• Important: Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils

Important: Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • Topic Is Locked
  • 16K Views
  • Last Post 24 February 2024
Chris posted this 11 March 2019

My Friends,

The Effects of Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils is important. What is Delayed Conduction? What is the point of this?

Delayed Conduction is specifically to get the Voltage on the Terminals of your Partnered Output Coils as high as possible in reason! Its the change in Magnetic Field that Creates Voltage, its the Opposition of Magnetic Fields that Pumps Current! 

Circuitry can also be employed to delay Conduction on the second Partnered Output Coil.

Ref: How to build your own Above Unity Machine

 

I gave an example of Delayed Conduction here.

As you can see, the Mosfets will only conduct when the Zener Diodes Conduct, this is rated to 18 Volts.

This means, the ends of the Partnered Output Coils must be at least 18 Volts, before the Coils can power any load!

We have seen this before! This is not new to those that have done the Study!

 

 

The MEG Demo Circuit

Where D2 represents a Bi-Directional TVS.

 

Ref: JLN MEG Replication

 

Ref: The MEG Team Data.

Where the Top Trace represents the Input Channels, and the bottom Trace Magnetic Resonance in the Output Coils, seen as Asymmetrical Regauging.

 

NOTE: JLN used a MOV in his MEG Replication. A MOV has similar Voltage to Current Characteristics! 

 

Ref: JonRB

 

 

Ref: Renesas Datasheet

 

 
Ref: The MOV or Varistor V I Characteristics

 

 

 

I want to stress the point of getting the Voltage on the Terminals of your Partnered Output Coils to a maximum without being disturbed. Input Creates a Voltage on your Terminals, then the Input is switched off. Then your Partnered Output Coils Conduct and we Pump Current.

Remember: Some of these Circuits may require an Earth Ground.

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
bodhi_mantra posted this 26 May 2019

Hi this is bodhi mantra, a friend linked me to what you have written here, very impressive. If you would like to formally write it up I would love to publish it at Esoteric Awakening if you are interested. Thank you for sharing it either way. Look into the searl effect generator and rodin coil for some further inspiration if you haven't yet. Hare Krishna my friend smile

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 26 May 2019

Hi Bodhi_Mantra and Welcome,

Thank You and thanks for all your excellent work explaining all the Esoteric Meanings of Symbols and so on! I am familiar with all the work you mention. 

More than happy if you would like to publish some info, if you want to let me know what you want to publish. I have to stress, this is only for those that want to learn, but here for all, if they wish. I have no wish to twist anyone's arms. This, then, means that they must put in the hard work to gain their goal as is the case with everything in life. Also, I am still learning, I do not have all the answers. I try every day to learn more of what's ahead!

Thank You for your post. Perhaps we are an example of Universal Karma and how Humanity can be One with All.

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 27 May 2019

Hi Guys, i just had an appifany on the Throne.,   number 2.

Thus far all my overly elaborate circuits for Delayed conduction have been made too visually line up the voltage, and reverse peaks on the scope, manually, - and all the time wondering if this is wrong, - however ; it now occurs,-   the reason for mandatory adjustable frequency in these experiments, is too find a hidden magnetic resonance effect, or too allow zener triggers a better chance too fall in place by chance and circumstance. ?  - 

as i have long suspected, these effects are actually very easy too replicate , - however doing so intreduces several parameters that that prevent a transformer from opporating efficiently,  thus a working machine may end up looking like a childs uneducated attempt at building a transformer.,

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Vidura posted this 27 May 2019

Hey Patrick1 Although some had results with mains frequency, it is more likely to achieve the effect with adjustable frequency. We have many hints that it is likely magnetic resonance, standing or traveling wave phenomena which produces the required effects. A very important detail is that the output should not load the input, the waves should be perpendicular to eachother, f. ex. transverse- longitudinal. That way a positive feedback could be implemented. Have a look at parametric excitation and oscillation thread also. Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 28 May 2019

My Friends,

I think its really important to ask the question: What does the delayed Conduction do?

An in-depth analysis may give a lot more ideas on why this is one way to achieve the goal! We end up with a Sawtooth Wave form. I also showed in my thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT, we also get a Sawtooth Waveform.

 

 

The problem is we saw a reduction on the Input in this configuration! Which is a result of the Phases not being equal and opposite.

So, we must look at this from the point of view, that the Change in One Coil is the inverse to the change in the other Coil. Thus the Term, Partnered Output Coils.

One must Mirror the Other!

