Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 29K Views
  • Last Post 04 July 2023
Chris posted this 08 October 2019

My Friends,

I am going to show a small experiment, one that follows the works of Andrey Melnichenko and even Tariel Kapanadze's works and as we know many others.

 

 

We have discussed here before, the fact that H3 is H3 simply because H1 and H2 cancel out: H1 + H2 + H3 = H3, why is this so, because H1 is Positive and H2 is Negative! We have seen this equation before: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1.

I think with Fighter's success recently, its time for some hands on!

  • First Layer: 88 Turns.
  • Second Layer: 43 Turns.

 

Layer One:

 

Layer Two:

 

Turns Direction:

 

Layer One Inductance:

 

Layer Two Inductance:

 

Non-Inductive Connected:

 

Layer One Resistance:

 

Layer Two Resistance:

 

Closed Loop Resistance:

 

My Coil, like Andrey Melnichenko's, is 0.33 + -0.33 + 0.33 = 0.33.

Two thirds of my Coil is canceled out. My Circuit looking like this:

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive.
  • L3 is Inductive.

 

If this Coil is carrying 1 Ampere of Current, and exactly one half of the Coil is Non-Inductive, then Turn for Turn, only 45 Turns will create an M.M.F, which is considered as 45 Turns x 1 Ampere = 45 Ampere Turns or 45At.

Science tells us, that Turn for Turn, where we have Non-Inductive part of the Coil, this part of the Coil does nothing! Creates no Magnetic Field, therefore does nothing.

However, from Experiment, we know that this part of the Coil DOES do something! Remember Floyd Sweets paper: Nothing is Something, this is the same!

At Resonance, we have a perfect Standing Wave! We know this as Magnetic Resonance! Where each Magnetic Field is 180 Degrees out of phase:

 

Now, straight away, we should see a problem! Why? Kirchhoff's Current Law says the Current must be equal at every node, but we have Turn for Turn, one Coil that is Inductively Zero, and another Coil that has only a part of the Induction canceled!

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is:

I = da+ / dt + da- / dt

Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

Each node does not equal the other, so the Circuit must balance out, Current is Increased as the Standing wave shows us.

Remember what Induction is? See here: Non-Linear Inductance

Induction gives us an approximation on the Coils ability to carry a Current: L = ε / di / dt

By Bringing a Coil arrangement like this into Resonance is our task.

Where each Electromagnetic Wave travels in opposite directions. One through the other in the same space.

THE NATURE OF SPACE

Space itself is the ability to accommodate energy. Consider for a moment the following illustration:

A signal (energy) is transmitted from point A to point B. A and B are separated by a finite distance. Consider three periods of time:

  • The signal is launched from A.
  • 2) The signal resides in the space between A and B.
  • 3) The signal arrives at B.

If (3) occurs simultaneously with (1) we say that the signal has traveled at infinite velocity. The signal has never resided in the intervening space and therefore there exists no space between A and B. A is virtually at the same point in space as B. For real space to exist between A and B it is necessary that a signal travelling between them be "lost" with reference to both points for a finite period of time.

Now we know that for real space to exist between two points a signal travelling between them will propagate at a finite velocity c, ( c = 1 / √με ). 

If a signal will not travel between two points, as in the case when c = 0, then we can also conclude that there is no link or intervening space between them. 

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

Floyd Sweet tried very hard to make c = 0! What does this mean? It is simply a Standing Wave, a Team Wave was used:

It is a simple matter using the equations E / H = √με and c = 1 / √με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

I have pointed out: Why 'C' is equal to One in these Devices.

We have a lot of data!

   Chris

above-unity
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 04 July 2023

My Friends,

All Researchers should be Pragmatic:

dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations. "a pragmatic approach to business ethics"

 

Success will follow if Researchers follow this approach, as those before us have, and succeeded!




Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Idiots flood the Forums, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282

The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already! Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Tinman was the first:

 

Others followed, like Captainloz:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

 

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

 

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

Fact is: Not many Researchers are Pragmatic! Most are irrational and illogical!!!

There is only One Truth!

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 22 June 2023

My Friends,

So many Posts I read over on Other Forums, they continue to show their Mouths are bigger than their brains, and their brains are pretty much firing on 2 neurons, which is a joke! Especially when you consider the Human Brain has in the order of over 100 Billion!

Experiment proves Fact, and Independent Replication is industry standard, because repeatability is proof! Fact is, aboveunity.com is the First, and Only place you will find Real Working Energy Machines!!! All the others are Fake! Especially over at BeyondPlagiarism.org!!!




