Partnered Output Coils

  • 13K Views
  • Last Post 05 January 2024
  • Topic Is Solved
Chris posted this 05 August 2017

Many times I have talked about Partnered Output Coils. People call them Bucking Coils. I prefer not to use this terminology. Its a bit confusing. I use a Sudo Diagram:

I have been through the "Common Mode Choke" and why Partnered Output Coils are different in the Timing Thread.

People in general seem to have a largely misunderstood inception of Partnered Output Coils, or Bucking Coils in general.

Andrey Melnichenko also shows a Bucking Component to his Coils. But the Coils were not Bucking as we think of Bucking.

Here is an example of how it is a misunderstood area of Science. Itsu is an excellent Experimenter, this is not intended as a dig, just an observation:

 

 

Studding this video, it is obvious there has been a lot of effort gone into this. A lot of work! But Itsu is missing something, something that is the most important of all! Can you spot what it is?

His Grenade Coil is wrong! This also pointed out in the comments.

The Grenade Coil must have, what would normally be thought of as a "Non-Inductive" Component, a Bucking Component! Actually, we will find, as time goes on, this is Highly, extremely Inductive!

Turns 1 and 2 are Counter Clockwise, turns 3, 4, 5 and 6 are Clockwise. 

Ask yourself the question, how is it that a huge amount of Electrical Power can be extracted from a NON-Inductive Coil?

Also from Ruslan Kulabuhov

It is actually this Extremely Inductive Component that makes a Common-Mode Choke work as it does!

Floyd Sweet also shows this exact same Bucking of Magnetic Fields:

 

The VTA Description is as follows:

 Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two magnets.


When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.


The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.


At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.


The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Now, a Right Hand Rule both facing Inwards, it is the same as:

Why? Why must we have Opposing Magnetic Fields?

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

By Opposing the Magnetic Fields in a Dynamic System, the Electrical Field doubles! The Mr Preva Experiment proved this to be true!

Floyd Sweet also said:

Current is deemed as a quantity or number of charged particles moving from P1 to P2 in time t, or as the charge transferred in one second by a current of one ampere. The coulomb is the charge on 6.24 x 1018 electrons. Electric fields are due to the presence of charges. Magnetic field effects are due to the motion of charges. Current is the net rate of flow of positive charges. This is a scalar quantity.


In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is: I = da+/dt + da-/dt. Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

The Mr Preva Experiment also proved this to be true!

We see a Standing Wave of Magnetic Fields! 

 This thread is for those with questions, thank you Vasile for the following question.

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 05 August 2017

Hi Vasile,

1: No, one Coil, if applying the Right Hand Grip Rule, is wrong.

2: Conventional Thinking, this is how Bucking would work. Yes.

As pointed out above, we are looking for an Energy Gain, this is a "Generating" concept that we need to think about. "Generating" Joules per-second, or Watts, this means we need to make Charge Flow inside the Insulated Copper Conductor.

To achieve this, we must know, already, how an Electric Generator works. A Magnetic Field moves with Velocity into a "Generating" Coil separating this Charge... A Dynamic System, with variables that Change over Time.

This is not how Bucking Coils work, Bucking Coils are Rigid, Non Dynamic Systems. They do not Change over Time like a "Generator" does.

In the recent Parametric Oscillator information I posted, we saw that the Frequency of the System must have another excitation twice that of the System Frequency. This fact introduces a Dynamic Component to a normally Rigid System, it introduces Non-Linearity.

I hope this gives some answers to your questions?

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 August 2017

I would like to point out a very interesting fact. Floyd Sweet said: "No Vibrations" @17:01 in the below video:

 

 

For your convenience, the initial release of this video is below for comparison:

 

 

Also, another important thing is, we know from images and the above video, that Floyd Sweet had problems with Vibrations:

  
Check out that huge sponge!

When the Coils Oppose, of course as you can imagine, they throw out a lot of Vibration! I guess, like a Bucking Bronco, trying the best he can to Buck Off the Rider, the Magnetic Fields under high Stress, want to separate!

 Its a hard one truth, but the early Floyd Sweet work is just too easy to pass by, but, when replicated, and replicated properly, this works:

 

In my opinion, its the smallest things that lead to the greatest successes. This work is the same as The MEG, only used in a slightly different way.

 

 

Don't forget the Magnets! Floyd Sweet gave us the reason to use Magnets:

An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:


Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship. The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity. This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat’s displacement of the medium, water. Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction.


Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless. In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect. This is reactive power – no work is done. The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship. The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.

When read enough times, you can see that in a certain System, the Magnetic Field from the Magnets gets integrated, added to the System, with the System's operation! Because it is moving in Time, it is now an Electric Field, this we know already, it is the Magnetic A Vector Potential.

I pointed out some work I did in the Resonance Thread:

Some years back: 29.11.2015 I did an experiment. It was very interesting. The layout:

Very simple, but also very effective. With no Earth lead I could not make this work, with an Earth lead, I found a resonance at a very unusual frequency! in my setup I found at around 1208Hz, my Input went nearly to Zero.

Yet the device was shaking as if it had a few dozen watts through it.

Input Voltage becomes nearly Sawtooth, Triangle Wave - but is in-fact Square, H-Bridge Switched DC

I have a sensing Coil on one leg - Voltage on the Coil goes up showing higher Voltage at resonance as one would expect

An example of Resonance. I had posted this to the net, none were interested!

   Chris

   Chris

 

Zanzal posted this 11 August 2017

I don't think its not that people aren't interested, but those transformer cores are not easy or cheap to obtain.

It might be better if people start here:

This one is the experiment I'll be working on next. Pay close attention to what he says at the end. He couldn't get it to work at first and he had to play with it a lot to get it to work.

Chris posted this 11 August 2017

Hahaha - Hey Zanzal, yes, this is a good example also!

Mark is a legend

Simple, cheap, and another proof of concept. Scaling is, as Mark says, important, also Magnets can add energy.

Another experiment I shared years ago: Here

   Chris

 

Wistiti posted this 12 August 2017

That also the reason why im here with you guys!

I am really not the guys with the great technical skills but im an happy hobby builder too!

Thank's again Chris for opening my eyes on it!

Chris posted this 12 August 2017

Wistiti, you're a legend also!

This is natural for you, thus your successes!

There is a period of adjustment after success, where there seems to be gaps that need to be filled... It is easy to get stuck in a circle, where nothing makes sense. But my advice is follow your gut feeling.

Thank you my friend!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 12 August 2017

The historical record presents some interesting interconnects.

Tom Bearden did state on many occasions: "Sweet used a center tapped coil, but never mentioned what he did with that center tap"

Anyway, now I think we may have finally hit the overall outline of the total process which "activation" accomplished. Fortunately, Walter Rosenthal (who built Sweet's actual synchronized discharge unit and process which Sweet used to get that coordination established) knows the rest of it from the bench implementation status. One will still have to experiment (Sweet used a center tapped coil, but never mentioned what he did with that center tap) to see if Sweet was using fields of unitary direction, or using deliberately "equal and opposite" (i.e., symmetrically regauged energy so he could then just directly oscillate the "internal stress energy" of the barium nucleus and the nucleons themselves, reaching the quark flipping fields in that manner).

The Tom Bearden Website

We know, Floyd Sweets early work had this fore mentioned "center tapped coil":

 

 I have verified this diagram and its authenticity, it has come originally from people that worked with Floyd Sweet in the early days. Originally, I received this diagram in this form:

Marked as Page: 25 - I do not know of how many pages in total. I do not know from which document this page comes from either.

What is interesting, it the correlation to Tom Bearden's above statement and what has been written in the following article published here: New Energy News Letter March 1995 - Floyd Sweet Page. 8

 Clearly, Tom Bearden was trying to give clues, this also correct and true:

to see if Sweet was using fields of unitary direction, or using deliberately "equal and opposite" (i.e., symmetrically regauged energy so he could then just directly oscillate the "internal stress energy"

All the other information on "activation" and magnets, barium and so on is complete rubbish! A Red Herring

   Chris

Fighter posted this 13 May 2019

I found this, I think it belongs to this thread.

He is using AMCC core meaning that is a Metglas core with special characteristics, not sure if this works the same with ferrite cores.

What I found interesting is the guy is saying when using pulsed DC there is no over-unity but when using real AC there is over-unity.

Zanzal posted this 13 May 2019

Hey Fighter,

What I found interesting is the guy is saying when using pulsed DC there is not over-unity but when using real AC there is over-unity.

I do think there is something interesting about amorphous alloy cores. I noticed a strange behavior with square waves when using these cores. A square wave on the input primary, often results in a square wave on the output secondary. This was common to observe, but not observed in every circuit. This seemed a little strange when I first saw it, because I have never seen this in non-amorphous cores it was a little puzzling. I didn't pay much attention too it, but I read a comment in Patrick Kelly's book that I thought was interesting, suggesting these cores have enough bandwidth to pass multiple frequencies. As the square wave can be thought of as a summation of multiple sine waves at different frequencies and amplitudes this made some sense to me. I've put no time into researching it, but it might be a relevant to support investigating the claim above.

Chris posted this 13 May 2019

Hi Fighter,

I do believe Debunkified is a member here on this forum, thus where the idea came from, but under a different username. I can not remember the username that was used but I remember passing some private message's with him.

 

See the Video Description.

@Zanzal, good to see you back! You're right about the bandwidth, but there is no magic in these cores. Many cores work all the same way.

You will see it everywhere, there must be two Output Coils, Partnered Output Coils for this to work. The Driving, on a single Input Coil, is a Single Pulse for each Cycle.

   Chris

fer123 posted this 25 May 2019

Hello Chris and all, this something I want to share magnets induce in bucking coils and producing electricity with a gap between both coils. Good luck.

 

https://www.facebook.com/100000123080073/videos/2692849117395831/

Marathonman posted this 25 May 2019

"What I found interesting is the guy is saying when using pulsed DC there is no over-unity but when using real AC there is over-unity."

Very Doubtful, the use of dc can not be denied. AC is completely wasteful having to reverse all the domains when zero is hit then the process begins all over of flipping the domain. Dc given frequency is the way to go not AC.

people need to think in these lines because the power and time to flip all the domains is not only wasteful  but takes way to much time to flip them for any kind of reasonable output.

I cry wolf, sorry but that is just my two cents worth with my tests of AC with the Figuera device. what i found is that having to flip the domains is very, very time consuming and takes a lot of power to do so so i will leave it to you to do the test and decide for yourselves.

the most disturbing fact is you liked trashbook, aka facebook to this site. my heart literally skipped a beat.

good luck.

Regards,

Marathonman

Chris posted this 25 May 2019

Hi Fer123,

I try not to ever make judgment on others work. I try to allows the benefit of the doubt. Simply because of the vastness of this technology. I like to think we Humans can have a Racial Trust in each other, even if this may not always be true.

Thanks for sharing! I have not seen this before.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 06 August 2020

My Friends,

Today I explain with some help from one of my favorite personalities, Ruslan, finding the resonant frequency, and breaking the Coils down to the smallest possible components, in other words, Diakoptics:

 

I was not going to post this video, thinking it may not really be of much use for most here, as this is mostly known already!

I ask you, please review the last Post i quoted from Ruslan:

Kind time of day. Maybe here we will find a common language. At once I will say that I do not sit at forums much. No time ! However, now for the 5th time I am collecting Akulin for a capacity increase. There are ideas .... But in fact the people are looking for a bit of everything is not right. All these systems operate on the basis of standing and traveling waves. It is necessary first to catch the motion of particles in the coil. Those. as Kapanadze does with a tester or an ammeter. Only at HF frequencies no ammeter will help and you will need to catch an oscilloscope. The first rule: Wind the coil 40 meters. 2. Find out its resonant frequency (1/4 wave) Inductor 1/4 = 10 meters of the same wire (for example, 2.5mm) Connect the generator to a 10 meter coil, drive the rectangles at a frequency of 1 MHz and crawl higher until 40 meters do not appear sinusoid. The maximum amplitude. The generator is desirable to take a normal, laboratory! With output adjustment from 0 to 20 volts. We achieve maximum amplitude and move tenths of a kilohertz until it starts to dance. This is your wave resonance !!! We fix the frequency and voltage. It is for this all have to do the generators. Further ... Tesla we shake under this frequency that the effect has turned out. Then we do everything as I did or the Shark. In this case, everyone wants to repeat this device. Forward! We fix everything beautifully and stiffly, without forgetting that the resonance and effect can escape in the case of fastenings on the snot. We need to get the effect itself and work, and not a ready device. Once you begin to understand what to do next, you can already move. So .... Tesla, as we know, also wets the sinusoid. Suppose your frequency is 1.821MHz. The frequency, but alas. It is necessary to adjust Tesla on it. The shark used a critic between Tesla and the toroid (Antenna) over the inductor. This is just an accurate adjustment. It is needed before launching. Then the system holds and no matter what has slipped in not large limits. But! Again ... What where? On the Inductor we feed the signal of rectangles with a frequency of 1/50. Consider: 1820: 50 = 36.4 kHz pumping a rectangle through the junction (Pot) with 23-29 turns of wire 2.5 squares. I repeat, you need to make the voltage on this harmonic not 10-20 volts, but higher by an order of magnitude. Approximately up to 50-60 volts and get the same dancing effect at the output. Further ! Do not forget that Tesla does not need strong power. Do not let sparks run and wet so that it breaks through. This is not necessary !!! It's better to make a controlled Tesla. Continue: The output voltage will be 195-200 volts. This voltage will not be higher. Why? Later we will return to this. It is necessary to rewind the transformer-reactor (Coil) so as to obtain the desired voltage. This requires experiments. Remember that we push the current in the reactor with a transverse wave. Created by Tesla. In the coil another wave is formed under the action of pumping by rectangles. The particles of which constantly rotate left and right. By giving them the movement of the pulsating Tesla, we disperse them in the very conductor. This is a gemmoroid understanding, but a fact. Tesla must operate in one half-cycle or one arm of the transistor. It is advisable to manage the Tesla pack - pulse generator. When everything is clearly adjusted, you will see how the effect manifests when changing the width of the pack. Consumption Tesla is scanty, and pumping does not strain at all. The current at the output is up to 7 amperes and the voltage is 200-209 volts. Bulbs and PSU pulses work well. Now for removal: 1. The coil is connected via a diode bridge. No parallel capacitors !!! 2. You need from Tesla only one half wave. Otherwise Tesla will take what she gave, back !!! Therefore, and put the diode from the ground to the very take-off coil (40m) The shark did this at the reception. He removed one part of the sine at the reception itself. Because Tesla. No one knows this and -bip-tsya to this day, nichrome does not work. It's clear! You need to swing the swing in the coil of energy removal. It is there that we push the current. By the way, the surplus from Tesla and the frequency setting of the Shark used a simple light bulb. Since the Inductor is galvanically isolated from the entire circuit, the light bulb serves as a resistive load to suppress surplus from cords and pickups. You can not bet, but do not rock Tesla very much. Do not ! Remember that the current is subject to voltage. This I see from experiments that I spent 2 more years ago. Next: The diode on the receiving take-off coil destroys one half-cycle and so we swing the oscillations without hindering them by the negative Tesla period. This, too, many do not know and continue to sculpt. That's why Roman (Shark) says that he is eating ground ... Everything is right! Because it kills the half-period pulse at the reception, which is grounded. This can be seen in all his settings! I wondered for a long time why he decided to use this solution and realized that it's easier to pick up BB diodes. Since interference at such frequencies in Tesla will lead to its improper operation. In other words, it will not be possible to cut off the half-period. Kapa solved this issue with an arrester and rectifiers at low frequencies. There everything is simpler, but more wires .... So on the German installation the diode is small, Tesla is far away, the grounding cable is long. By the way is equal to the length of Tesla !!! Do not forget about grounding .... On this installation it is important and without good support (grounding) will not work. Do not forget that the systems use high voltage. As we know, it moves even in the air. That's why grounding is necessary. Plus wave resonance and safety .... Like that .....

Ref: Ruslan K

 

NOTE: As is pointed out, 1820 / 364 = 50 Hz. Tariel Kapanadze had 50 Hz on the Output. The Resonant Frequency Ruslan gave was 1.820 MHz. Ruslan advised to use a Sub Harmonic, but advised to increase the Voltage by a Order of magnitude.

The most important part in my opinion is:

The first rule: Wind the coil 40 meters. 2. Find out its resonant frequency (1/4 wave) Inductor 1/4 = 10 meters of the same wire (for example, 2.5mm) Connect the generator to a 10 meter coil, drive the rectangles at a frequency of 1 MHz and crawl higher until 40 meters do not appear sinusoid. The maximum amplitude. The generator is desirable to take a normal, laboratory! With output adjustment from 0 to 20 volts. We achieve maximum amplitude and move tenths of a kilohertz until it starts to dance. This is your wave resonance !!! We fix the frequency and voltage. It is for this all have to do the generators. Further ... Tesla we shake under this frequency that the effect has turned out. Then we do everything as I did or the Shark. In this case, everyone wants to repeat this device. Forward! We fix everything beautifully and stiffly, without forgetting that the resonance and effect can escape in the case of fastenings on the snot. We need to get the effect itself and work, and not a ready device. Once you begin to understand what to do next, you can already move. So .... Tesla, as we know, also wets the sinusoid. Suppose your frequency is 1.821MHz. The frequency, but alas. It is necessary to adjust Tesla on it. The shark used a critic between Tesla and the toroid (Antenna) over the inductor. This is just an accurate adjustment. It is needed before launching. Then the system holds and no matter what has slipped in not large limits. But! Again ... What where? On the Inductor we feed the signal of rectangles with a frequency of 1/50. Consider: 1820: 50 = 36.4 kHz pumping a rectangle through the junction (Pot) with 23-29 turns of wire 2.5 squares. I repeat, you need to make the voltage on this harmonic not 10-20 volts, but higher by an order of magnitude. Approximately up to 50-60 volts and get the same dancing effect at the output.

 

This following video is useful also:

 

I hope this helps everyone!

Please Note: The same basic principles apply, but the methods are not necessarily the same. In the machines I have shown, the Resonance is found by a combination of Frequency and Duty Cycle and Input Voltage.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Augenblick posted this 06 August 2020

Chris,

Very instructive! Always good to refresh basic concepts to keep one grounded (no pun ...).

Thank you!

-A-

Chris posted this 07 August 2020

Hey CD,

I agree, I also have the feeling that EPR is involved.