I want to take a moment to share a thought with you, something that I might start a new thread on: If two signals Input can create One Signal Output, Harmonic interference, which Tom Bearden told us about in this short clip:

 

Listen for the Subtle Part... And the Output is a Bigger Fundamental, which it is, then is the Harmonic Interference something we can simulate to get more ideas on how this can work?

   Chris

Chris posted this 28 May 2019

My Friends,

I am hesitant to post this post, but I think some insight may be gleamed from it by some people, and possibly laughed at by others. I hope it is useful!

I have called this: The Stairway to Heaven.

 

In my last few videos, I mentioned the Increase of amplitude when one gets to the point of the above noted Harmonic Interactions. What do I mean by this? Well, from examples gone, lets see if we can find some similarities!

First, the oscilloscope can be broadly interpreted in this area and ones interpretation may be subject to opinion, the reason I am a bit hesitant to post this post!

I want to specifically point out, I am directly referring to Tom Bearden's Asymmetrical Regauging concepts.

First, because The MEG Team were first to show the data we are looking at, is The MEG Data:

 

 

Second, because he was second, is Bradley's RT:

 

 

Third, Graham Gunderson:

 

 

All fit directly into the profile of Asymmetrical Regauging:

 

 

Now, I can only compare two, as I don't have enough data on Grahams machine to compare directly, but you will get the same basic idea and be able to perceive the same concept due to the transition time.

 

The Zero Graticule Line is Center Image. You can see a very fast transition, from Zero, to Peak Amplitude, top of Image:

 

 

This very fast climb is seen on the Scope, in the form of Steps, a Stairway to Heaven I call it.  Yes we have the same on The MEG Team Data:

 

 

I have inverted the Y Axis on the Output, Bottom Waveform, only. You can see, we have a very sharp Increase in Amplitude. Again, Steps are seen.

Also, see the very short Duty Cycle! We were told the Frequency was 31KHz.

For most this would be very obvious and we have partially covered this before. I only wanted to give you some food for thought! 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 28 May 2019

In my last few videos, I mentioned the Increase of amplitude when one gets to the point of the above noted Harmonic Interactions. What do I mean by this? Well, from examples gone, lets see if we can find some similarities!

 

My Friends,

I should have also reminded you, as it is not clear in my last post: The Input Excitation is Excited by, Assisted by, L3, the Second Output Coil switching in! The Two MMF's are in the Same Direction, not Opposing!

Where D2 represents a Bi-Directional TVS.

 

So as D2 ( TVS ) Conducts, we have Three Coils with Current in them all at the same time, Two Positive and One Negative, remember our equation: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1?

This is why we must have such a narrow Time ( Rise over Run, X Axis ( Run ) considered to be Time ) as mentioned above. In the above Schematic, as D2 Conducts, we are able to Trick, or Fool the L3 Coil into assisting the Primary, this is why we have such a fast Rise Time. MMF is greater in the Forward Direction by almost two thirds! I have used the term and we have a Thread for this: Non Linear Inductance and also Parametric Excitations of Electric Oscillations.

We have Reduced impedance Effect on the Up and also Down Sides of the Sawtooth Waveform. Remember, our Input is reduced by this effect, we move from using Current, to using nearly No current or even Negative Current, remember what we spoke about.

We must Counter Balance Our Input Force, or M.M.F: Magneto Motive Force.

This is all such important stuff, please do the best you can to study, PM me any questions!

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 29 May 2019

My work with ferrites has yeilded poor results, which is a shame, - they are still in my sights for the future, because i think i can make them work eventually, however it will require a raspberry pi or similar

but for the time being, i have found iron cores the best too work with, - as it happens, i am currently 3d printing some new spools, for a new transformer, - the transformer, is basically.  or exactly...  a MOT with 2/3 of the lamination's removed,-     i think the best results at this stage will come via this approach, - i know im only nickle and dimeing, but this technology has marginal COP's - - can anyones core material or origins beat the COP 1.5 i think i can manage with mine ? what kind of material are you using ?

bodhi_mantra posted this 29 May 2019

You are welcome my friend, I just noticed the glitch in the matrix often times in life and had that, hmm this just doesn't fit moment, same as you and went digging into what these rascals have been trying to keep hidden. I will publish whatever you like to write about, I made the website as a network for researchers and readers/students to come together to bridge the gap between the science and the ancient knowledge/mysteries. We are only rediscovering it after all, we need talented people in higher vibrations and dimensions of thought to be able to collaborate away from censorship and the laughers and mockers who haven't quite caught up yet.