Independent Replication is Scientific Proof:


Proof, and the Dumb Dumb Club cant see the Forest for the Trees! When too many Idiots flood the Forums, they make a mockery of the Truth! Right here, it's been here for nearly a Decade, you can SEE The Truth:



Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282

The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already! Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Tinman was the first:

 

Others followed, like Captainloz:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

 

We have Self-Running Machines, Our Flashlight that a Member of AboveUnity.com has achieved:

 

 

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

 

There are a lot of very, very stupid idiots out there, they try to lead you!!! Don't be Led, be your own Leader! Don't follow Idiots!

There is only One Truth!

Aboveunity.com is Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Lighting up the Darkness!!!

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 17 June 2023

My Friends,

Interesting, YouTube removed my comments on this video:

 

Why were my comments removed? Because they are Censoring Me!

Energy is so simple! Stress in the Magnetic Field, Charge Separation! 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 09 February 2023

Hey Donovan,

Yes, if I add Diodes, and we have, as part of this experiment, then POCOne and POCTwo will Oppose, they will Buck!

Shown Here.

and combine the two, into a slightly different Circuit:

 

Of course, this way, we can Tune the Partnered Output Coils, using our H-Bridge, to find Magnetic Resonance, which is where we find Currents approximately Equal in Amplitude, and Opposite. Where we have Maximum Bucking occurring in our Closed Core, Magnetic Loop!

I cant believe how many Clueless Researchers there are out on the Other Forums!

 

We are LIGHT YEARS Ahead of the Other Forums!

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

donovan posted this 09 February 2023

Hi,

Some, bucking opposed magnetic energies.

Donovan

Chris posted this 09 February 2023

My Friends,

On the Outside of this Coil arrangement:

 

 

If I were to wind a Seven Turn Coil, and drive this Coil with an H-Bridge, what sort of behaviour should I expect from the Black and Red Partnered Output Coils?

NOTE: the Simplicity!

Its pretty straightforward and very cheap to run a few simple experiments.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 04 February 2023

Hey Donovan,

Everyone that has viewed this information, some for many years now, is becoming a contributor, weather they like it or not. Some Negative, but most Positive!

At the moment I will keep this experiment a Useful Toy, but lets see which way this heads... 

Thank You!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

donovan posted this 04 February 2023

Hi,

It is so exciting to be a part of this......I hope I can be a productive and worthwhile contributor....

Donovan

Chris posted this 04 February 2023

My Friends,

Please Note: This is the exact same setup as I have already Presented on this thread, that's why its on this thread!

As promised, some more images:

 

Here, you can see, very clearly, the parallel:

 

Some more:

 

 

Mr Plagiarist 💯! aka Mr 'Brainless Buffoon Boy', will not understand a single thing here, but everyone else will, you can see a Parallel that only study and learning can give, why we wind the Coils like this, why we have each Coil Opposing, mostly not yet shown in these experiments, but shown on this and other pages, but you will see, its coming, in time, and soon you will see how I am going to Drive, or Excite the Coils, to get Useful Power Output!

EDIT: Ohhhhh, Poor Little Buffoon Boy is having a moment... Oh dear how sad never mind!

I just cant believe how far behind the Other Forums are! We are Light Years Ahead of the other Forums!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 03 February 2023

Hi Donovan,

Metglas core yes,  and HV wire no, high current. I think from memory 12 Gauge multi strand.

More coming soon, we need to build on our knowledge as a team, and then we all benefit. I will pose a few more pictures today.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

donovan posted this 03 February 2023

Hi,

Is that a Metglas core and HV wire?

Donovan

PS, I keep studying all the material here......so much good information.....so many experiments to try......to reinforce the theory...

Chris posted this 03 February 2023

My Friends,

I will just leave this here:

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 27 January 2023

Hey Melendor,

Yes you're correct.

Science tries to teach us this is how Faradays Law, with Lenz in the equation as the Negative Sign: E.M.F = - dΦB / dt, works! And for the most part, it is correct:

 

The Velocity V of the Magnetic Field is Indicated. The Induced Magnetic Field B is also Indicated BInduced.

As discussed, POCOne and POCTwo are entirely bound by Electromagnetic Induction Laws, Voltage is Induced by the Change in Magnetic Field B.

 

However, do we see this in our Experiment? Can a Diode reverse Polarity Mid DC Cycle?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Melendor posted this 27 January 2023

 

 

His thinking is on the right track! However, the author of this document is not entirely correct in his thinking and diagrams! There are errors! When does B occur and how can this be used? Is Image Two correct?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

Hello Chris.
I can try to bring a little light on the errors if I may:

Image A is correct if Coil B is loaded...Opposing magnetic fields , because of Lenz's Law.
Image B , I find it not correct , because if 2 magnetic fields are in the same direction with 0 opposition..there is no Lenz Law.
In image C , as I can tell Both Coil B and C , are firing a N poles towards the input Coil.They are both opposing the Input.
Hope I got it right..