Ruslan, a legend, gave us this golden information:

 

In my effort to learn more about how this tech works, I have always been open to others ideas and methods. Ruslan's exquisite Radio Engineering background gives him a very good path on Antenna Theory, a theory as you know, I have also been very sportive of in the basic understanding of this technology!

I quote Ruslan:

I'll tell you there myself a little on this coil, one more time yes. Here inductor is an inductor pro wire length of all this brown from end to end, these with these including yes it is 37 and a half meters.

We are now opening a calculator, for those who is here, but I think there is someone we are have already dropped this very calculations, and then there is inductance so so so so you now here we will open oscillatory circuit advanced calculation, and now I will show you means you could not see because you can see so well.

That's the frequency yes that is enter and purity period wavelength, wavelength and quarter wavelength, length wave.

Our wavelength is equal to the length waves, me wires means that we make a wire with us 37 s half here you go means a quarter length how many waves we get 8 megahertz, got got me ?

So quarrel moment wavelength quarter quarter waves are shorter so we have a quarter of a wave it turns out 37 and a half 375 length waves, we have 150 meters, we get a period t 052 megahertz.

Yes this picture means that's what you have to mean that's what we have it turns out yes that is, this is a coil with us this particular weight coil so this coil we have two megahertz yes, that is, this is its resonant frequency wave until you cadet quarter-wave me somehow that a quarter of a rum the so-called antenna what if 37 and 5 take this from us the length of the whole wire which is the inductor we have must also be a multiple, we take 37.5 divide by 2 by one second we get 1875 here the coil should be in this place to be reeled in 1875 no other.

I proceed from calculations the coil itself, but again, so that this start winding the coil naturally to us will need a conversation about how we will have high voltage tesla.

Tesla as such she's here on this side and unwound now I will rewind here it is necessary to wind such a tesla that will give two megahertz but 2 megahertz she should give us on the antenna here that's where the antenna will be very necessarily antenna two fingers between here these inductor and antennas must be required i.e. capacitive coupling antennas around this all there should be something the less the better the antenna will irradiate already this high-frequency high-voltage field is already the whole thing without inductive inductive coupling the less the better but again I say not overdo it well, about one and a half two finger like this should be yes that is about winding top antennas what we do we we absorb energy from the environment into this place where will she converge with the energy that is already here will be in inductors here will be the current load before that is, the flow will be what do you do you just connect only voltage voltage will be from Tesla it will be from Wednesday make tesla.

 

Remember our Wave Equations:

 

299,792,458 m/s / 37.5 meters = 7.99446555 MHz x 0.25 = 1.9986163875, close to 1.875 MHz! Damping could be the difference!

Why 1/4 Wavelength? Its still not clear?

Turn for Turn, lets work it out:

  • 2 Layers Counter Clockwise.
  • 1/2 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/2 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/4 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/4 Layer Clockwise.

 

In decimal, 2.0 + -0.5 + -0.5 + -0.25 + -0.25 = 0.5. 1.5 - 2.0 = 0.75. 1.0 - 0.75 = 0.25 or 1/4 of the total turns in the Coil are Inductive, Three Quarters of the Coil is non-inductive.

Is this the reason for the 1/4 Wave length? I don't know! I do know Resonance in a Half Wave Antenna, requires Lambda / 2, a Quarter Wave Antenna is Lambda / 4 or Quarter Wavelength:

 

Perhaps YoElMiCrO can provide a little more insight on this topic? My knowledge is limited in these areas, I have tried to learn as much as I can, but still have a lot to learn!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 08 August 2020

My Friends,

We have made great strides ahead! For anyone following, if you stop and look back for a minute, only a year ago, you will see great progress made!

We have learnt the basic requirements inside out now:

  • Two Output Coils are required, or at least part Clock Wise and part Counter Clock Wise, but it is easier to think of two separate Coils.
  • We must find Magnetic Resonance!
  • We must increase the Voltage on the Output: Current I = Voltage V / Resistance R.
  • We must aim for Asymmetry, and avoid Symmetry entirely as Symmetry is not ever beneficial for us!
  • We have learnt that the Output Coil Impedance, can play a role in the operation of the machine!
  • We have some basic Math to help us aim for Machine operation, although it is not complete. Antenna Theory.
  • We have learnt our Input is merely a Catalyst for the Coil Interactions!
  • We have seen many replications from many different people, and we have learnt many methods for acquiring measurements for accurate Input to Output measurements.

 

Its been a long road My Friends and you all have stuck with me on this long road. I Thank You for this! It is you that is changing the world for the better! 

Right now, we are getting more visits and reads than ever before! People from every country around the world are taking notice of what we are doing and people are learning. This is key, this is the first step!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 10 August 2020

My Friends,

I want to go into a little more about Ruslan's Wave Theory.

Ruslan said:

That's why Roman (Shark) says that he is eating ground ... Everything is right! Because it kills the half-period pulse at the reception, which is grounded.

This can be seen in all his settings! I wondered for a long time why he decided to use this solution and realized that it's easier to pick up BB diodes. Since interference at such frequencies in Tesla will lead to its improper operation.

In other words, it will not be possible to cut off the half-period. Kapa solved this issue with an arrester and rectifiers at low frequencies.

There everything is simpler, but more wires ....

So on the German installation the diode is small, Tesla is far away, the grounding cable is long. By the way is equal to the length of Tesla !!!

Do not forget about grounding .... On this installation it is important and without good support (grounding) will not work. Do not forget that the systems use high voltage. As we know, it moves even in the air. That's why grounding is necessary. Plus wave resonance and safety .... Like that .....

Ref: Ruslan K

 

This is a really important statement! Lets look at this again:

Tesla is far away, the grounding cable is long. By the way is equal to the length of Tesla !!!

 

So, if we look at the above, where Ruslan says the Tesla is 37.5 Meters, then the Grounding Cable must also be 37.5 Meters!

Now, we must look at this as a Dipole antenna, or a Monopole antenna, where 1/4 wavelength is 37.5 Meters, half wave is 37.5 x 2 = 75, and thus full Wave is 150 Meters! This is what Ruslan says, but it is not clear, in the following video:

 

The Image here:

 

Now, I have to say, some of this, I do not understand, I have struggled with this for a long time! I have learnt Antenna Research from scratch and still have a lot to learn! The Above Unity Member Calculator provides some useful calculations to assist us with these calculations:

 

What evidence for a long Grounding Cable do we have? A Lot!

 

 

It is worth noting, Nikola Tesla also had patented this very requirement in Patent No#: US787412A

The ground should be made with great care, with the object of reducing its resistance. Instead of being directly grounded, as indicated, the coil C may be joined .in series or otherwise to the primary A, in which case the latter will be connected to the plate E; but be it that none or a part or all of the primary or exciting turns are included in the coil C the total length of the conductor from the ground-plate E to the elevated terminal E should be equal to one-quarter of the wave length of the electrical disturbance in the system E C E or else equal to that length multiplied by an odd number. This relation being observed, the terminal E will be made to coincide with the points of maximum pressure in the secondary or excited circuit, and the greatest flow'of electricity will take place in the same. In order to magnify the electrical movement in the secondary as much as possible, it is essential that its inductive connection with the primary A should not be very intimate, as in ordinary transformers, but loose, so as to permit free oscillation that is to say, their mutual induction should be The spiral form of coil (J secures this advantage, while the turns near the-primary A are subjected to a strong inductive action and develop a high initial electromotive force. 

Ref: Patent No# US787412A

 

The best and most convenient manner of carrying out the invention of which I am now aware, is to surround the freely vibrating circuit or conductor, which is to be maintained at a low temperature, with a suitable cooling medium, which may be any kind of freezing mixture or agent, such as liquid air, and in order to derive the fullest benefit from the improvement, the circuit should be primarily constructed so as to have the greatest possible self-induction and the smallest practicable resistance, and other rules of construction, which are now recognized, should be observed. For example, when, in a system of transmission of energy for any purpose through the natural media, the transmitting and receiving conductors are connected to earth and to an insulated terminal respectively, the lengths of these conductors should be one quarter of the wave length of the disturbance propagated through them.

Ref: Patent No# 13,563

 

The length of the thin wire coil in each transformer should be approximately one-quarter of the wave length of the electric disturbance in the circuit, this estimate being based on the velocity of propagation of the disturbance through the coil itself and the circuit with which it is designed to be used. By way of illustration, if the rate at which the current traverses the circuit including the coil be one hundred and eighty-five thousand miles per second then a frequency of nine hundred and twenty-five per second would maintain nine hundred and twenty-five stationary waves in a circuit one hundred and eighty-five thousand miles long and each wave would be two hundred miles in length.

Ref: Patent No# 649,621

 

So far, I am happy that this explains the question I posed in the last post:

Is this the reason for the 1/4 Wave length?

 

1/4 or Quarter Wavelength is used because 37.5 Meters is 1/4 of 150 meters.

NOTE: 1/4 Wavelength is maximum Potential for the shortest Time.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 10 August 2020

My Friends,

At this point, everything we have looked at, supports our original theories that Partnered Output Coils are Resonant with basic Wave Theory mechanics!

 

I have drawn the above circuit here:

 

I think this is very important to note!

Floyd Sweet also said about this very fact:

Resonance frequencies may be maintained quite constant at high power levels so long as the load remains constant. We are all familiar with AM and FM propagation, where in the case as AM, the voltage amplitude varies, and with FM, the frequency is modulated.

However, the output power sees a constant load impedance, that of the matched antenna system. If this changes, the input to the antenna is mismatched, and standing waves are generated resulting in a loss of power.

Ref: Magnetic Resonance by Floyd A. Sweet. PH. D

 

Floyd Sweet was studding Paul Raymond Jensen's UDT, an amazing achievement for a man that really was not looking to do what he did!

Wave theory is a very good and backed up path forward!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Atti posted this 11 August 2020

I like this idea of serial resonance.
Let's transplant the phenomena. From motor to transformer (ratio of primary and secondary voltage and currents)
This quick study shows that under load, the tuned motor does not absorb more power from the mains. It decreases until it tilts over to the point where the rotation stops. Then only the resistance of the coil absorbs the power. Current and voltage are 90 °

Atti.

Chris posted this 11 August 2020

My Friends,

Another example of Wave Theory in these machines is from Don Smith:

 

You will note, Don Smith's turns is an indication:

  • 16 Turns on the Partnered Output Coils.
  • 4 turns on the Input Coil.

 

Mathematically: 4 / 16 = 0.25 or Quarter Wavelength. This means, for 100 Turns on Each POC, the Input Coil is 25 Turns.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 12 August 2020

 HI Aloha


Chris has already covered this topic here  

http://www.aboveunity.com/thread/timing/

about common mode and differential mode


Jagau

 

Chris posted this 13 August 2020

My Friends,

Twenty years ago, Andrey Melnichenko tried to get out to the public the use of Secondary Magnetic Fields, normally not used, to "Generate" Energy in Excess of the Input.

 

Twenty years later, we are a lot more advanced and know that we must Break Symmetry, and move to Asymmetry. In other words, the use of Three Actions:

  1. An Input Pulse.
  2. An Output Induction Phase.
  3. A Secondary Induction Phase.

 

Three Phases all up, making an Asymmetrical System!

We can make this happen with Two Coils, or Three Coils, each Coil having its own phase, or one Input Coil becoming an Output Coil also, making up the three Phases.

Using two Coils and three Phases is what Aukla commonly used in his lantern's:, we covered this in Self Powering Above Unity Machines

 

When the Mosfet is On:

 

When the Mosfet is Off:

 

Don't forget, Amplifying or magnifying both Voltage and Current is easy, we have covered this many times! We only need combine the two methods, and find Magnetic Resonance, and this bursts into life!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

alohalaoha posted this 16 August 2020

Chris download this file, translate and put at forum what is themost interesting

There are 203 important comments about BTG by Ruslan Kulabuhov aka TOP RUSLAN from the forum: https://realstrannik.com/forum/recent

https://yadi.sk/d/RiGhmYqLcp4kK

Reg

Aloha

Chris posted this 16 August 2020

Thank You Aloha!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

Fighter posted this 17 August 2020

I translated it, anyone can download it from here.

Don't expect the translation to be 100% accurate because I used automated translation and I can't verify it,

I don't speak Russian.

But it's accurate enough to give details about what's happening on that Russian forum.

Thank you Aloha !

Chris posted this 17 August 2020

My Friends,

@Fighter, Thank You!

I want to spur more thinking on the Technology:

Turn for Turn, lets work it out:

  • 2 Layers Counter Clockwise.
  • 1/2 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/2 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/4 Layer Clockwise.
  • 1/4 Layer Clockwise.

 

In decimal, 2.0 + -0.5 + -0.5 + -0.25 + -0.25 = 0.5. 1.5 - 2.0 = 0.75. 1.0 - 0.75 = 0.25 or 1/4 of the total turns in the Coil are Inductive, Three Quarters of the Coil is non-inductive.

 

In the Grenade Coil:

 

We need to think of each turn and its respective Direction, as a Separate Coil! What do I mean? I mean the singular Grenade Coil as two Coils, one Clockwise ( 75% Turns ) and one Counter Clockwise ( 25% Turns ) in this case.

Two separate Coils, Fields Opposing, we get something similar to this:

 

Using Electromagnetic Wave Theory, as Nikola Tesla described, we can find the resonance of the Coils, and then, thus, draw Amplified Current and Voltage, greater than Unity or Above Unity Power Output!

 the circuit should be primarily constructed so as to have the greatest possible self-induction and the smallest practicable resistance, and other rules of construction, which are now recognized, should be observed. For example, when, in a system of transmission of energy for any purpose through the natural media, the transmitting and receiving conductors are connected to earth and to an insulated terminal respectively, the lengths of these conductors should be one quarter of the wave length of the disturbance propagated through them.

Ref: Patent No# 13,563

 

 

There are many ways to bring the Coils into Resonance, as pointed out above, a mosfet driven Push Pull Driver and a Spark Gap via a very low resistance Coil is one that Kapanadze used, as he stated:

Of course, the Grenade Coil is not drawn in the above Circuit. If the Grenade coil is 37.5 meters long, and the wave resonance is 1.875MHz, then the 375 Harmonic will be 50Hz. In Ruslan's case: 1820 / 50 = 36.4 KHz, the 50th Harmonic = 36.4KHz.

 

On the Inductor we feed the signal of rectangles with a frequency of 1/50. Consider: 1820: 50 = 36.4 kHz pumping a rectangle through the junction (Pot) with 23-29 turns of wire 2.5 squares. I repeat, you need to make the voltage on this harmonic not 10-20 volts, but higher by an order of magnitude. Approximately up to 50-60 volts and get the same dancing effect at the output.

 

double GrenadeResonance = 1875.0; // 1820.0

for (int i = 2; i < 501; i++)
{
    Console.WriteLine(GrenadeResonance + " / " + i + " = " + (GrenadeResonance / Convert.ToDouble(i)));
}

 

Remember: Grenade Resonance is where the Fields are 180 Degrees out of phase and the Magnitude, even though the Turns are not the same, are equal. This means external Magnetic Fields are not going to be negatively affected, because we have a Positive and a Negative force exerted on the Wire, 1 + -1 = 0, so no net negative affect on the Input!

Key Concept: Increasing the Voltage, because Current I = Voltage V / Resistance R.

So much work, so little time.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

thaelin posted this 18 August 2020

Hi Chris:

    You posted a schematic a week ago detailing the grenade coil. In it is a non used L19. Could this be used to verify if and when these fields converge correctly?  I just recently got a pair of C-cores and wound up a POC. Even tho it is not correct at all, I achieved 360V out where there should have been none. I need to find out what is going on in the neutral part of the coil. Just do not want to be "enlightened" when I do. I have seen streamers taken off the coil in question.

thay

 

Chris posted this 18 August 2020

Hi Thay,

Yes, the Coil was drawn by Ruslan:

 

in this video:

 

The Coil L19, could be Katcher, Spark Gap or similar. We have seen videos and documentation before, where the Spark Gap is atop the Sine Wave:

 

We know from the Tesla Circuits, the Spark Gap does give a big pulse atop the wave in the Circuit, the capacitor must charge first, then once the capacitor is charged, the Spark Gap fires, this is Tarial Kapanadze original style:

 

 

I hope this helps!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 19 August 2020

My Friends,

I believe the following two videos are the most important Ruslan has ever done:

 

you need to get this effect, and this you understand that there is an hour, if you twist more precisely, turn this sinusoid here it is, she, but she doesn't dance here like that then it doesn't seem to be visible it is necessary to reduce it from me a beach is generally a beach it seems that sine clean nifiga not clean here they are there she is standing wave will it work for me how the purity increased and I understand like this, behold!

 

The Standing Wave is KEY to this technology:

Magnetic Resonance, Clock Wise and Counter Clock Wise turns, in what we call Non Inductive mode, but in point of fact is highly inductive, as Tesla pointed out:

the circuit should be primarily constructed so as to have the greatest possible self-induction and the smallest practicable resistance, and other rules of construction, which are now recognized, should be observed. For example, when, in a system of transmission of energy for any purpose through the natural media, the transmitting and receiving conductors are connected to earth and to an insulated terminal respectively, the lengths of these conductors should be one quarter of the wave length of the disturbance propagated through them.

Ref: Patent No# 13,563

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 19 August 2020

My Friends,

A little thinking out loud in this post:

I have tried, since the early days, link Antenna Theory, to the machines we are all working on.

The length of a dipole is the main consideration for determining its operating frequency, and as a result, calculating the length is a key element of designing and installing any dipole antenna whether for HF, VHF, or UHF, etc..

Ref: Dipole Antenna Length: calculation & formula

 

Many of the greats before us have said that the machines are directly, 1/4 Wave or 1/2 Wave machines in their operation!

 

Ruslan wrote about Wave Mechanics:

The first rule: Wind the coil 40 meters. 2. Find out its resonant frequency (1/4 wave) Inductor 1/4 = 10 meters of the same wire (for example, 2.5mm) Connect the generator to a 10 meter coil, drive the rectangles at a frequency of 1 MHz and crawl higher until 40 meters do not appear sinusoid. The maximum amplitude. The generator is desirable to take a normal, laboratory! With output adjustment from 0 to 20 volts. We achieve maximum amplitude and move tenths of a kilohertz until it starts to dance. This is your wave resonance !!! We fix the frequency and voltage.

