The MrPreva Experiment

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 18K Views
  • Last Post 30 November 2022
admin posted this 23 March 2017

I think this is perhaps one of the most important experiments anyone could do! A huge amount of information can be learned by running this very simple experiment!

The MrPreva Experiment Circuit

Please Note: The Current's (I), add, Floyd Sweet talked about this specifically:

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right.

Current to the right is: I = da+ / dt + da- / dt.


Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

The total Current, is the Sum of the both Currents!

 

We see, 2.8 Amps (da+ / dt) + 2.3 Amps (da- / dt) = the shown: 5.1 Amps as Floyd Sweet told us.

We see a Negative Power Factor, where the Voltage (V) Current (I) are out of phase by a Degree, which results in a Negative Power Factor!

cos(theta)

Where theta is the Phase angle in Degrees. EG:

cos(180) =  -1

 

You will see there are some problems with the MrPreva Circuit, and it is explained, because, the Current (da- ) has become a Generator, or a Battery, which is the only time  Kirchhoff's Current Law does not hold in an applied situation. 

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 17 September 2018

Jagau and Vidura are Correct!

There is no complication to this! The principle is universal, the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field, which is analogous to Current:

 

V = L di / dt

 

Voltage ( V ) is the product of the Inductance ( L ) multiplied by the Time Rate of Change ( dt ) of the change in Current ( dI ):

 

Where does the Excess of Current come from, Electromagnetic Induction! We see the exact same principles in Circuit Theory:

 

 

Parasitic Inductance, something Engineers have struggled with for ever. They try the best they can to eliminate it, Truth is, its always there, they can only ever reduce it! Its the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field, Electromagnetic Induction inducing Voltages on Traces that are close and as a result stray signals interfere with Circuits, an unwanted situation, thus the term Parasitic!

I see Confusion, and posts that are over complicating simple straightforward fundamental Science! Please, ignore complication, a simple answer exists for all things!

 

Vidura and Jagau are correct, we have a simple explainable and provable answer, there is no need to make simple things complicated!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • vita_cell
Vidura posted this 18 September 2018

It's a rough analogy, but it helps to understand what's happening. I wonder if you had a center tap on each coil with a diode, connected to ground such that you could pull electrons in from ground? You'd have to drive it pretty hard to get the node of the standing waves below 0 volts such that electrons are pulled in from ground, but it could be done.

You can see the circuit which posted Chris in the thread "finding the resonant frequency of a LL resonant circuit", it has no centertap, is similar to the mr. preva circuit,but the current is forced in opposed direction by diodes, and it has no tank capacitor. In this thread you can see a video from the experiment I had posted. Regarding the electron pumping CDsharp has posted a experiment where he could do this in a very similar circuit, first it appeared that the current was flowing against a diode, when he searched he found current flowing to ground(electrons out of ground).I don't remember exactly which thread, it was a couple of months ago.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 18 September 2018

Hey Vidura,

Do you mean the Thread: Some Coils Buck n some Coils DONT

You're right, many threads here are based on this Thread! I think most here would agree we have broken ground, we have thoroughly investigated this and we have volumes of data on this phenomena!

Yes, CD's Thread also is based on this Tech: Finding the LL resonant frequency

I don't want to bore the members that have already read and researched this Tech, but for the new comers, there is a lot to be learned! A lot to experiment with!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Atti posted this 20 December 2018

I know it's broken bone. But it's a simple informational measurement by reversing the magnetic directions. 

Chris posted this 21 December 2018

Atti - Excellent Experiment!

You show exactly The Mr Preva Current Gain! This is a critical aspect of Above Unity Machines to understand.

We loose Voltage, Voltage is consumed by our Load but more critically Opposing Fields, known as a Voltage Drop. An Auto Transformer in Buck Mode is well known for this effect:

 

Auto Transformer in Buck Mode

 

In the above Auto Transformer Configuration, the Secondary Coil "Generates" an E.M.F of 100 Volts, then the output will be 240 - 100 = 140 Volts. We have lost 100 Volts, because we have Bucking Mode in this Auto Transformer.

