately replicate the procedures given. Many here have achieved various different results, some better than others. The degree of success depends entirely on the Magnetic Field Density and Strength. Which of course is the same Variable that defines an Electric "Generators" Output.
Electromagnetic Induction is Incomplete, currently it is entirely Symmetrical! We, www.aboveunity.com have added the Asymmetrical part to Electromagnetic Induction, giving Faradays Law the other half of Electromagnetic Induction that was missing!
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hi Melendor and Chris!
Nice to see some good replay. I will investigate and do some more testing.
When I got some good news I be back.
Just watch the Above Top Secret - The Technology Behind Disclosure documentary, nice if you have a chance watch it.
br,e
Hey Editor,
I want to invite you to join in on the thread: "Melnichenko's Effect"
I believe this will help you in the Effects of the Coils on this thread.
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hi, Chris and all!
Thanks for the invite I was already checking it a bit.
Just I friendly info, the forum is not reachable for a few hours of the day, almost every day!
As mentioned by the Melendor I will take his advice and start with the simple transformer and measure the efficiency.
I have no problems measuring the power at the input, but on the output with all those spikes, my scope is lost like me.
The initial idea with the project was, that i will not need to prove to my self anything with all kind of measurements, Why?
It should be obvious that the device is over... by the look of the eye. And now working with a small load with very low COP
it's a lot of room for measurement mistake. So any good advice how did you gays do the measuring on the load side?
The goal is to have 90% efficiency and the plug in L3.
Have a nice weekend, e
Now a have a question for all. I have no problems to
Hi Editor,
I have explained the outages we get in the thread: Site Slow and some Dropouts - Your Help
We have fixed the slow issues, now I only need to fix the dropout issue, which I believe is in part due to malicious behaviour.
When Starlink is able to provide a Static IP Address, the dropout issue will be greatly reduced.
It should be obvious that the device is over... by the look of the eye. And now working with a small load with very low COP
Editor, statements you have made concern me!
It should be obvious to any Member, that the Conventional Transformer is between 85 and 95% Efficient! L1 and L2 make up the beginnings of a Conventional Transformer, so any experiment should be at minimum 85 to 95% efficient!
With this very easy to achieve efficiency, it is not hard to calculate that an extra 15% makes Unity! 20% gives 105% and so on!
Thus:
So any Experiment should be at minimum 85 to 95% efficient, and when the right polarity is obtained, it is easy to make L3 add Energy to the System well Above-Unity as has been shown by Many Independent Replications for many Years now!
This advice has been given to you on several occasions now also, from a few different members.
If you're not able to reach 85 to 95% efficiency with L1 and L2, then you need to go back and study Transformer Technology! We are not here to help with Conventional Science Basics. Sorry, but we do not offer this sort of schooling!
If you are serious about this subject, and you feel confident about taking on a slightly simpler project, then you're welcome to join, but please understand, you need the basics first! Before you start!
Conventional Electromagnetic Induction is one of the most Efficient Scientific Transformations known in Science today! Its been known for some 200 odd years! All we have done is add a small part to make Electromagnetic Induction Complete which is evidenced in many videos:
Success comes from the Will to Succeed and Failure comes from the Will to Fail!
Light up the darkness!
Best Wishes,
Chris
Thanks Chris for your kind words.
Maybe you are right and I have to find an easier, simpler and especially cheaper experiment.
Have a nice day, e
Hi Editor,
The videos I referenced, show very minimal cost, no more than $20.00, most materials came free, repurposed, salvaged from the rubbish.
The average COP was 1.8 between the two videos.
I am a firm believer in a little Understanding and frame of mind leads to success. I believe you can do this, I believe you can make this work as it is supposed to! Of course, the Voltage "Generated" via Charge Separation, and the Current Pumped, must equate to greater Total than was Input to make this worth while, but one must work towards this goal and not expect it, especially on the first experiment.
Anyone can do this, but a basic understanding of Electromagnetic Induction is required, basic understanding of how a Transformer works:
Truly, 99% of videos online fall short of explaining How a Transformer works Correctly!
Voltage "Generated" is Sine Opposite, 180 Degrees, and therefore Current I through Turns N, or MMF will also be Sine Opposite.
Two Opposing Magnetic Fields, the Input being slightly greater than the Output, due to Losses, but, the total Transformation is between 85 and 95% Efficient!
This process of events is entirely Symmetrical!
Make it Asymmetrical, and you can have an extra Source of Energy that can Add a percentage of Extra Energy to an already very Efficient Transformation, where only a small percentage is required to make up the System Losses and reach Unity!
This is what we have done and anyone can do with the right frame of mind 😉
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hello editor , Chris and everybody.
It is true ,that we can not talk about over-unity , if one has not learned the basics.
One must keep the Equipment safe and himself and others safe , and for that some basics are required.
The transformer , it looks easy , but is it ?
The learning material on transformers , is not that great on the internet.