 

Also in his video:

 

Floyd Sweet wrote:

Resonance frequencies may be maintained quite constant at high power levels so long as the load remains constant. We are all familiar with AM and FM propagation, where in the case as AM, the voltage amplitude varies, and with FM, the frequency is modulated. 

However, the output power sees a constant load impedance, that of the matched antenna system. If this changes, the input to the antenna is mismatched, and standing waves are generated resulting in a loss of power. The frequency is a forced response and remains constant. Power is lost and efficiency becomes less and less, depending on the degree of mismatch.

Ref: Magnetic Resonance by Floyd A. Sweet. Ph.D.

 

This is just a small snippet, a few quotes of many! We must be wise and pay attention here!

 

Let take Don Smith's machine as an example:

 

 

What do we have:

  1. Primary, 4 Turns.
  2. Secondary, 16 Turns.
  3. Secondary, 16 Turns.

 

Mathematically:

4 / 16 = 0.25 or 1 / 4 or one Quarter.

I have estimated each turn' length to be 200 mm.

16 x 200 = 3.2 meters.

3.2 meters Wavelength is: 93685143.125 Hz

Now, 4 turns approximately 200 mm each is 0.8 meters.

0.8 meters Wavelength is: 374740572.5 Hz

93685143.125 / 374740572.5 = 0.25 or one Quarter!

You will note:

The first rule: Wind the coil 40 meters. 2. Find out its resonant frequency (1/4 wave) Inductor 1/4 = 10 meters of the same wire (for example, 2.5mm) Connect the generator to a 10 meter coil, drive the rectangles at a frequency of 1 MHz and crawl higher until 40 meters do not appear sinusoid.

Ref: Ruslan also said the same thing!

 

Ok, we see a pattern here, its quickly making some sense! Well sort of anyway...

Again, going through Nikola Tesla's Patents and reading about the Quarter Wavelength relationships gives great insight! I have provided some above, not all but the best ones I could find quickly. I post them again below:

 

The ground should be made with great care, with the object of reducing its resistance. Instead of being directly grounded, as indicated, the coil C may be joined .in series or otherwise to the primary A, in which case the latter will be connected to the plate E; but be it that none or a part or all of the primary or exciting turns are included in the coil C the total length of the conductor from the ground-plate E to the elevated terminal E should be equal to one-quarter of the wave length of the electrical disturbance in the system E C E or else equal to that length multiplied by an odd number. This relation being observed, the terminal E will be made to coincide with the points of maximum pressure in the secondary or excited circuit, and the greatest flow'of electricity will take place in the same. In order to magnify the electrical movement in the secondary as much as possible, it is essential that its inductive connection with the primary A should not be very intimate, as in ordinary transformers, but loose, so as to permit free oscillation that is to say, their mutual induction should be The spiral form of coil (J secures this advantage, while the turns near the-primary A are subjected to a strong inductive action and develop a high initial electromotive force. 

Ref: Patent No# US787412A

 

The best and most convenient manner of carrying out the invention of which I am now aware, is to surround the freely vibrating circuit or conductor, which is to be maintained at a low temperature, with a suitable cooling medium, which may be any kind of freezing mixture or agent, such as liquid air, and in order to derive the fullest benefit from the improvement, the circuit should be primarily constructed so as to have the greatest possible self-induction and the smallest practicable resistance, and other rules of construction, which are now recognized, should be observed. For example, when, in a system of transmission of energy for any purpose through the natural media, the transmitting and receiving conductors are connected to earth and to an insulated terminal respectively, the lengths of these conductors should be one quarter of the wave length of the disturbance propagated through them.

Ref: Patent No# 13,563

 

The length of the thin wire coil in each transformer should be approximately one-quarter of the wave length of the electric disturbance in the circuit, this estimate being based on the velocity of propagation of the disturbance through the coil itself and the circuit with which it is designed to be used. By way of illustration, if the rate at which the current traverses the circuit including the coil be one hundred and eighty-five thousand miles per second then a frequency of nine hundred and twenty-five per second would maintain nine hundred and twenty-five stationary waves in a circuit one hundred and eighty-five thousand miles long and each wave would be two hundred miles in length.

Ref: Patent No# 649,621

 

 

I hope this data is useful for all here!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 19 August 2020

Hey CD,

Thanks for posting your data, and yes you are right there are approximations made.

Of course the circumference of a circle is: 2 Pi r

Being that the Input Coil has much longer feed lines, the wire to the actual coiled part:

 

If one pays attention to the Coil Length quotes, and the parts where Antenna or Wave Theory are mentioned, then this all makes a lot more sense.

Don Smith said:

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

strape posted this 20 August 2020

Hello everyone. I still read carefully and try to understand everything. one thing is still unclear to me .. what is important for the coils .. The length of the wire or the number of turns .. Since both are solved here .. if I take as an important thing the length of the wire for the coil, let's say 10 meters and wind core a spool with several layers of some number of turns (50 turns) comes out .. then I need to wind a second spool on the same core, I should wind a spool 1/4 of 10 meters long. it is 2.5 meters .. but I should also have 1/4 of the threads if I understand correctly then it should be 12.5 threads .. But unfortunately it is not possible to achieve this because the diameter of the core has increased by the first coil ... So what for winding the coils is important ..
Maybe I wrote it all right ..
Thank you and have a nice day everyone ..

Chris posted this 20 August 2020

Hi Strape,

one thing is still unclear to me .. what is important for the coils .. The length of the wire or the number of turns

 

The Length of the Coils is the same as turns due to the average Turn Circumference being: 2 Pi rAverage = Average Circumference.

For example, the Coil may have an Average Radius of 3 centimetres, this means we have an average length of: 18.85 centimetres per turn, now total turns = 100, this means we have a Coil Length of: 100 x 18.85 = 1,885 centimetres.

You see, the length of the Coil can be gained by turns, simply by knowing the Turns and the average Turn Length.

NOTE: This is a close approximation, pretty accurate, not 100% accurate however. As you point out, its not 100% correct, its just a close method of working this out.

Many before us, have used the same basic numbers, not 100%, but all very close.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 20 August 2020

Hey CD,

The below video ( 0:58 ), I can only count, starting at Zero, 1, 2, 3, 4 here is the image:

 

 

Of course, if one skips Zero, and counts the Zeroth Turn as One, we do get 5 turns. I normally don't count turns until I have a complete turn down, then that's one. Of course, the starting point is important. Counting one half turn is not a full turn.

@All Readers, I urge all to very closely study the Videos of Don Smith! He is 100% correct in his methodologies, on how these machines work, always has been! From time to time he might have been confusing, or not 100% clear, but I see his work as 100% correct!

Dont forget, at 1/4 Wave, we have Peak Magnetic Field, no Electric Field, remember our diagram:

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 20 August 2020

Hey CD,

Always do what you feel is right, or the best method you feel. Its always the best path forward.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Jagau
Chris posted this 20 August 2020

My Friends,

I posted this post to CD's Thread:

Hey CD,

Same as you, I understand what Don and others was saying, but this is a little difficult to visualise.

I particularly like what Don said:

A coil will load and unload at its natural frequency.

 

I always like to see and understand the Coil Lengths for what they are and what they are meant to do! Whats why I posted the Image some time back of the Sine Wave and the Wire Lengths:

 

Looking back, I could have done this better! I should have had the Brown Wire as a Half Wavelength! Still the idea was there, and the supporting Videos on Antenna Theory were a help also.

Looking at the Wire Length and the Potential, we see Potential is maximum at 1/4 or Quarter Wavelength.

We know from our Antenna Wave Theory Videos:

 

 

 

That Half Wave is normal for Dipole Antenna, and Quarter Wave Antenna must be grounded to complete the extra Quarter Wave.

Electromagnetic Waves are Important! 

I think it is important to say, remembering the short Wave, the Input Coil has only one job to do, get the Potential Up! Maximum Voltage! We need to get the Partnered Output Coils up to Maximum Voltage in the Shortest Possible Time, so this would be be at 1/4 Wavelength as seen above! Also, the best possible method to do this is via Electromagnetic Wave Theory, Resonance, Also known as Antenna Theory! 

Practically, your Partnered Output Coils Length = either Half Wave with no Grounding, or Quarter Wave with Grounding!

Your Input Coil will be 1/4 the Partnered Output Coils Wave, either half Wave or Quarter Wave. It is much easier to wind 4 to 50 turns than it is to wind several hundred at a time so Tuning the Input Coil to this wave length is much easier.

NOTE: Fighters ZPM works when Resonant, this is the same thing!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

 

Remember what Don Smith said:

 

Using Antenna Wave Theory, we can see, at any one time, the ends of the Antenna has a Voltage Potential at the extreme of the scale:

 

Of course, we want Maximum Voltage Potential, for the minimum Input, this is at resonance, using Wave Mechanics:

Remember Floyd Sweet said the same thing:

Using a more rigorous wavemechanics approach...

Ref: Floyd Sweet Magnetic Resonance

 

 

Using the Wavelength λ, and multiples of the Wavelength, λ/2 or half wavelength, λ/4 or quarter wavelength, we can Induce a Voltage on a Wire or a Coil for the least possible work!

Important: At 1/4 Wavelength, we can see we have maximum Voltage Potential!

 

An Antenna, Transmitting and Receiving, must have the same length and orientation!

 

The above video is one of the best I have seen!

Our Partnered Output Coils will always see each other as each others Source, because the lengths are the same of very close to it! They are each an Antenna, and what potential one has, the other must also have, and it will be phase locked, equal and opposite!

Each Partnered Output Coil works as an Antenna:

 

The Green Wave coming from the Other Partnered Output Coil, and the same is true on the other side of the operation! Each Coil is its partners Source!

Our Input Coil is a Harmonic of the Partnered Output Coils Fundamental, so the Input Coil is only ever the Exciter, not the Source.

It is a real shame, so many active researchers, out there on the other forums have absolutely no idea about basic physics and Science in general! It is no wonder we are Light Years ahead of the other forums!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 21 August 2020

Thanks Chris for sharing this 1961 MIT video
I really like, we can see the notion of standing wave with 2 transmitters in constructive or destructive mode, very interesting.

We can notice that the polarization of the antenna is very important.


Jagau

Chris posted this 22 August 2020

My Friends,

I have done a video on this some time back:

 

I am going to do a small experiment today and share some basic Science. Most here already know this stuff, but for those that don't, they may find this beneficial.

We know, and have covered many times, the above waveform has a peak Voltage Value at 1/4 and 3/4's wavelength. In other words, 90 degrees and 270 degrees is maximum Voltage Potential.

We are going to experiment today with Wire length.

I have three Coils. Two of my coils are equal, 100 Turns, each turn measuring: 176 mm in length.

At 100 turns, the Coil Length is: 17.6 meters in length.

I have another Coil, 25 Turns. Average turn length is slightly more: 179 mm in length. Total length: 4.475 meters in length.

 

My Friends, you will notice, and this is important, we have a situation where we need each terminal of each Coil at a Difference of Potential.

Ref: Pay attention to each Terminal - Chris, me.

 

What does this mean? Well, we need one terminal at Maximum Potential and one Terminal at Zero.

 

This means, we need the Full Wave Length to be equal to 4 times the Wire Length. 17.6 meters x 4 = 70.4 meters.

Mathematically:

 

Our Resonant Frequency should be close to: 4,258,415.596 Hertz. So what do we get:

Using:

 

A maximum amplitude is found at: 4,488,300.00 Hertz. We have a difference of: 4,488,300.00 - 4,258,415.596 = 229,884.404 Hertz.

 

Or, using an Inductively Coupled Coil:

 

A maximum amplitude is found at: 5,008,300.00 Hertz. We have a difference of: 5,008,300.00 - 4,258,415.596 = 749,884.404 Hertz.

 

I hope we can see we have a very specific set of variables here. Just like Don Smith said, the Coil will Load and Unload at a specific Frequency!

 

At resonance, we have Maximum Voltage and Maximum Current for the given Wire Length. This means, the Insulated Copper Wire is able to Receive and Transmit Electromagnetic Waves at the Maximum efficiency with almost no loss. Lets not confuse what I mean about Receive and Transmit, because this is meant as a Action Reaction pair, between the two Partnered Output Coils.

Resonance is a very important aspect:

 

Electromagnetic Resonance is the same, Maximum Voltage, Maximum Current, Maximum Magnetic and Electric Fields. Resonance means we have maximum efficiency, the Coils do this at maximum efficiency:

 

Maximum efficiency Electromagnetic Induction!

I have referred to visualising the Insulated Wire, as a Wave guide. This is essentially what the Insulated Copper Wire is! A Waveguide.

 

Resonance is normally thought of, in components:

  • Inductance ( L ).
  • Capacitance ( C ).
  • Resistance ( R ).

 

RLC Resonance is: f = 1 / 2 Pi sqrt(LC)

My Partnered Output Coils Inductance is:

and

Our Calculator says:

So the capacitance of the Coil is apparently: 0.00000000000234850309452449 Farads, * 106 for Microfarads, * 109 for Nanofarads, * 1012 for Picofarads. We have: 2.3485030945 Picofarads of Capacitance in the Coil.

Many here are very advanced in Electronics Engineering, so please point out errors and or better methods to approach this simple experiment!

Remember: Harmonics are our friend!  5,008,300.00 / 100,000.0 = 50.083 Hertz.

NOTE: We have seen Quarter of the Wavelength using this method:

 

I hope this simple experiment, finding the optimum Frequency for the Coils, is helpful to all here!

Please Note: These sorts of very simple experiments are not something you will see on the other forums! We are Light Years Ahead of the other forums!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 22 August 2020

Hey CD,

These very simple experiments, and working out the parameters involved are so extremely beneficial! We can learn so much from these experiments!

The Damping Factor, Zeta ( ζ ), plays a role in the Resonant Frequency. Here is the definition of Zeta:

Damping is an influence within or upon an oscillatory system that has the effect of reducing, restricting or preventing its oscillations. In physical systems, damping is produced by processes that dissipate the energy stored in the oscillation.

 

Yes, I had no Core in these experiments.

Listening to, and working toward that understanding that those before us gave, I think is super important to make steps forward. We have to try harder to understand why this line of research was so important and talked about by nearly all before us! Don Smith gave us all! We only need understand it! 

 

This video is the best I have ever seen, it is very beneficial:

 

We have to focus on the Terminals of the Coil and getting the Voltage up on these Terminals, then the Current will follow.

 

We already have the configuration, we only need find the resonance. Most of us already have the Resonance, in other words running machines.

Fighter has already done this, he already understands the importance of Resonance!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend,

   Chris

Chris posted this 24 August 2020

My Friends,

With CaptainLoz's successful experiment today, an excellent job, and fantastic success, we see the importance of the above posts on this and other threads.

I ask everyone to please study, please work on this, and please replicate these simple experiments. We have the power to change the world if we all do this together!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 02 September 2020

My Friends,

I feel we are not focusing on the Electrical Energy "Generation" aspect enough. Especially for new comers. For all Members, I am sorry you have read this many times and are no doubt sick of this!

Shaft Torque, the difficulty to turn the "Generators" Shaft, when Loaded is a Force equal to the Electrical Output minus losses. So always a Below Unity System, Symmetrical. We see very large Combustion Engines driving "Generators" for this reason:

 

The same is true of the Conventional Transformer. The Primary Coil is opposed with Equal Force minus Losses:

 

We Humans are normally a smart bunch, when we see a problem, we normally work diligently to solve the problem! In this case, 189 odd years have passed and we have not made any progress! Well sort of...

Partnered Output Coils are designed Asymmetrically. This means, the above Symmetrical Opposition we see, is absorbed into the two Gold Coils, as Symmetrical Equal and Opposite Magnetic Fields, Equal and opposite Torque:

 

The green Coil, the Input Coil is the Asymmetrical component, bring the Coils into Magnetic Resonance only. Now for an example, if we are able to Reduce "Generator" Shaft Torque to Zero, then the Electrical "Generator" would be an Above Unity Machine! The same is true for the Conventional Transformer, if the M.M.F that if directly reflected back on the Primary Coil was some how circumvented, then the Conventional Transformer would be an Above Unity Machine!

Well, using Asymmetry, using Partnered Output Coils, this is what we have done!

Using very simple methods of Asymmetrical Regauging, we are able to Invoke magnetic Resonance between the Two Partnered Output Coils, in Gold, for a very short sharp pulse on the Input Coil in Green.

Like a Chain and Pulley System Counter Balances the weight, or a Crane Counter Balances Weight, we are doing the same thing.

My Series: Chris Non-Inductive Coil Experiment shows how to find and resolve problems and do exactly what I am saying above.

In an Electrical "Generator", if we are able to counter Shaft Torque by 20%, and the Machine is 90% efficient, then we have achieved: 110% or COP = 1.1, its simple, nothing difficult in this understanding. Of course, getting much more than 20% is the Goal!

This is the reason the Partnered Output Coils must Oppose!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 04 September 2020

My Friends,

A video I have of Ruslan Kulabuhov, shows exactly the Wave and Anti Wave Pairs to make a Standing Wave:

 

Today, I am sharing a very simple experiment, showing the wave of each Coil and how Partnered Output Coils Interact Together:

 

Scope Images of the Waveforms:

 

We get closer to an over all understanding and this video is one of the best yet. I have used, two of the following circuits to make this work:

 

Of course, I am using a different Frequency: 480.230KHz and 480.2499KHz. This setup gives us the effect I have shown before:

 

NOTE: My Frequencies I am using are different from my Above Experiment Here. I will explain this in up coming videos. Most of you know, its to do with Harmonics. Seems to be the 9th harmonic from what I can tell, not %100 yet however.

I hope this helps others to understand the Coils better!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 04 September 2020

where should this standing wave appear? in the coil which is producing the magnetic field, or in the POC coil where we do the extraction... very nice videos by the way. thx

Chris posted this 04 September 2020

Hey Guys,

Great comments, Thank You!

In an Electromagnetic Wave the Electric Field has a Plane as the Magnetic Field has a Plane, 90 Degrees to each other.

 

The Electric Field in Green, marked with an E:

 

Is the active plane, making Change in the Coils.The Magnetic Field, are effectively not touching each other, they are opposing:

 

This means, the Magnetic Field themselves are not responsible for the change in Current Flow as we expect in Electromagnetic Induction. Now I do not wish to confuse people, but there is a massive hole in EM Theory!