 

Auto Transformer in Boost Mode

 

In the above Auto Transformer Configuration, the Secondary Coil "Generates" an E.M.F of 100 Volts, then the output will be 240 + 100 = 340 Volts. We have gained 100 Volts, because we have Boost Mode in this Auto Transformer.

So, we have learned that in any Bucking arrangement, there is an elimination of Voltage in Bucking mode. The Kapanadze Coil also is exactly the same configuration, it is only a partial Bucking arrangement. We have conformation of this from Ruslan:

The output voltage will be 195-200 volts. This voltage will not be higher. Why? Later we will return to this. It is necessary to rewind the transformer-reactor (Coil) so as to obtain the desired voltage. This requires experiments.

Ref: Ruslan K

 

Ruslan is a man of wisdom and avail. 

 

 

The Coils Coupling is well less than half Unity Coupling, the turns are 48 CW to 36, a difference of 12 turns. At least half of the coil was uncoupled, or loosely coupled. This is the reason Ruslan said: "It is necessary to rewind the transformer-reactor (Coil) so as to obtain the desired voltage. This requires experiments."

Magnetic Resonance gives us a gain in Current. To achieve this, we gain a loss in Voltage as shown. So we utilise Timing and a Stepping Up of Voltage with turns. But this requires Experiment, something I have also said: "Some fiddling is required".

So, your experiment proves a very valuable concept, that of Current amplification. To get to the next step, a little more fiddling is required. You already have one of the most important concepts!

   Chris

alohalaoha posted this 06 January 2019

  • Liked by
  • fer123
  • Augenblick
mrblobby posted this 10 February 2019

The latest from Mr Preva, Two resonant circuits on one core:

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
alohalaoha posted this 17 February 2019

The other side of mirror....

mrblobby posted this 05 March 2019

Close but never touching.
maximum rotation strength.
Mr Prevas latest video,  plus a couple of images to illustrate what I think is going on.

The optimal distance to remove maximum energy

 

The part of a vortex that has maximum torque or turning strength.

 

mich posted this 06 March 2019

Hi everyone, I post my replication of Preva exp. that I did a while ago.

schemaversion1

opposition phase20KHz version1

 

in phase100Hz version1

sort of akula coreversion2 sort of akula core

opposition phase5KHz version2

30Hz version2

The circuit was powered with a frequency from 50Hz to some kHZ and I observed that:

When the frequency is below 500 HZ the impedance is almost zero so the circuit is practically a direct line.

When the frequency is above some KHz, the impedance increases and the phase displacement of the two coils increases up to 180 degrees.

another observation: there is a considerable transformation of the current on the shorter coil, this confirms the Preva theory of current amplification, and the circular path of magnetic flux in the core.

if someone can confirm what I'm writing because I've always seen replicas of the experiment with very high frequencies and not as low as the ones I used. thanks

good day to all

 

Chris posted this 06 March 2019

Fantastic job Mich!

Thanks for sharing! Another example showing how simple this can be and how much can be learned!

Did you note the negative power factor in one of the Coils? The Coil where the Current is 180 degrees out of phase?

I posted some numbers above showing this.

Great Job Mitch Thanks for sharing!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Augenblick
mich posted this 07 March 2019

I do not think I can make those measurements, I'm still learning 

Thanks to you

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 07 March 2019

Hey Mich,

I have a simple calculator here: AC or Sinusoidal Power Calculator

Hope this helps! Ask if you need help! Great job!

   Chris

mich posted this 11 March 2019

Hi, I have rebuild the experiment and have found the negative PF in one of the coils, but I have yet to fill other tests.

these are the results:

sort of akula core trace1 (with current amplification)

1.03V effective

0.63A effective

Phase: 168º

Watt: -0.63

PF: -0.978

trace2(with lower current)

1.03V effective

0.25A effective

phase: 15º (approximate)

Watt: 0.25

PF: 0.965

thanks for support!