Good Job everybody.
Keep up the good work.
~~~ Melendor the Wizard

Chris posted this 22 January 2023

My Friends,

Finally people are starting to get it! What I have been sharing for a very long time now, is starting to sink in and become Understood:

 

The Egg of Columbus

 

NOTES:
One of the most fundamental physical laws is known as Lenz’s law, which states that a changing
magnetic flux causes an induced voltage. The resulting current creates a magnetic field that opposes
the magnetic field that created it. Lenz’s Law will always exist in every two coil arrangement.
It is foolish to believe anyone can prevent this natural effect from occurring. Drawing A and B identify
how magnetic fields interact in a typical transformer/generator circuit. In Drawing A, magnetic fields
are compressing each other. In Drawing B magnetic fields are complementing each other.
In the absence of Lenz’s Law, the magnetic field would produce potential energy without, or having
done very little work. This configuration would violate law of conservation of energy. This is evidence
enough to understand a two coil arrangement does not, and can’t produce extraordinary results.

Coil A can be 120 or 220 volts (or any primary voltage you desire). Drawing above identifies one specific moment when Coil A induces a
magnetic field in Coil B. Coil B magnetic field is LENZ induced. Coil B North Pole opposes Coil A North Pole. LENZ also creates a South Magnetic
Pole, and this South magnetic pole is feed energy through a low power magnetic field generated by Coil C. In the ideal design, Coil C voltage
matches Coil A Primary Voltage.
It is important to understand that Coil C cannot be energized before Coil A. If Coil C is energized before Coil A then Coil C will be subjected to
LENZ forces, and will be the driver of Lenz in Coil B. However, the stronger Coil A magnetic field, when energized, will quickly distort the
magnetic field in Coil B when Coil C initiates Lenz. When Coil C is energized, AFTER a LENZ generated magnetic field in Coil B, due in whole to
Coil A, then Coil C is not impacted by LENZ, or influences Coil B through Lenz, but feeds energy, through its magnetic field to Coil B.
In the drawing, Magnetic Poles of Coil C are shown as smaller letters. This implies that this magnetic field must always be smaller then the
induced field. If Coil C generated a larger magnetic field, then Coil C magnetic field would have too great of an influence on Coil B, and Coil B
field would distort. 

There is no Free Energy

Is it a myth and only fools believe they will generate Free Energy from
High Voltage. Power is only produced through interaction of magnetic
fields. There is nothing free, power is always required to generate power.
COP < 1 is produced with two interacting magnetic fields, as seen in a
simple generator design. COP > 1 is always produced through the
interaction of three magnetic fields. COP > 1 should not be confused with
Free Energy. Free Energy implies that the power generated came at no
cost. COP > 1 requires that energy is utilized to produce results greater
than the typical outcome. The math, when calculated correctly will
identify that energy is conserved, or no laws are violated.
A large magnetic field will always influence a smaller magnetic field, and
can change the pole configuration or distort the smaller magnetic field.
Coil C should never be more powerful then the induced magnetic field.
The magnetic energy from Coil C will flow unimpeded due to Lenz’s
already having been developed from the Primary Coil A. Coil C magnetic
field growth must be delayed, or in other words, Coil B magnetic field
must develop first through Lenz before Coil C is fired off. Essentially there
is no direct Lenz relationship between Coil C and Coil B.
No complex electronics are required. A toroid coil is sufficient and AC
voltage on the primary coil should be used. If AC 120 Volts is used for the
Primary then AC 120 volts will be the output at a combined increased
power output. A 220 volt AC input will also produce a 220 AC output. A
feedback coil (feedback oscillator) can be used to drive Coil C.
Happy Experimenting.

Ref: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

 

Member Hannon, posted the pdf attached to the bottom of this post.

His thinking is on the right track! However, the author of this document is not entirely correct in his thinking and diagrams! There are errors! When does B occur and how can this be used? Is Image Two correct?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Attached Files

Chris posted this 18 January 2023

My Friends,

Truth of the matter is: "Those ignoring the technology in this thread are either: Dumb or Ignorant"

Do the math:

 

Independent Replication = Scientific Proof and choosing to stay ignorant when the Answers are right in front of your eyes is stupidity!

Why do so many 'supposed' researchers choose to stay ignorant to the most simple, cheapest, Free Energy Machines ever! The reason is, they are not Genuine Researchers, they are Paid Disinformation Artists!

This thread gives you all the data you need to Succeed!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 13 December 2022

My Friends,

If you want Free Energy Machines, the answer is right here, in this Thread!!!

Are you paying attention?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 07 October 2022

