Nonlinear resonance

  • 2K Views
  • Last Post 22 December 2021
Jagau posted this 14 December 2019

This thread is the continuation of flashligh2.


Here is the original Akula's circuit on we gonna work:

I modified the basic circuit of Akula so that it works like a high gain oscillator. It consumes almost nothing, 2 ma,.
 It has the effect of a hammer (the Circuit) on a bell (the Coils) by easily adjusting the natural resonance frequency of the coils which has already been vitrified in advance with a F.G. and a 28.2 Khz oscilloscope,


I used a 2 K multi-turn potentiometer for accuracy as a voltage divider and a small 1.55 volt battery as the main power supply for the circuit.


Here the modified circuit used i used in the test.

The test :


You will notice that at the natural (linear) resonance frequency of 28.22 Khz and an input voltage of 1.08 volts appearing on channel 2 and a current draw at the input of 2 ma, we still obtain a fairly good voltage approximately 33.6 volts peak to peak at the output.


 


When I exceed a certain voltage of 1.45 volts ( near the max of the battery) another effect occurs quite abruptly the frequency drops to 26.77 Khz and this is what I will call nonlinear resonance.
Quite surprising this effect is the voltage X8 and so is the current.

 

 

The reactive power developed by this circuit, is around 130 volts at the maximum of the battery, if we consider that the entire circuit is supplied with a single 1.5 Volt battery and there is no d external oscillator it seem good performance.

This small circuit has 2 BJT transistors 1 x NPN and 1 X PNP is the basic idea of ​​the Akula circuit. Thereafter I will modify the same circuit in order to be able to charge C1 and thus have this famous flashlight without battery.

Akula's basic circuit cannot be copied as it is built, having followed hundreds of tests of its circuit, I have not yet seen anyone succeed, but their way of thinking is very good, it you have to rebuild it while keeping the basic idea.
I believe I am on the right track.


A more explicit video will follow soon, I have a little problem with my camera.


Jagau

above-unity
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Jagau posted this 17 December 2019

I am currently working with a 1.2 volt rechargeable battery instead of the C1 and with recharging in non-linear mode

it has been going on since yesterday with only one milliamp of total consumption and 6 LEDs on.

It’s good.

p.s. I mean linear in continuous mode so very low power and non-linear in charge mode.

Jagau

Jagau posted this 17 February 2020

Good morning all
After 3 days, without interruption the small circuit does not want to fall.
I added 3 other LEDs for a total of 9 LEDs.
The 3 small AAA rechargeable batteries did not decrease by 1 millivolt in 3 days, on the contrary, they remained stable.

A first observation; taken with the oscilloscope shows that the recharging of the setup is exactly 1/4 of the resonance frequency of the main coil which is at 28khz.

Here is scope shot:

You can notice the sinus shape in the center.

A view of complete set up, circuit, potcore, led and batteries:

Did anyone try my first circuit at the start of the thread?

Other observations, photos and a circuit will follow.

P.S. John Bedini wrote on his web page: ''This has been on my pages forever, but nobody understood it.''

I wonder what he meant by that


Jagau

Jagau posted this 18 February 2020

Hi all

I would like to present you a very simple circuit to make but how useful.

It's the same one I use for what's going on in the project above.
You can use the 2 inductors of your choice as long as they are on the same core, for mine I use a potcore.


As soon as they are connected by 3vdc it starts to oscillate on its own and in addition if you look on your oscilloscope at point A and B it adjusts by itself to the resonance frequency. Very nice little circuit simple and easy to do. 

Thereafter I will be able to explain to you how I achieve what I did.

I think it was one of Akula's favorite circuits but modify by me as you can see at the beginning of this thread.

P, S, The variable resistor 1K does not change the frequency, it is there to adjust the gain of the circuit only.


Jagau

 

Jagau posted this 19 February 2020

Hi all

Now we will add 3 LEDs in parallel and 2 others battery in the circuit.
Place an ammeter at point C and adjust the 1K pot to get 3 milliamps.
I hope you have successfully completed this part because the next one is the most important.

News
Since last saturday, February 15, the system is still working well. The LEDs are on and the voltage barely fluctuates.
Jagau

 

Jagau posted this 20 February 2020

And now the first version of the complete circuit.