We are all still learning, that is the purpose of this life and this dimension to raise our gnosis for the higher realms . Yes we are karmically "chosen" if you will to be the variables that shift the consciousness into this new age. We all have our roles to play in the cosmic dance, we are simply avatars of the divine that works through us. I don't want to sound woo woo or like a religious nut lol but the math and science shows this conclusively so denying it is foolish. All we are here to do is try to determine why the creator sent us, what our function is, and try to fulfill it as best we can. We don’t even need to be conscious of it in fact we are programmed to do it regardless, but the signs we were given were to find this truth so we can level up? I am still working on the proofs for this part lol. Anyhow if you ever want to write an article write on whatever you like, the strictly science or spiritual side it is up to you.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 29 May 2019

Hey Patrick,

I have used all sorts of cores. Ferrite and Nano Crystalline my best yet, Iron ( Poor Results ), Iron Powder, also poor results.

If one uses Iron Cores, I am firm one needs Gaps, 2MM or more.

I recommend to do more study on the data I have provided before going to much further ahead.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Chris posted this 29 May 2019

Hey Bodhi_Mantra,

I could not agree more!

I will have a think on a passage and see what I can come up with. Perhaps just a Scientific link to the Black Sun Symbol?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
patrick1 posted this 30 May 2019

Hello Bodhi_ Mantra, We are in agreement about much, - and yes i do rather enjoy spiritual wooey too say the least, - As an engineer of my life path, - i am very keen too keep my aspirations and paths grounded in stone. - but this comes with risk or limiting ones cosmic potential. - so i inhale as much spirituality as i can too create balance. , . or rather too let balance create itself.     -with the right grounding.

 

Chris, Thanks for the advise, - what is the reason for the iron gap ?,   -  your right about taking time, but its not by choice ;-D.  unfortunately im consigned too doing things the best way, -    getting a feel for transformers.  - something which cannot be taught.  it must be learnt

Chris posted this 30 May 2019

Hey Patrick,

Iron Domains align and hold residual Domain Alignment. A small gap allows for the release of the domain alignment. See: Ed Leedskalnin's PMH for an example. We have covered this a few times in a few different threads.

Most Ferrite's and Nano-Crystalline does not do this. See: Raselli1 YouTube Channel.

Yes you're right, experience wins.

   Chris

Chris posted this 01 June 2019

My Friends,

The RC Time Constant is the Resistance ( R ) in Ohms multiplied by the Capacitance ( C ) in Farads, which is equal to Time ( t ) in Seconds.

 

So, t = RC = 1 Ohm x 1 Farad = 1 Second.

Now, I want to point a few simple things out. Akula published several schematics, where the Transistor was set with a Resistor and Capacitor to the Base to Emitter or Gate to Source for a delay:

 

The Combination of Resistance and Capacitance can delay the switching in of a Transistor / Mosfet:

 

So, if you have 180 degree signals and need to delay one, ever so slightly, this technique can be employed! Don't forget, you need to trick your Second Output Coil to Assist the Primary: Magnetic Resonance. So you need to delay the signal only a tiny amount: 0.000001 approx., or so seconds:

I have given the processes of Power "Generation" it simply is 1, 2, 3:

  1. Input - Frequency and Duty Cycle tunned for Magnetic Resonance.
  2. Secondary CoilOne Conducts Current, powers a Load.
  3. Secondary CoilTwo is switched in ( Delayed Conduction ), in such a way to Assist the Primary ( Magnetic Resonance ( Mr Preva Style ) )

Ref: Urgency Required!

 

Please remember those before us:

An alternate explanation for the current gain in the UDT is to consider each secondary winding as acting as the primary winding for the other secondary winding when an output current is drawn because the two secondary windings generate geometrically opposing fields.

Ref: Paul Raymond Jensen

 

I hope this helps some in moving forward in the direction of Delayed Conduction!

   Chris

bodhi_mantra posted this 02 June 2019

Beautifully put Patrick, you should take the time to watch this video I just added to the website. I am gearing up to go into the science of the soul chains soon so this is a nice lead in. Stop by anytime and leave comments or join our discord server if you like :-)

http://esotericawakening.com/esoteric-astrology

  • Liked by
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 08 June 2019

Hi Guys, - i want you too know, i have developed a great tool for bucking coils, -  can you think transformer type i should use too implement this circuit build ?.  - it works great.   especially with my super fast photoisolater transistor drive circuit

adjustable 555 delayed conduction circuit advanced.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 08 June 2019

Hey Patrick,

Its getting to complicated.