The Actual Standing Wave is the Current, or Electric Field, marked in Green:

 

 

Each Magnetic Vector sums to Zero, this is not a Standing Wave, it is no wave at all, because it is Zero. H, the Magnetic Strength, Sums to Zero, and C, the Speed of light Sums to Zero. The Green Current Arrows are Additive and they Sum, giving rise to greater Current, see The Mr Preva Experiment for this verification.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Vidura posted this 05 September 2020

Great discussion! If I may add my two cent's. The basic condition for a standing wave are two signals traveling in oposite directions thru a medium. The signal pair can be of various types: mecanical, magnetic or electric. In the case of a transformer or coil arrangement the standing wave is developed in the core or the medium, not in one or another coil. altough it is possible to set up a standing wave in a conductor as well , provided that two signals travvel in oposing directions.

Vidura

Chris posted this 05 September 2020

My Friends,

Vidura is correct!

I used an Air Core, for this very reason!

What is the Medium that allows for Electromagnetic Waves to Travel? The Aether? Or the Ether? Well, we will one day accept the Aetheric Model even if we do not today!

 

Aristotle noted that the motion of the body moving upward would be fire or air, and downward would be water or earth. This would mean the objects that could be effected by circular motion must be of an exalted substance. Circular motion is connected with more 'heavenly bodies' such as planets. The planets that were allowed to be in circular motion were spheres. These planets revolve around an Earth. He believed the initial motion of the objects was from a 'prime body' who acted on the outermost sphere. Since these spheres are moving in a circular motion, they could neither have weight or lightness as they cannot move naturally or unnaturally towards or away from the centre. The prime body was seen as always running and eternal, going past any other element. This element was known as aether or quintessence. Essentially, this was the fifth element which made up the Sun, planets and stars. Aether or αἰθήρ was described as a pure, perfect substance, which is unlike anything else on Earth.

Ref: Aristotle's On the Heavens

 

Look how it is coming back:

In physics, quintessence is a hypothetical form of dark energy, more precisely a scalar field, postulated as an explanation of the observation of an accelerating rate of expansion of the universe. The first example of this scenario was proposed by Ratra and Peebles.

Ref: Wikipedia

 

The Quintessence was discussed by the Greek, before our modern age! 

The word αἰθήρ (aithḗr) in Homeric Greek means "pure, fresh air" or "clear sky". In Greek mythology, it was thought to be the pure essence that the gods breathed, filling the space where they lived, analogous to the air breathed by mortals. It is also personified as a deity, Aether, the son of Erebus and Nyx in traditional Greek mythology. Aether is related to αἴθω "to incinerate", and intransitive "to burn, to shine" (related is the name Aithiopes (Ethiopians; see Aethiopia), meaning "people with a burnt (black) visage")

Ref: Wikipedia

 

It is everywhere when one chooses to look:

In Plato's Timaeus (58d) speaking about air, Plato mentions that "there is the most translucent kind which is called by the name of aether but otherwise he adopted the classical system of four elements. Aristotle, who had been Plato's student at the Akademia, agreed on this point with his former mentor, emphasizing additionally that fire has sometimes been mistaken for aether. However, in his Book On the Heavens he introduced a new "first" element to the system of the classical elements of Ionian philosophy. He noted that the four terrestrial classical elements were subject to change and naturally moved linearly. The first element however, located in the celestial regions and heavenly bodies, moved circularly and had none of the qualities the terrestrial classical elements had. It was neither hot nor cold, neither wet nor dry. With this addition the system of elements was extended to five and later commentators started referring to the new first one as the fifth and also called it aether, a word that Aristotle had not used.

Ref: Wikipedia

 

The medium is important, it is Everything, Everything is it!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 06 September 2020

My Friends,

In the video I recently published, here:

 

I have confirmed, exactly what Don Smith Told us:

 

Also, I have shown that using a very slightly different frequency, we can produce a Sawtooth Waveform, the required Waveform for Energy "Generation":

 

I hope all Members here can see the Importance of my video above! Magnetic Resonance is a very important fundamental concept, and the Concepts at Resonance show how easily the Coils can be made to Load and Unload at Specific Frequencies. It's important and we need to start thinking about this in our builds!

At Resonance maximum Voltage Amplitude is achieved! Current I = Voltage V / Resistance R

In The Mr Preva Experiment, we learned of Resonance and its importance!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 07 September 2020

My Friends,

In light of recent events and personal attacks, I have decided to make the Video on resonance, Unlisted, available to only members here. Much of this information is not only sensitive, but also something I do not wish to share with those that would not help and be productive with us.

We have forces that fight against us and our effort! I have tested waters, and there is still a lot of effort to suppress us! To stop this information coming out!

I will always do the best I can for you, Members of Aboveunity.com!

Ask yourself, what does it take for something to withstand the rigors of Time?

We have shared the links to The Black Sun, and the Yin Yang symbols:

 

 

 

 

We have shown that these very important Symbols have stood the test of time are are directly linked to Technology we are exposing to the Public! Technology that some do not want you to have!

Please understand, change does not occur over night and we must be careful with what we do! We must be smart with our steps forward, we must look after all members and make sure they progress on an even footing as they choose and have time! Because, without them, we can not succeed! It is only in numbers we can force the hand of those that have suppressed this technology and expose them for what they are!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 08 September 2020

My Friends,

The below image, is Electromagnetic Induction, or if you wish, Antenna Theory, one coil only, with a single signal:

 

Note the Phase Angle, also the reduction in Amplitude from the Yellow to the Blue or Teal Waveform. Yellow is being driven, Teal or Blue is Induced Voltage.

Some Scope Images with both coils driven in Resonance:

 

I guess the question is, whats the practical use of this? What is this showing? Of course its pretty to look at! 

The reason I show this, is because this is Open Circuit, no Current, Standing Waves!

 

There is no Brute Force here what so ever! This is purely a Resonance Phenomena!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 08 September 2020

hi chris, nice scope-shots! question.... why can there be magnetic induction when no current flows? i guess there is no current flowing because of open circuit. maybe you trigger only the domains from the wire and because of that you can see a waveform?

some time ago i had a similar situation with an halfbridge where i connected an aircoil  and let one end open. the waveform was on the scope but there were no magnetic field present in the coil.

still so many things to learn...

regards!

Chris posted this 08 September 2020

hi chris, nice scope-shots! question.... why can there be magnetic induction when no current flows? i guess there is no current flowing because of open circuit. maybe you trigger only the domains from the wire and because of that you can see a waveform?

some time ago i had a similar situation with an halfbridge where i connected an aircoil  and let one end open. the waveform was on the scope but there were no magnetic field present in the coil.

still so many things to learn...

regards!

 

Hey Baerndorfer,

My Friend, EXCELLENT Questions!

You are right, it is open circuit, no Current as we understand current can flow! However, the Coil is in Resonance. We do still have Current! As the Coils moves into the Resonant Frequency, the Current is Cycled.

Like an LC Circuit, very little Current is used, the related Q Factor, it is Cycled from Electric, stored in the Capacitor ( Distributed Capacitance or Inter Winding Capacitance ), to Magnetic, Energy is stored in the Magnetic Field:

 

As you know, Open Circuit means no closed Circuit, no Closed Circuit no Current can be supplied from the Source, right? Well not entirely true. There is a bit of Current. It builds up over time.

 

I have covered some of this stuff in a few threads, one being: Parametric Excitations of Electric Oscillations

In this circuit, we have Capacitive Coupling, even though we don't have a fully connected or closed circuit. The Capacitive Coupling can complete the Circuit to some degree and allow for some Current to flow:

Capacitive coupling is the transfer of energy within an electrical network or between distant networks by means of displacement current between circuit nodes, induced by the electric field. This coupling can have an intentional or accidental effect.

Ref: Wikipedia

 

With everything, I am also learning, so please check and research what I am saying, however, I am pretty confident this is how its working. I hope this makes sense?

 

Charged Particles inside the Coil are in Resonance! Each and every one of them all in unison!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 08 September 2020

Hey CD,

POC 3 Layers 100 turns: 33, 34, 33

Center Coil 25 turns

This is not important, any Coils will do this, as long as they are wound and resonance is found.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Wistiti posted this 09 September 2020

Hi Chris and freinds! Your usage of opend end coil remind me an experiment done by Skywatcher (OriginalSkywatcher here) in the thread "Bucking coil inverter " at energetic forum. He basically used his original joule thief set-up (the one I usually use in my experiment) and extract power from open end POC as a secondary.

Here is his quote: (Hi folks. Ok, i tried the open circuit wiring for each separate bucking secondary coil and it works. With basically two open circuit secondary coils, meaning one wire end from each connected to the led bulb, lights the bulb to the same brightness as before, using same .52 amps, actually seems a little bit brighter. I took wire end from coil under oscillator at end of core and other wire end from center of other coil and this is powering the bulb. Any thoughts welcome. peace love light)

Chris posted this 09 September 2020

Hey Wistiti,

Yes, I agree, open ended coils have been used for a long time! Antenna is open ended, Brovin Kacher also open ended.

I think its important to make sure all see, I am doing this to find the Resonance.

I found some videos and uploaded them so I never loose them again:

 

The above video, a comment was left by an old friend of mine:

Yes is same effect when tuning antennas top hat capacitance lowers resonant frequency (and lowers radiation angle also).

 

 

The Resonant Frequency found: 55.5KHz the third harmonic mentioned, 166.9KHz...

All match Ruslan:

 

Turn on the Subtitles, Ruslan says 2x more in the circuit, he writes 2x by the coils:

you are assembling such a scheme yes, and get b-tg without anything at all, there is an increase in two times, multiplied by 2

 

This is once Resonance is Found.

Resonance gives us maximum Voltage amplitude and the Coils Load and Unload at maximum Efficiency:

 

This is what Floyd Sweet said about Resonance:

Using a more rigorous wavemechanics approach,...

...

Resonance frequencies may be maintained quite constant at high power levels so long as the load remains constant. We are all familiar with AM and FM propagation, where in the case as AM, the voltage amplitude varies, and with FM, the frequency is modulated. 

However, the output power sees a constant load impedance, that of the matched antenna system. If this changes, the input to the antenna is mismatched, and standing waves are generated resulting in a loss of power. The frequency is a forced response and remains constant. Power is lost and efficiency becomes less and less, depending on the
degree of mismatch.

Ref: Floyd Sweet Magnetic Resonance

 

I only mean to provide others with as much as I can without upsetting the apple cart too much. Just trying to help.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 09 September 2020

My Friends,

What do we think about when one says Pythagoras? Do we think of a Right Angle Triangle? The Pythagorean Theorem:

 

Is this what The Shark, Akula, gives us here: ( 2 : 25 ) Above Video.

 

There should be enough information to make special reference to the Sawtooth Waveform, making sure special attention is paid! I have said, The Sawtooth Waveform is the defining Energy Waveform.

 

 

Remember: I = V / R so increasing the Voltage, increases the Current! Voltage is Free!

 

We must Pump Electrons down the Wire, and there is only one way to do this! We already know how to do this!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 10 September 2020

My Friends,

With hesitation I post this, we have had our falling outs, but you should not miss out as a result of that!

Information that was posted by a person that was in contact with Akula back in the day:

this is another the latest video of Akula as of today 10-16-2013. More about construction and tuning. He utilizes resonance in resonance phenomena his device reacts as a pump, creating difference potential to the ground. While ground is trying to balance the difference the pump differential - load is being powered constantly and is dissipating energy that is induced in output coil. Output coil is inductively coupled to the differential pump circuit/

начало! Роман Карноухов
 youtube  /watch?v=uOopbo...

Ref: Youtube Video: watch?v=ScXhI2hQawc

 

And some comments from The Shark, AKA Akula:

почьти все правильно !


almost everything is correct!

Ref: Youtube Video: watch?v=wuoISZAlFAc

 

As you all know, I have tried to explain the Electric "Generator" as a Pump many times in the past.

This has also come from T. H. Moray:

An electrical generator is, in the true sense, not a generator, as it does not create electrical energy. Electricity is not made by the generator, it is merely pumped. From that standpoint, an electric generator might be referred to as an electric pump and the Moray radiant energy device as a high-speed electron oscillating device.

Ref: T. H. Moray - THE SEA OF ENERGY IN WHICH THE EARTH FLOATS

 

 

All Electrons are tiny Magnets!

Akula tried to tell us, it got too hard, too many trolled him, he did not have the will power to explain, he just sold it and took the money! Perhaps he was not sure on certain things, he did say he did not know many times.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 12 September 2020

My Friends,

NOTE: In this video, the Coils are configured in 180 Degree Polarity, not the Signals! So 180 degree phase is correct for the phase difference.

Most here will know this stuff, some data in there that some may not know:

 

Looking at fundamental requirements for Energy "Generation" technologies. A lot of people forget, the Magnetic Fields must oppose, there must be a Bucking to "Generate" Energy.

This is the Slapping together of the Waveforms, the same as Delayed Conduction. They are the same things occurring here.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 12 September 2020

My Friends,

NOTE: Speculation ahead.

In Floyd Sweets VTA, I am fairly confident he used a simple Faraday's Law Equation to get his Voltage up, the task we have a bit of trouble with, but know of a few ways.

Remember what Walt Rosenthal told us:

The VTA "likes" to always see a minimum load of 25 watts.

 

Well, each Coil has a given Current, at 25 watts, and 120 Volts, the current is: 0.20833 Amperes.

Of course, knowing the Coil Dimensions, one could calculate the Magnetic Field B: 62.8308478 Gauss.

Note: Again I am speculating some what, I am not intending to mislead anyone but want to share some basics:

 

Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets. 

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

 

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically: E = ( B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )

 

Putting each bifilar element into each Coil, we get:

 

Again, a step closer to achieving Floyd Sweet level of Energy Machine, perhaps. I think it depends on how open ones mind is to the possibilities?

October 10, 1871, Patent No. 119,825, Daniel McFarland Cook was right all along, we just weren't smart enough to figure it out!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 02 October 2020

My Friends,

With many replications of My Non-Inductive Coils Experiment, some very successful and some not so successful, we have without a doubt, seen a lot of progress!

Don't forget, we have been told:

 

We have seen this many times, but again, here are the images, recently removed from ou.com:

 

Remember, in the thread: The Input Coil, we go through the Input Power and the Power Returned, indicated by the Argand Diagram above. All this stuff is important to see, important to understand, this is not Symmetrical, not like a Conventional Symmetrical Transformer.

We have massive amounts of information, you can start here: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

All of us here can help! Some here are much further ahead than others, but all here are treated Equal! No Trolls here, all Trolls will be immediately removed with no warning!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Atti posted this 03 October 2020

Hi.

This is the Slapping together of the Waveforms, the same as Delayed Conduction. They are the same things occurring here.

 

I do not have the ability to study coil resonance with modern instruments. But the guidance in the video is about the phenomenon of standing wave and the interactions. But I try to study the phenomenon with my own possibilities. I think that was the best demonstration.

Atti

Atti posted this 03 October 2020

Hi.

Today, I am sharing a very simple experiment, showing the wave of each Coil and how Partnered Output Coils Interact Together:...Of course, I am using a different Frequency: 480.230KHz and 480.2499KHz.

 

 In this video, the Coils are configured in 180 Degree Polarity, not the Signals! So 180 degree phase is correct for the phase difference........the Magnetic Fields must oppose, there must be a Bucking to "Generate" Energy.

I wanted to reproduce this last video you uploaded.
Chris Help me interpret things.
But others can get involved.
I wanted to examine the standing wave. Unfortunately, I couldn’t watch it with a square wave. Nothing has changed.
Therefore, I thought I was imitating its self-capacitance with a capacitor. Thus, the resonance of the coil.
(I know this is not a good idea but if I have already done the experiment I will show it in the uploaded video)
In Chris’s recent video, we can see the signal coming out of both channels of the function generator are connected to the coils. The signal from one of the channels creates a standing wave. There is no current in the presentation, so there is no load.
The latter can be delayed conduction or load in an existing transformer. ?

(in the previous comment different Frequency: 480.230KHz and 480.2499KHz. )

And now for the layout of the video presented.
Winding process according to the current directions already specified. The direction of travel of each roll is shown on the yellow roll. The latter was loaded only for oscilloscope examination.
I am aware that this is not a standing wave.
Theoretically, in a closed-loop iron core coil, the flux passes through each coil and should induce the same amount of voltage.
The phase of the two coils with capacitors (both the coil and the capacitor have the same value) is the same. At certain frequencies, however, it is 180 degrees. But only if I pull the primary coil to either side. Asymmetry? There is no significant change in the middle.

Atti.

 

 

Chris posted this 03 October 2020

Hey Atti,

We have covered Standing Waves many times here, if you review: Standing Waves on Aboveunity.com

One of the better posts, found Here, shows what you're looking at. Pay special attention to the direction of the Waves.

That's a very good experiment! Well done!

 

  • At 180 Degrees, Peak Voltage drops but does not go to zero!
  • At 0 Degrees, Peak Voltage increases.

 

You see this voltage increase and decrease as the "dancing" that Ruslan spoke of. This dancing is the speed at which the waves change, this is a pumping of sorts. 

 

It is the Difference in Wave Amplitude that changes the Standing Wave Amplitude. Each Traveling Wave has:

  • λ or Lambda is the Wave Length.
  • c or the speed of light, 299,792 kilometers per second, is the propagation velocity.
  • f or Frequency of the Wave.

 

Remember what Floyd Sweet said:

It is a simple matter using the equations  E/H = √με and c = 1/√με for a team wave to get rid of H and C and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field

Ref: Nothing is Something by Floyd Sparky Sweet.

 

It is clear, Floyd Sweet wanted to remove H, which is the Magnetic Field, and C which is the Speed of Light, in other words a Standing Wave or a Team Wave, as c + -c = 0. In a Standing Wave, C becomes Zero. There is no Propagation Velocity, v = 0.

 

 

IMPORTANT: The Standing Wave is the Current, in Green. At the moment, in experiments we see a Voltage Standing Wave, this is to give you the same idea, but don't forget, Partnered Output Coils are Primarily Current Devices, however, we need Voltage to get the Current. The Current is the wave we need to Stand!

Also, remember, the Voltage V follows the Change of the Magnetic Field B, or the Change in Current I.

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 05 October 2020

My Friends,

The Standing Wave, as we see it, we have a major problem, not yet bought up and discussed!

 

Voltage Amplitude:

In the Following Scope Display Image:

 

You will notice a very large difference here, the Voltage Amplitude never goes below a certain level, this is not a true Standing Wave as such. 