Hi Ansen,

Yes, on the Forum we have many links to Resources: Reliable and Flexible Switching System

You will see this on the Website:

 

 

Switching System is where you will find the PCB and data.

NOTE: I use a single Chanel Mosfet, not in H-Bridge Mode, to Drive My Input Coil! Please see Circuit Diagrams on this Thread.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

ansen posted this 07 October 2022

Hi Chris,

So I understand that you use an H-bridge to drive your primary coil. And I know that it's also possible to just do simple switching with a transistor, but do you have a circuit diagram or guide on how you built your H-bridge?

Regards,

ansen

Chris posted this 22 September 2022

My Friends,

I saw a post today, and I think this should become a topic of discussion, perhaps 20-30 or so years ago it should have been prioritized as a primary prerequisite? Hay that sounds a bit logical doesn't it!

Here is the post:

Ref: Holcomb and other FE technology debate 

 

My Friends, this is a very simple solution!

 

Example

An Electric Generator is 95% Efficient, Torque Energy is equal to the Electrical Output Energy minus Losses!

We have a method to reduce Shaft Drag by 80% for the same Electrical Output, simply by off setting the Magnetic Force, or MMF, imposed on the Rotor, in the form of Shaft Drag, and still have the same: ΔΦB / Δt which is the Magnetic Field Density Changing in time.

This is very easy to achieve! "Generator" Shaft Drag is entirely M.M.F related, meaning, the "Generated" E.M.F is present with Shaft Drag of only:

  • Bearing Friction Loss
  • Windage Loss
  • Inertial Loss

 

However, if one loads the Output, and a Current Flows, a Secondary Magnetic Field is then present, apart from the Source Magnetic Field, we have an extra Loss:

  • Magnetic Drag Loss, or MMF Damping

 

Which is the most significant Loss of all, I have shown this in this video:

 

It is very important to study and understand Electromagnetic Induction, as this IS Energy "Generation" which Powers your Lights and so on!

In the above Video, there is one: v x B or E.M.F, in the single Copper Conductor which has a Magnetic Field that Changes in Time in Phase, remember: Floyd Sweet told us, we need 2 v x B to make this work!

This means the question posed in the above quoted post is a very poor question to be asking after a few decades of Research!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 22 September 2022

My Friends,

This is a prime example of why we Ban the Trouble Makers:

Ref: Holcomb and other FE technology debate

 

Oh My, what trouble Other forums have! 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 21 September 2022

My Friends,

I had to have a giggle at this:

Ref: Holcomb and other FE technology debate

 

Do you see what we are dealing with?

Proof is in the work you put in yourself to make these machines work, some never will!

Do you think F6FLT has ever done an experiment along the lines of this:

 

Only one member of that forum ever tried to replicate, and they stopped at, I believe, a 1.6% drop in Input Power before they made sense of what was going on, and achieved the goal!

NOTE: 90% Input Power Drop is very easy to achieve with a bit of work:

My Friends, you need to do this for your selves, no one is ever going to do this for you! I will help you! Members here will help you!

 

There is NO ENERGY Crisis, its a manufactured strategic plan that they are applying.

Focus on the facts, and observe the small things:

 

Aboveunity.com is the only forum in the world with Answers!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • strape
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 31 August 2022

My Friends,

Jagau is correct! This small motor shows some very simple Magnetic Concepts!

Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F is the same as Magnetic Field Strength, H, except the difference is:

H = M.M.F / l

  • H = Magnetic Field Strength measured in Amperes per metre (Am-1).
  • M.M.F = Magnetomotive Force measured in Ampere turns (At).
  • l = average length of Magnetic circuit measured in metres (m).

 

A larger M.M.F will naturally produce a stronger field. This is shown in the last posts, as Amperes Force Law, and we went through some calculations, please check to make sure they are correct, that Faradays Law requires Unit Magnetic Field Density B:

B = I / A .

  • B = Flux density measured in Webers per metre squared (Wm-2).
  • I = Magnetic Flux measured in Webers (W).
  • A = Cross sectional area perpendicular to the field lines measured in metres squared (m2) .

 

Now, the Magnetic Field Strength, H, is never covered in Faradays Law and is never touched upon in Physics as being associated in the same domain as Faradays Law, but I can prove, via some math and experimentally, that the Magnetic Field Strength is a very important factor in this quest of Energy Density ε.

Soon I will be showing a device that immediately you will see all the necessary concepts to improve my Output, this I have already given in the thread Coil Geometry and here on this Thread.

If you want to have Energy to Power your Home and make it Free, its very easy! I have given you all the answers! All in the threads on this Website!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