 

 

mich posted this 13 March 2019

Hi to all, I was particularly interested in doing the voltage-current phase shift test to better understand
the behavior of the akula core. Since the circuit is inductive, thus the current is delayed respect the voltage.

 misuration 20turns coil

The smaller coil 20 turns test. Trace 1 voltage, trace2 current: delay voltage-current about 25°. Freq: 1KHz

 

misuration  40turns coil

The greater coil 40 turns test. Trace1 voltage, trace2 current, delay voltage-current about 180° Freq:1KHz

 

misuration only currents shift

Here we see the phase shift of the two currents together, the mrPreva diagram with currents in opposite directions is confirmed like above. The smaller coil (trace2) is slightly out of phase and higher current, the greater coil (trace1) is in opposite phase and low current. I did not understand why the phase shift is greater than 180° probably due to inaccuracy caused by harmonic distortion I think.

the next step is to figure out how to apply this to akula, I accept suggestionssmile  hi!

 

Zanzal posted this 13 March 2019

the next step is to figure out how to apply this to akula, I accept suggestionssmile by!

Hey Mich,

Good work on your replication. It has been on my todo list for a long time now to try this replication using AC rather than pulsed DC as I did in the past, but the amplifier I ordered was lost in the mail, and I never reordered. 

You mentioned suggestions which caused me to wonder how Mr Preva would behave if four coils where used instead of two. With two coils for a primary the same as the MrPreva and two for the secondary also an identical MrPreva. Of course this is more difficult to test without an isolated oscilloscope and the results probably not very unexpected.. But you asked for suggestions, so I figured I'd toss it out there for you or anyone else. If I get a chance to test it myself I'll share the results.

Chris posted this 13 March 2019

Hey Mich,

Excellent work! Thank you for sharing your excellent progress!

In my opinion, a critical, most valuable experiment to do, to understand and set a baseline for experiments in the future! Now that you have taken this time, to take the step forward, following experiments will be very much easier and make more sense! You know what to aim for!

I would like to invite you to study and participate in the two threads: Parallel Wire or Bifilar Coil Experiment and Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils.

Your contributions would be most welcome!

   Chris

mich posted this 14 March 2019

to Zanzal: Hi, thanks, which experiment are you referring to? 

Zanzal posted this 14 March 2019

to Zanzal: Hi, thanks, which experiment are you referring to? 

Perhaps a visual illustration would make more sense. This is what I was trying to describe:

Ignore the component values as they are only placeholders. 

Atti posted this 15 March 2019

Hey mich.

It is also worth noting that if one of the coils is tied up in the opposite way, how the current strengths on the secondary side.
Measurement.
North-South or North-North roll coils.
When bigger and less power. Why?
Thus it is possible to refer to the presumed presence of magnetic resonance.
Good work.

mich posted this 15 March 2019

Zanzal: the lamp test is my next step, still in work.

Atti: what you are referring to is the experiment (I suppose) similar to the Chris experiment "Some Coils Buck n some Coils DONT" , that I started a while ago, right?    also still in work. 

 thanks to all

Atti posted this 16 March 2019

 

mich.

Reference?

 


You need to start thinking sooner or later, what is good to keep but to misinform the wrong information.
They are trying to imitate the work of many inventors. Right or wrong.
Chris points out that good information (such as magnetic resonance) should be kept.
Mrpreva case. There is hardly any induction at one of the magnetic arrangements, so there is hardly any secondary current.
In the other case, one of the coils has more current (which will do something again)
For example, the layout is similar. Just like that.
Buy a soldering popper.

Kapcsolódó kép

Primary current is less than secondary current. Now tie it to the Preva layout. If you would do this with a disc meter
  (which is irregular and punishable !!)  

then the dial gauge rotates faster in one of the binding directions.
At the other binding direction, the disc measuring clock stops.
Why is that? What does the current do with the dial?
But this was just one example.

http://aramlopas.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html

 

Personally, I think it's good to think about everything, and of course I try some things. Watching for bad experiments. Because there is plenty of it.

And finally:
   One measurement is not a measurement, two measurements are a half measurement; you can start with three measurements ...

mich posted this 20 March 2019

hi to all, with this I hope to answer Atti's suggestion,

the experiment looks very much like another experiment of an brasilian boy, concerns a kind of resonant transformer.