 

I am going there gradually so that you can understand how it works

Jagau

 

Jagau posted this 22 May 2020

Hi all

For those who would be interested in building, something you should know when making your 3 coils, they must be wrapped one on top of the other with a gap made of electrical tape (air space) between each coil

. In fact it is as described in the patent of Andrey Melnichenko:


  This is obtained by the presence of a weakly magnetic air or space, resulting in a magnetic field energy greater than the work of the current source to be magnetized and which can be converted into electricity during demagnetization.


In addition, the 3 coils must have the same number of turns which ensures the same inductance. By doing this the second and third coils will be a few turns longer, as Don Smith mentioned, a few turns longer on a two-sided side compare to first one.

Jagau

Jagau posted this 24 October 2020

Update

Hi all
The project is ahead more than I hoped, in another post I gave you a voltage of 700 volts, I now managed to get near 1 Kv, a lot more power always with the same setup at the input, so even more power.

Still have other great ideas for more powerful development. Slowly but surely.

More than unity is possible, I tell you.


jagau

Jagau posted this 01 November 2020

Thank you for your help Chris you just confirmed me and gave me a great idea at the moment.

over onto the counter part of the magnetic side none of those laws apply and it's a whole different system and most of the critical information they're missing intentionally so what in effect what you have on the magnetic side you can make as many copies of it as you want without depleting the source 

I am going to try something to finally prove to me that a non-inductive coil is like a transmitter and that the receivers do not affect the input.
in experimentation, thank you
Jagau

Hi all
the experiences happen very quickly and successfully
as I succeeded in duplicating the magnetic side, I can easily
duplicate and even more as don smith predicted.
Am in experimentation to check this early and will keep you posted on the results soon
Jagau

Jagau posted this 14 February 2020

I had to be away recently, keeping an eye on what was happening in the forum,
Finally back in my lab.

Jagau

Jagau posted this 16 February 2020

hi Chris

Yes it is a very interesting thread that I had already read during my research when I joined this forum, I also proposed it to those who want a conclusive experience and with results. It helps a little to understand what Edwin Gray meant.


Yes, I rediscovered this very interesting concept, but as part of the Akula LEDS lamp.


There is no battery switch between the input and the output and the batteries must always remain fully charged, that is to say in the cricuit that I am currently experiencing.


For the moment I am experimenting this kind of circuit but with only 3 small rechargeable batteries at the input and  none at the exit.
The system has been operating for more than 2 days with 6 LEDs plus the operating circuit and the batteries continue to charge. I add other LEDs to stabilize the system.

I rediscovered this concept by re-reading the invention of Edwin Gray and by re-reading the book by Peter Lindeman on how to divide the positive. Do not forget that sharing the positive also applies to capacitors as in the case of Gray

I'm going back to my laboratory.
The best way is to experiment.

Jagau posted this 18 February 2020

Hi wistiti


Yes these are the first modifications at the beginning which had been made in the system has had an evolution. It is for this reason that I redid the basic circuit as simple as possible above, it is the same as on the little brown board on the photo above. The goal is to progress slowly but surely in the explanation of the circuit if you build the last little circuit very simple above, I could guide by the following it will be less complicated like that, I think.

@ CD 

I understand you very well CD, there are so many interesting things to do in this forum that we do not want to disturb others in our own experience, but it is part of the game. Don't worry CD, I'm also following your experiences with a lot of interest.

Other questions?

Some news:


At the fourth day the system still works as well the voltages of the 3 batteries are always higher than the nominal voltage of each which is 1.25 volts, they stand between 1.3 and 1.4 is great.


Another observation, the mornings of strong sun the ions increases a little and the evening decreases a little but never below 1.3 each.

 

Jagau

Jagau posted this 20 February 2020

Hi Wistiti, You are welcome with any questions.

Okay
I know that rechargeable nick-cad batteries have a capacity each and a nominal voltage. So it is easy to calculate the time the circuit would operate under a certain load and the voltage would drop linearly every 24 hours.

This is not what happens, the voltage varies in + or - no more than 0.001 volts and it remains stable at above the normal nominal voltage for this type of battery which is 1.2 volts, they are all the 3 at the over of this nominal voltage and sometimes reach 1.4 depending on the hours of the day.


Another beautiful puzzle to elucidate?

Jagau

Jagau posted this 21 February 2020

In this project we have to consider 3 key elements.

The first is the nonlinear resonance, as demonstrated by the thread

The second is the theory of "YoElMiCrO", which speaks of the negative slope in ferro-resonance

Yo quote:
Voltage increase is related to the negative slope that has the magnetic permeability of the core

the third and very interesting one is by Edwin Gray on electrostatic transfer while sharing the positives.