Use the very basic circuits I have shared, the one with the TVS, Bi-Polar switching. Keep it Simple...

Those working to replicate are going to have to stick to the outline given, or success will not be possible!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
Forelle posted this 09 June 2019

Hi all

This was a really good tip to check if the core holds its magnetism like in Leedskalnin PMH,unfortunly i thought that is the case with every corematerial and i never checked other than full iron.Now i have one part more solved why my rotating MEG (this word doesnt really make sense,thats why i call it Radusboots motor)is not working as i thought.I still have to  learn much more basics.

Good day.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
patrick1 posted this 10 June 2019

i  feel one important issue for me.   - is too achnoledge that its possible too have a transformer using these principles, that is so badly built, it is only 80% efficient !?!. -   because i fear my early attempts months ago, were actually working fine, as i suspected, - but chopped up microwave oven transformers are not destined too beat COP1 ... because fankly i would never have expected the conventional operation of such a large * E core,  converted too a C core. and made 70% thinner.*   too work that well. even if it is only COP 0.85

 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Chris posted this 10 June 2019

Hi Patrick,

The Mr PREVA Experiment by itself is not Above-Unity. Its a tool to observe effects. Some very interesting effects if one replicates the experiment properly.

I have shared this information in many places, those that have read the threads I have posted would already know this.

I cant help think you're posting miss-leading information to my threads deliberately? Is this the case?

I appreciate your posts, but I do see discrepancies with what you're posting.

I do not wish to allow for any misleading information for other interested people, so I ask you to please be more careful with what you're posting. This is a public forum, all readers need to have accurate information and not be misled. That only happens on the other forums with the Trolls! Not Here!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
patrick1 posted this 11 June 2019

Excellent , i have removed my redundant progress posts too my own thread ( about too try too anyway ). 

im sick of reporting failed experiments too, sorry about that Chris.  - but i am making daily youtube videos of them for later reference, because it is an excellent learning progress, and if i get struck on the head, - i can save myself 3 months , and just watch the videos.again

Thankfully today, first time ever, i will post the video here, of my successful experiment, and pictures too the Mr Preva thread.

https://www.Utube.com/watch?v=SvzpGKnxeHk

Thanks for sticking with me., , cant wait for the next step towards a real working practical transformer    3D printing the coils as we speak.

 

Quote**I appreciate your posts, but I do see discrepancies with what you're posting..  - dude.  its a hard journey, and i only have half a brain,  - btw, thankyou enternally for your translations, - almost understandable, -  - but together. we are making progress.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 11 June 2019

Hey Patrick,

We must be honest with ourselves and others if we are all to succeed. I very much appreciate how you have handled my critique, very professional. Lets move forward with solid experiment and show the world how its done.

Thank You Patrick!

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 June 2019

Patrick and other readers,

I invite you to study and to start thinking of the greater processes of Energy "Generation" or Pumping.

I did a 101 series:

 

Now apply what I have been sharing, a third Magnetically Resonant Exciting process. Come join the thread: Facts, keeping it Simple!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
Chris posted this 14 June 2019

My Friends,

What is the Excitation Process? What process gets a Coil Excited enough to Join the party in the Electromagnetic Induction Processes?

If a Coil has a Coupling Coefficient ( k ) of say 0.99 and a 0.01 loss, then it is considered Tightly Coupled. Coupling > 5 is said to be Tightly Couples, Coupling < 5 is said to be loosely coupled.

 

 

Don't forget, an LCR Tank Circuit is merely a shuttling of Energy, its not "Generating" anything! We must "Generate" Energy, if you like. Mutual Coupling is a 1 to 1 Energy Transfer, unless we can trick one Coil into assisting us with our Input and replace part of the Input with a Mutually Coupled Coil in the Positive Direction!

You may remember me saying, these devices require a "Loose Coupling". I have written it in several places, including the original PDF.

 

 

In the above image, you can see, there is a different Coupling Coefficient between each coil.