1

1

Frequency 1KHz. The power supply is via a sinusoidal generator and audio amplifier, the lamps are all perfectly equal (2.7 ohm), the current is detected with toroidal cores, it is not an accurate measure but I am only interested in having an idea of what happens. In this case the current follows the law of the resistive divider so only the lamp with the highest voltage drop is switched on. The traces are currents, 50graus phase shift.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2

2

Frequency 7KHz. In this case the situation changes and we have a current circulation between the 2 coils L20turns(blue coil) and L40turns(black coil). In fact, if the lamp is removed from L40turns(black coil) the phenomenon does NOT occur and the other lamps light up together with ANY frequency with identical and halved brightness. It's remarkable that the power is greater on lamp L20turns because as we have seen previously the phenomenon of current amplification is verified. 131graus phase shift.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the current sensing is moved to the common line.

1A

1A

Frequency 1KHz. L20turns current test in comparison with the total current, we see that the power absorbed on the lamps follows again the law of the resistive divider. There is no phase shift, note the amplitude of traces.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2A

2A

15KHz frequency. Trace 1 current on common line, trace 2 current on L20turns (blue coil). The frequency is higher to demonstrate the phenomenon more clearly, it is important to note how much the current that circulates between the 2 coils increases, and how low is the overall current absorbed, (to be confirmed). here too we have no phase shift.

EDITED: I think this exp is important although I have not completely understood the phenomenon. The overall power seems to be less, but in reality there is absorption. Soon I will correct the parts where I made some inaccuracies.

thanks good day

Atti posted this 24 March 2019

Hey Mich.

 

- Do not delete any posts.
- Everyone's comments are important, you can learn from everything.
- My intention to comment was not offensive.
-If you can do all the experiments, walk around properly.
Draw conclusions.
Read everyone's comments, but don't trust anyone.
Only in this way can you progress your work properly.
Precise measurement does not always have to be done, often enough to find out what happens in the circuit. The Mr Preva layout is important, but you don't have to wait for a miracle. But the layout must be kept in mind. I'll tell you another example, but it doesn't necessarily belong here.

I investigated Árpád Bóday's magnetodynamic invention.
Take two parts.
-The primary drive with bridge H, with a 25% -25% filling factor per transformer. The remaining 25% should be the fill factor for the permanent magnet line.
-The secondary side switching can be divided into two parts.
Load and backfill.
There is a MrPreva "theory" within a transformer.
24V and 12V. forms of binding. The effect is important. Magnetic resonance is important. The load on the backfill is important.

Yet the road to pleasure is stubborn.

Kapcsolódó kép

Kapcsolódó kép

Képtalálat a következőre: „bóday árpád”

And finally, don't listen to me because I'm just a student.

Chris posted this 24 March 2019

My Friends,

I do apologize, we may sometimes have Translation problems with some posts. I am sorry if this happens, I have not finished the Universal Translator yet. wink

Atti is right, please do not delete any posts.

If there is any posts that may come across as offensive, please private message me and I will sort it out!

Guys, these experiments are excellent! Please keep the good work up!

   Chris

mich posted this 25 March 2019

Hi, you last post Atti seems a lot to Joe Flynn invention, only the magnet are  in internal position instead of external, I try this kind of enbodiment several years ago, finding only the Force moltiplicatioin in the core as Joe said. Certainly you are ahead with the work. thanks 

Atti posted this 09 April 2019

Hey Mich!

This is not Joe Flynn's invention! This is not the arrangement of the arrangement or the coils!
This is the invention of Árpád Bóday!

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Forelle posted this 12 May 2019

Hi all

Now i have made the Mr. Preva experiment so good i can to prove the point,not so as the original where you see the wire glowing on different sides ,but you see that in one branch is more current flowing than in the other and the 180° phaseshift.One coil has 40t and one 60T ,no capacitor.

In the first picture you see the setup with both lamps glowing at 37Hz.