This is a lot to check but should be checked, 

Jagau

Jagau posted this 24 March 2020

Hi all

As you can imagine, it is not only us who seek to understand the mystery of the small lamp of Akula.
I recently found a very interesting article from an Indian engineering college which offers a topoly buck boost converter as Yo's proposal. They title their articles:

 

Self Powered Buck-Boost Converter for Low-Voltage Energy Applications.

 

I put it in paste.


Jagau

Attached Files

Jagau posted this 02 May 2020

Hi my friends

I am preparing an update for my trhread
I haven't forgotten you, see you soon
Jagau

Jagau posted this 19 May 2020

update


Hy my friends


By carefully studying the very well-known schematic of A. Melnichenko;

 

We can easily see what Chris has shown us lately. In a complete cycle we can divide it into 4 equal parts of 90 degrees.


I redid this schematic so that it works in the project of the small led lamp, because this small lamp uses the basic principle of the operation of this schematic.


We must have 3 coils, a diode and a capacitor, I will show you in a short video all the power to develop by this arrangement of 3 coils of which 2 transmit the starting impulse and I cancel the one of the middle by disconnecting it in a natural way and by reconnecting it in series and only by capturing the way in which the coils interact with each other, as Akula said, you must capture the functioning of your coils first.


No need for a complicated switch, just think about it. When I transmit the pulse (phase 1 and 3) I am in very low inductance about 45 microhenries, therefore in energy saving, when I receive at the output the inductance goes from 45 microhenries to 350 millihenries, which gives me a great increase in power.


The schematic is the basic idea of ​​the operating principle but if you plug it in as it is present, it does not work as I had already demonstrated in another post by shorting a single inductance we can not have an inductance increase in that this during the relaxation (disconnection) of the circuit in phase 2 and phase 4 of a cycle as demonstrated by Chris and CD in another post.


I am preparing this short video to show you my latest advancements in this project.


Jagau

Jagau posted this 19 May 2020

So this simple confuguration gives me at the input inductance is 58.85 uh

and at the output inductance is 348.4mh

The setup

 

It is ja way in which I connect the 3 coils which give me this advantage. As the inductance increases considerably you can see in the video the effect produced.
As you will notice in the setup, it is imperative to have a square wave AC, ie it goes through zero and increases in negative with the same amplitude as in positive.

Function generator who act like S1 in melnichenko schematic and no need of S2 switch,

And more at 21 Khz a functiongenerator have an outputt power contrill by the amplitude of about 45 milli watt and it is normal. I apply this 45 mw to this set up


Here the difference between a square wave AC and DC.

The effect is completely different when I use AC,

so AC square wave is better.

The video is almost finished, I'll get back to you with that

 


jagau

 

 

Jagau posted this 21 May 2020

Hi my friends

Here is the video:

 

Scope show across  0.1 ohm board current of 19 ma and voltage 5 volts, 95 mill watts or 0.095 watt at 19 khz AC square wave at resonant frequency and we get 550 volts RMS in 2-3 sec.

 At output i discharge an incandescent lamp of 10 watts 120 volts in, note the very fast increase in voltage with so low input power. I will surely lit some leds in my project of lamp with this coils configuration.

I would never have thought of one day lighting an incandescent lamp with the very low power of a function generator.

Asymetric transformer plus resonance is the perfect combination to get above unity.

Next goal, would like this leds lamp a  project succeeds.

Chris posted this 21 May 2020

Hey Jagau,

Very nice! Thanks for sharing!

We know, Charge: Q = C ⋅ V and we can calculate the work: W = 1/2 C ⋅ V2 so a quick calculation shows you have: 0.875000 Joules across the cap when its at 500V. This is all for 0.095 Watt Seconds, or Joules.

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 21 May 2020

hi Chris
  The system has a recharge time of 2 to 3 to make an average with 2.5 we have e = (cv square / 2) = 1.059 watt /2.5 second=   0.4235 watt second  and and with the amplitude of the F.G. completely closed, I still have 47 volts RMS, 

The 10 watt 120 volt lamp is only to demonstrate the rapid increase in charge mode.
The LEDs take almost nothing. I will demonstrate later.
Jagau

Jagau posted this 21 May 2020

Hi chris


At the input I only consume P=E I  5v x 19 ma = 0.095 watt
and at the output I have 7Uf x 550v squared /2 and divide by 2.5 sec average = 0.4235 watt per second

do we arrive at the same result,  don't worry i can be wrong, tell me what you think your idea is important to me?