 

Below, the Three Red Lines, indication, from bottom up, Zero Volts, 1.85 Volts and then approximately 6.0 Volts respectively:

 

This means, in a DC Region of this portion of the Waveform, we have another, if you like Pumping effect occurring, due to the Changing Magnetic Field B. Remember, B changes V, the Change in B affects V. V, or Voltage follows B, the Magnetic Field Change.

At this point, I would like to remind you of an old image:

 

What is a Conjugate?

a reciprocal relation, especially having the same real parts and equal magnitudes but opposite signs of imaginary parts.

 

I was reading an article today, the term: "scientific achievement" was used. Achievement is only possible under a set of very narrow conditions:

  1.  the act of achieving something the achievement of an ambition.

  2.  
    1. a result gained by effort : accomplishment being honored for her academic achievements a major scientific achievement.

    2. a great or heroic deed.

  3. the quality and quantity of a student's work standardized tests to measure achievement.

 

Isn't it odd, how we are so extremely far ahead of the others, simply through the Art of Exploration without Bias!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

YoElMiCrO posted this 12 October 2020

Hi everyone.

@Chris.

This circuit is used to find the speed of magnetic propagation
within the core used, the delayed conduction time of your POC.
Once the time it takes to reach the secondary wave is found
longitudinal it will be possible to find the natural frequency of the core / material
that composes it, it is mandatory to separate both windings 180 degrees to
find such spread.
One will act as primary while the other will act as secondary, this
last with any load.
This definitely shows that it is possible to create standing waves
within it, since the velocity is calculated from the propagation time
of said wave and if we use a sub-harmonic of said frequency the
searched magnetic resonance of the nucleus used.

Here is an image of the circuit and waveforms.

Here the core used in the experiment, the secondary one in this case
mobile to be able to affirm that said speed is constant throughout the magnetic length.
In this case the secondary inductance is twice the primary, this is achieved when
we multiply the number of turns of the primary by the square root of two.
It is a TOROID-43.


Thanks in advance.

YoElMiCrO.

Jagau posted this 12 October 2020

Thank you Yo for these information, it seems interesting to try
what type of toroid 43 do you use?
see here the different specs and model

http://toroids.info/FT114-43.php

I have a question, in schematic, is it a low side pulsed on negative rail with Pmosfet??

jagau

Chris posted this 15 October 2020

Thank You YoElMiCrO!

@All readers, in the following video, the work referenced by Professor Eric Laithwaite: @15 : 45 through to 21 : 29

 

The machine Professor Laithwaite refers to:

 

Coils, with Current, are also a Gyroscope! Mass in a Rotational form just as a Gyroscope works.

My Friends, we have a lot to still learn as a species! Professor Laithwaite admits there are area's where we still do not know or understand many things!

Remember, Current has Mass, and this Current accelerating in a helical motion, does not obey all the Laws we know of. Einstein's Special Relativity does not allow for Black Holes:

 

The rotational effects have non local Curvature in Space and Time, we know Space and Time Must Curve, so we have holes!

 

In order to magnify the electrical movement in the secondary as much as possible, it is essential that its inductive connection with the primary A should not be very intimate, as in ordinary transformers, but loose, so as to permit free oscillation –that is to say, their mutual induction should be small.

Ref: Nikola Tesla Patent: 142,352

 

I must ask, does this part sound familiar:

By impressing upon the earth two or more oscillations of different wave length a resultant stationary wave may be made to travel slowly over the globe, and thus a great variety of useful effects may be produced.

Ref: Nikola Tesla Patent: 142,352

 

Nikola Tesla used the term:  Stationary Waves instead of Standing Waves. He uses the term: 15 times in this particular Patent.

My Friends, a Current in a Helical motion, 6.24 1018 Electrons per second equaling One Ampere, can curve Space Time!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 16 October 2020

My Friends,

The video that started me on YouTube, as corrupt as it is, Floyd Sweet Forgotten Genius:

 

I referenced this video, in my last video:

 

In this post, I want to talk about Coil Dimensions. This image shows what I mean:

 

Here is the completed, Generation 6 VTA:

Above, you can see the closest rule I can find to what we saw in Floyd Sweet's image. This is in CM and not in inches, so I cant be sure its right. Do we have another method of getting some idea of the Coil Sizes?

Yes!

Taking note of Floyd Sweets knuckle length:

 

My Knuckle length is:

 

So roughly 50mm, this means, Floyd Sweets must also be very close, not exactly, but close.

Reevaluating the image again, we can confidently say, approximately two knuckle lengths wide for the Coils:

 

I have to say it, I have never seen Magnets 100mm x 200mm, but the length of these Magnets are in the order of 2x the width and this is seen against the Rule also. So we have to say 200 mm long.

Height, a value that has changed dramatically over the Generations of the VTA, see VTA Generations Here, is approximately one Knuckle Length, or 50mm. Its worth noting, Floyd Sweet wrote about this, as "Aspect Ratio", in his paper: "Nothing is Something" 

We now have dimensions of the Coils in Generation Six VTA, 100mm x 100mm x 50mm, here is what we have learned:

 

Floyd Sweet said:

Now let us consider the losses. Copper or Cu I2R losses remain but may be minimized by using wire of larger than usual cross-sectional area.

...

As the load current increases, the complimentary flux adds to the cross flux. The voltage output remains constant. The primary limiting factor is the cross sectional area of the phase winding conductor.

Ref: The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator by Floyd A Sweet

 

Now, we have a problem, and something that is hard to prove for sure, we know each Power Coil had 2 Wires, or were Bifilar. There is some evidence to show Floyd Sweet wound his Coils one on top of the other, this is both written form and also pictorial form:

 

If one studies the above image, one can see an uneven edge horizontally through the middle. This also supports what Floyd Sweet said: "The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed" He said this for both Coils and gave Arrows to show this also:

 

This means, we have Two separate Coils, within our known dimensions, 100mm x 100mm x 50mm, that fit 100mm x 100mm x 25mm each, one on top of the other.

We have come far in a short time!

We also know, 240 turns of 0.8mm wire was used in most of Floyd Sweets Machines!

I wish to point out, Walt Rosenthal also said, importantly:

The VTA "likes" to always see a minimum load of 25 watts.

 

As pointed out previously, each Coil has a given Current, at 25 watts, and 120 Volts, the current is: 0.20833 Amperes. Here.

Furthering on this post some, we can calculate the Field in Gauss: 

 

You can see, for the Dimensions we have, we need a Change of Flux of: 1 to 85 Gauss at 60Hz to generate a Voltage of 120.96 Volts.

Remember: Your Input Coil controls the Frequency and Amplitude, not the Energy Transformation! Your Input Coil does not supply the Energy to the Machine, the Machine is an Oscillator and Energy comes directly from Encouraged Electromagnetic Induction.

Electromagnetic Induction, this is the key and essential principle, the same as every Electric "Generator"!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 19 October 2020

My Friends,

Another video, I think it is better in a Video than a lengthy Post:

 

Apologies, a Codec Problem, and the video was corrupted at the end, loosing some good information. Sorry all, 3rd time lucky?

 

To Power a Load, we must have: Voltage first, then a Current can only flow, through the Resistance, when we put the Volume of Electrons under a pressure and then pump them!

Don't forget, the Action of Force and Reaction always count:

 

Force and Balance of the Forces.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 20 October 2020

My Friends,

Partnered Output Coils are the only answer, that is Cheap and Simple!

 

My Thread: Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment is the answer, the most simple and easy path to Above Unity Machines!

For your convenience:

 

Remember: The Rate, how fast, these Coils Slap Together, dΦB, the Change in Magnetic Field, dt, the Change in Time, as indicated:

 

The area, marked Important, is the area that these Coils exhibit the super efficient effect of Electromagnetic Induction, where each Coil having a Magnetic Field Vector of: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1, puts no electrical Load on the Input at Resonance.

In Conventional Transformer Theory: 1 + -1 = 0, for a Symmetrical System. We are using an Asymmetrical System, we introduce Asymmetry, or Broken Symmetry, where Action, Reaction and Counter-Reaction occur in the System.

All the other forums, are not following any of this Logic, they are off chasing Magic and Rainbows, they do not follow advice given by the greats before us, they do not follow the logic, they do not follow the basic rules of Powering a Load:

 

Very simple, very straight forward. Study Electromagnetic Induction, study what I have shared, it works, its unlimited! Energy is: E = MC2, plain and simple, Electron's, Magnetically Pumped from the Atom!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

Chris posted this 23 October 2020

Hello Munny,

Thanks for Sharing!

L2 and L3 need to be 180 degrees out of phase. L2 and L3 must oppose.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

   Chris

 

P.S: Don't forget, you must load the Coils to make them work.

Chris posted this 14 January 2022

My Friends,

I want to encourage more thought on this subject! Lets use Diakoptics to move toward a better understanding!

 

Partnered Output Coil One

We all know, by now, any Coil that is Loaded, will have an associated Magnetic Field. Using this Circuit we Visualise Partnered Output Coil One:

This Magnetic Field can be calculated using Amperes Law:

 

So, at Peak Magnetic Field, with a Coil using the following Design Characteristics:

  • Length = 25mm
  • Turns 240
  • Permeability = 200
  • Current = 0.20833 Amperes.

 

We get a Magnetic Field = 5026.467821 Gauss!

All this, simply because we have a Current Flowing in the Wire!

 

Partnered Output Coil Two

Again, we all know, any Coil that is Loaded, will have an associated Magnetic Field. Using this Circuit we Visualise Partnered Output Coil Two:

 

Because we have a Changing Magnetic Field in Partnered Output Coil One, and we know what this Magnetic Field is: 5026.467821 Gauss, then we can use this same Magnetic Field, as it Changes in Time, to "Generate" a Voltage in Partnered Output Coil Two!

Using Faradays Law of Electromagnetic induction, we can Calculate this Voltage:

 

You can see, 126 Volts using a Coil with the same Turns, and the displayed characteristics!

 

Combined Interactions

We have an Electric "Generator". With Changing Magnetic Field in close proximity, we get this occur:

 

Using clever design, pointed out here: Coil Geometry we can very easily get a grasp of why we get this:

 

Partnered Output Coils Oppose each other, exactly as the Stator and Rotor do in an Electric "Generator". The difference is, we are Solid State and we use an Input Coil to Excite, or give the impression of Delta t, the Time Rate of Change.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 21 March 2022

My Friends,

Electrical Energy is Kinetic Energy, in Nature. The Volume of Charged Particles q, moving at Velocity v, which is Voltage, and Current.

We know, from Experiment, that The Copper Coil is the Source of Charge, which is normally in a static, non moving state on our level, however we know charge moves on the macrolevel, as Electrons revolve around the Nucleus at high velocity.

Conventional Electric "Generators", power our world! But most do not even know how they work! Most don't even know that the Torque on the Shaft is an After Effect, of the "Generators" function: Electromagnetic Induction!

We know from Experiment, that Electromagnetic Induction is the "Generation" of a Voltage! Which is E.M.F, a unit measured in Volts.

Current is not predicted by Faradays law of Electromagnetic Induction!

When and only when Current flows, do we see Shaft Torque on the "Generator" in the form of Drag!

This means, the Magnetic Field is the Cause of Shaft Torque, and the Magnetic Field comes after we allow Current Flow, they are intimately linked, one is the other, but from a different view point.

The Magnetic Field is a necessity! We must have a Current, this is a Requirement for Power, so we must advance this entire incomplete Concept, and complete a 197 year old technology to gain what we should have, over 100 years ago, Free Energy!

As one Magnetic Field opposes, we must arrange another that also opposes! This Superposition gives us a 1 + -1 = 0 Vector Sum of the Magnetic Forces, or M.M.F. Thus Partnered Output Coils.

It is very important to understand, Electromagnetic Induction can occur more than once in a single Machine!

I have shown you how to do this here:

 

When you achieve 2 B x V like I have shown you all, then you need to work out how the Voltages are "Generated". Which is easy!

Remember what Steven Mark said:

 

This is what creates the Standing Wave:

 

But, instead, with two Magnetic Fields, each being the Source of the other, at Magnetic Resonance!

 

Each Coil, has Turns N, and when Loaded, each Coil has a Current I, which creates a Magnetic Field B, which changes in Time t, thus the very requirement for Electromagnetic Induction! In the Thread: Coil Geometry, I have shown you how to work out the Design Characteristics, to "Generate" a sufficient Voltage!

I am surprised more have not come forward with successes, as this is so easy, it is so cheap, and all can have access to this right now! There are no Secrets, it works just as the Electric Generator does, we now have no Shaft Torque, and have essentially circumvented the Negative effects, some call Lenz's Law.

We have no competition! We have no Rivals! We are Elite Electromagnetic Induction Experts and here to help YOU Succeed! All you need do is start your journey! No one else even comes close to our Expertise! Many have spent a lifetime trying, and FAILED Miserably! We succeeded, and they hate it!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 23 March 2022

My Friends,

In my extensive study of Floyd Sweet's VTA:

 

I learnt a lot, but most important, I learnt a Secret that very few have known before! As time went on, I realised, most machines work on the same basic principle, even though there are many ways to get to the same basic end goal!

This Secret, I have shared with you all already:

 

I have explained in great detail, how these machines work and how to improve on it, very easily and cheaply! Most here know already, but the thread: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines contains all you need to know!

We have had many Independent Replications, which is considered Scientific Proof, yet many still choose to ignore this proof, either naively or insanely!

Floyd Sweet used an advanced version of the very same technology! We here at aboveunity.com have all the answers! But we are still Students, ourselves Learning how to further advance this very simple cheap Technology.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Jagau posted this 23 March 2022

A very important thread to read and re-read again

A lot of free information here.


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 27 March 2022

My Friends,

Electromagnetic Induction can lead to Above Unity Machines, so one must learn how we already "Generate" Electrical Energy in the first place, and then be prepared to add to existing Theory, breaking the Symmetry of the Transformer:

 

And making the Transformer Asymmetrical:

 

With some simple work and some sensible, logical thought this machine can go way above the Unity Boundary!

We have given you all the information! Free Energy machines are within reach of every person on Earth now! Cheaply and Simply!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Solhi posted this 28 March 2022

Hi, nice to be back again. The side suddenly disappeared from the net a year ago and a few days back I all in a sudden got an update.

I would like to ask, after I learned through Patrick Kelly's publication about Don Smiths works and Patrick's thoughts if it is true what I did read other places, That feeding a solenoid with very high frequency, it reduces its magnetic capabilities?

In theory the partnered coil would produce the same amount of Volt as Amperage e.g. 600/600 = 360 Kw. by (dependent on wire length) e.g. 40 Mhz.

Don, even he did say the 2nd coil should be wound counter clockwise actually never did it in his models, so what is the trick here?

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 28 March 2022

Hi Solhi,

Please read: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines this thread explains all of it in great detail.

All the information in those threads explains all of it and shows you how to build these machines.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Solhi posted this 21 April 2022

I think it is more correct to say  2 Pi (r + 0.5 dia of wire)

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Solhi posted this 21 April 2022

Funny, I have not had time to read this thread before now, but I came to the same conclusion 2 years ago reading Patrick J. Kelly's work about Don Smith. Still have to build anything in real though. Thinking this over until understanding saves time and material

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 21 April 2022

Hello Solhi,

We are way more than Serious about this, so please understand when I say, we are way further ahead than some think! Way further ahead! We don't find this "Funny", it is a serious event here!

Your Statement:

Funny, I have not had time to read this thread before now, but I came to the same conclusion 2 years ago reading Patrick J. Kelly's work about Don Smith

 

I will be interested to see how far ahead you are then, if you have had this concept in your head for this long, you should have a very good grasp of the whole topic! Some have spent years and made very little progress! Some no progress!

Some like to gloat and make unbelievable statements that have no basis in fact, and then, where we have had many Independent Replications by many Members, those are often the Quietest! Proof is in the pudding some might like to say!

We do not provide a Free Ride for others here! We only help those showing proof of helping themselves! So lets see if you choose to progress here or make posts with no real direction.

Recently we had to remove a very small group of people for creating trouble here, and its great they are now gone! Please do not become one of those statistics. We only want genuine Members all working for the same end goal. Progress for all!

I wish more would come here and work for this very goal, as times are so tough now, there is really no other options than to look at what was considered impossible ten years ago and prove the evidence correct for yourself!

I hope you can become a contributing member as others do here!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Jagau
raivope posted this 22 April 2022

Hi,

Just wondering what will happen after second and third reflection?

https://www.aboveunity.com/content/uploads/b5d8d256-5657-4ec2-ac7c-a741014a20b4/0135e9c8-6563-4c84-abcf-ac2c014edf93_standing-wave.jpg?width=690&upscale=false

I think the current gets multiplied further.

Raivo

 

Chris posted this 22 April 2022

Hey Raivo,

Good Question!

 

Effectively, Energy is Unlimited! We have a Scalable System that uses the Magnetic Field of Each Coil, with an Asymmetrical Off Set, in other words: MMFa + MMFb + MMFc = MMFc, where in a Conventional System, we have MMFa + MMFb = 0. This is Symmetry. 

So in an Asymmetrical System, we can produce as much Voltage as we want, and Current is dependant on the Coils Geometry, in other words, Energy Density increases as the Magnetic Field Increases.

Remember what Floyd Sweet told us:

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.2418 electrons ⁄ second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes. I2R Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.

 

So the Magnetic Forces, which can be controlled, are the Pump, Freeing more electrons from Source, Accelerating them down the Wire.

So, a machine must have two Output Coils, its a Requirement, and either one Input Coil of  use one Output Coil as an Input Coil and an Output Coil, having two functions.

I believe the ideal configuration is Three Coils. Its not a Requirement however!

 

As Voltage Increased, the Magnetic Field must also Increase, there is a Feedback Force, making your Machine push more Electrons, so we have a machine that does work, from Source, by its very function!

The Timing of the Coils is important, Voltage V must be "Generated" in POC one and two at the same time, so Currents are also in Phase, equal and Opposite, this is the Pumping Force.

I hope this makes sense?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 22 April 2022

My Friends,

I want to say, I really like Raivo's way of thinking about Partnered Output Coils:

what will happen after second and third reflection?

 

The "Reflection" or Reinforcement of Waves of Magnetic Force, known as M.M.F which is Current I, through Turns N, and of Geometry ∈, is the Pumping, and the Assisting Force, that gives your Input, an other wise, negative Effect under Load, when Current I increases as Load Increases, and Resistance drops.