In the second you see the waveform of the current.Both the same 10mv/div,one div.1Amp

In the third the shifted phase at 887Hz.

And in the fourth only one lamp glowing.

Have a good day.

Chris posted this 12 May 2019

Hey Forelle,

An excellent example of how the Currents are 180 degrees out of phase! Well done!

   Chris

Forelle posted this 12 May 2019

Hi Chris,

thank you,next step is to delay one of the POC with a Mosfet and Zener or similar with 3 coil setup.Every day its getting a little forward due to this forumlaughing and the good spirit of everyone here.

Oliver

getreal156 posted this 13 June 2019

Hi all,

I saw this one that I think belongs to the Preva list.  Very interesting experiment

Later I will post some info on my own device.

BR

Jasper

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Vidura posted this 14 June 2019

 

Hello All!

 

The last couple of days I have done some tests with  different coils to replicate the Mr Preva effect, using the new Switching Tool. But to my surprise the effect was not present, although I used various different coils, cores, frequencies  and capacitors. Then I hooked up the audio amplifier, feeding a pure sine wave but still nothing, a couple of times very unstable it seemed to be present, but it resulted to be  false readings due to double triggering of the scope. So I thought what is going on here, haven't I done this many times before ? The problem was that I sometimes have failed to document my experiments properly, the issue was very simple , I made the same mistake as in my first  replication intent's : A reversed connection of the coils. The reason I post this here is that maybe it can help for some to avoid to make the same mistake , and hopefully  to understand more clearly the principle of the opposing fields and Lenz' Law. Using my (mistaken) logic I connected the setup in a manner that the magnetic fields according the right hand rule opposed, BUT in the conventional current direction not 180ª out of phase! The correct polarity is that the fields must oppose when One of the coils has the opposite current direction(when the effect is present). When I corrected the polarity of course all the coils showed the effect clearly, also with the H-bridge and short square wave pulses good results as with sine AC.

 

 

 

For a clearer understanding of the effect just imagine a conventional transformer under load, the current in the secondary produces a magnetic field which opposes the primary field(bucking equal magnetic poles), thus the reduced impedance effect makes the primary current rise.  This is the well-known Lenz Law.

 

Now in the Mr Preva experiment we have to understand the timing  and how the inductors behave when potential is applied. Any inductor when a voltage potential is applied to the terminals  instantly, before current begins to flow the inductor will have an  equal and opposite voltage, which begins to decay, while the current is increasing. The smaller inductance will increase faster, and the associated changing magnetic field will induce a voltage in the second, larger inductor. Due to the winding ratio the induced  voltage will be greater than the source voltage, and will cause the current in the second inductor to flow backwards  against the source potential and return forwards thru the smaller inductor, adding to the original current. Thus the increment of current in this experiment. 

 

 

 

For the next experiment i will post results in the "delayed conduction Thread", I want to reproduce the reversal of current with equal inductors-windings by introducing a switched delay in one of them.

 

Regards Vidura.

 

Chris posted this 14 June 2019

Spot On Vidura!

You're exactly right!

   Chris

getreal156 posted this 15 June 2019

Hi Vidura,

Very interesting indeed. During my experiments I also tried several 1:1 ratio coils. None of them showed any good results (so far).

This seem to confirm your statement about the need for more windings in one coil to create a higher voltage. Why and how this works I don't understand (yet). I will however keep experimenting with the 1:1 coils. My gut feeling is that there is much more going on and we have to get to the bottom of it.

I'm not convinced that the bigger coil should be wound from thinner wire. The best results that I have seen so far come from a type of coil where L2 is wound over L1 on a single bobbin and put on an E core. Similar to what Akula showed. Both L1 and L2 have the same wire size (2,5mm2 stranded PTFE insulated wire) and a 7:23 winding ratio. I could be totally wrong but my personal experience in my devices is that bigger coils with many windings give less output. I speculate that this might be due to heat generation in the coil (increase of resistance).

BR

Jasper

Forelle posted this 14 July 2019

Hi everyone,

i am still experimenting with the Mr.Preva setup and measured in and out,which did  surprise me.

