In my previous thread on ISLab's Replication of Basic POC Effect, I had many useful learning outcomes and got a good "feel" for the behaviour of POC coils under various kinds of situations. With help and encouragement from all of you, I was able to get the Sawtooth Wave and "generate" more power than "induced" within the coils.
This thread will focus on optimising the POC coils and maximising their magnetic resonance for optimum power generation.
Good to see you're back, and still doing experiments!
I have been doing much these last few months but did not post as I could not make any further breakthrough on getting the SW levels up.
My Friend, with respect, you're going off target.
Please see: Polarity Experiment for the correct path forward, as the path forward is very important to get correct.
Hi Chris, Thank you for the correction. I take your words very seriously and will follow the framework and path that you've laid down for the POC tech because I know that you speak from rich and long and validated experience.
In this particular case, I was enthusiastic only because the deliberate use of the spike fits perfectly in the framework of L1 oppossing L2 which opposes L3. The shift was only on which part of the input pulse we use for what. This was clearly a mistake as I note below.
Please see: Polarity Experiment for the correct path forward, as the path forward is very important to get correct.
It is confusing when you point to Marcel's Polarity Experiment with Polarity Two as the correct path, because that is precisely the one with L1 opposing L3.
But it is clear from the waveforms that the input pulse initiates important responses both in L3 as well as L2. So I understand why the spike should not be our focus, and will correct this mistake in understanding.
But the question remains: Why does L1 opposing L3 give a large clean SW? Or rather, why is L1 opposing L2 not giving a clean SW?
Is this related to the coupling constant between the coils? Should we test both configuration on any new setup and see which works better for that setup?
When you have this configuration, and you did have it correct some time back, all that's required then, is scale. Use Faradays Law Equations to Generate sufficient Voltage, and then, as long as the Potential Difference in Voltage is Present, the POC will Pump Current!
Yes, my problem presently is only the scaling, and I've been struggling with this for months. I do get the clean SW with POC opposing. But the SW is too low in relation to the input pulse when L1 is opposing L2.
So I will now continue with L1 opposing L3 which gives far better results for my setup. (And I will not make the mistake of focussing on the spike! 😁)
Hey ISLab,
I would encourage finishing your current path of investigation, finish there, learn as much as you can there, and see where the positives and negatives are.
Then return to where you were, and look at the same there, the positives and negatives.
You will find, there are more positives when you return.
The Coil design, in the Thread Coil Geometry, shows why the Coil Design is important, and in Scaling, we need to ensure the POC Generate a decent Voltage.
Best Wishes,
Chris
No one online at the moment
In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.
You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!
The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.
A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!
Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.
Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome
God be in my head, and in my thinking.
God be in my eyes, and in my looking.
God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.
Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.
We love and trust in our Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth!
More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:
They REFUSE to tell me why!
The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!
Thank You So Much!
Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.
Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).