Chris was right when he said , that nobody talks about the CURRENT in the secondary.
You will find lots of people from India with youtube videos , where they talk and talk and talk about :
- Dots , + , - , step up - step down , grid frequency 60 Hz , polarity change etc
All the information above , and you will not learn one thing about the Current in the secondary.
Also the information above is valid , and talked about . with a SINE wave , that is Positive 120 V and negative 120 V.
We are using pulsed DC that is positive and 0.
This forum is light years ahead from any other forum on the Internet !!!! ,
In this situation , why not be the first forum ,that INVESTS in his members ??
Why not make a Transformer Thread ( 2 coils ) , to see scope shots , current flow , diodes direction etc. ??
If one understand the interactions between the 2 coils , that one can add the 3rd coil , 4 coil etc
All I want to say friends , is that with information from other forums , Wikipedia , google images , etc a standard member from TRIER 1 , will never ever get good results , not now , not in 1 century.
I am not he Owner here , and I do not make the rules ,but hell Yea , I would love to see step by step material on whatever subject.
Stay safe everybody !
!!! Melendor the wizard
Hey Melendor,
Regarding your statement:
This forum is light years ahead from any other forum on the Internet !!!! ,
In this situation , why not be the first forum ,that INVESTS in his members ??
Why not make a Transformer Thread ( 2 coils ) , to see scope shots , current flow , diodes direction etc. ??
If one understand the interactions between the 2 coils , that one can add the 3rd coil , 4 coil etc
I completely agree!
I have shared many hundreds of hours of experiments on Electromagnetic Induction:
https://www.aboveunity.com/thread/simple-electromagnetic-induction-experiment/
https://www.hyiq.org/Page/Details?Name=Support
Pretty much every video I have released includes information on how to make this work. Includes information on Electromagnetic Induction!
Many hundreds of hours of detailed information, including my Series: Chris's Non Inductive Coil Experiment:
There is no need for Tier II or III they are irrelevant and not of any use, no secrets in those threads! All information is shared openly!
It only takes Minds which are ready to learn something new! That's All!
Any one can do this! Any one!
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hello everybody.
It took me a few days to think about what to write on this thread of mine.As I notice I still have no ability to measure the power of the dc spikes on the scope,well not my model ( 300eur) , a very cheap one. I looked around to maybe get something better some day, and then when I was exploring how to correctly and accurately measure the positive negative dc spikes I came across this video:
This got me really thinking. Ok if I would like to measure like 1.2w or 1w i presume i would need some fancy power analyzer and not one but two so I can compare the results. This of course is completely out of my reach, since I'm building devices for just a few euros in my limited time.Maybe all the Then I was thinking again... Hmm so the easiest would be to build a cheap device which can power itself and produce some additional energy to light up a 5w bulb. In this case I don't need any instruments at all, no measurements, nothing. After that I can start exploring why copper has 29 electrons and in which way this information will help me to upgrade the device to get to my 100w. In other words the device which is not looped or like the experts will say selfruner they all probably have bad measurements, especially at high frequency. Maybe I'm mistaken, but there is no self powered device on this forum, everybody are using battery or power supply and everybody is having bad measurements, that is a fact. Reading this forum for months and watching videos did help, but like all other forums also here is 90% of useless info. Well maybe it is a bit lower percentage if you are a cook or something like that, ( I'm a cook too) and you are afraid of the 9v battery.Also this thread of mine the same 90% is ....For example last year i solder build, wind... a transceiver for a few frequencies till 30 Mhz.I wound a couple of coils, ferrites and so on, and an amazing thing happened, at the smoke test, there was no smoke and the device worked.Why am I writing this? Because I got normal instactions, and the author also mentions that every device is different, because of the different ferite bach and so on. But then he wrote. If you are for example not in the range of the desired output power, change the turns in L8 for +-2 For fine tuning when you are approaching the limit use the technique by spreading the turns on the ferrite core closer or opposite. I just follow the manual and tune the megahertz device in 30minits. Unbelievable.
So for all the newcomers, cooks like me, if you don't have a lab, with the: solder, meters, battery, power supplies, converters, mosfets, resistors, capacitors, copper wires, diodes oscilloscope, signal generators, different multimeters, tools in general and some hand skills then be prepared to invest a few thousand euros to go this way. If you already have all this then you are in luck and you can build the device with the instructions in this thread of mine in half an hour.
Good luck.
Editor, the cook.
Hello editor
This is not going well buddy.
There are a lot of things , you wanna do , mixed emotions , no goal.
If you remember one thing from what Chris has thought you , is to set a goal.
The DC Spike are not OU !!!! Not OU !!! Never will be OU !!!
25 years ago , there was no internet , no phone ...we were sending experiments with LETTERS !!
I was doing the Bedini Schoolgirl , Joule Ringer , Joule Thief etc and I believed that inductive spikes are OU....but they are NOT !!