So, again, how do we get one Output Coil to assist the Input Action? Remembering that ANY Magnetic Field changing in Time can act as a Source for another.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Aetherholic
patrick1 posted this 15 June 2019

Chris , that description reminds me of my bench model right now, - it is the circuit diagram i have posted above, - i decided too stick with it because i feel i need the advantage of more knobs too twist...  im having trouble learning otherwise it seems.

currently im tuning the trigger timing on the globe secondary...   its glowing brightly off the iron transformer relaxation power (negative offset) .  , and im about too hookup the second partnered output coil too put a brief short on the (positive offset) of the input pulse  via the second POC

sorry i dont mean too complicate things too much with my overbuilt circuit. but i believe it will help.  .   do you think my regauge region, should be 1% of the original 10%duty,  (the last 1% obviously.)  ... its all about increasing that relaxation time power right ?.   -

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 15 June 2019

Hi Patrick,

Forgive me, I need to say that you're not quite understanding Cores and Magnetic Fields in the Cores.

If I may recommend watching and understanding the following videos:

 

A laminated Iron Core with no Air Gap can not release the Magnetic Field! A Nanocrystalline Core can! A Ferrite Core Can, some Powdered Iron Cores Can.

From the Top of the Sawtooth Waveform, the Linear decrease in time, is simply the decay in Magnetic Fields. So, if the Core can not Decay, then you can not achieve the end result. From the Red Arrow to the Blue Arrow:

 

 

Please do more study, when you have done more study, more of this will make sense. 

The Logic in this post has been posted here before: Here, Here, Here, and Here.

I am happy to help, but when I have gone to such lengths to detail information, I really do expect people to read what I have posted, I keep saying, its all in the understanding, knowing what to aim for. Then the rest is just a bit of fiddling.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 16 June 2019

My Friends,

I hope all readers can learn from this recent Core Experiment pointed out in several places.

Cores require Movement. Like a Wind Turbine, the must get up to Speed, then Wind Down again. Its a two part process, thus the Sawtooth Waveform! Wind up is from the Green Arrow to the Red Arrow, Three Coils are tricked into Assisting the Magnetic Wind Up, then at the Red Arrow, the Input is switched off!

Amazingly, the Wind Down then Changes, the Inductance in the arrangement has now changed, through this Cycle, the Inductance is NON-Linear!

Then the Wind Down is from the Red Arrow to the Blue Arrow, so we have Electrical Energy Pumped during almost the entire Cycle, of which the Input is connected for a very short part of the Cycle!

We are Counter Balancing the Forces, this is the Magnetomotive Forces ( M.M.F ):

 

 

m1 is dragged up the Hill because m2 is heavier and on a steeper decline. m2 is simply the combined Input Coil M.M.F and also One Partnered Output Coil M.M.F, working together, in unison in Time. Tricked into Assisting the Input because the Delayed Conduction and also the Coupling Coefficient is greater to the First Partnered Output Coil than the Input Coil.

This is the same analogy as above:

  1. Input - Frequency and Duty Cycle tunned for Magnetic Resonance.
  2. Secondary CoilOne Conducts Current, powers a Load.
  3. Secondary CoilTwo is switched in ( Delayed Conduction ), in such a way to Assist the Primary ( Magnetic Resonance ( Mr Preva Style ) )

 

Or:

1 + -1 + 1 = 1

 

Or:

  1. →
  2. ←
  3. →

 

Remember: Only when a Changing Magnetic Field is present in proximity to a Conductor, can an E.M.F be "Generated". For a M.M.F to be Present, the E.M.F must be Loaded and Supported.

I so hope this makes sense to people!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 16 June 2019

My Friends,

The Super-Numptys over on one of the other forums are only just now coming to the conclusion of how the technology I have been sharing since 2011 can work!

They use the terminology: Magnetic force without local magnetic field.

I have to say, this realisation, claiming all this wonderful enlightenment they have just achieved, on their own by the way, isn't it amazing...

These smart people, now, some 4 years after I publicly introduced it, are only now seeing the light.

I applaud these smart people for the goal they are reaching! Well Done Smart People!

Isn't it amazing how we are forcing their hand like we are! Either Evolve or turn to dust!

   Chris

 

P.S: Brad still regularly visits this forum, thieving information!

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
Vidura posted this 16 June 2019

A question arises when thinking about this devices, the MEG, the MIT and the vacuum triode amplifier, at least this three uses a permanent magnet in or near the core, In the case of the MEG the developers assume in their theory that the excess energy is obtained by switching the flux of the magnet alternately. can this be confirmed or discarded? 

Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Chris
Jagau posted this 16 June 2019

I think the same thing as you Vidura
Floyd Sweet used magnets, Gunderson too and the MEG
reproduces the same effects with the ferromagnetic viscosity.

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 16 June 2019

Hey Guys,

can this be confirmed or discarded?

 

Magnets have a purpose. It depends on how you think of them.