In from Audioamp 12,67V and 2,1A=26,6W

Out first coil 12,25V and 1,25A        =15,31W

second coil 11,62V and 1A              =11,62W 

                                                        =26,93W

I never had something i measured more out  than in it is a very small difference and the measuring devices are not very accurate but if it would have 95% it would be a very good transformer for the size.The 180°phaseshift was at 744HZ,one coil had 40 turns and the other 60.It is the same device i have shown some posts before.

Have a good day.

Oliver

AETHERIC_MIND posted this 15 July 2019

Hi

Here is a link to the elaborate explanation to this type of negative resistance by Gabriel Kron.

http://emediapress.com/johnbedini/icehouse.net/john1/

 

''Change is never easy but it's worth inertia''

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 18 July 2019

Hey Oliver,

Please feel free to create a new thread for your Device Under Test ( DUT ).

If you wish to proceed publicly, that is?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Augenblick
Forelle posted this 18 July 2019

Hi everyone,

I think there is no need for a new thread,all i think is that this experiment is not finished because there is a lot more to investigate,the sad thing is that it is much easier for me to built a motor or generator than to actually tune or adjust a device like a transformer.I have no problem with proceeding publicly but i allways think what i am doing  is not intresting enough for others or worth to show.Maybe when i have finished the Mr. Preva Experiment i make my first video.

Have a god day.

Oliver

patrick1 posted this 19 July 2019

Forelle, well done !! i think its amazing.  - also my Preva was successful too !!. i think i got about 130% efficency, , nearly as good as your 140%...  so very consistant,  but if you can spot and other improvements that would be amazing too !!.... afterall, the russians have glowing nichrome wire, -  we can have globes. - ....   anyways its only a competition if your coming second !! rawr

Atti posted this 21 July 2019

patrick1

 

i think i got about 130% efficency,

 

Can we see something more about this?

Forelle posted this 01 August 2019

Hi Patrick,

how do you came up with 140%?

26,93 divided by 26,6%=1,012

and due to measurement errors i am sure it is under 100%

Have a good day

patrick1 posted this 24 August 2019

Hi Atti, good question my friend, - i actaully seem too recall my best mr preva result was 113% efficiency.  but it is hard too be sure.  - although i am as sure as i could be. - analog meters are very good for this kind of range.

still a facinating results. and i am building on it as we speak, be sure i will share my results ;=)..  also please note, all my previous results were using an audio amplifier, - i was unable too get those results with a square wave. - however i am working on that as we speak,... very important since audio amplifiers are very limited in frequency.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 24 August 2019

My Friends,

Atti has a point, as do others here.

@Patrick - I have done The Mr Preva Experiment about forty times and all my experiments, as it stands, are all Under-Unity.

Supporting Figures are a recent Rule we termed - IMPORTANT NOT TO MIS-LEAD OTHERS.

New Rule: Any COP > 1 Claims must be accompanied by Measurements please!

 

The Mr Preva Experiment as it stands is Symmetrical - There is no Asymmetry to it! It is impossible to get Above-Unity figures from a Symmetrical Machine! Input = Output - Losses!

The Machine must be Asymmetrical to get Above-Unity Figures. With some modifications to the experiment one can get Above-Unity Figures, so again I ask you, present your figures if you have done the math and we can write it up.

I am sorry but this is important! Getting a reputation for a bunch of BS in our pages is not the goal here!

In the decades been, haven't we seen enough wrong doing by Traitors of Humanity! Most of us here know who I am talking about! Lets be better than that!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Augenblick
patrick1 posted this 24 August 2019

Hello Chris I understand your position,.  however i do stand by my test results at this stage.  please allow me too prove myself wrong, rather than trust the prevailing winds.

i sincerely hope too be able too prove myself wrong, thus learn something more important than free energy !!. taking competent measurements and living up too my training and military certs.

MAKE no mistake though, - this place has wonders beyond the realms of mortal men. ... that i am only beginning too understand.. let us grow together, - and know that i definitely accept the possibility that i am wrong. but it would be a world first.