P.S: there are so many Idiots that cant navigate their way out of a Paper Bag, so please do not, ever, follow or pay any attention to them! They are idiots and will always be idiots!

Jagau posted this 31 August 2022

Good to see this thread back.
For your question, the answer is in your video a little before this post.

 

Jagau

Chris posted this 31 August 2022

My Friends,

I have decided to unlock this topic for the moment.

We have seen so much Trolling and Fakery from Foolish Morons that I think its time we start showing how stupid and incompetent they really are! The community is being steered by Liars Cheats and Shills!

Failure is 100% assured, when ones Goal is to Fail !!!

Inside any Generator, we have several things going on:

 

The Magnetic Field creates a Drag on the Rotor when the Coils are Loaded, but we have found a way to completely avoid the Drag, we have eliminated all drag from the system and this thread shows you how! Its Easy!

So, I have a question for you:

What is it that I need do to improve my Output?

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • strape
Chris posted this 07 April 2022

My Friends,

Energy Machines that produce more Energy, Watt seconds, output than Input is a very easy task! This thread shows you all you need to know, starts you off in the right direction, showing you the necessary effects to Build Aboveunity Machines.

 

Using the Threads here on this forum, outlined here: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines you can build Aboveunity Machines that output unlimited Energy, for very little Input.

The Answers lay here and no where else!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 31 August 2021

My Friends,

A short video to show you that a simple Understanding is very important:

 

Here is some code, showing you a more advanced look at what is really going on:

// Ampers Force Law:
var AmperesForce = AmperesLaw.AmperesForceLaw(3, -3, 3, 0.1, 1);

/// <summary>
/// Ampère's force law
/// In magnetostatics, the force of attraction or repulsion between two current-carrying wires is often called Ampère's force law.
/// Equation: FM = μ0 * I1 * I2 * I3 * l / 2π * r
/// </summary>
/// <param name="CurrentA">Current in Wire A in Units of Amperes.</param>
/// <param name="CurrentB">Current in Wire B in Units of Amperes.</param>
/// <param name="CurrentC">Current in Wire C in Units of Amperes.</param>
/// <param name="Length">Wire Length in Units of Metres.</param>
/// <param name="Distance">Distance of Wires in Units of Centimeters.</param>
/// <returns>Fm a double containing the Force in Newtons (Kg m/s^2)</returns>
public static double AmperesForceLaw(double CurrentA, double CurrentB, double CurrentC, double Length, double Distance)
{
    // FM = μ0 * I1 * I2 * I3 * l/2π * r
    return ((Constant.VacuumPermeability * CurrentA * CurrentB * CurrentC * Length) / ((2 * Math.PI) * Distance));
}

 

Asymmetrical Force gives us: -5.4E-07 Kg m/s2

Symmetrical Force gives us: -1.8E-07 Kg m/s2

Yup, some PPL are a bit Dupid ha! See a problem here?

My Friends, this is very important, very basic Facts! Anyone disputing these very simple Facts is either Bought and Paid for Shills or Bought and Paid for Shills, no other options exist!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 13 August 2021

My Friends,

This Thread, is one of the most important threads on this forum!

Many here have replicated this and understand this, we have several other technologies also, successful replications of some of the Akula Work.

Please Create your Own Threads and post progress, we will help you on your own threads.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 08 June 2020

Hey Ourbobby,

I was more so pointing to stick with your current experiment and find what it takes to make that better, and better, and better, and better, and then one day you will have the Floyd Sweet Machine 100%.

It is of course up to you, what path you take, I am not twisting yours, or anyone's arm! I will say, however, most of us here, have had very good results so far! Only a few have not gone Above the unity Boundary yet. Mostly it is because:

  1. Too many Turns.
  2. Incorrect Polarity.
  3. Bad Core, may need to gap the core or something.

 

So its is up to you what path forward, you decide to take. 

I am going to lock this thread, simply because this thread is now filled to the brim with totally off topic, not relevant posts. I have asked several times to start your own threads and not post on this thread.

Best wishes,  stay safe and well,

   Chris

Ourbobby posted this 08 June 2020

Hi Chris,

             Thanks for the reply. Always a problem for me, and maybe others are the circuits that load up with coils or components that are are difficult to assess to see the proof! I have looked at the thread which contains a couple of videos showing what appears to be a magnetic core. Perhaps the bucking coils, what is not clearly seen are the EX coils for example. Anyway, all that winding on one core is likely to produce a concoction of fluxes without expert knowledge. Perhaps look for another solution?

Regards

ourbobby

Chris posted this 08 June 2020

Hey Ourbobby,

Floyd Sweet was quite literally, a Legend, decades before his time!

If I may suggest, starting the race at the Finish Line, is not a Race we can win! That's cheating if you get what I mean.