There is a beautiful set of Wave Mechanics here that works to "Generate" a Voltage, and the very action of Drawing Current increases the Energy Density available for use.

It so impresses me, how the Human Mind works, and when we come together, to advance on a subject of infancy.

Raivo has bought a very good way of thinking about a subject to the table! Thank You Raivo!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Andreas posted this 19 May 2022

Hi Chris,

I have done some experiments regarding this principle with 3 coils. The problem is to overcome the opposite voltages in the bucking coils, induced by a current change in L3. It seems, there are some ways around this problem. I got interesting results with my coil- pulser and an one Ohm resistor. The power is indicated thrue the voltage over the resistor. P = U(eff)^2, there are high peaks. With no filtering of the peaks measured with the scope, there is an efficiency of about 200%. But, the heat of the resistor says no, it feels more then 100% or less. Could it be possible, that this kind of energy does produce cold, instead of heat in the resistor?

If this could be possible, then an output transformer (non- bucking) instead of RL could solve this. The impedances could be matched for any load. I want to try it as next step, building a load- transformer to catch both, negative and positive energy. Here is a way, that forces high currents thrue the bucking coils.L1 and L2. L3 is wound direct above L2 and L4 is wound direct above L1. The distance to each other of the bucking coils is about 5cm.

 

This circuit pushes the current thrue the bucking coils when the Mosfet switches to on. In the same time L3 and L4 "charge" by bulding a magnetic field. When the mosfet switches off, the magnetic field from L3 and L4 collapses and the current flow thrue L1 and L2 stoppes and goes rapidly in the other direction. During shooting off, the voltage above the Mosfet has a peak of nearly 200V. Voltage (really current?) above RL is oscillating very heavy shortly after shooting on and off. The frequency is in the Mhz- range. When measuring the input- current, there is a "shoot- back" at the switching moment- especially when switching off.

May be this could be of interest. I am sure, there are many opinions, regarding "cold" and "hot" current, nonsense or not. Is it only conventional current, which is produced thrue bucking mode- coils?

Best Regards,

Andreas

Chris posted this 19 May 2022

Hi Andreas

On your Question:

Could it be possible, that this kind of energy does produce cold, instead of heat in the resistor?

 

I have deliberately avoided this topic for a very long time! Its a Can or Worms, its a topic that can not be sensibly discussed without becoming a bunch of Kooks, which the likes of Bedini became after a while.

This topic will become more insightful when we have more working on this and more replicating what we have done!

Great work! Thank You for Sharing!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Andreas posted this 23 May 2022

Hi Chris,

 

you are right. Cold electricity is a field, where much disinformation goes around. Live is too short, for that, we should focus on harvesting free energy.The missing heat on my resistor probably has nothing to do with cold electricity. The inductance is too high for measuring seriously. The calculated U(eff) could be nonsense. My output transformer instead of RL works great, it is possible to match impedances. With a transformer instead of RL you can feedback the energy to the source, the driving battery.  When the circuit reaches overunity, the voltage of the source- battery will rise up during work. In my circuit, the voltage drops very slow, the efficiency is good, but not good enough. I believe your theorie about partnered output coils is right, so I will make a better coil with much more windings....

My pulser- circuit is a simple, low cost and very efficient way to get sharp and powerful pulses. Hope, it gives coil experimenters an idee, how to pulse a coil without expensive equipment.

 

Kind Regards,

Andreas

Jagau posted this 02 June 2022

Hello Andeas

what is the purpose of using 2 mosfet low side drivers to make a single mosfet acrive r?

I ask the question because you did not use the first driver (lower one)it is just powered at pin 6

and the two output pin 5 and 7 are not connected

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Andreas posted this 13 June 2022

Hello Jagau,

Sorry for my late answer...saw your post today...

You are right, it makes no sense. The lower Mosfet driver has no function. It is only there to expand the circuit for more Mosfets to increase the amount of current you can switch. I did not erase the second driver, maybe it is needed later.

Best Regards,

Andreas

Rakarskiy posted this 17 June 2022

Generator Coils by Walter RUSSELL - focusing magnetic flux.

http://www.rexresearch.com/russellcoil/russellcoil.htm

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
scalarpotential posted this 18 June 2022
  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Chris
Chris posted this 12 July 2022

My Friends,

I was asked a question today by a member, and I want to share the answer here:

The question:

What is the condition needed that POC2 . POC3 , POC X , to communicate with the Trigger ?
Is this process of " Aiding the Input" automatic ?  Or there must be some conditions met , before the power drops on the DC Source ?

 

The Answer:

Any Current Flow, and the Change of the Current Flow is considered a Magnetic Field, or the Magnetic Field, Changing in Time, and in proximity to another Conductor, considered a "Parasitic Inductance", by some, will induce an E.M.F Measured in units of Volt.

So, the method of Inducing Voltage, is the Change in Magnetic Field, or the Change in Current.

Remember:

  1. The Change in Current/Magnetic Field "Generates" a Voltage.
  2. The Opposition of Magnetomotive Force, of Magnetic Fields, Pumps Current.

 

So, L1 induces L2, L2 induces L3 and if all three are this way, then there must always be one Coil that Assists L1 right? So, L3 also induces L1! Increasing L1 total Impedance. So the input Current then comes right down as Ohms Law states: I = V / R.

So, always one Coil must assist the Input Coil.

This is Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction!

 

Loose Coupling is an important factor, but not too loose.

Get Involved, prove it for your self, it works!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Melendor
Chris posted this 03 August 2022

My Friends,

In this post Here, I talk about the Symbiotic Relationship of Partnered Output Coils!

I will quote this here:

Let me tell you, something important happens, where I have marked: Important:

 

What Happens? Well its a little hard to explain, but here goes:

The Partnered Output Coils do work on each other, to "Generate" a Voltage via Charge Separation, and Pump a Current by Opposed Magnetomotive Forces, at this point, your Input Coil does the tiniest amount of Work! It requires very little Current to achieve this task: 

 

So, your Partnered Output Coils "Generate" Voltage and Pump Current! This is largely a Self Regulating System, doing work entirely by the Geometrical Design of the Coils! The Magnetic Field Strength being the Component that does Work! Or M.M.F, the Magnetomotive Force does Work on each Coil, regulating the other Coil, exactly as I described in the Thread: Timing 

 

The Magnetic Field can be entirely created from the existence of another Current:

 

There is nothing that says You MUST be the Source! This is Called Parasitic Inductance Or Stray Magnetic Fields, a phenomena that Electrical Engineers are Brain Washed into getting rid of by the very definition of the Term: Parasitic

 We want this, its a Useful and Required Phenomena, the opposite of: Parasitic, is Symbiotic we want this! Its Natural, it is how Nature works and wants to work! Don't Fight it, encourage it!

 

I want to point out a simple fact! Steven Mark showed us several devices, two of which were important to define the difference between:

 

In the above video, you can see, this machine:

 

and this Machine:

 

 

You can go through the video and listen to the numbers, but I have something for you to ponder!

 

Question:

Why is it, the bigger machine puts out so much more Energy?

 

Question:

What sort of Energy did Steven Marks Machines Output?

 

Oh, you mean DC something like this:

 

 

Question:

What Effects were Observed?

 

An observation similar here:

 

Remember this:

 

Its just the knowledge of the Coils and how they interact with each other!

 

Aint that the truth!

Again, there is a Symbiotic Relationship, between he Coils, all working in a Harmonious Symphony to "Generate" Voltage and Pump Current and its all because of the Geometrical Configuration of the Coils, all working together, an Asymmetrical behaviour, where you need only put a tiny amount of energy in, and get our Copious Amounts of Energy in Comparison!

When the Super Numptys realise they have missed a very Important part in Science, we are gonna party like its 1999!

Never forget: Its the Symbionce of the Coils in a Harmonious Symphony that creates the effect! This is Magnetic Resonance!

I am sorry to all paying attention, I am just loving this: "Teasing of the Family of Clowns we have had to deal with for so long!" Trolls that is!

Best Wishes

   Chris

Jagau posted this 03 August 2022

Yes, this image of the current is very important and

I confirm that I also find it in the Melnichenko thread effect.


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • Chris
Chris posted this 03 August 2022

My Friends,

Partnered Output Coils are Symbiotic like Tuning Forks:

 

Ring one, and the other starts to go also, the exact same way! To do this, Partnered Output Coils must be loaded to work, because a Load defines the Current which in turn defines the Magnetic Field!

This is the Symbionce of the Coils in Magnetic Resonance! You could almost say a Sympathetic Resonance:

 

Do you remember this video:

 

In the VTA Gen 1:

 

We saw a Bridge Rectifier, on the Input, do you know why Floyd Sweet had this in place?

The Rectifier turns AC Input from the top waveform to the bottom waveform:

 

Take note of the shape of the Rectified Pulses! Dont forget, half Bridge Rectification is also possible. 

Best Wishes

   Chris

Chris posted this 14 November 2022

My Friends,

I read a post on another forum today, which I feel needs to be bought up here!

It is from Member Smudge:

I think the Mark referred to in that letter could be Mark Goldes.  He ran a free energy organization Magnetic Power Inc. (MPI).  Mark was a good guy trying to bring free energy to the world but got a lot of online criticism because he was encouraging investors but never got them any monies because the free energy dream never came.  He mortgaged himself up to the hilt to keep the company going.  I think this alternator idea from Sweet was one of the things MPI put forward, but Sweet died before it got anywhere.  So maybe it has never been explored further than his idea put on paper.  I note that his current sensor started out as a helical coil wound around the primary conductor, but then changed to a ring core around the conductor (bizarrely stated as a hollow core in the diagram you posted) and the ring core has its own winding for the sensing output.  This tells me Sweet was developing the idea in his mind at that time and realized that the helical winding would not work.

Sweet made a number of fundamental assumptions or errors in his writings.  Perhaps the most striking is his statement in the image you posted that says "The rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere= 6.24x1018 electrons/second".  That would mean that the electron charge increases value.  Reading further on I don't think he meant that, but rather more charge is somehow entrained from the copper atoms so the number of conduction electrons increases.  Whatever was in his mind it is beyond what current science will accept and F6 would have a field day criticizing this.  Personally I would agree with F6, this is fanciful dreaming by Sweet.  Another of his errors claims that space has a frequency given by f=1/(2π*sqrt(μ0*ε0)).  This is of course nonsense, that formula merely gives you the frequency for which the wavelength is 1 meter.

Mark Goldes received a number of hairbrained ideas from different people, and he recruited me from another FE site to become an unpaid adviser.  MPI was later taken over by Hagen Ruff who then continued its work under the guise of Chava Energy and I was pleased to continue as a paid consultant.  Sometime later Hagen decided that pouring money into FE research was not going to provide any short-term returns, so he pulled the plug and my contract ended.  Chava continues offering not free energy but alternative energy solutions like wind generators.

Smudge

Ref: Floyd Sweet 'Space-Flux Coupled Alternator' (NOT the VTA)

 

Mark had about 10 organisations!

I think it is worth noting, Smudge has always played down Floyd Sweet as have many other of the people that were involved with Floyd Sweet! There is a number of non-sensical statements in his post!

Let me quote Floyd Sweets paragraph again:

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.2418 electrons ⁄ second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes. I2R Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.

 

Now Smudge states:

That would mean that the electron charge increases value

 

I absolutely disagree with this statement! This is simply a very bad interpretation of a very basic Statement made by Floyd Sweet!!!

Water Pumps have Flow Rates, in GPM, Gallons per Minute, or LPM, Liters per Minute!

 

Electromagnetic Charge Pumps are exactly the same, there is no ignoring the basic Science and Math! Elementary Charge also has a Flow Rate!

The definition for One Ampere is:

6.241509074×1018 elementary charges moving in a second.

 

I see a real concerted effort to try to confuse and smear the hard work that those before us have done!

Don Smith told us the very same thing:

 

Let there be Twits! Let the twits be a mouthpiece for Non-Sense! 

Did any of Akula0083's work ever see the light of day?

 

Was there a cover up and an effort to burry his work? What happened here? 

My Friends, you need to be very careful what you believe! Some people will lead you down the Garden Path and you will find out after a long time, that there is nothing but Manure at the end!

Floyd Sweet said:

A static version of the Space Flux Alternator is on the drawing board. 

 

and went on to say:

The defining equations are similar to those of the dynamic Space Flux Coupled alternator. 

...

As the time varying flux of a period of 1/400 or 2.5 milliseconds sweeps over the stationary armature coils, voltage is induced defined by Faraday's law. 

...

The underlying principles are the same. 

 

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 05 February 2023

My Friends,

Science is catching up, slowly!

https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3839

 

Please read the above article. Its worth the read! 

One must study what is being said, what is the Dirac Semimetal and the Weyl Semimetal:

 

 

Do you see the correlation to Partnered Output Coils?

 

Inside the Core, we have a series of Domains called: Antiferromagnetic Ordering or a antiferromagnetic System:

We have this very same Core Ordering when each Partnered Output Coil is Opposing each other, and the Core therefore does not travel the BH Curve as a Conventional Transformer would!

As is shown, we do have a Four Wave Mixing, because each Coil has a Primary and a Secondary Magnetic Field! Like Tom Bearden pointed out, the Whittaker Papers point this out.

This is because each Coil has:

  1. Induction
  2. and Self Induction

 

Do you see now, how far behind the Other Forums are! So many clueless goons out there that pretend to be Gurus!

We are Light Years Ahead of the Other Forums!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

ISLab posted this 09 February 2023

Now Smudge states:

That would mean that the electron charge increases value

 

I absolutely disagree with this statement! This is simply a very bad interpretation of a very basic Statement made by Floyd Sweet!!!

Water Pumps have Flow Rates, in GPM, Gallons per Minute, or LPM, Liters per Minute!

..........................

Hi Chris,

The kind of junk put out by Smudge not only confuses, but wastes time and energy, and in the ends leaves the serious researcher lost and frustrated. Even if one feels intuitively or logically that they are wrong, it still saps energy and sows seeds of doubt to pushes one to distance with an unhealthy agnosticism.

I want to thank you for taking the trouble to clarify the issues and to bring back focus on basic principles, and to help to identify who the genuine authorities in the field are.

Your site is a boon to genuine researchers in the field!

Much gratitude! 🙏

Chris posted this 09 February 2023

My Friends,

I wan to share this with you:

Fundamentally, a single Weyl fermion is not identical to a Dirac fermion. Weyl fermions are in many ways more fundamental than Dirac fermions. In the context of topological materials, you can experimentally see points in k-space associated with either Dirac fermions or Weyl fermions. For example, in the material TaAs, two Weyl points (will be explained later) have been observed:

Dirac and Weyl fermions transform differently under, say, parity and other discrete transformations. In representation-theory language, they also belong in two different representations.

There two “kinds” of Weyl fermions: left-handed and right-handed. These refer to a property called chirality, which is a mathematical concept but we can physically understand it more easily when the mass of the fermions is zero.

In the massless case then, chirality is the same with the so-called helicity, which is the measure of how much the spin of a particle is aligned with its momentum. Hence, in the massless limit, left-handed Weyl fermions have their spin oppositely aligned with their momenta compared to right-handed Weyl fermions.

A Dirac fermion is a representation in which we combine a left-handed Weyl spinor with a right-handed one. Now, when the fermions are massive, left-handed Weyl fermions and right-handed ones mix with each other and it doesn’t make sense to keep track of either of the two, since they mix together. In this case, it is more convenient to work with a Dirac fermion. We can definitely look at this from two points of view, one being the Dirac fermion one which does not mention Weyl fermions, and the other being through Weyl fermions that interact with each other because of their mass. It is in this sense that Weyl fermions are more fundamental than Dirac fermions. But, this depends on the dimension of our space, as I will explain later.

In the massless limit, the Weyl fermions don’t interact, so don’t mix with each other. In this case, we can still work with a Dirac fermion and view it as a composition of Weyl fermions of opposite chiralities or just decompose the Dirac fermion into two distinguishable Weyl fermions.

A crucial point of all of this is the existence of a matrix γ5�5, which is satisfies the Lorentz algebra {γμ,γν}=2ημν{��,��}=2��� along with the standard gamma matrices γμ��. In the four-dimensional spacetime, all of the above is valid, but this can change with the number of dimensions. To make this more concrete, we denote a Dirac spinor as ΨΨ and the left- and right-handed Weyl spinors as ψL,ψR��,�� respectively. See, in 3+13+1-dimensional spacetimes, the existence of γ5�5 allows us to write ψL=1−γ52Ψ��=1−�52Ψ and ψR=1+γ52Ψ��=1+�52Ψ. It thus results in a decomposition of ΨΨ into ψL�� and ψR��.

In graphene, which is effectively a system with two spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension, γ5�5, does not exist. More generally, there is no way to decompose a Dirac spinor into two Weyl spinors in 2+12+1 dimensions. Hence, there are no Weyl fermions in graphene; only Dirac fermions. The conclusion is the same as in a 3+13+1-dimensional spacetime: Dirac fermions and Weyl fermions are different types particles.

This is true for all topological materials in 1+11+1 or 2+12+1 dimensions, such as graphene. Bear in mind though that there also exist topological materials that are three-dimensional (plus one dimension of time). An example of these are called Weyl semimetals and, as their name probably suggests, the fermions describing them are Weyl fermions. Now, it does not mean that all of the topological materials with this dimension are described by Weyl fermions, since if the particles describing these materials have an effective non-zero mass, they are represented by Dirac spinors.

In topological materials, these particles are associated with special points in k-space. At these special points, the band gap closes and the conduction band touches the valence band. In materials like graphene, these points are called Dirac points and there exist so-called Dirac cones living near them. These Dirac points can also be found in 3D materials. In materials such as Weyl semimetals, these Dirac points get split in two and form two distinct Weyl points. You can split a Dirac cone by breaking some of the initial system’s discrete symmetries for example. The Weyl points are connected via what’s called a Fermi arc, as illustrated below:

Summing up, in the context of topological materials such as graphene, Weyl fermions and Dirac fermions are different kinds of particles. That being said, in spaces of dimensions that allow us to decompose Dirac fermions into Weyl fermions, we can work with either of them but this does not mean that they are identical.

Ref: Adam Lantos - Quora

 

Can you remember where we covered left-handed and right-handed, chirality's before?

Maybe Here? Why do they Fail?

Best Wishes,

   Chris

earthbound0729 posted this 02 March 2023

So Chris, and all present,

Earlier in this thread you mentioned to maximize self-inductance in the coils (POC?).