You place 10 V / 1A into a coil , you OPEN the Switch , and you will get 1000 V / 0.01 A, MINUS losses !!!
The energy that you used to create the magnetic field , transforms itself into a high voltage low current spike ,
You got no effect there , like pumping current etc
After that I can start exploring why copper has 29 electrons
What ?
If it has 29 or 39 or 109 ...does that matter ?
Here on this forum we do not go into rabbit holes. We take in consideration that current flows from + to - .
How many electrons flow from the ground side of the circuit into the circuit , it could take a lifetime to discover !!!
Offtopic You do realize that in this world people started talking that there is not such a particle called electron that flows into the wire , and that all is an ether field !!!
Did you hear Nikola Tesla talk about the Electron particle ?
If you go into this rabbit hole , you can get 70 years of age , and than science will admit , that all is an ether field.
NO Rabbit holes mate !! Current flows from PLUS to MINUS !! Electrons flow from Negative to Positive !!
Trust Chris , Trust this forum !!
This forum is like Galaxies light years ahead !!
Did you see that Chris has posted a Transformer Thread ?
Lets combine our efforts there , and put down this " beast " , let us see how L1 and L2 interacts in a transformers.
You have the equipment right now on your table. 0 $ to invest.
PLEASE keep things simple , stay away from rabbit holes , and make baby steps ! one step after another !
~~~ Melendor the WIzard
Hello Editor,
With Respect, all I see in your posts are Excuses.
I see a conscious effort to try to persuade others that this either:
and the list goes on!
I want to point out, again, Tinmans RTV3 was mostly Free, it cost him no more than $20.00 in a few parts! Captainloz spent around the same. Yes some equipment is required, but all researchers should already have all this equipment!
It disappoints me how some approach things with such a Negative Attitude! Perhaps with a more positive attitude a better end result can be obtained?
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hello,
I will try to comment some things. But first, thanks for still replying to my most, I really appreciated.
What ?
If it has 29 or 39 or 109 ...does that matter ?
Exactly Melendor, I just want to point out how many useless information is here, like on there forums. And everything is important or
very important, then if you want to combine and put all those info together it is not easy anymore, there are a LOT of info.
Nobody commented the video regarding Rigol measurement's, I hope we all agree that the scope is a tool for viewing signals and not to actually measure something accurately, especially like in a low power scenario, or with the low price range oscilloscope.
This forum is like Galaxies light years ahead !!
Where? I don't see it! Are we on the some forum? I also check quickly the new transformer thread, with all the "successful" devices. Well if the bulb is bright somehow and if this is success, ok then. For me it is not. The only way you can be sure that you have a fully functional device is to loop it. Do we agree?? Haven't seen that on this forum, so I don't get this "galaxy" at all! Or please point me to the right thread.
It disappoints me how some approach things with such a Negative Attitude! Perhaps with a more positive attitude a better end result can be obtained?
Me to Chis, very disappointed. I hope that it will spin the wheal to other direction. But more reading and watching, building is
currently just showing me that there is no "device" here that I'm want to build. I wish I'm wrong.
Editor, the cook.
just a trouble maker in my opinion.
this is easy if you follow the guide.
E
Hello Editor,
Like Elvis said, and many others have said, this is very easy if one puts in the effort to learn what is required before making steps to save the world.
I wish I could help you further, but I feel your effort, is not to Succeed?
I feel you have not achieved any of the goals we have set, and laid out very simple instructions for, which is very easily achievable for any serious researcher.
I will give you seven days to turn this thread around, and if you can then good, but if not, I will lock this thread.
Best Wishes,
Chris
Hi Chris!
You don't have to wait for seven days, lock it now. It is better for everyone, especially the new members seeing the important questions not answered. Didn't want to mention before, but Itsu was telling me that this will happened and it did.
Editor, the cook.
Hello Editor,
Didn't want to mention before, but Itsu was telling me that this will happened and it did.
Thank You for letting me know! I appreciate one thing about your approach: "Reading between the lines is very informative!" I had a feeling you were part of that crowd! My Gut Feeling proved true again!
We have had immense trouble with Trolls starting back in 2015 when I bought out this Technology in the Public Domain, we have dealt with them with a swift stern hand, sweeping them away as fast as we can, this is why we have been so Successful, more Successful than any other Forum Ever!
You see, we have a very good image depicting this behaviour:
You don't have to wait for seven days, lock it now. It is better for everyone, especially the new members seeing the important questions not answered.
I will proceed and lock this thread as you wish!
Its a real shame you failed to follow any of the guide we provided! It is so easy to fail when one chooses to!
This should be a Very Enlightening Read for many many Readers! Very Enlightening!
Chris
No one online at the moment
In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.
You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!
The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.
A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!
Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.
Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome
God be in my head, and in my thinking.
God be in my eyes, and in my looking.
God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.
Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.
More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:
They REFUSE to tell me why!
The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!
Thank You So Much!
Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.
Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).