Are they Required: No

Can they add Energy to a system: Yes

Floyd Sweet wrote:

An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:

Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship. The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity. This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat’s displacement of the medium, water. Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction.

Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless. In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect. This is reactive power – no work is done. The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship. The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.

In the case of the Space Flux Coupled machine, there is no visible entity. It’s abstract. A steady state coherent force is present when brought under the influence of the electromagnetic controllable forces. It returns to an incoherent state when the initiating magnetic forces are absent (except in the case of a permanent magnet).

Ref: The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator

 

and then:

The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly. The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

An illustration will help to clarify how the feedback principal counters the magnetic force binding the electrons in orbits, restraining them from motion as charged particles in the form of an electric current.

Ref: The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator

 

I urge you to remember what Floyd Sweet told us:

The underlying principles are the same.

Ref: Letter to Mark Goldes from Sparky

 

Magnets can bring the Core Potentials Up, and any assistive Field entity's can add to the Output.

I hope this helps some:

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Vidura
Fighter posted this 17 June 2019

A laminated Iron Core with no Air Gap can not release the Magnetic Field! A Nanocrystalline Core can! A Ferrite Core Can, some Powdered Iron Cores Can.

From the Top of the Sawtooth Waveform, the Linear decrease in time, is simply the decay in Magnetic Fields. So, if the Core can not Decay, then you can not achieve the end result. From the Red Arrow to the Blue Arrow:

 

 

Chris is right, this is exactly what my device (I named it ZPM - Zero Point Module, as the free-energy units from Stargate Atlantis) does now:

I'm using a Metglas AMCC-200 core with bucking coils but without any permanent magnet.

Edit: Please be aware of the fact that depending on your core and your coils characteristics this phenomenon is appearing only in a specific frequency range; you will need to find that frequency range and fine-tuning it in order to find the optimum performance of your device.

This is how I search for the frequency range where the phenomenon appears and then fine-tuning it for my device to find the value where the input from source is minimum (most specific minimum value in mA):

Chris posted this 17 June 2019

@Fighter - Very Nice!

If I may suggest, some improvements, look at the secondary Coil with Delayed Conduction, and check it is Conducting properly. Once Full Conduction is occurring, the length of the Off Time of the Input should be around 90%, meaning the Partnered Output Coils are "Generating" Energy for around 90% of the time with no Input, and 10% with Input.

Currently it looks like you're about 50% Duty Cycle?

Does that make sense?

With a much greater Off Time on the Input and larger "Generation" Period, much greater Output can be achieved.

Excellent Work Fighter! Thanks for giving us a heads up on where you're at!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Vidura
Vidura posted this 17 June 2019

Hey Fighter, Looking promising the experiment, are you using two or three coils? If the values of the power source reading correctly there could be excess energy already. Although still no sawtooth wave is visible. Good work! Vidura.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Wistiti
Forelle posted this 18 June 2019

Hi Chris In the first post of this thread you write at the end, some circuits need an earthground, you refer to Ac circuits? Or anything Else? Still not knowing how Don Smith get the Amps out of the ground(of topic) . Thank you. Good day to everyone.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Fighter posted this 18 June 2019

@Chris: Thanks ! I know what you mean but I tried with less than 50% duty cycle and unfortunately it's bringing the output down, lights are dimming and under 10% they shutdown completely. This is a direction I should explore during the optimization cycle but I'm not there yet, I'm looking for ways to properly measure the output as when I tried with my current bridge-rectifier (using MBR 4045 PT Schottky diodes) it burned out the 10,000uF/50V electrolytic capacitor, it was so hot that I couldn't touch it 10 minutes after I shut down the experiment. So right now all I got about output are these oscilloscope readings using probes set on 10x but I can get an estimation by comparing luminosity of bulbs powered directly by source and powered by the device. But I like to think I double-checked the source's readings by putting in parallel on source an DC watt-meter so I think at least the input displayed by source is correct. I'm currently documenting what I have and I intend to open a thread here soon presenting all the details.

@Vidura Thanks ! I'm using two coils. As I said in my answer to Chris at this moment I don't have a way to get exact data about the output but considering the input displayed by the source and the luminosity of the lights my estimation is that I have a COP between 9 and 14. I'll be 100% sure about COP when I'll have a way to get exact measurements but at this point and after discussing and presenting the test results to my friend Cd_Sharp I'm pretty sure this is an over-unity device with COP at least bigger than 5 (look at the images below, the input is only 0.2W).