One must look at the progression of Floyd Sweet, where he started, his line of thought, what his goals were, why he proposed what he did, and what he delivered and what the basis of thought was.

Individual statements Floyd Sweet made, in context with Power "Generation", is extremely important! This statement is perhaps the most important of all:

We now have, when the current and voltage windings are excited, another set of fields, virtually in quadrature with the alternating fields initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process. 

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulation machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

 

The Nth Degree, is an example, an example of something else quite important! 32 = 9, so the nth degree is the Square Function, this leads us to another statement made by not just Floyd Sweet, but also Andrey Melnichenko:

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases.

and

This winding produces a magnetic field that varies in intensity as the square of the load current on a 1:1 isolation ratio.

and

The D.C. flux varies as the square of the current and not sinusoidally as does the voltage and current of the power phase windings, with proper capacitors across the D.C. control voltage.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator

 

The field energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the total electromagnetic field. As a result, the simple addition of the energy fields of the total field can be many times the energy of the initial fields separately. This property of the electromagnetic field is non-additivity of the energy field. For example, when added to a stack of three flat circular permanent magnet energy of the total magnetic field is increased to nine times!

Ref: Andrey Melnichenko - Transgeneratsiya electromagnetic field energy

 

Like I said, when starting a race, the Start Line is always important place to Start. You already have some experience under your belt, and the following image will make some sense to you now:

 

As time goes on, as we gain more knowledge and more understanding, then the Machines Floyd Sweet ended up with, we will end up with! That's progression, we saw this in Floyd Sweets work, Generation 6, after 8 years of work. Don't forget, Floyd Sweet was a genius, so we have a lot of catch up to do!

Feed Forwards, Feed Backs and the System self looped, will be achievable when one has the knowledge gained, as was seen in Floyd Sweets case! Until one has this knowledge, one will not be able to achieve this goal, again, one must start at the start!

Stick to the provable facts! This is important, and is why we are so far ahead compared to others that dont have any of the Tech We have! These very important statements:

The VTA can be started by momentary connection of a 9 volt battery to the drive coils when the machine is operated in the self-powered mode.

 

The VTA "likes" to always see a minimum load of 25 watts.

 

The operation is stopped by momentary interruption of power to the power coils.

 

The understanding, the solutions to these statements, these are critical to making progress forward! In-depth study on these phenomena, in combination with what Experiments you have already performed, is the Starting Line. You are very much further ahead than many others that have not gone as far as you have already gone!

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

Ourbobby posted this 08 June 2020

Hi guys,
I am looking at the Floyd Sweet diagram - Vacuum Triode Amplifier. I cannot quite get the configuration of the pair of coils EX1, T1 and EX2, T2. I get the bucking of the centre coils, and the pulse by coils FB1 and FB2. The centre coils are shown as having a core, but, the EX1 and EX2 coils do not show sharing a core. Would it be that the EX1 and 2 are wound over each set of P1 and P2 coils?

regards

ourbobby

Atti posted this 02 June 2020

Hey Ourbobby

I say it again. I only used the 120 volt tiny light bulb to see how the self-inductive voltage at the foot of the Fet drain rises. A few volt light bulb with adequate limiting resistance is also suitable to indicate this.
So in my opinion, it is not the small light bulb that matters, but the effect of the load current on the excitation current due to the loose coupling.
An older video has been uploaded again. This is also visible.
But as Chris says:
If you post a bit more detail, Images, Videos and so on, then we can help more. (although I am not an expert on the subject)

 

Chris posted this 31 May 2020

My Friends,

I want to share something, I hope this will clear up some confusion. We here, have been through this many hundreds of times. New Members may not have read this, and other Members of other forums seem to totally miss this, I don't see why it is so difficult...

As you all know, I have been attempting to share information over at ou.com, a very difficult place to make any progress, however, I posted this:

My Research leads me to believe Floyd Sweet spent every effort to concentrate on the Charge contained In-Side the Insulated Copper Wire, specifically the Cu Atom. To Free this Charge, then to make this Charge Move.

 

You can read the post here. We have covered this here many times, in many threads! Don Smith was also the same, he said is machines were Electron Accelerators:

 