Jagau

YoElMiCrO posted this 21 May 2020

Hello everyone.

@Chris.

You're right, power is energy per frequency (Ef) or energy between time (E / t)
as well as voltage per DC current.
So the energy expended to produce 550V in a 7uF capacitor is ...
EIt = 5 * 0.019 * 2.5 = 0.2375 joules.
Let's calculate the energy stored in the capacitor ...
E = Vc ^ 2C / 2 = (550 ^ 2 * 7 * 10 ^ -6) / 2 = 1.05875 joules.
The energy efficiency is Eout / Ein = 1.05875 / 0.2375 = 4.4579.
Corroborating your calculations.

@Jagau.

Yes, it definitely shows AU.
In all the experiments I have done I always had the same
problem, only E appeared but nothing of I.
The only solution I found was through capacitors, these
they store charge E and have the property to use time to
produce I, since charge equals current times (Q = it).
It was for this reason that I dedicated myself to finding another way.
Bravo, good demonstration, we must analyze how it can be done
so that it is 100% functional in closed loop.

Note:
If you look closely at the input waveform, you will see that your system
it is ferro-resonant, it is necessary to obtain loads and it is
with what Nikola Tesla discovered in his time in another way.

YoElMiCrO.

Jagau posted this 21 May 2020

H iChris and Yo

I had a lot of trouble sleeping last night.
I redid the calculations several times in my head
I am very happy to see that you both confirm AU

I am very happy to have realized this in the site here Aboveunity.com

Aboveunity.com is the future


Thank you


Jagau

Jagau posted this 22 May 2020

Hello yo
For the condenser not sure if it is with oil it is what General Electric used in the power supply of high power. It is a Delektrol number 19A13457P2
I believe that the specs can be found on the internet.
For spec: 7 Uf-660vac GE trade mark.
I have 2 of these capacitor, it was used in power supply CVT in conjunction with a special Xfo built in the 1960s, maybe the floyd sweet team worked on this plan, being himself an ex employee of GE in usa. 

I send you a schematic, they even used ferromagnetic transformer technology at that time.

I joint you a description form the book of this P.S.

P.S. I will redraw my schematic, he is difficult to follow,I will do it again for a better understanding

Have a nice day

Jagau

Jagau posted this 26 May 2020

Hello

After having made different test on different type of capacitor
the oil capacitors are very efficient and the chemical capacitors with a low ESR are also very good.


I redid my coils with a higher inductance and I now reach 642 volts DC on output capacitor 7 uf 660vac

Jagau

Jagau posted this 27 May 2020

Hi all

Another important detail about building

The Rx coil,  the one that receives the energy,it is the first to be rolled up,

it must be followed first by the 2 bifiliary windings, 
If you do it backwards it will only work at half the power. I will explain in another post why this happens.


Another thing, the gap must be between the coils and not between the ferromagnetic material as some have interpreted, very important. For those who have already experienced this phenomenon  2 coils effect it's like two plates of  a capacitor, I think Akula had guessed it, think about it when you build the gap.

 


Jagau

Jagau posted this 01 June 2020

Hi all


Even if I am not often present in the forum these times do not worry, I experiment a lot with all kinds of different parameters, will come back with other very encouraging results


Jagau

Jagau posted this 22 June 2020

Hi all

As Ruslan says in his video, an important point is when you meet this figure.

I did it with the beat of 2 frequencies

photo to come, And explain it to you in detail

jagau

 

Jagau posted this 31 July 2020

My friends

 
The last few days I've been working on this thread's project a lot. I have tried several ways to virify the last results and I always arrive between 2.9 and 3.2 of A.U.No matter how I go about it, I always get more or less the same results.


So when I will have succeeded in controlling the input impedances (Z) in relation to the circuits involved, I calculate a result much greater than that achieved. It may be a dream but a goal to achieve.


Firstly, as Don Smith said: 


 The people who have successfully duplicated my experiments are those who have successfully matched the various impedance of the circuits involved.

 

I'm working on it now and it's a noble goal. This project is in serious development.


Jagau

Jagau posted this 01 December 2020

Hi Fighter

      1. Between the coils there is only the thickness of the black electric tape with only one turn this allows the maximum capacity between the coils.