Here are 3 photos with ZPM and two 12V/35W halogen lights (link to bigger image here):

I will create a thread here and post details when I'll find some time, sorry but right now I have almost no time because I'm very busy at work.

patrick1 posted this 18 June 2019

Hey Guys, that all does look promising, -  my attempt is so finite in regards too COP. that i need too consider the energy driving the base of my transistors, lol !!.  needs work...  - but currently getting about COP1 i think

input and output too the transformer about 1watt either way, - but using about 4 watts in the drive circuitry, hmm..

anyway im improving that as we speak,  illl beee backkk  ...  anyway pretty confident its really working ;-D

Marathonman posted this 18 June 2019

You mention your getting COP 9-14 one post them come back and state COP 1 the next. then state your using two coils when you are clearly using three coils. but that is not what is upsetting me but the fact you did not mention Chris in your video as if it was all your work. respect should be given to the researcher that started the whole path in the first place in which you are showing no sign of doing so.

i applaud your work very much so but please respect what has freely been given.

regards,

Marathonman

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Vidura posted this 18 June 2019

Hey MM, I There are two different members and devices who posted. Regards Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Fighter posted this 18 June 2019

You mention your getting COP 9-14 one post them come back and state COP 1 the next. then state your using two coils when you are clearly using three coils. but that is not what is upsetting me but the fact you did not mention Chris in your video as if it was all your work. respect should be given to the researcher that started the whole path in the first place in which you are showing no sign of doing so.

i applaud your work very much so but please respect what has freely been given.

regards,

Marathonman

Hi. Where did I mentioned COP 1 ? And I'm kind of sure I'm using two coils. I already mentioned I'm using bucking coils and I'm pretty sure everyone here knows this concept belongs to Chris. What's new in ZPM is actually how bucking coils are used, believe me I don't try to take credit for anything else. As a matter of fact as soon as I'll have enough time I'll create a thread here and make public all the information about ZPM so others can reproduce it and prove me right or prove me wrong. Because it's true we all as species have very little time left if we don't change our way of living on this planet. I guess you didn't noticed there are two different posts from two different members. It's okay, it's late here too and I'm also very tired after work, we all can make mistakes...

JohnStone posted this 18 June 2019

Hi Fighter, great setup!

I'd like to chime in for a remark regarding mesurement of luminosity.
You may use a cheap solar cell from garden lights or from a calculator. Add a considerable capacitor to the outputs and measure the current in short circuit mode. That's all.

Solar cells behave quite linerly in short circuit mode. Of course it is not an absolute measurement but as relative measurement for comparison it is very reliable. Make sure the lights sit in a box (or PVC tube) so no refelctions form your cloth can disturb the readings. Do not move the cell or the lights in the box if you want to compare the readings.

In case you want to calibrate this setup:

  1. Feed your bulb with pure DC current and take readings at the cell for differnt amperage.
  2. Observe the rush in time (if any) at amp change for stable readings 
  3. Generate a table along Watts input vs. cell readings.
  4. Draw a graph based on that table

If you operate the same bulb in your setup you may apply the readings from your cell and obtain from the graph the true wattage going in. I assume the accuracy to be way better than 3% - given you care for costant temperature. A small fan running constantly may help.

Recalibrate on regular base.

I hope it helps for more reliable research.

Chris posted this 18 June 2019

@Forelle,

Please remember: AC is DC, only Alternating in Polarity. Two DC Half Cycles with opposite Polarity. Yes, sometimes an Earth Ground can make finding the Magnetic Resonance easier, and sometimes is required on some machines. I cant explain why.

We did cover this, on this, or the last thread somewhere.

 

@Marathonman - Go easy old mate wink

 

@Patrick - Keep up the good work! Remember, your Input needs to be assisted by One Output Coil.

 

@Fighter - Good work! Thanks for the update. 

 

I would like to say, I am only sharing what I have learned, much of what I learned is from experiment, in replicating others before me, their work. So Bucking Coils is not new, and not mine persey, I am only giving others my knowledge, what I have learned.

Its true, one can not make this work without Partnered Output Coils!

Partnered Output Coils are all of ours wink

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Fighter
Marathonman posted this 18 June 2019

Vidura; you are correct, i do apologize for mixing the two. seams the upstairs neighbor is making me loose more sleep then i thought.

Sorry again, will reread when not so tired. yes i read all the threads all the time.

all info is valuable at one point in time.