We need to focus on the very same things as those before us have! Focus on the Charge contained within the Insulated Copper Wire.

Energy is V x I over Time. That means V can be increased, I will follow, but if the Time is reduced, then it can be the same as less V x I over a greater Time. So do not ever bind yourself to misconceptions laid out by others!

The Magnetic Fields you create, are a Function of the Energy Produced! More Magnetic Field, Changing Faster in Time, the More Energy you will get out.

If you need to brush up on the fundamentals: Volume, Density, Strength, and so on:

 

Remember: Conventional Theory is incomplete and we have much more detail on the above Videos, not explained in Science.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 30 May 2020

Hey Ourbobby,

If you post a bit more detail, Images, Videos and so on, then we can help more.

Its a case of getting to know your Coils. Learn what they like to see. Observe the Polarities, look for the best configurations - Document as your'e going along so you don't make the same mistakes all the time. 

The Effects, look for the effects, maximise on the effects. With the effects, the numbers will come.

You have to take whats in front of you and make that work optimum. Take Don Smiths Coils, he used pretty much the same configuration. Look for the same things I suggested to CD_Sharp, read his threads, observe his experiments.

If you post more we can help more.

Bewt wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

Ourbobby posted this 30 May 2020

Hi Chris,
Well I can predict the bucking coils running and I can predict blowing up the mosfet driving the primary! I personally have found that if I have a small separation between the C sections of the cores, then I greatly reduce the likely hood of blowing a fet with too much current draw or feedback voltage when initiating start up. I have also received my 120v globe. This I have found works too, as per Atti's video.

The big issue for me at the moment is stopping my mosfets from exploding with flames when I am tuning for the opitmal frequency with a load across S1. I am not sure if it is too much current draw or too much voltage pressure. I say too much current draw, as, if I use a lower wattage globe it never happens. It occurs when I put a 12v 30 globe in the S1 circuit. I have been using IRFP460 at the present time which should be able to handle the current. How best might I try to reduce the impact of the feedback? Personally, I think that if it is too much current draw, then there must be very little OU occurring for me.

regards

ourbobby

Chris posted this 27 May 2020

Hey Baerndorfer,

Each Copper Coil has Atoms filled with Electrons, Protons, Neutrons and some might include Ions. You could think of each Copper Wire as a Battery, having no immediate Charge, Flat by Definition. We have an abundance of Charge at our disposal, we just need to know how to Free Charge and make it move, like these guys do:

 

Every single piece of Charge has a Magnetic Moment, and as the Magnetic Fields build, the Charge in the Wire is Freed, moving to Higher Orbitals and becoming Free Electrons, ready to be Accelerated down the Wire.

From the great man, Floyd Sweet:

Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway.

Ref: The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator by  Floyd A. Sweet. Ph.D.

 

We have to Engineer the Vacuum, Matter, Magnetic Fields can do this, its very easy, Magnetic Resonance is important.

Every kind of matter produces a field

...

energy is a kind of matter

Ref: NOTHING IS SOMETHING by Floyd A. "Sparky" Sweet

 

The Conductor is a Source of Infinite Charge, only needing us to Pump it!

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 26 May 2020

when i look at this circuit i see a bunch of coils that are switched on the low side by S1. that will cause a positive spike running to the coils and through the diode to the load (R). this should happen no mater what S2 is doing. thx on the explanation which i don't realy get but i will rethink it over and over again till it makes sense in my brain

i'm on the way but not there

regards and thank you for this platform Chris.

wwg1wga

Jagau posted this 26 May 2020

Hi baerndorfer

In phase 1 (switch one closed) the first 2 coils cancel each other (POC)

and in phase 2 it is to increase the inductance given that we receive the inductance from L1 and L3 and because L2 is short by switch 2, we get more energy than in phase one.

.
It is only a very simplistic idea to do it but it is not the right way to do it.


Jagau

baerndorfer posted this 26 May 2020

found this image on top and have a question.

can someone explain why there is a switch (S2) for cancel out L2 ?

Ourbobby posted this 23 May 2020

Hi Guys,
Just to report my progress.

Have eventually got the bucking coils slapping to order! Big problem has been the mosfets I have that were testing ok but failing when io into Atti's circuit. When I got new mosfet, not from ebay, coils lit up with purple flashes everywhere, and plenty of noise. When I ran the circuit without the switch part of the circuit, my primary coil heated up quite quickly and melted my insulation. So I am thinking I have to review allowance for current control and increase in voltage to increase output. I don't have the switch working, but, I have located some 120v 25ma telephone globes. Am now waiting for delivery to test current hypothesis and over heating of primary. Very expensive globes! I am thinking that this part of the circuit is a form of current control.