 

      2. AWG is 24

 

      3. Mine have Al 7800 with 9800 it will be better. I use exactly 100 turns, which is important for the correct frequency. With 100 yours you will have between 26 and 29 Khz at the resonant frequency.

 

        4. As Tom Bearden said the more the capacitor has the internal regularity to the deformation the better it works, for LOW ESRs at these voltages there is not much difference. It also works with propylene capacitors.There are two definite advantages to using oil capacitors

 

        1. As I work in high voltage, it helps prevent arcing from between the two plates.

 

        2. Better temperature stability so that it works optimally

 

          You will have approximately 40 to 60 times the output voltage of what you place at the input
          Wound first 2 coils CW-CCW and last one CW
          What people don't realize is that 2 coils on top of each other is like a capacitor, you see the effect depending on the capacity of your set up, I think you must have observed this effect with your Romanian ZPM
      hope this help
      Jagau

Jagau posted this 06 December 2020

Hi all

Just a link test 

ABOUT EnerGenius Favorites 

You will be able to appreciate this document with many very interesting links

Jagau

Fighter posted this 28 December 2020

Hi Jagau,

About your latest diagram (the one I used for building the device) I just want to make sure the points where I'm putting the output connector is correct. Can you confirm the output live and ground points are correct ?

This is how the device is looking like right now (link to larger image here):

It contains your AC oscillator and your way of building the coils in a pot-core on the same PCB, the only addition is the 2200uF/25V electrolytic capacitor on input.

There are multiple measurement pins and also sockets for easily switching the essential components: oscillator's capacitor and variable resistor, the capacitor and the fast diode connected to the coils.

The output socket is not connected yet to the circuit, just wanting your confirmation before building the connections.

Thanks for your help !

P.S.: Also, the ground connector below the 7uF capacitor, is that a physical connection ? Should I connect it on the negative output of the signal generator ?

Jagau posted this 31 December 2020

hello fighter
I could not answer your questions, I was not at home and on vacation I do not use the internet, it's an isolated place in the forest far from everything, it makes me good for my body and my mind.
I have just arrived and I will take the time to analyze your request, but at first glance you are correct in your connections, except the mass not put to the same as the function generator.
A lot of interesting message to read on the forum, I will come back to you with more precision and by the way I wish you a very happy new year 2021
Jagau

Zanzal posted this 18 December 2019

Question: Is your schematic correct in that your L2 only connected at one end?

Jagau posted this 18 December 2019

Hi Zanzal

the modify schema was to demonstrate non-linear resonance only so L2 was not plugged into one side alone.
I am trying a second schematic and it is not yet ready and that is what it gave me that the tension does not drop until very soon after 2 days.

I'm going to put it online soon and you're going to be able to try it,
Just for curiosity did you manage to achieve the nonlinear resonance effect as explained?

Jagau

Zanzal posted this 18 December 2019

Thanks Jagau. Looking forward to seeing your next schematic.

No replications for me for a few months still (at least). All my stuff is in boxes, it is hard to get access to anything and I have no space away from my little one who would take an obsessive interest in anything sitting on my desk. I've only been able to do a few very simple experiments in the last few months.

I do want to attempt a replication of what you've posted though. I think your observations and intuition are very good here and I like the path you are pursuing and intend to follow a similar one.

Jagau posted this 15 February 2020

I reread Edwin Gray's invention and it gave me a fantastic idea that I had been looking for for some time. It was a genius this guy,

SPLITTING THE POSITIVE


Besides, when we look at Akula's setup it works the same way.
Finally I found a set up which seems to work well.


I'll keep you posted.


The best way is still to experiment.


Jagau

Chris posted this 16 February 2020

HeyJagau,

We have a few threads here, work from Wistiti and L0stf0x: Split positive + Plasma generator + Bucking Coils Combination

I hope you find this useful!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

Jagau posted this 21 February 2020

Good morning all:


In this sixth day of experimentation I have built since yesterday a second circuit which works just as well as the first so we can replicate it.


I build this test circuit with larger batteries and the power is evident on the LEDs. The goal is to slowly increase the power to make it shine with an incandescent lamp.

Jagau

Jagau posted this 21 February 2020

Hi wistiti 

You understand that I would like to improve this circuit which works in very low power with a larger one, so as not to change a winning combination I have to replicate exactly the same with a potcore.
However I would like to know if another has succeeded with a different core.


