Ruslan Generator Theory of Operation CAE and Development Aid Add On

  • 342 Views
  • Last Post 8 hours ago
solarlab posted this 3 weeks ago

A very good CAE style video presentation link and a possible development aid (add-on) paper [zip] can be found in a post located here:

https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg529425/#msg529425

Also included in the text is a link to 31 Ruslan demonstration videos.

Some advanced developers may find the material interesting and valuable.

Unfortunately this site does not accommodate file attachments over 2MB or the "USING THE INVERTER SECTION OF A DUAL FUEL INTERNAL COMBUSTION INVERTER/GENERATOR WITH A RUSLAN TYPE ELECTRONIC EXCESS ENERGY PRODUCTION SCHEME" zip or rar file would have been attached in this post.

Good luck in your work and have a great day!

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Zanzal
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
solarlab posted this 3 weeks ago

Some "free tools" you might find useful when working with YouTube videos and other files:

Youtube-DLG - this program will directly download videos with a translation subtitle enbeded. You must set your language first, along with some other parameters, in the settings.
https://github.com/MrS0m30n3/youtube-dl-gui     {then Clone or download (right hand side)}

VLC Player - a video player that will allow you to slow down the video (read subtitles easier). You must select "subtitle" in the menu bar or in settings | subtitles | select "all" for default subtitle on.
https://www.videolan.org/

ImageGlass - allows you to view and size many picture formats. For example: in the " How does the installation of Ruslan Kulabukhov 2018 Part 2" video page [found in the above post] there is a file called "Final.jpg" (screen view of video CAE). To zoom in on the text use ImageGlass and "screen width," etc.
https://imageglass.org/

InfanView - a more sophisticated and powerful general file, video, etc. program.
https://www.irfanview.com/

Also, a good site for some theories with "interactive parameter graphics displays" as well (e.g. Coil Standing and Travelling Wave power) examples. Site translation is also included (upper right hand flags).
http://gorchilin.com/articles/

Appologies if some of this has already been provided elsewhere.

Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

Great job on sharing Solarlab!

From what I can see, and I have not spent a lot of time reviewing the material, but it looks to be spot on!

Excellent job!

   Chris

solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Thanks Chris... You might appreciate the first paper referenced in this attachment brief:

ELECTROMAGNETIC MOMENTUM AND ELECTRON INERTIA IN A CURRENT CIRCUIT
By Professor E. G. CULLWICK, O.B.E., M.A., D.Sc, F.R.S.E., Member.

Attached brief:

"DOES USING HIGH VOLTAGE TO INCREASE ELECTRON INERTIA YIELD GENERATED ELECTRIC POWER?"

 

Attached Files

solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Chris,

Is there any way I can contribute such that the download file size limit can be increased?

Please let me know.  Thanks. SL

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Solarlab,

Thanks for the offer. I have a few problems with Files. The transfer of large files restricts site performance. I need site performance.

However, I have increased the file size from just over 5mb to 10mb. This is a more realistic size.

Let me know if this is not enough, I am happy to increase a little more if required.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Thank You Chris,

Ten (10) mb should be more than adequate; I fully concure, site performance above all.
BTW, just read your latest version of "Guidelines to Bucking Coils V2.7;" excellent, very informative!

Have a great day! smile

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Solarlab,

Cool, 10Mb.

V2.7 is old now. I should update it. I have learnt a lot more since then.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
alohalaoha posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Solarlab and Happy New Year

I am think you are on the right track !

"DOES USING HIGH VOLTAGE TO INCREASE ELECTRON INERTIA YIELD GENERATED ELECTRIC POWER?"

FROM TESLA'S WORK WE KNOW THAT EVERY INCREASE OF ELECTRONS SPEED YIELD TO EXCESSIVE CHARGE PRODUCTION WITH FURTHER CHARGES DISCHARGING IN FORMS OF SPARKS, STREAMERS, CORONAS.

THE QUESTION IS HOW HAS THIS HAPPEN, NOT WHY ? WHAT HAS CHANGED IN INTRINSIC ELECTRON STRUCTURE ?

Aloha

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Aloha,

Happy New Year!

Your question as to "What has changed in intrinsic electron structure?" unfortunately I don't have a definitive answer for. That answer, if it could be varified by experiment, would probably be Nobel material. But we can always ponder and study.

A real short (cheat) answer, from an engineering prospective, might be "increase the potential difference [add HV pulses] within the system." This appears to what has been done in Ruslan's and others early (2015) devices.

Over the years my leaning has been towards thinking that Dirac's work in the 1930's is more believable, to me at least, and holds the most promise in describing a viable electron structure and interaction.

One long term project I would like to complete someday is integrating the Dirac and Maxwell equations such that modern CAE software (Comsol Multiphysics in particular) had the capability to work in both positive and negative energies (Dirac). There is light however, since I recently read a paper where apparently this has been accomplished.

There are several papers attached relating to Dirac and one that describes a late 1990's project called Genesis. A long while back but it did strike my interest. Also, I am actively working on Comsol analysis of coils and high voltage interaction. So far so good but still a long way to go!