Will report again soon.

regards

ourbobby

Chris posted this 15 May 2020

Hey Guys,

CD is right, it would be great to see you guys on your own thread. It would be easier to help, and see your progress.

You guys are greatly appreciated, Thank You! Thanks for Sharing!

Don't forget the Sawtooth Waveform, this is important. POC cant have too many turns, the turns must be 70 to around 200, if the Coils have too much impedance, they don't work.

Core Cross Sectional Area can play a role on the Output, so very small cores may not work as well, but you can still see the effects!

Focus on the Sawtooth Waveform, Asymmetrical Regauging, look specifically for the effects.The Numbers will come when you maximise the Effects.

The Partnered Output Coils are a Pump, for Charge, you must get the Potential, Voltage up, but your Waveforms are not right. CD Had trouble with Polarity, so maybe this is something to look at?

   Chris

Ourbobby posted this 15 May 2020

Hi,

Here is a photo of output when swapping terminals on coils. Twice the output 340vpp. 

Regards

ourbobby

Ourbobby posted this 15 May 2020

Hi vidura, 

Thanks for the input. There is much learning to absorb just on magnetic technique. I am switching the primary through the discharging neon. Good for keeping the batteries charged, but, not so good for current into the system. I am showing about 400uA total being used through the primary Does not seem correct to me. But will account for the issue of power loss. I have also swapped the L1 and L2 terminals and the output is now 340 vpp. Waveform has changed to fractured sine wave. Will post a photo tomorrow. Has a funny little dip at the peak which I think might be the winding differences of the two L coils. One has 10 turns more than the other. I am going to have to redesign my input approach.

Impedance. I have variable 25w 50 ohm resistor. at maximum output I am using approx 40ohm. If I short this with a 20w 12v globe, out put disappears! No current = no power. I shall get a few low voltage GDT's. They might increase current.

Its late here, off to bed.

Once again, thanks for the feedback

ourbobby

 

Vidura posted this 15 May 2020

Hi Ourbobby According to the scope shot you have an output of 170vpp , and maybe no current? Check the impedance of your load, it might Bry too high. Regards Vidura.

mich posted this 15 May 2020

Hi Chris considering your last post, this for let you know that i'm working :-)  I would like also to thank you for your effort so far and the others too.


In my replication at the moment nothing special resonance to see, the imput is 11V 400mA, by varying the dutycycle I don't see great piks of power on the load but a linear action, for now I build a normal trasformer with a feature that the load is supplied only by flux discharge in the core.

I try many length of coils in many configurations, I try to maximize the L3 work (the support coil without load) which for now it doesn't contribute much to the output, next I will try different cores.. or change schema..

photos of last configuration:

bye!

Ourbobby posted this 15 May 2020

Hi,

Well I think I am getting closer! Cannot seem to get any current though. I have small wattage globe across the coils, will not light up. So likely too that I am not bucking properly? Two photos, one with probable output for envelope conversion and the other current layout. Coils joined as per guidelines to bucking coils.

regards

ourbobby

 

Ourbobby posted this 13 May 2020

Hi Atti,

           Thanks for the reply. When I increased the voltage tolerance, that is where the damage would occur. The sharp discharge.I am able to run at with some sort of oscillation at around 70 volts across the protective circuit. My input is 24v. However, although I can appear to be oscillating I am not getting any output across S1 or S2. I take that to mean that I am getting limited current through put. For some reason, I am unable to increase the current through the primary, which I am thinking is the source of my issue with serious success!

Thanks again for your assistance.

ourbobby

 

 

Atti posted this 13 May 2020

Ourbobby.

As far as I know, neither Chris nor CD uses the protective circle tied to the Fet source leg. Look at their switch circuits, or maybe ask them. But maybe it would be better to buy one from them.
Or Vidura switch circuit.
But to the specific question instead of the light bulb:
-Maybe it would be better to use a switch with a higher voltage tolerance.
-Perhaps a snubber (100ohm-10n). I made the protection circuit because the fet is low voltage (IRF 540) and of course the self-inductive voltage is visible at low power consumption.

Ourbobby posted this 13 May 2020

@Atti,

          What do you think i could use as a substitute for the 120v 25ma globe? It is impossible for me to find one here, Importing one from USA is likely to force me to buy a minimum 100 or so! I am using neon globes at the moment and have had to resort to 70v neon. 100+ volt neons are doing too much damage as they pulsing too high a current. Knocks out the mosfet and also the 3525! The 70v neon restricts the circuit voltage! 

 

regards

ourbobby

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close