From what I see, these are several ways to help accomplish that goal:

Greater number of turns of wire on the core
Increase Cross-sectional area in a coil
Minimize Length of coil
The greater the magnetic permeability of the core

Anything else along these lines? 

Piecing this altogether for a Newbie, especially in reference to the timeframes (ie, chronology) since there are multiple threads and 6 years or so worth of notes here makes it a little difficult to keep everything in proper order and context.  I am taking extensive notes to help me.

Hopefully I will be able to start on some of these experiments soon. I believe you have mentioned on more than one occasion that the Mr. Preva experiment should be a good starting point for anyone. I thank you for your software tool as well, as that can be very helpful on important details of coil construction.

Ty,

earthbound

Chris posted this 03 March 2023

Hello earthbound,

Best way to learn, is to get into it, on the bench and explore the most simple technology ever discovered! 1832, and now, some 191 years later and science still has not acknowledged Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction.🤡

WOW, if I had the opportunity way back, when I started, and now with all the Independent replications, showing the proof, its a no brainer! 

Too much procrastination is the enemy of the People!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 04 March 2023

My Friends,

Never before, ever, has this happened:

 Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

There are two mistakes along the way to Mastery: Not Starting and and not going all the way!

Cite: Master Shi Heng Yi

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: http://merlib.org/node/5282

The Answers you seek are right here:

 

I have provided 11 videos on this showing you how to approach this Technology! I have given you all of the data to make this work, and more, to make this, not just a TOY, to make this Power very much more than just a few Globes!

My Friends, when I see 10 successful replications, I will release another Video showing a bit more work, again we have had quite a few successful replications already! Do the Math in these videos! COP > 1.6 in both Machines!

Tinman was the first:

 

Others followed, like Captainloz:

 

Others also, some may not want their names used? Security for people is important to me, but eventually, we must do this as a Team and make a Stand!

 

Some have taken advantage of this, some plunder it.

Its so simple, and so cheap! The problem is, too many stupid, stupid people in the community!

 

Don't tell anyone, but

We are LIGHT YEARS Ahead of the other Forums!

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

donovan posted this 04 March 2023

Hi,

There is so much information here.  I read more and more every day. 

Thanks for everything, Chris.

Donovan

Chris posted this 08 March 2023

Hello Donovan and Friends,

Yes, there is a lot of data here on this forum, and some have used this data to make excellent progress!

I have collected all the data and posts from many forums over the years and I estimate about 3% of the Community are Serious Dedicated Researchers!

That's a very poor number!

Many run multiple names!

The fact of the matter is, majority of the community has been controlled disinformation for decades and I don't think any one would disagree with that! Groups of people paid to make a mockery of the Energy Field for a very long time, and yes I have a list of names when the time comes.

ChatGPT:

 

There are a lot of very brain dead people out there, doing the dumbest things, sadly! ChatGPT is very much smarter than these idiots! Even if ChatGPT is not completely correct!

 

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 05 September 2023

My Friends,

This post is partly for Madscientist, for his thread here: Madscientist's Non-Inductive Coil Replication

POC must oppose because of Lenz's Law.

To visualise this, we have a Magnetisation Phase:

 

And a De-Magnetisation Phase:

 

To observe the Effect of Lenz's Law, we see Drag:

 

To be able to achieve an Asymmetrical Machine, one must have a Symmetrical component first. 

 

Symmetry

Symmetry is seen directly in Newtons Third Law:

  1. An object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion remains in motion at constant speed and in a straight line unless acted on by an unbalanced force.
  2. The acceleration of an object depends on the mass of the object and the amount of force applied.
  3. Whenever one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite on the first.

 

The way I state the Third Law is like so:

For every Action, there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction.

 

NOTE: Newtons Third Law is Incomplete! Currently we only have: Action and a Reaction. Only accommodating Symmetrical Systems. It does not hold in Asymmetrical Systems!

Because we are dealing with Electromagnetic Induction, we have to consider this in the following way:

Output equals Input minus Losses.

 

Here you can see, all Symmetrical System's, can never be an Above Unity System, always a Below Unity System!

We can say, mathematically, OutputPower = InputPower - Losses. In a Transformer, where it is say 90% efficient, then we can calculate: 100Watts - 10Watts = 90Watts. So Symmetry ensures we always have a Below Unity System!

 

Asymmetry

An Asymmetrical System must always have a Symmetrical component, contained in the system.

The way Newton's Third Law should be stated:

For every Action, there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction, and for every Reaction, there is an Equal and opposite Counter-Reaction!

 

Therefore we will see: Action, Reaction and also a Counter-Reaction. Now Newtons Third Law accommodates Asymmetrical Systems!

Partnered Output Coils are Symmetrical by themselves, but our System, does not consist only of Partnered Output Coils, we have an Asymmetry, because we have introduced a Third Coil to our Partnered Output Coils, our Input Coil:

 

We have Three Magnetic Fields:

  1. Input Coil
  2. POCOne
  3. POCTwo

 

Everyone should already know, every Coil that carries a Current, must always have an associated Magnetic Field, always, there is never any Exception. A Flow of Current constitutes a Magnetic Field.

Now we can say, mathematically, OutputPower != InputPower - Losses. Where ( != ) means Does NOT Equal.

Output Power can be thought of in another way, OutputPower is defined by System Design Specification.

Floyd Sweet was quoted in saying:

Sweet was also a transformer designer and expert, and he remarked that he had also observed specialized self-oscillation in certain transformers.

Ref: Energy From The Vacuum by Tom Bearden

 

On rare occasions, Sweet saw this effect, called self-oscillation, occur in electric transformers

Ref: Jeane Manning http://merlib.org/node/5282

 

Floyd Sweet also labeled the SQM as an Oscillator, in his original Lab Notes:

 

Electromagnetic Induction is currently Incomplete in todays Scientific Textbooks, I have completed Electromagnetic Induction, and given Experimental Proof to support the Completion. You have the proof right in front of your eyes, its up to you to use this knowledge and apply it for useful purpose!

Of course, to Club Dumb Dumb, over on the other forums, none of this will make any sense, because they just have no idea whatsoever!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 15 October 2023

My Friends,

In regards to my last post, in this thread, I want to explain something very important, something I have explained before, but no one has touched upon, except one person, which I will not use his name for the moment.

I have pointed out, before, in the Thread: The Reduced Impedance Effect, that we can have a situation, where all of the Coils Impedance can be removed, from a machine, simply by clever design techniques!

What does this mean?

Very Simple, this means an Electric "Generator" can be designed that has no Drag on the Shaft! This concept extends well beyond just the Electric "Generator"! This Concept can be applied to all EM Machines, all of them! 

The Conventional Transformer is another machine that can have this Concept applied to!

Like I pointed out in the last post, the concept of Drag is removed from the Asymmetrical Machines I have shown you:

 

NOTE: No Drag as we know it, means that the Potential we can achieve can be achieved very much faster than we would normally expect, because we are essentially not fighting against a Magnetic Field. We are using Magnetic Fields to Cancel, or Control Magnetic Fields.

Some would say we have Negated Lenz's Law, technically, this is not an accurate way to view the situation, but its how many have thought of this. We are using Magnetic Fields to do more work for us in a single machine, than is conventionally thought possible, because we are using Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction, a concept that Science has not been able to explore at all, because Science Establishment is too ignorant and arrogant to accept that they entirely missed it!

Here is some advice I posted via PM, to a member here, I normally don't get any time for PM's so I ask all to post in your own threads, and I will help:

some advice:

  • Treat your Input Coil and POCOne as a simple Conventional Transformer.
    • In a simple Conventional DC Transformer, the polarity of each Coil is determined by Electromagnetic Induction and Lenz's Law. The Phase is always 180 Degrees, represented by the Negative sign. So if you were to take two parallel wires, the Polarity would be opposite.
  • POCOne and POCTwo oppose and you can use The Right Hand Grip Rule to ensure each Diode is orientated correctly.
    • The Diode Polarity in the Circuit with POCTwo, will Increase your Input Coil's Current in one Polarity, and reduce your Input Coil's Current the other Polarity. We are aiming for Input Coil Assistance! To Lower your Input Coils Current is the Goal!
  • Ensure each Circuit on POCOne and POCTwo are isolated and kept separate until a greater understanding is obtained.
    • Have one Circuit for each Coil, manage each Circuit as required, to make steps on improvement as required.

 

Each Coil is always abiding by the Right Hand Grip Rule because Lenz's Law holds. If you look at each Coils Polarity, you get: Positive + Negative + Positive, and here you can see, we have a System that has an extra Input, an extra assistive force, which is an open System, allowing for Gains Above Unity!

Maximize your Machines Bucking, make the Machine Pump Electrons from the Atom, stripping away all the Electrons from the Atom if required, and Accelerate them down the Wire as a Current, where One Ampere = 6.241509074×1018 Elementary Charges per Second.

 

Each Partnered Output Coil is like a Battery! Each Coil must always Buck Each Other, and all you have to do is get the polarity of the "Generated" Voltage Correct!

 

This is so simple and its so cheap, and there are so many stupid ignorant idiots in denial, its so funny to watch these Idiots Squirm and Lie, each sentence they post, they keep making Idiots of themselves!

 

Very Simple, the Magnitude of the Magnetic Field of each Partnered Output Coil must be approximately Equal, and Opposite, then, when you achieve this, amazing things happen, things that the very same Idiots I mention above, have told you for many decades, cant be done, sadly! These people will become Enemies of the people very soon! They will become the Hunted very soon! Good People will start holding them accountable very soon!

The other forums don't cover any of the basics, so how can they have any direction? When they are unaware of the basic, simple principles, we hold dare and require to gain an understanding! Duuuurrrr!!!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 07 November 2023

My Friends,

While Gutter Trash are still messing around with total non-sense, we are showing machines that are changing the world!

Here you will see how extremely Simple, and very Cheap these machines can be! Don Smith was 100% correct, problem is, dumb idiots do not understand 10% of what Don shared with you all, but claim to be All Knowing! Truly, they know Nothing!!!

This build was a rather successful machine:

 

Here, you can see, very clearly, the parallel:

 

Some more:

 

I already posted the above here. Below is new to the Forum:

 

Why would I show you a picture of the Gas Discharge Tube?

Its true, McDumski Club, you know the dumb dumb club, the Homer Simpson Scientists, they have no idea whatsoever, none of this will make sense to them, but wait for it, in 3 weeks, they will be claiming it as their own, because they are Professional Plagiarists! Liar's Cheats and Bought and Paid for Shills!

My Friends, never forget this statement:

 

This statement is 100% correct and there is nothing here to be confused about! I have already explained it all!

Leave the idiots at the Gate!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

FringeIdeas posted this 08 November 2023

If I may take a noob crack at this.. The toroid first made me think of Ruslan... But..

The gas discharge tube would be your spark gap.

I could be off. I'm not sure how much spark gap action those things can take before they die.

Your switching appears to be flip flopping direction of the magnetic field in the toroid, driving the third coil with AC, which is output to the screw terminals there. But that GDT is rated for 470V? The toroid appears to be more of a 1:1, not a step up. And I'm going to just guess you are not switching 230V on each mosfet.

Looking good btw. I was curious, from the other thread, how this project was coming along.

Br,

Marcel

Chris posted this 08 November 2023

Hey Marcel,

Yes, spot on on all points, you're correct.

I had to add turns in a few places, so the turns are not 1 : 1, in some places 12 to 17 and so on.

I posted the Circuit for this setup, Here:

 

At resonance, one can achieve quite High Voltages in the Resonant Tank, for very little Input Voltage. As you know, we have the ability to turn up our Input Voltage on our Bench Power Supply's.

It really is just a case of fiddling until we get something working, something running, and then work to optimize it. I could spend another few days optimizing this setup! At the moment, because I have a different setup running, this is just an experiment to learn more and more to gain the ultimate knowledge to know what's best and simplest!

One thing is certain, we have a small group of idiots that CANT think, or experiment their way out of a Paper Bag, fighter, you know the Banned and Disgraced idiot, he is still lost in his lunch bag from second grade!

Every experiment we do, gives us more and more knowledge to make better and better machines, those that have done Zero Experiments, they will have no idea where to go, what to do when the Lights Go Out!

There is one question I am waiting for, wonder if it comes, and who will ask it...

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Chris posted this 09 November 2023

@Marcel,

I wanted to give a little more explanation of the inferred "Spark Gap". When you said:

But that GDT is rated for 470V? The toroid appears to be more of a 1:1, not a step up.

 

No, we are stepping up the Voltage, its a Step Up Toroid Push Pull Transformer.

Please understand, this is the same idea, same concept as any other Spark Gap, see Impulse Pressure Wave for some back ground, so any rated value can be changed by the application of a force to close the Electrode Gap, ever so slightly. So 470 does not mean, necessarily 470 Volt Break Over Voltage, this can change by closing the gap slightly.

Also in any Tank, the Internal Resonant Voltage will always be a lot higher than the external applied voltage. As already stated.

I guess what I am trying to say, is don't get hung up on specifics that really are, or can be, Dynamic! Look at the bigger picture and the idea behind the concept. As an example, the Atom and all of its Charge and Neutral particles, will see a very important Effect, the Impulse Pressure Wave:

 

@00:17 seconds, "Watch out the for the shock, its coming!" and then Bang, the Shock Wave blasts everyone, what effect do you think this would have on the Atom, the Electrons in their Orbitals, the Protons, and even the Neutrons. What do you think these subatomic particles will do?

Do you think a huge number of Electrons will be thrown out, becoming Free Electrons, and the Insulated Copper Wire, will thus have many billions and billions of Electrons everywhere, free and ready to be accelerated down the wire?

Bucking Magnetic Fields are the Pump, but the Insulated Copper Wire, the Atom, specifically the Electrons, the Elementary Charge, is the particle we need to grab and throw down the Wire, with a Velocity, remembering,  6.241509 × 1018 e, or charges per second is One Ampere. So these e's must come from somewhere, we are not getting e magically, and the Atom is the only place we have e, its the only source! We are essentially Engineering the Sub Structure of Space, our Aether is being Engineered by Magnetic Fields!

No one in Conventional Science, will allude to any of this, they will tell you the Shaft is the Source of Electric Current. Hmm, really smart isn't it! Like fighter, still stuck in his second grade lunch bag! Idiots beget idiots!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Adam posted this 18 November 2023

Hello Chris,

 

I’m working on a variation of this same winding on the core.

I have a few questions.

 

1.  What is delaying the conduction on the first pulse say with a north up? Diodes resistance or switch or maybe delay is not needed?

 

2. When the second pulse hits in the reverse polarity and the diodes can not allow conduction does the conduction take place in the collapse phase? Trying to prevent the collapsing field and at the same time bucking each other?

 

 

Thanks.

Adam.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 18 November 2023

Hey Adam,

I believe you have answered your own question, maybe...

1.  What is delaying the conduction on the first pulse say with a north up? Diodes resistance or switch or maybe delay is not needed?

 

All delayed Conduction is, is Conduction that does not take place at the exact same instant as the Input Pulse, so the Conduction is delayed, due to the fact that the Input Coil is not causing the Induction, to "Generate" the Voltage, to make the Diode Conduct. The Induction, to "Generate" the Voltage, to make the Diode Conduct, comes from the Secondary Coil, that has its own Changing Magnetic Field in Time t. Which you have also answered here:

 

2. When the second pulse hits in the reverse polarity and the diodes can not allow conduction does the conduction take place in the collapse phase? Trying to prevent the collapsing field and at the same time bucking each other?

 

On the Input Phase, you can see all this happen in the period marked Important:

 

Both Partnered Output Coils have an Impedance, close to Zero, see Reduced Impedance Effect, this will make this phase much clearer, the Coils can build to Max Voltage very quickly because the Coils have no Impedance. Nothing is slowing down the Building of Magnetic Fields, due to the Asymmetry we have implemented in our machines.

If you like, each Partnered Output Coil pushes each other up the Hill, to the House of Maximum Potential, for a given Design!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
  • Augenblick
Adam posted this 18 November 2023

Hello,

Well on your normal device you show the primary turns on and you have to delay the conduction in POC1 so it does not buck the primary until just as you turn off the primary you then close the switch on POC1 to conduct. At this point POC1 will buck POC2 wile primary is off. Then we wait till the saw tooth is at zero and hit it again.

 

But this device is slightly different in the fact that the primary is wrapped over both POC1 and POC2. So, what I’m asking is do we still need the same delay switch or MOV to keep POC1&2 from bucking the primary as the primary ramps up the field?

 

Thanks

Adam.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 18 November 2023

Hey Adam,

Ah I see what you mean.

No, all Coils reach Maximum Voltage Potential during the On Time of the Input Coil.

Input Coil Conducts via the Mosfet, the Input Coils Magnetic Field Builds, and a Voltage is "Generated" in POCOne, then POCOne Conducts through the Diode, then the building Magnetic Field in POCOne creates a Voltage on POCTwo and then the Diode on POCTTwo Conducts. Always, it is the "Change" in Magnetic Field that "Generates" a Voltage, a Steady Magnetic Field is useful for Pumping Current, but has nothing to do with "Generating" a Voltage! I have shown all of this in my Video Series, in great detail.

Important: Every single Coil that carries a current, must, MUST, always have an associated Magnetic Field!

You must arrange your Coils like so: POCOne opposes your Input Coil, POCTwo opposes POCOne, therefore POCTwo must Assist your Input Coil.

The degree of Input Assistance you achieve, is where you achieve Above Unity Effects, because if you get 50% Assistance, you get a 50% reduction in Input Current Draw for the same Output.

You need to think Cause and Effect, and then apply the Asymmetry to gain Excess Output.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

Edit and please NOTE: In the Conventional Transformer, we see a Total 1 : 1 Transformation: Output = Input - Losses, so what you put In, you get out, minus the Losses in the Machine, in our machines, we don't have a Closes System, we have an Open System, the Strap or Parasitic Inductances that everyone tries so hard to get rid of, we use, we take advantage of "Generated" Voltages, and Current Distribution in the System is such that we support the "Pumping" of Charge.

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
  • Augenblick
worldcup posted this 21 November 2023

Translation :

 

 

 

If anyone winds, then record an video and link over youtube.

 

@chris, regarding layer 1 and 2, here is corrected one.. i think you wrote it wrong in your first post.