SL

 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Chris
solarlab posted this 3 days ago

With respect to "How might High Voltge Pulses be used to increase current flow" question. You may find the attached papers to be quite interesting and thought provoking. Experimenting as well as varification should not be too difficult.


About mid 1999 a postulation was developed known as "The GENESIS PROJECT." It posed an interesting view of positive and negative energy flow and followed Dirac's approach to an extent with an extended feature of adding high voltage around a coil.


The only two surviving papers, to the best of my knowledge, are attached.


Links to the papers are:
Original paper March 1999: http://www.linux-host.org/energy/agenesis.html 
Revised edition: http://freenrg.info/Misc/Genesis/


Ergo; an interest in integrating Maxwell's and Dirac's equations and ultimately developing a CAE analysis/proof of the Ruslan generator device operation theory.


The Genesis Project 'may' tie well into explaining the Tesla Transformer part of the attached schematics which are a part of the previous video cited by Steven Marks, a.k.a Absolut. Use of the term "non inductive" in the paper, I believe, would also describe a coil's Bi-Filar effect.


SL

Attached Files

alohalaoha posted this 2 days ago

Hey SolarLab

As an experienced EE and follower of P.Dirac you probably well know what did he said about General Theory of Relativity

Quote him

"The main equations of modern quantum electrodynamics are incorrect." P. Dirac

END OF EINSTAIN'S RELATIVITY RUBBISH !!

 

About "Genesis" project i have stopped reading further after 3rd page where i have found this:

"The above is a new interpretation (genesis project) based on the general principle of relativity about a
conduction current, a magnetic field and an induced electric field."

If you are really searching for the RIGHT TRACK in infinite abyss of lies i can help you , simply pointing you in a truthful direction.

Start research about, particle mass, particle kinetic energy and inertial forces. !!

Reg.

Aloha

alohalaoha posted this 2 days ago

About one of main misconception in modern relaitvity "science".

SolarLab - do you ready to take a look in the eyes of the TRUTH ?


Belive or not, know or not but - in modern Main Stream Physics everything was based on policy.

How had started ?

The Danish theorist Lorentz can from boredom, and can out of boredom, set for himself such ridiculous task: "What happens to Maxwell's equations if to place them in the moving system of coordinates?"

Does there will be they invariable (invariant) or will change?

He thought up the known transformations which were wrong, and showed with their help the invariance of the equations of Maxwell in the moving system of coordinates. Soon these transformations from Lorentz were bought by the WallStreet, Zurich and London bankers, and they entered as a fundamental factor, in the "theory of relativity" of Einstein in a year published in the German scientific magazine "Annalen der Physik".

So the world learned that Einstein is not a small clerk in patent office of Geneva, and the great Jewish physicist and greatest mankind physicist. And Maxwell's equations were after Lorentz it seems objective check of correctness of transformations of Lorentz. Here and everything as it appeared, a detective story with humour of the electrodynamic equations of Maxwell. All business appeared not in Maxwell and even not in Lorentz, and in the Trojan Horse in the jewish physicist Einstein who was filled from the head to a tail by one policy formulated by the called Jewish banksters. And Europe went for this monetaristic zhupel again, taking away science and the people from Truth light to the swamp of obscurantism and fascism.

And where is humour —  you could ask?

Here everyone has to think and, it is possible that depending on man's personal outlook the humour will appear in different color.

I do not want to expatiate on this collective work XIX of Europe and the beginning of the 20th centuries more. Maxwell of these equations composed twenty pieces and soon died.

Then there were well-wishers and began to canonize them. Activists in this process were Hevisayd and Hertz. They long were called Hevisayd's equations — German Hertz until Jew Einstein did not became "the greatest physicist - again Jewish".

From its instruction appropriated to these equations a name of Maxwell again. And all archaisms in them remained. Including one famous that magnetic field has no mass!!. In reallity Magnetic Force Field could be so huge, while in the same time, magnetic carriers of these forces has no mass at all.

Unless is it not a humour ?

Besides in the modern relativity books on physics is written that magnetic field has no mass. Precisely Maxwell's hypothesis repeats divB=0 !

and, of course, not withouth instructions of "greatest physicist" ever.

Here also it turns out, as money of the WallStreet , Zurich and London bankers is valid and, of course, has also mass (weight). While with a mass of magnetic field - there is a crunch.

The Truth is come to the rescue by skilled material from the reference book
Grigoriev I.S and Melihov E.Z. - Physical quantities: Reference book. by: Energoizdat 1991 USSR.

In this reference book the dependence of specific resistance of tungsten against the magnitude of cross-sectional magnetic field is given or ρ = f(B)

It is established fact that change B from 102 T(Tesla) to 105 T, ρ increases more than by 7 orders (10 million times - look at the Chart of the Colour) [6, page. 748, fig. 30.24].

Question is what happens to tungsten if his electrical resistance becomes almost like ceramics influented by giant magnetic field ?

If Magnetic filed has no mass, who did this with tungsten - Evil Spirit maybe ?

................................................................................