Chris posted this 24 August 2019

Hey Patrick,

I do not mean to be a party pooper!

I hope your results prove me and my results wrong! Good luck!

   Chris

solarlab posted this 09 September 2019

Hi Fellows,

Since it appears the "MrPreva" circuit efficiency (<1, 1, >1) question still remains unresolved, further analysis might be in order.

Having not followed the discussion closely a quick review of this thread leaves me with these conclusions:

Although a relatively simple appearing circuit; this combination of components may have some hidden effects that warrant further analysis and study according to several investigators.

NOTES:
1. it is unclear at this point whether the V1 generator is Sine Wave or Pulsed.
2. However one video shows a pulsed source at f = 23.5 kHz with 37.5% duty cycle.
3. There are a lot of posts that show an effect of one bulb brighter than the other.
4. However, there are also a lot of posts where the "effect" is not seen.
5. Several "claims" of up to 130% and 140% efficiency are also reported.

Therefore; it might be worthwhile to investigate the "MrPreva" circuit further in more detail. This circuit does NOT appear to fall into either of the two n2 basic catagories (non full-cycle or asynchronous) so, does the "MrPreva" circuit present yet another excess energy anomoly - is something "hidden" within it's configuration?

Maybe we can find out!

A rough draft "semi-formal investigation" proposal is attached.

If any of you fellows have simulation, analysis, detailed coil data, MC12 schematic, or other information that would help shed light on this circuit please share it. Also, if you have access to a "Spice model of a light bulb" that would be very helpful.

Thanks,  SL

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
parkham posted this 10 September 2019

I came here two years ago, and for whatever reason forgot about Mr. Preva. And for whatever reason, like an itch in the back of my mind, I couldn't scratch it.  So, here I return.  I'm pleased the site is up and active.

I want to do a replication.  Consider the following:  

I have basic electronic skills.  I like visuals as well.  I don't have stuff lying around, as it were.  Would someone please supply me a parts list and point me to a replication video?  I also want to know if I can use this device to keep batteries charged.  I would be honored to make a donation to the Patreon fund after I confirm the technology is real, and useful. 

Thank you,

parkham posted this 10 September 2019

Other questions:  Is this similar in some ways to the Benitez device or Bedini SSG?

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 10 September 2019

Hi Parkham,

Similar to Benitez - I would say no from what I know.

Many videos and circuits on this thread, you can replicate as you wish.

You will need:

  1. Two Coils, one with less turns than the other.
  2. One AC Capacitor.
  3. Sine wave Function Generator.
  4. Audio Amplifier.
  5. Wire to connect.
  6. Time to replicate.
  7. Help can be found here.

 

I hope this helps!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Augenblick
solarlab posted this 10 September 2019

Hi Parkham,

There is a variety of information and videos regarding the "MrPreva" circuit in this thread - scroll up to the beginning for a good review of the subject.

 

Of interest is the observation where it appears there is a circuit current in the forward direction of 2.8A, a second current in the forward direction of 5.1A  through the top torroid winding; but most interesting is an apparent reverse current of 2.3A through the lower torroid winding - in the reverse direction. This is shown in the second diagram in the attached pdf file above.

 

A typical circuit of similar type is a simple offset BALUN, thus the reverse current observation is (likely) a new "thing." It will be interesting to discover the fundamental details! 

 

Although Chris and other members know this circuit probably better than most; I do not believe the circiut is developed enough at this point to be of any real practical application. But if the reverse current anomolies have merrit, then there might well be some interesting and useful off-shoots - as seen in the simplified current diagrams!

 

Note that this is but one of the many potential "excess energy" concepts being explored here at AU; however there are a few real proofs that have now been demonstrated. My primary quest, and that of many other investigators here, is to develop a generalized theoretical basis, including the mathematics and experimental evidence, for these "excess energy" devices. Without a viable theory we are still in the dark for the most part.

 

A "valid" parts list will ultimately result through the detailed schematic needed for simulation analysis; so hold off a bit until the schematic is CAE validated or, at least, shows some promise.

Have good one, SL

 

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close