 

1st layer counterclockwise (48) 56 turns 6 square.
2nd layer clockwise, (48) 56 turns 6 square.
3rd layer clockwise 24 turns 6 square.
4th layer counterclockwise 24 turns 6 square.
5th layer clockwise 12 turns 6 square.
6th layer counterclockwise 12 turns 6 square.


6-layer
5-layer

4-layer
3-layer

2-layer
1-layer

 

Regards

Some more indeed...

 

Grenade first layer and second layer are the same, is wound CCW,
the rest 4 layers are all CW wound.
see Diagram below, Turns 1 and 2 are Counter Clockwise, turns 3, 4, 5 and 6 are Clockwise.      --  

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 09 December 2023

My Friends,

Partnered Output Coils can Power your Future, its up to you!

 

Partnered Output Coils already are Powering my Future and many others around the globe! Electromagnetic Induction really does work! This arrangement is an Electromagnetic Charge Pump! Plain and Simple!

Floyd Sweet used Partnered Output Coils, The Meg Team used them, Don Smith used them, and many many more! They work! They are Simple and they are cheap to implement!

With just a little work, you can do it!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • FringeIdeas
FringeIdeas posted this 12 December 2023

Chris, from a few posts back, November 7th.

There is one question I am waiting for, wonder if it comes, and who will ask it...

Did this make discussion? Just curious.

And a question of my own, referring to these new pictures on November 7th. Maybe a bit beyond what I want to mess with right now. I have a few more basic experiments I need to run through first. But the few turns on the POC coils and the talk on resonance got me thinking.

So you use resonance in the push-pull circuit, understood. But we still need to observe resonance, or a sub-harmonic thereof in the POC coils, for several reasons, correct? So is it safe to assume you matched this with the resonance of the push-pull circuit?

And somewhere on this forum I read, sorry I can't recall where, that the lower the sub-harmonic that is chosen the higher the input voltage needs to be. Is this the reason, or partially the reason,  you are using an abrupt discharge? And what is the operating frequency, roughly?

Looking forward to seeing more development, thanks!

Marcel

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 12 December 2023

Morning Marcel,

Did this make discussion? Just curious.

 

No, we did not get any discussion on this:

There is one question I am waiting for, wonder if it comes, and who will ask it...

Ref: My post here.

 

I don't blame people, we are at a point where we have more visitors than ever before, but most visitors are readers and not participating actively. I think many are scared to get involved? I also believe we have a number of active readers that already have working machines, that are following to answer some of the more technical questions that arise. While I am still learning, and still have some deep questions, I have come a long way.

And a question of my own, referring to these new pictures on November 7th. Maybe a bit beyond what I want to mess with right now. I have a few more basic experiments I need to run through first. But the few turns on the POC coils and the talk on resonance got me thinking.

 

I am a firm believer, any and all experiments are valuable! Of course, "Generating" a Voltage on each Partnered Output Coil in the desired polarity is the key, and this experiment shows a lot more detail in the operation. Its just the Change in Magnetic Field. Magnetic Resonance between Partnered Output Coils can be thought of as the Generation of Voltages due to each Coils Changing Magnetic Fields, thus a Faradays Law Equation can predict the Voltage and an Amperes Law Equation can predict the Magnetic Field. We have the ability to make a prediction all be it close but not entirely accurate, but close enough to make some sense of this very simple arrangement.

So you use resonance in the push-pull circuit, understood. But we still need to observe resonance, or a sub-harmonic thereof in the POC coils, for several reasons, correct? So is it safe to assume you matched this with the resonance of the push-pull circuit?

 

Yes, a LCR Tank Resonance is used in the Primary Circuit, to get the Spark Gap Firing. This fires off a very fast, very sharp Magnetic Pulse, that can be controlled somewhat, by adjusting the Input Voltage, and giving us a means to "Generate" a Voltage on POCOne.

Ideally, yes, there is a "matching", if you like, we do want to have an Input Frequency and Duty Cycle of such a Nature, that Each Partnered Output Coil is functioning at a Frequency and Duty Cycle where the Voltage each Partnered Output Coil "Generates" an equal but opposite Voltage and therefore Current, due to equal Load Resistances, however, sometimes, its a case of experiment with the machine to slowly improve on the balancing of Voltages, which has a follow-on effect due to Ohms Law.

And somewhere on this forum I read, sorry I can't recall where, that the lower the sub-harmonic that is chosen the higher the input voltage needs to be. Is this the reason, or partially the reason,  you are using an abrupt discharge? And what is the operating frequency, roughly?

 

Yes, some of this is theory, and yes for the most part, there does seem to be some correlation here. However, again, we "Generate" these Voltages, so Faradays Law is an important aspect.

Cause and Effect, always, we have Harmonics, Sub-Harmonics and Fundamentals to think of, but I would not get too tied up in these areas, because some of this is not quite so important.

Looking forward to seeing more development, thanks!

 

Yes, I think we all could make more contributions, and this would go so much faster. I am only one person, with limited resources and funds. I do what I do all from my own time and money, all for free, but if others joined in and we all worked along the same line, then the world could have this tech.

It is easy to stop one person, but thousands, no so much! Together we can do this.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

FringeIdeas posted this 13 December 2023

Thank you for the explanations. You say..

Yes, a LCR Tank Resonance is used in the Primary Circuit, to get the Spark Gap Firing. This fires off a very fast, very sharp Magnetic Pulse, that can be controlled somewhat, by adjusting the Input Voltage, and giving us a means to "Generate" a Voltage on POCOne.

I'm curious though, about the input coil wrapped around both POC coils. Again I have not played with this yet, other experiments to get through first. But I would imagine that this input coil would bring up the voltages on both POC coils at the same time. And the POC coils would begin to buck, or fight, from the very start, Removing pretty much any push back on the input, as well as allowing the impulse to be sufficient with no time spent supporting the POC coils while they ramp up in current. Would this be a close assumption?

New bobbins came today, finally. I'll finish up my extended Mr Preva experiments tomorrow or Friday. Then start preparing to check out some coils buck and some coils don't.

Thanks!

Marcel

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 13 December 2023

Hi Marcel,

This was the line of question I was waiting for:

I'm curious though, about the input coil wrapped around both POC coils.

 

The Coupling between the Input Coil and the Output Coils is important to understand! You have hit the nail on the head My Friend!

Again I have not played with this yet, other experiments to get through first. But I would imagine that this input coil would bring up the voltages on both POC coils at the same time. And the POC coils would begin to buck, or fight, from the very start, Removing pretty much any push back on the input, as well as allowing the impulse to be sufficient with no time spent supporting the POC coils while they ramp up in current. Would this be a close assumption?

 

This is mostly correct!

Partnered Output Coils always work together, Bucking, at the same time, always, its the nature of the Configuration and the Geometry in combination with Faradays Law.

This snippet is worth repeating:

Removing pretty much any push back on the input

 

With a properly designed and thought about machine, we can eliminate all "push back on the Input" simply because we have employed Superposition, using Force and Counter-Balance of Force to make the Input Coil think there is No Load.

This is seen in the equation I have shared: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1, this equation shows an Asymmetry, its an Asymmetrical arrangement, now, we look at the Conventional Symmetrical arrangement, we have: 1 + -1 = 0. So we have Forces that have Canceled each other out.

This concept is not new! Hundreds of years we have known about this, one place is the Magnetic Compass:

 

 

New bobbins came today, finally. I'll finish up my extended Mr Preva experiments tomorrow or Friday. Then start preparing to check out some coils buck and some coils don't.

 

You have a very good understanding Marcel! You should be proud! Not many have this much knowledge on this subject!

Looking forward to hearing about your progress Marcel.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
  • Augenblick
Adam posted this 13 December 2023

Chris,

Let’s just say the Primary is wrapped on top of POC1 or the coil that bucks it.

 

Now you fire the Primary and we need a delay for POC1 to conduct.

So we delay with a MOV or TVS or switch or just the delay from the breakover 0.5v voltage for the diode you are using.

 

This first delay is so:

1.     the primary does not see the pushback from POC1 ?

2.     And to build voltage in POC1 before conduction?

 

Now POC1 conducts at almost the same time the primary is turned off?

 

At this moment POC2 has the same delay MOV or TVS that POC1 has voltage increases to the desired voltage and it conducts bucking POC1.

 

Now the real question is:

Does POC2 help the primary at exactly the same time that the primary is still ON or slightly after the primary is turned off by sending energy back to the source?

 

If it helps the primary at exactly the same time then we should be able to use no frequency and just hit the primary one time and POC2 will help the primary on just that one hit ?

If it’s all happening at the same time.

 

Or does frequency play a part so that the next time you pulse the primary POC2 is still reacting to POC1 and helps the primary turn ON?

 

I am still not understanding the frequency part of this.

 

Thanks.

Adam.

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 14 December 2023

Hey Adam,

My Reply is between your post:

Let’s just say the Primary is wrapped on top of POC1 or the coil that bucks it.

Now you fire the Primary and we need a delay for POC1 to conduct.

So we delay with a MOV or TVS or switch or just the delay from the breakover 0.5v voltage for the diode you are using.

This first delay is so:

1.     the primary does not see the pushback from POC1 ?

2.     And to build voltage in POC1 before conduction?

 

 

I think there is some confusion in the term: "Delayed Conduction"!

The Delay is from the Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, not from Circuitry, specifically. I tried to explain this, but I think my use of Circuitry as a Prop, to try to explain Electromagnetic Wave Propagation and the Delay, has confused people, I am sorry for this!

I tried to explain in my Series: "Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment", about this Electromagnetic Wave Propagation and how there is a Delay in the Propagation of a Wave, inside and around the Core, to try to clear up this confusion.

NOTE: Electromagnetic Wave Propagation takes Time, this Delay can change depending on Core Material, Design Specifics, and other factors.

 

Partnered Output Coils take Time to reach Conduction Voltages, break over Voltage on the Diodes, around 0.5 - 0.7 of a Volt, as you pointed out, because the Magnetic Fields building in Time also takes Time, so we have a Delay, between the Coils. So, the Time it takes, from Input Coil, TOn, to POCOne Break over Voltage, has a Delay in Time, its not instantaneous! The same is true between POCOne and POCTwo.

The reason we need to take this into account, is, Work Done by our Coils, needs to be understood. We are dealing with Directional Inertia in the Electromagnetic Wave, and the time it takes to travel from Point A to Point B and do useful work at Point B, is not instantaneous!

If the Delay is too slow, for example, we will use too much Input Power, to make our machines useful! We get detrimental Results from a very slow Propagation! I have termed these slow cores "Slugs", in the past.

 

Please Note: We want to take advantage of the Natural Delays, in Fast Acting Materials, to allow us to "Generate" voltages, of sufficient proportions to achieve useful Work!

 

Yes, from Input Coil TOn, to POCOne Conduction, there is a Delay, from POCOne Conduction to POCTwo Conduction , there is also a Delay, this I have called Delayed Conduction. The Coils take time to Slap Together, and thus these very important Interactions I have marked:

 

 

Now POC1 conducts at almost the same time the primary is turned off?

 

NOPE!

You and I do not see eye to eye on this area of operation. Sorry! I have to be up front, this is not how it works.

In Time, we see a series of events that a Coil must go through:

  1. Mosfet is Off, TOff, and the Coil has no Voltage applied across it, therefore no Current can flow through the Coil.
  2. Mosfet is turned On, TOn, a Voltage is applied across the Coil and the Current Ramps up, reaching 99.7% of the total Current in five Time Constants ( τ = R C ).
  3. At the the designated Duty Cycle, or at TOff, the Mosfet is Switched off. The Coils Magnetic Field falls to Zero from IMax.

 

So the Coil starts in a State, that is at Equilibrium, the Coil has no Current Flowing Through it, therefore, the Coil is producing no Magnetic Field, the only Magnetic Field the Coil see's is that of its surroundings, the Earths Magnetic Field, or Environmental Fields. So the Coil has no Effect on its surroundings, when it is Off.

The Coil must always start at a point of "Off State", it can not be in a state, where its turning off, and misses the "On State" of TOn. A Coil just can not do this. Therefore, we must always account for all three Operations:

  1. TOn
  2. On
  3. TOff

 

At TOn, there is always a Magnetic Field that Builds in Magnitude from Zero, either a North Pole increasing in Magnitude, or a South Pole, depending on what face of the Coil you are observing.

There is no missing any of these stages!

 

At this moment POC2 has the same delay MOV or TVS that POC1 has voltage increases to the desired voltage and it conducts bucking POC1.

 

The MEG Team used a TVS, and I also used a TVS to illustrate the Delay, but again, a simple Diode is more efficient and does a better job, it is also more hardy.

Now the real question is:

Does POC2 help the primary at exactly the same time that the primary is still ON or slightly after the primary is turned off by sending energy back to the source?

 

Yes, this is the whole Point of Partnered Output Coils!

The Input Coil "see's" POCOne and POCTwo as individual Magnetic Fields that, if you apply Superposition, the NET effect of these two Coils on the Input Coil = Zero! Which is: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1.

So the Input Coil sees a Negative and also a Positive Force, and these forces should be approximately equal.

Partnered Output Coils bring the Primary Current down to such a small quantity that the Input becomes insignificant! We saw this in Floyd Sweets VTA! We learned from Floyd Sweets VTA that the Output remains constant while the Input Changes, dropping to micro amps, a difficult feat to achieve!

If it helps the primary at exactly the same time then we should be able to use no frequency and just hit the primary one time and POC2 will help the primary on just that one hit ?

 

Again, no, its not at exactly the same time!

We always have Electromagnetic Wave Propagation that takes time to do work in the region of space we want it to! Delayed Conduction!

Later you will learn, this Delayed Conduction, is why the Coils don't just spontaneously jump into life, and the Machine does not "Run Away" on its self! This is the very reason, we are able to Control these machines, its a Control Mechanism.

If it’s all happening at the same time.

Or does frequency play a part so that the next time you pulse the primary POC2 is still reacting to POC1 and helps the primary turn ON?

 

No, perhaps some residual effects, maybe, but generally, this is a no.

I am still not understanding the frequency part of this.

 

Adam, this is cool, and I respect you saying this! There is a lot to learn! This is a new field in Science, as far as Conventional Science is aware! We are breaking Ground in territory that no one has entered before, in many cases! Its brand new! Even many before us, they may have had working machines, but did they understand how they worked? Most of the honest ones tell you, No they did not understand them.

Well, we do! I have a very good understanding, however, I am still learning! I have lots to learn still! There are areas that I have not yet studied in depth, and if I were, no doubt the satellites would be able to see what I was doing! Keeping this hidden, under the covers, its not always easy!

I want everyone to be clear, I marked this region:

 

for a VERY good reason! Its a very important region, EVERYTHING happens in this Region, its where ALL the Magnetic Fields interact and achieve the Maximum Amplitudes that the given Design Parameters can Reach!

This is a very important Region! Its the Charge Pump Region, its the Bucking Region, its the Accelerometer Region, its the Horse Power Region! Its a very Important Region!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • FringeIdeas
Adam posted this 14 December 2023

Chris,

Thank you for the answers.

 

If I let the POC coils buck from say the diode break over voltage of 0.5v I will get an output wattage of say 10 watts.

 

But if I delay the coil from conducting from the 0.5v to say 100 volts, then conduct using an SCR.

Would my output wattage increase to say 100 watts or more than the 10 watts anyway?

 

The 10 and 100 watts are just an example.

 

This is a part of what I was thinking getting the voltage up was, other than narrower coils, more turns, faster primary pulse.

 

Thank you.

This will hopefully help some of my confusion.

Adam

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 14 December 2023

Hey Adam,

One Watt is One Volt x One Ampere, with no phase difference.

One Volt is the total Charge or Potential Difference of 6.241509 x 1018 Elementary Charges, between Terminal TOne and TTwo.

A Voltage is "Generated" via Faradays Law, which turns out to be pretty accurate and useful when applying it to Symmetrical Data.

One Ampere is 6.241509 x 1018 Elementary Charges past point P1 in one second.

These Elementary Charges are subatomic particles:

 

Doing some experiments, it is easy to observe, to Free and Accelerate Elementary Charges in the Insulated Copper Conductor, requires a Magnetomotive Force of equal proportions. This is "Bucking" Magnetic Fields. This puts the Charges in the Insulated Copper Conductor under immense pressure, first of all Freeing the Charge and then Accelerating it down the Conductor.

Electromagnetic is nearly 200 years old, and its only now complete, I have completed this Incomplete field simply by adding Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Induction to the existing Symmetrical Electromagnetic Induction! There is always two Halves to a Whole:

 

I have also completed Newton's Law's of Motion, Action, Reaction and Counter-Reaction, where it was previously only Symmetrical, Action and Reaction!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Augenblick
  • donovan
FringeIdeas posted this 05 January 2024

Hey Christ,

Another question about your setup, specifically the gas discharge tube. Just thinking and probably getting ahead of myself like normal.

I have been going over some Don Smith videos. This one made me think of your setup, when you talk about the impulse pressure wave. 

https://m.

The first minute or so of the video, he says this..

And once you upset the balance, well, you trigger off a lot of things that are happening. And and that point, if you have a device for collecting the energy, you got a generator. Because, generators don't make electricity, they simply, by the coils and the magnets moving in relation to each other, they upset the background balance. And when that happens, well then uh, you got energy available. And if you have a way of collecting it, you got energy.

I'm curious. The impulse pressure wave, would be what he means by "upset the balance". And "a device for collecting the energy" would be the POCs. So.. once we have proper partnered output coils in place, then we can look at knocking loose a lot more available water for the pump so to say?

I ask this only because I then think to Floyd Sweet, and to my understanding he did not have any spark gap or pressure impulse wave, aside from a square pulse, correct me if I'm wrong. And he still had quite a fantastic output compared to the input. In his case would it be just more of a precision balance between input and POC coils?

I did receive my extra wire, and have added turns to my POC coils. Hopefully this weekend I'll get a chance to take them for a ride and report something. If not this weekend, then early next week for sure.

Thanks!

Marcel

Chris posted this 05 January 2024

Hey Marcel,

My Friend, good questions and good line of thought there!

I have opinions on this "Impulse Pressure Wave", from observations, but I can't prove much of this theory. I feel that the Pressure Wave acts and reacts on the Electrons, Protons and Ions in the Copper Wire, as a "Jolt" in difference of Ambient Pressure, changing the state of the Subatomic Particles. This State, allows for a greater overall, freeing and acceleration of these particles, that are in a dazed state, so the Magnetic MMF's can Pump Current.

Just MHO.

Best Wishes,

   Chris

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close