Marathonman

Vidura posted this 18 June 2019

Hey Fighter, The first impression i had that it is AU, The most save and final prove will be the ability to self sustain with a Feedback loop, anyway the method of luminosity measurement suggested by John Stone also can be used quite accurately. If I may add a couple of suggestions for measurements: Use opto isolated drivers, adding the driver supply to the input power , at > 200khz a considerable power can be transferred thru the gate of the switch. Double check the input using simple coil wound analogue meters.

Regarding the "fried" Electrolytic capacitor, the reasons are likely to hi voltage spikes , or passing of AC current due failure or avalanching of diodes. Very rarely seen,  electrolyte breakdown can also be caused by hi frequency scalar waves.

here I add an image form a transformer test witch had given a surprisingly high efficiency, the ringing was produced due to a overload of the audio amplifier (AC setup with a partially bucking output coil). Looks a bit similar the waveform?

Regards Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Fighter
patrick1 posted this 19 June 2019

You mention your getting COP 9-14 one post them come back and state COP 1 the next. then state your using two coils when you are clearly using three coils. but that is not what is upsetting me but the fact you did not mention Chris in your video as if it was all your work. respect should be given to the researcher that started the whole path in the first place in which you are showing no sign of doing so.

i applaud your work very much so but please respect what has freely been given.

regards,

Marathonman 

 

Hi, Mara, with respect im going too ignore that post. - im just a happy go lucky guy with his head in the desk working hard. and ii really dont put any thought into IP,.   - if i get this working. i will be very proud,  spread the technology, and withhold no information.  - nor about the origins or future of this stuff. - btw. please note, i did never quote COP14 about anything at all, - however about 5 years ago i did try too replicate the rosemary ainsle heater. perhaps this is the confusion ?

  • Liked by
  • Fighter
  • Chris
Fighter posted this 19 June 2019

Guys, in order to not hijack this thread I created a new one specific to ZMP here.

@Chris I created a thread under Devices category, if you think it should be placed somewhere else please feel free to move it, thanks !

@JohnStone Brilliant idea ! That method can be used for all the experimental devices we work with in this domain considering we're dealing with so many diverse and strange characteristics on the outputs of these devices. I will consider building such a device, thank you !

@Marathonman: No worries, forget about it...

@Vidura I agree with you the ultimate prove of an over-unity device is the feedback loop but that will be hard considering the strange characteristics of the output and also what I found during my documentation - some researchers say that feeding input with DC from output have dramatic negative impact on the over-unity capability of any such device; they say any kind of connection (even through electronics) from output to input will negatively impact the functionality; anytime I did read about this I was thinking what Bearden said about not affecting "the primary dipole"; so how this feedback loop can be achieved we will see, ZPM is not there yet. Yes, I agree, the measurement method JohnStone came with is brilliant, I will consider doing such a device; "Use opto isolated drivers" - I'm only a beginner in electronics, I'll make some research about that; "adding the driver supply to the input power at > 200khz a considerable power can be transferred thru the gate of the switch" - if that would happen I suppose I would see it displayed by the source and by the wattmeter I used to double-check the source's display, isn't it ?..; yes, I was thinkking about analogue meters too, my only concern is they're using coils which added to the circuit could modify the behavior of the device's coils maybe ? worth a try tho..; both scenarios are possible - high voltage spikes (because of Schottky diodes even they're fast are not able to handle properly the output) or the mysterious scalar waves, don't know yet what's going on there.

Marathonman posted this 20 June 2019

I agree for what it is worth. optically isolating any resonant effects whether it by magnetic or ferroresonance  from interfering with the input would be highly beneficial in this case.  obviously looping the output to the input would squash any such doubt of any kind.  it might also be useful to add a choke filtration in the feed back which would also squash such anomalies or frequencies that would hinder the input like possibly a PI filter.

regards,

Marathonman

Chris posted this 21 June 2019

My Friends,

I hope this video helps some more!

 

When a good understanding is achieved, we will have more and more successes. Its only a matter of time now!

@MM - Thanks.

   Chris

Chris posted this 21 June 2019

My Friends,

I want to re-iterate, pointed out in the last video: Non-Linear Inductance occurs.

I wrote an article about this: Whats it going to take to Get OU? Way back on: 10/01/2014

Its worth reading up about, as this follows closely the Parametric machines of the early 1900's.

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 21 June 2019

glad we are working together with re gauging,  i hope many will replicate my further, simplified, circuit., ... been working on it all day & night the last week, and very happy with it now, and more suited too the job in hand.  i will post enlarged diagram shortly and full detail,

bou yeah, tuck the parasites.

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Chris

Topic Is Locked

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close