Jagau

Jagau posted this 21 February 2020

Hi all

One of the advantages with this kind of auto oscillator is that it does not waste energy in order to produce a pulse.
The frequency is determined by the RC network which produces a constant time with the 200Pf capacitor and the input impedance Z of the coils to pulse.

With this capacitor we can oscillate between 20khz and 130khz, so resonant frequency is egal to  1 divide by ZC 

in other words it adjusts itself

Jagau

YoElMiCrO posted this 25 February 2020

Hi everyone.

I could not be active in the forum due to work problems.
But whenever I can go to review all the findings they find.
This is a community like no other on the net.
I think I can continue with the experiments I left a while ago.

@Jagau.
If you don't mind, I pass a circuit with which you can see
the behavior of the back emf when it returns from the negative slope in this treat.
As Vidura says, in conventional designs it is forbidden to saturate
any ferro-magnetic core.
Now...
If we start thinking ...
It turns out that in the linear region of the hysteresis curve, during the ton cycle
B grows and permeability grows too.
but when we turn off the sw the current drops (-di / dt) but the permeability too.
However, if we make permeability pass through its negative region during
Ton cycle, when Toff touches the current will fall as before, only the permeability
It will increase now.
If the inductance grows during Toff and the current remains relatively constant, we can
Have an energy gain.

Thank you all in advance.

YoElMiCrO.

Jagau posted this 25 February 2020

Hi Yo

You are always welcome for your comments Yo.
As you can see in my first experience at the start of the thread, I noticed this effect you are talking about,

when the inductance grows the frequency decreases, is that what you mean?

Jagau

Jagau posted this 25 February 2020

Hi Yo

Completely agree with you the law of BIO-Savart is that which we must use in the cases of non linearity and in time variation, the law of faradays is for the very linear systems in closed loop.

Your future circuit to come look very interesting.
Thank you for your comments.
Jagau

Jagau posted this 01 March 2020

About the leds project.

After almost 2 weeks, the batteries in series have started to drop slowly except that in reverse which is still held at 1.4 v
I learned a lot with this very simple little circuit and I plan to develop one with more power.


Jagau

Jagau posted this 22 March 2020

Small update


On the circuit that I sent you,

the more I increase the load at the output by increasing as an example the capacity of capacitor

the more consumption at the input decreases and the output voltage increases with no change in frequency,

very interesting observation, under study


Jagau

Chris posted this 21 May 2020

Hi Jagau,

I trust your math, I believe you are right. Yes I believe we get the same result at the end.

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 21 May 2020

Thanks Chris I appreciate your answer.


I’m learning myself too like all of us, that’s why we’re here.
If others find something I will appreciate your help
thank you


Jagau

Chris posted this 21 May 2020

Hey Jagau,

 

double Uf = 7.0;
double F = Math.Pow(10, -6) * Uf;
double Q = F * 550;
double W = 0.5 * F * Math.Pow(550, 2);

Q = 0.00385
W = 1.05875

 

A quick method:

  • ‭0.095 x 2.5 = 0.2375‬ Watts over 2.5 seconds or 0.2375 Joules Total Input.
  • 1.05875 Joules = 2.5 seconds, to get 550V in a 7Uf Cap = 1.05875 Joules Output.

 

COP = 1.05875 / ‭0.2375‬ = ‭4.4579. If someone wants to correct me, please, I would be grateful to point out any mistake.

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

   Chris

Vidura posted this 23 May 2020

Hey Jagau

Excellent experiment, very simple and conclusive. The capacitor is almost certainly oil filled, the Russian investigator Sergei Deyna also mentioned some experiments with predominantly longitudinal oscillations to result much better with this oil filled capacitors.

Today I had a couple of hours free and tried to make a similar setup as yours, using a small EE30 ferrite with tree coils 35T each. As I didn't have a capacitor of this type, I used a 330uF 400V electrolytic for collection. I could dot get the ferro resonant oscillation, likely too poor self capacitance of my coil, so I added a 100nF cap in series with the entrance and then could see the effect. In a narrow frequency range I could bring the cap up to nearly 70V with 8Vpp fed with a half bridge. I didn't make measurements and math's for the moment, will go on playing with this to see how to increase the effect. I tried with a gapped core for comparison, but the efficiency seems to be better with out gap.

Thank's for sharing.

Vidura.

 

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close