SolarLab - keep in mind that, this is not exclusieve example.!!!

Those experimetal facts were gathered on several thousands !!!

Best regards
Aloha

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
solarlab posted this yesterday

Hi Aloha,


A quick question for you - maybe a long and twisted answer, but let me ask anyway.
As a follower of Dirac and, I suspect, familiar with Maxwell:


Do you have any ideas or specific suggestions regarding how best to integrate Dirac's equation (positron - negatron energy states; an equation with two or four possible answers), with the Maxwell equations?

 

Also, I try not to discount any theoretical approaches to physics or engineering. Some theories sometimes work better than others with respect to the problem being solved.


For a simple example; Ohms law is good for determining the bias current/voltage for a switching diode even at 4GHz (Kirchoff) but the directional coupler part of the device requires a distributed electromagnetic approach (lines and waves); whereas an optical style (ray trace) approach might be used to analyze the horn and parabolic reflector part of the system. The same applies, in my opinion, to relativity and the other various theories. We don't as yet have the Golden combined "theory of everything." Although I do agree Dirac may have come the closest to it!


The primary point of the "Genesis Project" is simply an approach in explaining that by subjecting the bi-filar coil to an external high voltage (potential) influence, the coil may exhibit a change in characteristics; e.g. negative inductance - no inductance - positive inductance.


This may or may not be the theory of "why" this happens but it has little to do with the General Theory of Relativity, in my opinion, mearly a way of trying to explain the experimental results.


Your comment about "research particle mass, etc.," as I explained above - I try to consider all theoretical approaches. No "one size" approach fits all! It would be very myopic (and detrimental) to do otherwise. The rest of your post is mear history and conjecture, so it goes into the round bin as far as I'm concerned.


Particle Theory versus Wave Theory debate will rage on for many many years I' sure, as will conventional versus relativity - but it's a stupid debate with little to be gained in the end.


Use whatever theory gets the job done, and allows you to move forward - that's what real engineers and physicists do. Leave the debate to the academics - since, as useful as it may be, they are generally capable of little else.


Of course all of the above is just My Humble Opinion.

Regards

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
alohalaoha posted this yesterday

Hey SolarLab

I have no idea about your plan to mix UNMIXABLE stuff - like proved Particle Kinematic Theory against unprovable Einstain&Main Stream "science" Wave Theory !

If you want to make complete new theory maybe i can help you somehow. My personal oppinion is for begining you can try to replicate simple Mr.Preva experiment according to Chris instructions.

Another suggestion you can do with easy - make experiments with isolated charges (both signs) against influence of stationary magnetic field of any neodymium-iron-boron magnet.

I guess you have all needed equipment to make professional job here ?

ps: Answer to your question is yes, but much better i think is making mentioned experiments as a master judge of any theory !

Regards

Aloha

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this yesterday

Aloha,

This link may help explain the desire to mix Dirac and Maxwell. This is just one of many but it accents the idea:

https://maths-proceedings.anu.edu.au/039/CMAproc39-booth.pdf

Many experiments have been done, including Preva, however the focus is developing a theoretical understanding so that Comsol Multiphysics or similar software can be used to analyze and optimize the related devices.

This is why I posted in the "Theory" section of this forum. My interest at the moment is not any specific experiments but rather attempting to use CAE to characterize a Ruslan or similar device. We have proved they work but are still not able to fully explain and varify why, using technical science. Without the math we will continue to go in circles.

We use Maxwell in our software analysis on an almost continual basis to solve and optimize our electromagnetic problems but it has difficulty yielding any hint of excess energy. Dirac on the other hand appears to open the door to infinite excess energy.

Combine the two and we might possibly have the key to EM analysis with the probability of excess energy optimization! A worthy persuit?

Regards

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
solarlab posted this 8 hours ago

This thesis points out an experimental approach to coil analysis and touches on computer aided engineering at the end.

Although their objective is to examine insulation failure in transformers; it has some good introduction information regarding transients (high voltage spikes and waveforms), resonances within the coil windings and several measurement techniques. The author also discusses relationships with respect to standing and traveling waves in the coil. Link:

http://webfiles.portal.chalmers.se/et/MSc/Salman_Saeed_Report_Final.pdf

 

Review the paper while keeping in mind his objective is to investigate harmful transients and mitigate excess energy, whereas our objective is to instigate transients and promote excess energy. Generally note that many papers are like this - what they try to avoid, we try to create!

 

Reading between the lines, so to speak, it appears that a 'continual' introduction of transients within a coil by certain 'waveform shapes' does indeed cause excess energy and thus transformer insulation failure. But the process is complex to describe technically and even more so to design, control and sustain.

A long read, however contains some good information.

 

BTW; Here's a Vector Network Analyzer that covers 1Hz to 50MHz (a bit pricey - about $5K US or so) but it works really well. Low frequency coverage, quality, VNAs used to be rare, they probably still are (?). Or sweep generator and storage scope with ch2 ref.

https://www.omicron-lab.com/products/vector-network-analysis/bode-analyzer-suite/

 

 

Close